Pembrokeshire ports praised for growing Welsh economy
A Senedd member has praised Welsh ports for their role in economic growth.
Samuel Kurtz, representing Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire, hosted an event at Cardiff Bay's Pierhead Building to celebrate the ports' contribution to prosperity.
Industry leaders, including Andrew Harston, outgoing chair of the Welsh Ports Group, and Richard Ballantyne, chief executive of the British Ports Association, attended the event.
The discussions centred on the success of Welsh ports and their potential to drive investment, job creation, and trade.
Tom Sawyer, chief executive of the Port of Milford Haven, was also present and congratulated on his new role as chair of the Welsh Ports Group.
Welsh ports are crucial gateways between Ireland, Wales, and global markets, handling 11.6 per cent of all freight arriving in the UK.
They play a significant role in trade, tourism, and economic growth, sustaining industries and creating jobs.
After the event, Mr Kurtz said: "Our ports are economic lifelines that sustain communities, create skilled jobs, and drive prosperity.
"From Pembroke Port, Milford Haven, and Fishguard to Holyhead and beyond, these ports ensure Wales remains a competitive hub for global trade and investment.
"Whether it's boosting local employment, supporting businesses, or strengthening our trade links, our ports are central to Wales' future success.
"They provide well-paid jobs and attract new industries, particularly in renewable energy and freeports, vital for Pembrokeshire's long-term prosperity."
Mr Kurtz highlighted the value of ports and those who keep them running, stating that 'their role in shaping Wales' economic future cannot be understated.'
He also promised to continue to 'champion' the ports at the Senedd.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nigel Farage's pitch for Welsh elections: bring back coalmining
Nigel Farage has demanded the reopening of domestic coalmines to provide fuel for new blast furnaces, arguing that Welsh people would happily return to mining if the pay was sufficiently high. Speaking at an event in Port Talbot, the south Wales town traditionally associated with the steel industry, the Reform UK leader said it was in the 'national interest' to have a guaranteed supply of steel, as well as UK-produced fuel for the furnaces, a close echo of Donald Trump's repeated pledges to return heavy industry to the US. Pressed on whether this was a realistic plan, particularly given that even if Wales did elect a Reform-run Senedd next May it could be blocked by Westminster, Farage conceded that the idea was most likely only realistic if done in conjunction with the national government. 'Our belief is that for what uses coal still has, we should produce our own coal,' he told the event, intended to boost Reform's prominence in Wales in the run-up to next year's elections. 'I'm not saying, let's open up all the pits. What I am saying is there is coal, specific types of coal for certain uses, that we still need in this country, and we certainly will need for the blast furnaces here, that we should produce ourselves rather than importing. 'We are going to be using more steel over the next few years than we probably ever used, as we increase military spending and as we attempt a housebuilding programme … We are going to need a lot of steel. Our belief is we should be producing our own steel.' Asked during a media Q&A how long it would take to reopen defunct blast furnaces such as the Tata steel plant in Port Talbot which shut last year, and if this was even possible, Farage accepted it would be difficult, needing 'a change of mindset'. He said: 'Nothing's impossible, but it might be difficult. It might be easier to build a new one.' Quizzed on what evidence he had that young Welsh people would want to go down coalmines, Farage replied: 'If you offer people well-paying jobs, you'd be surprised. Many will take them, even though you have to accept that mining is dangerous.' Pressed then on whether even a Reform-run Welsh government could not achieve this alone, Farage accepted this was probably the case: 'It's difficult to know just how much leverage the Welsh government can have over these things. It probably needs to work in conjunction with a national government. It needs a complete change of philosophy. It needs a scrapping of net zero.' A YouGov poll last month of voting intentions in Wales found Plaid Cymru leading with 30%, but Reform on 25%, ahead of Labour and the Conservatives. In his speech, Farage said Reform 'hit a speed bump last week' with the sudden resignation of Zia Yusuf as the party's chair, although Yusuf did subsequently say he would return to carry on leading efforts to find costs to cut in Reform-run councils. Farage denied that he repeatedly falls out with colleagues, saying some people had worked with him for 25 years, and that he was still friends with former employees from his City of London metals trading job in the 1990s. But he added: 'I am someone that maintains long-term friendships, and I'll do that, but if ever anybody talks behind my back, or if anybody betrays that trust, then I'll never speak to them again. Quite simple, and they should expect the same level of trust back from me.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fix system and give Wales fair funding
Wales does not get its "fair share of rail funding" and the system must be "fixed", said a former Labour minister responsible for transport. Plans for a £6.6bn Oxford-Cambridge rail line were previously classified as an England-only project, which means Wales could have been entitled to more money. But the Treasury announced there was a "publishing error" in a 2020 document and it should have been classified as an England and Wales project. Lee Waters, the Labour MS for Llanelli said the "cock-up" highlights the broader issue of how "unclear" and in need of reform the funding system is. Anger as Oxford rail line classed as England and Wales project Why does Wales not receive money from HS2? Rail plan reclassified, denying Wales funding - MP Rail in Wales is not devolved, which means funding is determined through the UK government using the Barnett formula. Speaking to BBC Radio Wales Breakfast on Monday, Waters said: "Is it cockup, is it a conspiracy? Who knows - almost always a cockup in my experience." But he said "it speaks to the broader truth" that "the system needs fixing". He said: "We have not had our fair share of funding, the formula does not work to our advantage. "It is not clear how the formula works and therefore we don't trust when things like this pop up." Waters said only a few weeks ago the Welsh government "had to dip into our own coffers" to pay for the national insurance costs, which should be covered by the UK government as per a Treasury agreement. "We need to reform the Barnett formula," Waters said. "We need to have the UK treasury acting as a UK treasury for the whole of the UK, not just for whoever happens to be in government in England at the time." He added that this is not "a party issue" because "this happened under the last government, it's happening under this government". He said it is "the government machine" which must be "changed and fixed". He said he is "confident" his London colleagues are ensuring Wales gets more funding, but is "less confident" they are trying to reform the Barnett formula. He said part of the issue is there "is not a Wales pot of money for rail, we have to fight our corner in the England and Wales pot". Waters said: "There's a UK Labour manifesto commitment to create a Wales fund for schemes so there can be transparency." But he said he is "nervous" about "wholesale devolution of rail without the extra funding", because it comes with the responsibility of repair work. He said: "You can argue we should get the extra funding, but it's back to 'do we trust the UK funding arrangements to do that?'" The UK government previously said the "error" over the Oxford-Cambridge line classification "will be amended when an update is published at the spending review". The HM Treasury has been approached for comment.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
WHSmith pricing 'should be illegal' after customer charged £4.19 for a Pepsi
WHSmith pricing "should be illegal", according to shocked customers. Welsh snooker legend Mark Williams recently posted a picture of a checkout screen in WHSmith, where it showed a 500ml bottle of Pepsi Max costing £4.19. Williams was at Heathrow Airport at the time. Airports across the country are slightly notorious for charging inflated prices. At the time of writing, a 500ml bottle of Pepsi Max from Tesco costs £1.59. Customers subsequently blasted the store. WHSmith pricing should be illegal in general, no clue how they get away with it — Sel (@SA1903_) June 4, 2025 One said: "WHSmith literally sold off their entire High Street business but kept travel hub shops for this very reason. It's like printing money and they don't care about the customers." Another commented: "Smiths are proper cosy cosy with all the airports, word is they mark up their prices by 50% and go halters with the airport the shops located in". Someone else replied: "I paid that in Liverpool airport a couple of weeks ago, couldn't believe my eyes". Another said: "WHSmith pricing should be illegal in general, no clue how they get away with it". Some, however, defended the pricing. Recommended reading: Jeremy Clarkson bans fan from The Farmer's Dog pub after heated argument UK government makes major driveway law change set to affect millions of homes Pest control expert issues 'incredibly sneaky' bed bug warning to all UK homes Replying to the previous post, a user commented: "It's in an airport mate". To which he responded: "Expensive in other WHSmith stores too hence why I said general". Airports tend to be expensive due to a combination of factors, including high operational costs, the captive audience they serve, and the unique challenges of operating within a confined space. These costs are then reflected in higher prices for food, beverages, retail goods, and services within the airport, as well as in airline ticket prices, which often include airport fees.
