South Korea turns off propaganda loudspeakers to North
South Korea's military says it has suspended its loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts across the border to North Korea, as part of a bid to "restore trust" between both countries.
The move comes a week after the country elected its new president Lee Jae-myung, who had campaigned on improving inter-Korean ties.
Pyongyang considers the loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts an act of war and has threatened to blow them up in the past.
They were previously been paused for six years but resumed in June last year in response to Pyongyang's campaign of sending rubbish-filled balloons across the border to the South.
In recent years, the broadcasts have included news from both Koreas and abroad as well as information on democracy and life in the South.
Ties between North and South Korea had deteriorated under previous president Yoon Suk Yeol, who was more hawkish towards Pyongyang.
Yoon was impeached and removed from his post for briefly placing South Korea under martial law in December, citing supposed threats from anti-state forces and North Korea sympathisers.
His successor, Lee, had campaigned on a series of pledges, including one to restart dialogue with Pyongyang and to reduce tensions between both countries.
The move aims to "restore trust in inter-Korean relations and achieve peace on the Korean Peninsula", the military said in a statement.
But organisations advocating to improve the human rights of North Koreans have criticised the suspension.
"The loudspeakers were a vital bridge to the North Korean people, a reminder that they are not forgotten. By turning them off, we've only strengthened Kim Jong Un's efforts to keep his people isolated", said Hana Song, the Executive Director of the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights, based in Seoul.
"The fact that one of the new government's first actions is to turn off the loudspeakers is a troubling sign," she added. "It suggests we're returning to the days of appeasing the North Korean regime."
But residents living along the border have welcomed the move. They have for months complained that their lives have been blighted by the noise of the loudspeakers coming from both the South and North, sometimes in the middle of the night.
One border region, Ganghwa county, said in a statement: "We hope this decision will lead to an end to North Korea's noise-based psychological warfare, allowing our residents to return to their normal daily lives."
According to a report by the Yonhap news agency, the military's decision also took into account the fact that the North has no longer been sending rubbish-filled balloons across the border.
However, by suspending instead of terminating the broadcasts, the military is signalling that the speakers could be fired up again if needed, adds Yonhap.
Seoul claims the broadcasts can be heard as much as 10km (6.2 miles) across the border in the day and up to 24km (15 miles) at night.
The suspension comes almost exactly a year after they were first resumed in June 2024 - when both countries had engaged in various retaliatory campaigns involving rubbish and propaganda balloons.
Reuniting with the South had always been a key, if increasingly unrealistic, part of the North's ideology since the inception of the state - until Kim abandoned the idea earlier last year.
Both countries are technically still at war since the Korean War ended in 1953 without a peace treaty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Promises To Bring Back Fort Hood Name
(Texas Scorecard) – Speaking at a recent event at Fort Bragg, President Donald Trump announced his intention to reverse the renaming of several U.S. military installations, including Texas' Fort Cavazos, restoring their original names. 'For a little breaking news,' Trump said, 'we are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Brucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill, and Fort Robert E. Lee. We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change.' 'I'm superstitious, you know? I'd like to keep it going,' he added. Fort Hood—renamed Fort Cavazos in 2023—had been one of nine U.S. Army posts renamed after a federal commission recommended removing Confederate-linked names. The installation was renamed in honor of Gen. Richard Edward Cavazos, a decorated Korean and Vietnam War veteran and the first Hispanic four-star general in U.S. Army history. Trump had previously opposed the renaming effort during his first term, vetoing the legislation that created the Naming Commission in 2020. Congress overrode his veto, however, and the commission's recommendations were later implemented under President Joe Biden. Fort Hood, established in 1942 and named after Confederate Gen. John Bell Hood, remains one of the largest military installations in the world. It has grown to occupy 340 square miles and is home to around 34,500 military personnel and their families, 5,000 contractors, and 4,000 civilian employees. Trump's speech notably took place at Fort Bragg, which had its own name restored earlier this year following his return to office. Bragg had originally been named for Confederate General Braxton Bragg, and then renamed Fort Liberty by the Biden administration. Earlier this year, the Bragg named was restored but this time for PFC Roland L. Bragg, a World War II paratrooper and a hero of the Battle of the Bulge.


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
With Trump as ally, El Salvador's President ramps up crackdown on dissent
Authorities in El Salvador have targeted outspoken lawyers like Anaya, journalists investigating Bukele's alleged deals with gangs and human rights defenders calling for the end of a three-year state of emergency, which has suspended fundamental civil rights. Some say they have been forced to flee the country. 'They're trying to silence anyone who voices an opinion — professionals, ideologues, anyone who is critical — now they're jailed.' Quintanilla said. 'It's a vendetta.' Advertisement Bukele's office did not respond to a request for comment. 'I don't care if you call me a dictator' Observers see a worrisome escalation by the popular president, who enjoys extremely high approval ratings due to his crackdown on the country's gangs. By suspending fundamental rights, Bukele has severely weakened gangs but also locked up 87,000 people for alleged gang ties, often with little evidence or due process. A number of those detained were also critics. Advertisement Bukele and his New Ideas party have taken control of all three branches of government, stacking the country's Supreme Court with loyalists. Last year, in a move considered unconstitutional, he ran for reelection, securing a resounding victory. 'I don't care if you call me a dictator,' Bukele said earlier this month in a speech. 'Better that than seeing Salvadorans killed on the streets.' In recent weeks, those who have long acted as a thorn in Bukele's side say looming threats have reached an inflection point. The crackdown comes as Bukele has garnered global attention for keeping some 200 Venezuelan deportees detained in a mega-prison built for gangs as part of an agreement with the Trump administration. 'Of course I'm scared' Anaya was detained by authorities on unproven accusations of money laundering. Prosecutors said he would be sent to 'relevant courts' in the coming days. Quintanilla, his lawyer, rejects the allegations, saying his arrest stems from years of vocally questioning Bukele. Quintanilla, a longtime colleague of Anaya, said he decided to represent his friend in part because many other lawyers in the country were now too afraid to show their faces. On Tuesday, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights expressed 'deep concern' over Anaya's arrest. Anaya, 61, is a respected lawyer and commentator in El Salvador with a doctorate in constitutional law. He has criticized Bukele's crackdown on the gangs and Bukele stacking of El Salvador's high court. Last year, he was among those who unsuccessfully petitioned the country's top electoral authority to reject Bukele's re-election bid, saying it violated the constitution. Days before his arrest, Anaya railed on television against the detention of human rights lawyer Ruth López, who last week shouted, 'They're not going to silence me, I want a public trial,' as police escorted her shackled to court. Advertisement 'Of course I'm scared,' Anaya told the broadcast anchor. 'I think that anyone here who dares to speak out, speaks in fear.' While some of Bukele's most vocal critics, like Anaya and López, have been publicly detained, other human rights defenders have quietly slipped out of the country, hoping to seek asylum elsewhere in the region. They declined to comment or be identified out of fear that they would be targeted even outside El Salvador. Fear and an ally in Trump Last month, a protest outside of Bukele's house was violently quashed by police and some of the protesters arrested. He also ordered the arrest of the heads of local bus companies for defying his order to offer free transport while a major highway was blocked. In late May, El Salvador's Congress passed a 'foreign agents' law, championed by the populist president. It resembles legislation implemented by governments in Nicaragua, Venezuela, Russia, Belarus and China to silence and criminalize dissent by exerting pressure on organizations that rely on overseas funding. Verónica Reyna, a human rights coordinator for the Salvadoran nonprofit Servicio Social Pasionista, said police cars now regularly wait outside her group's offices as a lingering threat. 'It's been little-by-little,' Reyna said. 'Since Trump came to power, we've seen (Bukele) feel like there's no government that's going to strongly criticize him or try to stop him.' Trump's influence extends beyond his vocal backing of Bukele, with his administration pushing legal boundaries to push his agenda, Reyna, other human rights defenders and journalists said. The US Embassy in El Salvador, which once regularly denounced the government's actions, has remained silent throughout the arrests and lingering threats. It did not respond to a request for comment. In its final year, the Biden administration, too, dialed back its criticism of the Bukele government as El Salvador's government helped slow migration north in the lead up to the 2024 election. Advertisement On Tuesday, Quintanilla visited Anaya in detention for the first time since his arrest while being watched by police officers. Despite the detention, neither Anaya nor Quintanilla have been officially informed of the charges. Quintanilla worries that authorities will use wide ranging powers granted to Bukele by the 'state of emergency' to keep him imprisoned indefinitely. Journalists stranded Óscar Martínez, editor-in-chief of news site El Faro, and four other journalists have left the country and are unable to return safely, as they face the prospect of arrest stemming from their reporting. At a time when many other reporters have fallen silent out of fear, Martínez's news site has investigated Bukele more rigorously than perhaps any other, exposing hidden corruption and human rights abuses under his crackdown on gangs. In May, El Faro published a three-part interview with a former gang leader who claimed he negotiated with Bukele's administration. Soon after, Martínez said the organization received news that authorities were preparing an arrest order for a half-dozen of their journalists. This has kept at least five El Faro journalists, including Martínez, stranded outside their country for over a month. On Saturday, when the reporters tried to return home on a flight, a diplomatic source and a government official informed them that police had been sent to the airport to wait for them and likely arrest them. The journalists later discovered that their names, along with other civil society leaders, appeared on a list of 'priority objectives' held by airport authorities. Martínez said Anaya's name was also on the list. Advertisement Now in a nearby Central American nation, Martínez said he doesn't know when he will be able to board another flight home. And if he does, he doesn't know what will happen when he steps off. 'We fear that, if we return — because some of us surely will try — we'll be imprisoned,' he said. 'I am positive that if El Faro journalists are thrown in prison, we'll be tortured and, possibly, even killed.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Vladimir Putin has incurred one million casualties in his pointless war
In October 2022, we warned that Russian President Vladmir Putin was willing to exchange more than 300,000 Russian coffins for a modern-day empire in Ukraine. Tragically, we were not wrong. If anything, we underestimated Putin's preparedness to kill and maim as many Russian, Chechen, North Korean, Cuban and Chinese soldiers and conscripts as needed to achieve his Peter the Great-like realm. Today, Russian casualties in Ukraine surpassed one million, according to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. No matter how willing Putin is, his meat grinder tactics are not militarily sustainable. In April, Gen. Christopher Cavoli, dual hatted as Commander, United States European Command and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, testified before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee that the Russian military can likely only sustain its current operations for about 12 to 24 more months. At the current rate of daily casualties for the Russian and their allies — about 1,200 a day — that translates to another 438,000 to 876,000 Russian casualties. The Kremlin continues to feed the Ukrainian meat-grinder with little regard for its soldiers. As Cavoli would go on and say, 'Russian commanders still emphasize quantity and mass over skill and operational acumen.' Ukrainian defenders have become quite efficient in killing and wounding Russian soldiers — or those dressed for the part — but they come back the next day, along the same avenues of approach, with the same result, gaining just a few meters of territory in exchange for appalling numbers of dead and wounded. Despite President President Trump saying, 'It's time to stop this madness, it's time to halt the killing, it's time to end this senseless war,' Putin continues to attack along the frontlines and with daily bombardments of Ukrainian cities with drones, ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles. Meanwhile, Ukraine continues its valiant defense. Putin does not see eye-to-eye with Trump because he does not want to stop the carnage. As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Martha Raddatz of ABC News, 'I feel strongly that Putin does not want to finish this war. Inside his mind, it's impossible to end this war without total defeat of Ukraine.' Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made that clear in April when he said, 'Russia will accept nothing less than total victory over Ukraine.' There are multiple fights being waged in Ukraine concurrently — deep, close, rear, and interdiction. For now, though, the most important fight is for control of the skies above Ukraine. Ukraine is capable of maintaining its current positions in the close fight; however, success depends on prevailing in interdiction and deep-strike efforts. Concurrently, Ukraine is insufficiently armed to effectively defeat the continuous drone and missile assaults targeting their urban areas. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz described the recent attacks on Ukrainian cities as the 'most serious war crimes' and 'terror against civilians.' Moscow, he said, is escalating the situation and attempting 'to create a bloodbath' instead of negotiating with Ukraine. As Zelensky notes, 'Without the help of the United States, we will have more losses.' The Trump administration, however, has chosen to punt the problem to Europe in order to focus on their 'priority theater.' In his testimony before the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said, 'As we shift our focus to the Pacific, we are counting on our NATO allies to devote more resources to defense to forge a strong shield of deterrence in Europe.' At the most inopportune time of the war, as Russia launches hundreds of drones a day at Ukrainian cities — killing and wounding civilians and first responders with no legitimate military targets in sight — Hegseth announced that the U.S. will reduce funding allocated for military assistance to Ukraine in its upcoming defense budget. This was preceded by the White House announcement last week that they were redirecting key anti-drone technology — 20,000 missiles earmarked earlier for Ukraine — to U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East. Then Israel stepped in to relieve some of the pressure against the ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missile threat. As Zelensky continues to await a response from the White House concerning his request to purchase ten Patriot Air Defense Systems in April, Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine Mykhailo Brodsky announced the transfer of an undetermined number of Patriot systems to Ukraine that were provided to them by the U.S. in the early 1990s. Ukraine reportedly had eight Patriot systems prior to this announcement. This in addition to the ten German air defense missile systems that were sent to Ukraine in May. Following their lead, the United Kingdom approved a deal on Wednesday to secure $2.2 billion in funding for additional air defense and multipurpose missile systems. But defeating the individual missile does not defeat the threat. That requires destroying the weapons systems, and Ukraine is doing just that with its own weapons. Operation 'Spiderweb' on June 2 reportedly destroyed 34 percent of the Russian strategic bomber fleet that is being used to launch cruise missile attacks against Ukrainian cities. Follow-on deep strikes over the weekend against the Kristall oil depot, Engels-2 and Dyagilevo air bases, Savasleyka airfield , Azot chemical plant, Kazan gunpowder plant, and VNIIR-Progress facility targeted the weapon systems, their support networks, munitions production, and funding sources for Russia's terror campaign. Heightened sanctions against Russia will not prevent further carnage — they may actually accelerate it. Sanctions are part of the solution, but they must be parlayed with other instruments of national power to have any effect. The piecemealing of air defense systems in Ukraine will only provide limited results. To control its skies, Ukraine needs a sustained, integrated and layered air defense network, including a No-Fly zone, similar to the one Israel employed to defeat two Iranian missile attacks in April and October of 2024. Merz's message is clear: 'Russia only understands force — so the West must show it.' Eventually, NATO weapons systems, manned by NATO Soldiers, will be needed to provide Ukrainian civilians with security. For now, Putin's killing fields are in Ukraine. If he is left unchecked by Washington, London and Brussels, they might soon find themselves ordering coffins for NATO defenders, beginning with the Baltic States or Poland. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer. Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.