&w=3840&q=100)
Volume-based discounts do not amount to discriminatory pricing: SC
The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday ruled that offering volume-based discounts does not amount to discriminatory pricing under the Competition Act, 2002, unless such discounts are applied differently to equivalent transactions.
A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Prasanna B Varale upheld a decision of the now-defunct Competition Appellate Tribunal (Compat).
'The order of the Compat is affirmed. A cost of ₹5 lakh is imposed on Kapoor Glass for prolonged litigation,' the court said.
A volume-based discount, also known as a quantity discount or bulk discount, is a pricing strategy where the price per unit of a product or service decreases as the total purchase quantity increases, encouraging customers to buy more by offering a lower price for larger orders.
This will have a significant impact on the competition law landscape and market dynamics, experts said.
'The judgment provides legal certainty for companies, particularly dominant enterprises, to design pricing models that reward bulk buyers without risking Competition Commission of India (CCI) scrutiny. This is relevant for industries like pharmaceutical, fast-moving consumer goods, and industrial supply, where volume discounts are common,' said former Additional Solicitor General and senior advocate Sanjay Jain.
The apex court verdict came 11 years after the appeal was filed in 2014. Kapoor Glass, a manufacturer of glass ampoules and vials, had filed a complaint saying that a dominant supplier of neutral borosilicate glass tubes was engaging in discriminatory pricing. It alleged that the supplier extended preferential discounts and commercial terms to its joint venture entity, which was disadvantageous to other buyers in the market.
CCI had found the supplier, Schott, guilty of abusing its dominant position under the Competition Act, 2002, imposed a fine of ₹5.66 crore, and passed a cease-and-desist order. Schott appealed the decision before Compat, which reversed the CCI's order, saying that volume-based discounts do not automatically qualify as discriminatory unless they are applied unequally to similarly situated buyers in comparable transactions.
The now-defunct Compat had also imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh on Kapoor Glass, which has now been enhanced by the SC to ₹5 lakh.
'The decision is a pragmatic step that prevents over-regulation of legitimate business practices and ensures that competition law does not stifle commercial incentives which benefit consumers through lower prices. Upholding the validity of volume-based discounts will enable companies to structure discount schemes with confidence, provided they maintain transparency and uniformity,' Jain said.
Alay Razvi, managing partner of law firm Accord Juris, said after the verdict, 'Companies can confidently use incentives like bulk discounts, tiered pricing, and loyalty schemes so long as they are fair and accessible to similarly situated buyers.'
Jain said the verdict will strengthen the threshold for CCI investigations, which may extend the benefit to consumers.
'The Commission may adopt a more cautious approach to initiating probes into pricing practices and focus on cases with clear evidence of market foreclosure or consumer harm,' he said.
The judgment brings Indian competition law closer to international standards, where volume-based discounts are permitted unless they create exclusionary effects in the form of predatory pricing, loyalty rebates, etc., Jain said.
'This enhances India's attractiveness as a business destination. In the EU, the Intel case (2017) clarified that rebates are lawful unless they foreclose competitors—a principle echoed in the ruling. Similarly, US antitrust law under the Sherman Act permits volume discounts absent anti-competitive intent,' he said.
Jain, however, cautioned that the CCI's ongoing probes into technology giants like Google and Amazon may be influenced by this newly set judicial precedent.
'Legalising bulk discounts may further lead to new disputes over complex pricing models, particularly in digital markets (e-commerce, app stores), where discounts are often tied to exclusivity or platform policies,' he said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Flexiloans raises another Rs 375 crore from Fundamentum, Accion and others
New-age non-banking finance company Flexiloans has raised Rs 375 crore in a mix of primary and secondary capital to fuel its expansion plan. The funding was led by existing investors Nandan Nilekani 's Fundamentum, US-based impact investor Accion Digital Transformation, American asset management firm Nuveen, and Denmark-based asset management major Maj Invest. 'Through this round, we have given exits to the high networth individuals who had invested in the company in 2017. Most of our existing institutional investors have doubled down in the company,' said Deepak Jain, a cofounder of Flexiloans. Jain did not comment on the valuation at which this round was closed. UK's development finance firm British International Investment was the new investor. Sanjay Nayyar-backed Flexiloans, founded in 2016 in Mumbai, focuses on small businesses, offering them term loans and working capital. Discover the stories of your interest Blockchain 5 Stories Cyber-safety 7 Stories Fintech 9 Stories E-comm 9 Stories ML 8 Stories Edtech 6 Stories The funding round comes on the back of a Rs 290-crore infusion in October 2024. ET had reported then that the round had pushed Flexiloans' valuation to $140 million. While the October round was all primary capital, this round had a significant secondary component. This comes at a time when the MSME-focused lending opportunity in the country has opened following heightened regulatory scrutiny in unsecured consumer loans. Jain said that despite the headwinds that the sector has faced, Flexiloans has managed to report three years of profitability, which helped the company raise funding even at a time when equity infusion has been hard for lending fintechs. Flexiloans closed FY24 with total revenue of Rs 263 crore and a net profit of Rs 3 crore. The company is yet to file its FY25 financials. Backed by its own NBFC Epimoney, Flexiloans has built a book worth Rs 2,300 crore. Jain said about 50% of the assets under management (AUM) sits on its own books and the rest is with partner lenders. Flexiloans sources business from ecommerce portals and food delivery platforms by financing sellers on these platforms. It also uses digital marketing to get leads on its own website. The startup also works with online marketplaces such as Paisabazaar . 'We will scale up our products with a target of achieving Rs 3,500 to 4,000 crore in AUM by FY2026,' Jain said. Eventually, the target for the company is to achieve the Rs 5,000-crore milestone in the next 18 to 24 months. While the startup offers unsecured business loans, its plan is to expand into secured lending, launch new credit products like dealer and vendor financing, and get into insurance distribution as well. Jain said the management is planning to apply for a corporate agent licence from the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India. Also Read: Flexiloans secures Rs 290 crore in funding from Accion, Fundamentum, others


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Fresh FIR against Nikant Jain for Rs 4 crore bank fraud
1 2 3 Lucknow: Hazratganj police on Tuesday lodged a fresh FIR against Nikant Jain, the alleged kingpin in the Rs 8,000-crore solar commission scam. This is the sixth FIR against Jain, who is currently lodged in Lucknow district jail. Three FIRs were lodged starting March 20 from his arrest in Gomtinagar, then in Wazirgaj on May 26, and then in Hazratganj on June 10. The other FIRs are one each in Meerut, Etah, and one more in Wazirganj lodged in 2019. This new case is linked to a massive financial fraud involving forged property valuations and criminal conspiracy to defraud Indian Bank of Rs 4 crore in 2017–2018. The new FIR was registered on the complaint of Ashish Jindal, branch manager of Indian Bank's Stressed Asset Management Branch, Lucknow. As per the FIR, Jain, along with his co-accused — Sukant Jain and Vaishali Jain —fraudulently obtained a loan of Rs 4 crore in the name of their registered company, M/s SSJ Agrotech Pvt Ltd. The loan was taken against two properties mortgaged by the company. However, later, the company sought permission from the bank to substitute the first property with a third property. This substitution was approved by the bank. Things took a turn in 2018 when the account turned into a Non-Performing Asset (NPA). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like SNS에서 화제인 그 팔찌, 예쁜데 의미까지... 굿네이버스 더 알아보기 Undo During SARFAESI proceedings, a fresh valuation of the substituted property revealed that its actual market value was significantly lower than earlier presented. The inquiry, led by an internal committee, concluded that M/s SSJ Agrotech grossly inflated the value of the mortgaged properties. The bank declared the account as "fraud" and blacklisted the valuers involved. It initially approached the CBI for action but instead served a final notice to the company on Oct 21, 2024. Later, the bank approached the Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Lucknow, with a formal request to register an FIR, said ACP, Hazratganj, Vikas Kumar Jaiswal.

Mint
6 hours ago
- Mint
Flexiloans to expand lending offerings, enter insurance following ₹665 crore funding
MSME lending player Flexiloans is planning to enter two new lending segments while also diversifying into insurance for its customers and is actively looking for acquisitions to support these multiple forays, a top executive of the firm told Mint. This comes as Flexiloans raised more funds in an extended series C round totalling ₹665 crore from existing investors Fundamentum, Accion Digital Transformation, Nuveen, and Maj Invest, with new investor British International Investment joining the round. Also read: Diderot's Curse and the BNPL Trap: Why India's middle class may be walking into a debt crisis 'We are looking at areas where we want to build up new products or new offerings for acquiring a larger share of wallet from these MSMEs," said Deepak Jain, co-founder and CEO, Flexiloans, in an interaction with Mint. 'We're aggressively and actively looking for (inorganic) opportunities." In this round, the firm has raised ₹375 crore, with the intention to grow its assets under management (AUM) to ₹4,000 crore from ₹2,000 crore, within the next year. 'This funding should support our growth for the next 18 to 24 months, by which time we aim to reach ₹5,000-6,000 crore in AUM." In September, the company raised ₹290 crore from investors in its first phase of Series C funding. Jain added that a significant majority of the investment is primary fundraise, while the rest is secondary funding, where all early investors have made partial exits. Also read: RBI rate cut impact: Bank of Baroda, HDFC Bank reduce lending rate by up to 50 bps, 10 bps 'We will definitely be launching dealer financing and secured financing products over the next 12 to 18 months," he said. Currently, almost 90% of its revenue comes from two existing offerings of equated monthly instalments (EMI) based term loans and vendor financing within the supply chain. In addition, Flexiloans also plans to enter into offering insurance products to its existing Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) customer base. 'Today, lending is our core product for MSMEs," the executive said. 'But the plan is to start cross-selling other financial services, such as insurance and similar offerings." He explained that the company has already begun work on this expansion. 'We're looking at multiple insurance segments—life, general, and others. The idea is to build a full financial services suite around MSMEs." Founded in 2016 by Jain and co-founders Ritesh Jain and Manish Lunia, FlexiLoans enables small businesses to access financing, especially in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities. To date, the company has raised a total of ₹746 crore in equity and over ₹2,000 crore in debt. Also read: Should you lock your FD before banks cut their interest rates? These 6 lenders offer highest rates on fixed deposits Prior to this round, the company raised capital from Sanjay and Falguni Nayar, MAJ Invest, and Fasanara Capital, along with other prominent family offices of erstwhile bankers. The firm claims to have empowered over 50,000 MSMEs, with about 66% of customers in Tier 2, 3 cities and beyond. On the initial public offering (IPO) outlook, he added, 'Will we go for an IPO in the next round? Unlikely. We're more likely to work with sovereign and endowment funds. Once we hit ₹8,000-10,000 crore in AUM and achieve double-digit ROEs (Return on Equity), that's when we'll consider the public markets."