Microsoft puts some ousted employees on a 2-year block list and counts that as 'good attrition,' internal document shows
Microsoft is embracing two controversial management approaches that suggests the software giant is getting tougher on employees.
When the company ousts employees due to performance issues, it will now put them on a two-year block list that bars them from being rehired, according to an internal document viewed by Business Insider.
In addition, Microsoft will count these job cuts as "good attrition," according to the document. This means the company is shedding staff that it's happy to see leave.
These two tools are new for Microsoft and they're part of a broader effort by the company to change its performance-management process to shed low performers faster and keep them out.
There are no goals for this "good attrition" metric at present — or at least BI has not uncovered any yet. However, this is already being reviewed at the executive level and appears to be becoming more of a focus as the company dials up performance expectations, two Microsoft managers told BI. They asked not to be identified discussing internal matters. A Microsoft spokesperson declined to comment.
Good attrition is similar to an infamous " unregretted attrition" metric at Amazon, which gives a goal to organizations for the percentage of employees they want to lose every year.
Microsoft's new two-year block list is also similar to an approach used by other tech companies. Meta, for example, maintains internal lists barring some former employees from rejoining the company through systems that track rehire ineligibility, including a "non-regrettable attrition" designation and a "do not rehire" flag, as BI previously reported.
Overall, the industry overall is shifting toward more rigorous performance expectations and less coddling. Performance-based cuts are becoming more of a regular occurrence as tech companies get tougher on employees.
Earlier this year, Microsoft fired 2,000 employees deemed underperformers without severance and started a new performance improvement plan. A recent internal email sent to Microsoft managers, viewed by BI, disclosed that this new plan is "globally consistent" with "clear expectations and a timeline for improvement."
The new process gives employees an option to enter the PIP or quit and accept a "Global Voluntary Separation Agreement (GVSA)," according to another email that BI viewed. Another document, also viewed by BI, shows the agreement includes a payout equal to 16 weeks pay.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Investing in the AI Revolution with Dan Ives
(0:45) - Why Is AI The Most Compelling Investment Theme Right Now? (2:30) - Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla: Should You Own These AI Investments? (6:00) - Has Apple Fallen Behind the AI Revolution? (7:00))- Which Industries Stand to Benefit the Most from AI? (8:55) - Dan Ives Wedbush AI Revolution ETF: IVES (10:50) - Episode Roundup: Podcast@ In this episode of ETF Spotlight, I speak with Dan Ives, Managing Director and Global Head of Technology Research at Wedbush Securities, and Cullen Rogers, CIO of Wedbush Fund Advisers, about the AI revolution and a new ETF designed to invest in it. Artificial Intelligence is a compelling and transformative theme, rapidly changing how we live, work, and interact with technology. The Dan Ives Wedbush AI Revolution ETF IVES seeks to capitalize on the explosive growth of AI by investing in 30 companies poised to lead the transformation. Microsoft MSFT is currently the top holding, followed by NVIDIA NVDA, Broadcom AVGO, and Tesla TSLA. Microsoft emerged as one of the biggest winners from the recent earnings season after posting strong results. Its closely watched cloud computing unit delivered blockbuster growth—half of which was driven by AI. NVIDIA—the poster child of the AI revolution—rebounded strongly from its recent DeepSeek and tariff-driven sell-off. What makes Dan so excited about its future? Apple AAPL, meanwhile, appears to have fallen behind in the AI race. Its Worldwide Developers Conference this week failed to impress investors. Tesla shares have rebounded after plunging last week following a public spat between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. What's next for the EV maker as it plans to launch its robotaxi service later this month? The biggest tech companies are pouring billions into the race toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), believing it will result in a winner-takes-most outcome. Are we on the cusp of AGI—or is it still a distant dream? Tune in to the podcast to learn more. And be sure to watch for the next edition of ETF Spotlight! If you have any comments or questions, please email us at podcast@ Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Apple Inc. (AAPL) : Free Stock Analysis Report Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) : Free Stock Analysis Report Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) : Free Stock Analysis Report Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF (IVES): ETF Research Reports This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's first term shows why markets are cautious on the China trade deal
The stock market was largely unmoved by the trade agreement the US struck with China. Market pros say investors expect the trade war to unfold much as it did during Trump's first term. The US and China made scant progress on key issues in their 2018-2019 trade dispute. The stock market has been encouraged by easing tensions between the US and China in recent weeks, but investors were largely unmoved by the announcement of a trade deal between the superpowers on Tuesday. US stock futures failed to climb on news of the deal late Tuesday evening. While markets are edging higher on Wednesday, that's largely because the consumer price index report for May showed inflation was tamer than expected at 2.4% year-over-year. Here's where major indexes stood at 10:20 a.m. ET: S&P 500: 6,055.26, up 0.28% Dow Jones Industrial Average: 42,997.65, up 0.31% (+130.78 points) Nasdaq Composite: 19,788.36, up 0.37% On the trade front, observers say it's looking more likely that the trade war will shake out like it did during President Donald Trump's first term, with talk of constructive deals even as tensions remain elevated. Simply put, investors see a long and winding path ahead, and knee-jerk reactions to trade announcements have largely subsided since the chaos of "Liberation Day" in April. The framework agreement announced on Tuesday outlines how the two nations will continue trade talks. Importantly, it involves China allowing exports of rare earth minerals, while the US eases up on restrictions for exports of advanced tech to China, like semiconductors. This embedded content is not available in your region. The reaction is far more muted than how the market reacted last month, when stocks popped after the US struck a rough framework deal with China that lowered tariffs between the nations for 90 days. Art Hogan, the chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth, told Business Insider that markets are reacting to trade talks similarly to when the US-China trade war first kicked off in 2018. He pointed to regular pullbacks in stocks during Trump's first term as traders digested the lack of progress in US-China negotiations. "We still have that muscle memory from Trump 1.0, that dealing with China is difficult and there's a multitude of issues," Hogan said. "I don't think we're going to solve this in short order and likely never solve it in the longer term." He added that markets are likely waiting for a more positive catalyst, pointing to more than 100 nations that have yet to strike a trade deal with the US. Peter Berezin, the chief global strategist at BCA Research, said the framework made only small progress on negotiations with China. "I would say that the 'deal' in London simply restores things to how they were right after Geneva," he told BI in an email. He added that he expected tariffs on China to remain high "for the foreseeable future." Strategists at Deutsche Bank also said that tariff talks appear to mirror the 2018-2019 period, when the US and China didn't make much headway in resolving key issues. Back then, the US said that China had unfair trade practices related to industries like agriculture and manufacturing. It also said China had unfairly transferred technology and stolen intellectual property from the US. Deutsche Bank pointed out that the agreement announced Tuesday skipped over fentanyl-related tariffs that Trump implemented against China earlier this year. "So while the mood music has stayed positive, investors may be wary of the pattern that emerged during the previous US-China trade talks in 2018-19," strategists wrote. "So there's perhaps a little disappointment this morning that we haven't yet got a bigger announcement." The agreement also appeared to lack detail that markets were looking for, David Morrison, a senior market analyst at Trade Nation, wrote in a note. "The big question is what kind of trade deals can the US negotiate that will be good enough to get the indices to fresh records?" he said. US stocks have whipsawed this year amid the turmoil surrounding tariffs and incremental news of trade agreements between the US and other countries. Indexes have erased their steep losses since the April 2 tariff announcements, with major averages now positive year-to-date. Read the original article on Business Insider Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump's former Commerce Secretary, Wilbur Ross, says the US-China deal is still far from comprehensive
President Donald Trump's former Secretary of Commerce doesn't think the trade deal between the US and China is close to being "done." "It looks as though they made a fairly modest deal, mostly focusing on export controls on both the US side and the China side," Wilbur Ross, who was part of the first Trump administration, told Business Insider. "So it's far from a comprehensive deal." On Wednesday morning, Trump said on Truth Social that the deal with China is now "done." "It seems more or less to be reiterating the deal they thought they had set a few weeks ago," Ross said of the deal. China and the US reached a trade framework agreement on Tuesday, after their respective negotiation teams held two-day talks in London. The current Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, is part of the US trade talk team. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China," Trump added in all caps in the post. "Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)." Ross said that the deal has not addressed many important issues, including intellectual property, so it may be too soon to call this a victory. "The Chinese side has been very careful to say it still needs to be approved by President Xi," said Ross. "When we negotiated with the China side last time, it wasn't unusual for the trade negotiators to agree to something, and then they would go back to Xi, and he would not go along with it." This year in duties on imports from China reached up to 245% on some goods. On May 14, many of the tariffs on China were reduced to 30% for 90 days, with a deadline of August 12. A 10% baseline tariff is still in place on the rest of the world, while additional higher tariffs on 75 countries have been paused until July 9. Ross said that it would be important to complete at least a few deals with key trading partners before the tariff pause on 75 countries expires. "I think that will help clear the air for the stock market because it'll start to show a direction and that there is a way to get all these things resolved," he said. "It's very important from a bond market point of view and from an equity market point of view."
