logo
Victory Day parade in Russia celebrates the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany

Victory Day parade in Russia celebrates the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany

MOSCOW — Russia on Friday celebrated the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II, as President Vladimir Putin presided over a massive parade of tanks, missiles and troops through Red Square and welcomed over two dozen world leaders — the most since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine.
Victory Day, which Russia marks on May 9, is the country's most important secular holiday. The parade and other festivities underline Moscow's efforts to project its global power and cement the alliances it has forged while seeking a counterbalance to the West amid the conflict in Ukraine that is grinding through a fourth year.
Friday's parade was the largest since Russia sent troops into Ukraine in 2022 and drew the most global leaders to Moscow in a decade, including high-profile guests such as Chinese President Xi Jinping, who sat next to Putin, and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Their attendance underscored how Putin has tried to emphasize the failure of the West to turn Russia into a global pariah.
'It's again showing that Russia is not isolated, that Russia is seen as a very legitimate victorious nation that is among victors in World War II,' said Alexander Gabuev, director of Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.
'Russia is standing tall among the so-called global majority,' Gabuev said, adding that the attendance of Slovakia's Prime Minister Robert Fico showed that 'Russia has allies even within the Western camp' and marked a major public relations victory for Putin.
World War II is a rare event in the nation's divisive history under Communist rule that is revered by all political groups, and the Kremlin has used that sentiment to encourage national pride and underline Russia's position as a global power.
The Soviet Union lost 27 million people in what it calls the Great Patriotic War in 1941-45, an enormous sacrifice that left a deep scar in the national psyche.
Addressing the crowd in Red Square, Putin praised Russian troops fighting in Ukraine, saying that 'we are proud of their courage and determination, their spiritual force that always has brought us victory.'
Putin, who has ruled Russia for 25 years, has turned Victory Day into a key pillar of his tenure and has tried to use it to justify his action in Ukraine.
For Putin, Victory Day celebrations have become 'a civic religion that boosts patriotism, nationalism, nostalgia, and justifies both his repressive regime at home and Russia's increasingly expansionist foreign policy abroad, particularly including towards its neighbors,' Gabuev said.
The parade featured over 11,500 troops and more than 180 military vehicles, including tanks, armored infantry vehicles and artillery used on the battlefield in Ukraine. As a reminder of Russia's nuclear might, huge Yars nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles launchers rolled across Red Square. Also among the weaponry on display were drones carried on military trucks, a tribute to their pivotal role in the conflict.
Fighter jets of Russian air force's aerobatic teams flew by in close formation, followed by jets that trailed smoke in the colors of the national flag.
Afterward, Putin shook hands with Russian generals who led the troops onto Red Square and spoke to medal-bedecked senior North Korean officers who watched the parade, hugging one of them.
Last month, Putin thanked North Korea for fighting alongside Russian troops against Ukrainian forces and hailed their sacrifices as Pyongyang confirmed its deployment for the first time.
The Russian and North Korean statements emphasized their expanding military partnership, especially after Russia said its troops have fully reclaimed the Kursk region that Ukrainian forces seized in a surprise incursion last year. Ukraine denied the claim.
After the parade, Putin hosted foreign leaders at a Kremlin reception and sat down with Lula for a bilateral meeting. More sessions were planned, officials said.
Putin and U.S. President Trump exchanged 'warm words' and 'congratulations on the occasion of our common holiday' through their aides, the Russian leader's foreign policy advisor Yuri Ushakov told state Channel One TV.
Victory Day festivities this year were overshadowed by Ukrainian drone attacks targeting Moscow and severe disruptions at the capital's airports. Aeroflot on Wednesday canceled more than 100 flights to and from Moscow, and delayed over 140 others as the military repelled Ukrainian drone attacks on the capital.
Russian authorities tightened security ahead of the parade and cellphone internet outages were reported amid electronic countermeasures aimed at foiling more potential drone attacks.
Military parades and other festivities were also held in scores of other cities across Russia amid tight security. As a historic tribute, Putin's hometown of St. Petersburg symbolically regained its Soviet-era name of Leningrad for a day Friday and Volgograd temporarily reverted to Stalingrad, as it was known during World War II.
Putin had declared a unilateral 72-hour ceasefire starting May 7 to coincide with the Victory Day celebrations, but warned that Russian troops would retaliate to any attacks. Moscow has been reluctant to accept a U.S.-proposed 30-day truce that Ukraine has accepted, linking it to a halt in Western arms supplies to Ukraine and Kyiv's mobilization effort, conditions Ukraine and its Western allies have rejected.
Ukrainian authorities reported scores of Russian strikes Friday that killed at least two people in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions and damaged buildings. A Russian drone also struck a civilian vehicle in Zaporizhzhia, critically injuring a man and also wounding his wife.
As the parade and other festivities unfolded in Moscow, dozens of European officials met in Lviv, in western Ukraine, to endorse the creation of a special tribunal to prosecute Russian officials accused of war crimes.
'Russia needs to feel our common and, most importantly, growing strength,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said, addressing the Lviv meeting. He emphasized the need for Russia to be held accountable, adding that 'this is the moral duty of Europe and of everyone in the world who values human life.'
'I'm sure that this tribunal will allow for the fight against impunity against all war crimes that have been committed during this war of aggression of Russia against Ukraine,' said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot.
Russian authorities have fiercely denied allegations of war crimes. Asked about the tribunal on Friday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow 'will not be reacting to this.'
Barrot also said European allies have agreed on another package of sanctions against Russia.
Standing alongside top Ukrainian government officials in Lviv, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said the tribunal's launch will mean that 'nobody can be left unpunished for the crimes committed.'
Most of Europe marks the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II on May 8.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts
Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts

National security and China experts are warning that Israel's attack on Iran is an example of why Beijing's efforts to purchase land and other assets within the United States need to be stopped immediately. After the initial attacks began on Friday, news reports began surfacing indicating that Israel had secretly built a drone base on Iranian soil that it used to launch its attacks. The operation was years in the making, one Israeli security official told the Jewish Chronicle, adding that weapons systems and soldiers had been smuggled into the country ahead of time. "Look at the ways Israel penetrated Iran for sabotage operations. Now look at the Chinese companies and assets permeating the US power grid (solar converters), local law enforcement (DJI drones), and social media (TikTok)," China policy expert Michael Sobolik wrote in a post on X. "The CCP is preparing to paralyze us in a crisis." The Real Implications Of The Chinese Fungus Smuggling Gabriel Noronha, president of Polaris National Security, also drew parallels between the China land grab in the United States and the recent Ukrainian drone strike that decimated a significant portion of Russia's air fleet. The attack reportedly involved drones smuggled into Russia and released near airfields. "After Ukraine's drone operation in Russia and Israel's operation in Iran, it is obvious that America's enemies will try to replicate that playbook on our soil," Noronha said. "It is increasingly dangerous to allow Chinese companies and individuals to own land - especially near our military bases and critical infrastructure. Left unchecked, we are opening our land to host clandestine Chinese military bases to launch all sorts of attacks and cripple our nation in wartime." Read On The Fox News App After Ukraine's Surprise Drone Assault On Russia, New Attention Drawn To Sensitive Sites Stateside Officials in the United States have been sounding the alarm for years now about China's efforts to purchase land near military bases, and other strategic assets that could help them sabotage the country. Just recently, the Arizona legislature passed a bill meant to block Chinese entities from obtaining more than a 30% stake in Arizona real estate, but it was vetoed by Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs. According to the bill's sponsor, China had recently been trying to lease property near a major Air Force base in the state. Michael Lucci, the CEO and founder of State Armor Action, a conservative group with a mission to develop and enact state-level solutions to global security threats, warned Friday that if the United States does not get serious about interrupting China's asset grab, it risks losing a war with them. He said land grabs are just the "tip of the iceberg." "CCP land ownership is bad but it's tip of the iceberg," Lucci said. "Their industrial property holdings are worse, as is their port access. Perhaps worst of all is their deep penetration of critical infrastructure and govt systems." "I now understand the potential problem of the Chinese government owning land in America," added writer and podcast host Jamie article source: Israel's drone strikes in Iran show why US must halt China's land grab here: experts

After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars
After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

After Trump restores fort names, it's time to end the silly renaming wars

After President Donald Trump restores the names of military bases that once honored Confederates, the left and the right need to call a name-change truce. During Tuesday's speech at Fort Bragg (formerly Liberty, and before that, Bragg again), Trump announced that his administration would be reviving the names of Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort A.P. Hill and Fort Lee. Those forts were renamed during the left's crazed push, in the aftermath of the George Floyd protests in 2020, to purge public-property references to any figure it deemed controversial. Advertisement Much of the frenzy was a ridiculous exercise in woke revisionism: The hysteria got so bad that not even Teddy Roosevelt, a once-hero of progressivism, was safe. Trump has made his disdain for the whole gambit clear: One of his first acts as president was giving Mount McKinley its name back. But both the left and the right made the argument for nixing the names of traitorous Confederates from public property, especially in cases where the names were picked during the 1950s and '60s, purely out of hostility toward the Civil Rights movement. Advertisement So both sides should be happy to learn that the restored fort names technically won't honor Confederates. During Trump's first term, Congress passed the bipartisan National Defense Authorization Act, which required the Pentagon's newly established Naming Commission to remove Confederate-linked names from Defense Department-owned property. So in order to give the forts their names back, the DOD is nodding to service members with identical surnames. That silly trick doesn't might go a bit too far: For instance, Fort Bragg is now named after a relatively unknown World War II private, Roland Bragg, instead of Confederate Gen. Braxton Bragg. Advertisement Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters But many of the new honorees do merit the recognition: Fort Rucker will now be named after heroic World War I Capt. Edward W. Rucker, instead of Confederate brigade commander Col. Edmund Rucker; Fort Robert E. Lee will now be simply 'Fort Lee,' paying tribute to Army Private Fitz Lee, a black Medal of Honor recipient who served in the Spanish-American War. This seems a fair compromise: The bases no longer reference men who fought against the Union, but locals will be able to call the forts by their long-held names. And Trump's move makes a point — the ever-escalating, Orwellian push to scrub flawed men from the history books needs to stop. Advertisement Tens of millions of taxpayer dollars were shelled out to change the fort names once, and a similar amount will presumably be spent changing them back. 'Round and 'round we go. In fact, every time any publicly owned building, street or base goes through this process, it's a costly, divisive mess. Without a cease-fire, it'll never stop; any man or woman deemed worthy of honoring today could be vilified tomorrow, as the standards and values of the time change. Enough is enough: By finding a solution that should satisfy both sides, Trump is offering an opportunity to end the expensive, renaming war the left started. An opportunity neither side should miss.

How Israel Executed Its Surprise Assault on Iran
How Israel Executed Its Surprise Assault on Iran

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How Israel Executed Its Surprise Assault on Iran

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. To pull off the most ambitious and sophisticated attack in the long history of antagonism between the Middle East's preeminent powers, covert Israeli agents set up a drone base deep inside Iranian territory. They recruited disaffected Iranians to aid their cause. They smuggled weapons systems across enemy lines. These are among the espionage tactics that allowed Israel to conduct its surprise attack on Iran last night, simultaneously eroding Tehran's defenses and limiting its capacity to retaliate as Israeli forces picked off senior commanders and struck sensitive nuclear sites. The operation, termed 'Rising Lion,' signals a new phase in Israel's efforts to transform extensive intelligence gathering into decisive military campaigns intended to outmaneuver its enemies throughout the Middle East. In recent years, Israel has used intelligence to assassinate top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists, as well as the leaders of Iran-backed militias. Israel has also targeted sensitive locations within Iran for air strikes. The attacks begun this week, however, were more audacious both in the scope of the targeting and in the clear aim of arresting Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Among the sites struck was the Natanz Nuclear Facility, where Iran has generated most of its nuclear fuel. Fordow, a facility buried under a mountain, presents a more difficult target. A former U.S. intelligence official with expertise in the Middle East told us that Israel may need U.S. bunker-buster weapons to do more lasting damage to additional Iranian facilities. That makes Washington's potential support for what is expected to be a drawn-out campaign all the more important. Israeli and other Western officials said the campaign was in its initial stages, and Tehran has vowed a vigorous response, which began after sunset today when it fired dozens of missiles toward Israel—including some that made it through the Iron Dome defensive shield. But current and former U.S. and Israeli officials and analysts told us that the blow already dealt to Iran in the early hours of the attack makes manifest Israel's advantages. [Read: The war Israel was ready to fight] Iran's 'Axis of Resistance'—a network of militias expected to join in any war with Israel—is flat on its back, degraded by a series of U.S.-enabled Israeli offensives over the past year and a half. Israel weakened Iran's air-defense systems and missile-production facilities in a pair of strikes conducted last April and October, while also revealing the limits of Iran's offensive capabilities by fending off drones and missiles in a coordinated effort with Western partners. As a former CIA station chief in Israel told us, the Mossad has 'a good network inside Iran, and they have the support of the U.S.' Iran, meanwhile, has shown that it possesses neither strategic foresight nor the technical ability to fend off Israeli operations, the former station chief said, pointing to the 2020 assassinations of Qasem Soleimani, Iran's senior security and intelligence commander, and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the country's top nuclear scientist. 'To add to it,' the former senior intelligence officer said, 'Iran has few friends, so it's hard for them to get supplies in.' Iran also has enemies within: A former Israeli intelligence official told The Atlantic that Iranians opposed to the regime make for a ready recruiting pool, and indicated that Iranians working for Israel were involved in efforts to build a drone base inside the country. Israel's operation drew on years of intelligence gathering against senior Iranian commanders and scientists and relied on extensive cooperation between the Mossad and the Israeli military. It showed not just technical prowess, homing in on key targets, but also creativity in executing covert action that has been a hallmark of Israel's multipronged campaign against its enemies in the region. The Mossad released video today of Israeli operatives deploying precision strikes on air-defense systems from inside Iran. Security officials briefed Israeli media on other aspects of the secretive operation, including the use of vehicles to smuggle weapons systems into the country. In a statement late yesterday, in the early hours of the strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the United States was not involved in the attack. But a former Israeli security official told us that there is 'no doubt' that Israel had U.S. backing for its actions, even if Donald Trump and his advisers had worked to avert a strike. The former official said that the apparent inability of the Iranians to mount a vigorous self-defense makes clear that there is 'less Iranian capacity than they wanted us all to believe.' Still, the former official said, Tehran will retaliate and 'can do much damage over time.' The central questions now are what role Trump intends to play, how severely Iran's nuclear program is stalled, and whether negotiations can be resumed. 'The Israelis are very tactically successful,' Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, told us. 'But they often confuse short-term success with long-term gain.' [Read: What Trump knew about the attack against Iran] A primary reason the Israelis were determined to act now, Takeyh said, is that they knew they had a limited window for success and needed to strike when Iran had reduced retaliatory capacity through its proxies—among them Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas has been seriously diminished by nearly two years of fighting triggered by its October 7, 2023, assault on Israel. And Hezbollah has been depleted by a long-running conflict with Israel, whose intelligence services succeeded in penetrating the group so extensively that they were able to remotely detonate the militia's pagers and walkie-talkies last year, killing or maiming scores of fighters. Proxies still in a position to respond militarily, analysts told us, include the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite militias in Iraq. The Houthis are perhaps the strongest component of the Iranian-backed axis. The Islamist faction active in northwestern Yemen has continued launching drones and missiles at Israel even as Washington secured a cease-fire agreement with the group, whose attacks on ships in the Red Sea had snarled international trade. U.S. officials told us that Israel feared Iran's rapid efforts to improve its retaliatory capacities, which added to their feeling that they had a limited window to act. But the inclination for a military solution also reflects a long-held impulse of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Before his second inauguration, in 2009, Netanyahu told Jeffrey Goldberg, now The Atlantic's editor in chief, that he would have to act if then–President Barack Obama failed to stop Iran's nuclear program. Obama reached a deal with Iran over Netanyahu's objections in 2015—a deal that Trump tore up three years later. In the midst of Trump's attempts to secure a new agreement, Netanyahu has taken his long-promised action. 'Since the dawn of the nuclear age, we have not had a fanatic regime that might put its zealotry above its self-interest,' Netanyahu said in 2009. 'People say that they'll behave like any other nuclear power. Can you take the risk?' Article originally published at The Atlantic

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store