
Progressive coalition faces biggest challenge in trying to reelect Mayor Gainey
Progressive coalition faces biggest challenge in trying to reelect Gainey in Pittsburgh
Progressive coalition faces biggest challenge in trying to reelect Gainey in Pittsburgh
Progressive coalition faces biggest challenge in trying to reelect Gainey in Pittsburgh
A progressive coalition is facing its biggest challenge yet in trying to get Pittsburgh Mayor Ed Gainey reelected.
They've won election after election, becoming the dominant force in local politics. But this is their toughest challenge yet.
In his quest for reelection, Gainey is backed by a powerful machine: the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. It is a coalition of left-leaning community groups called Working Families, Pittsburgh United, OnePA, 1Hood, plus unions like all the branches of the Service Employees International Union.
In the past four years, the progressive coalition has been the organization and money behind the election of Gainey, Congresswoman Summer Lee twice and Allegheny County Executive Sara Innamorato. Allegheny County Councilwoman Bethany Hallam says they've gained power by connecting with the working class and the underprivileged.
"We've been winning because we talk about a message of hope and a message of progress, whereas the traditional old-school Democrats are trying to pull back and get to the past," Hallam said.
KDKA's Andy Sheehan asked, "It's a mighty, mighty machine. They've won four big elections, and this will be a real test of whether they are the power."
"A number of big elections in a row," political consultant Mike Butler said, "but here's kind of a pivot point potentially. And now they've been governing for a few years, and people are going to assess are they're doing a good job or not."
Butler says with this election, the progressives face their biggest challenge to date, with Gainey having governed to mixed reviews.
"People like the rhetoric when you're a challenger. Do they like your performance as an incumbent?" Butler said.
Traditional Democrats say the Gainey administration has sputtered and have lined up behind Corey O'Connor, who's getting massive financial support from the building trade unions, who have been dissatisfied with a lack of economic growth, development, and construction in the city.
The election will decide which faction leads the Democratic Party going forward.
"The trade unions think it's more centered around jobs," Butler said. "And I think Mayor Gainey and his coalition think it's more about neighborhood development, and there's tension as to where those priorities ought to be."
But Gainey is running a spirited campaign, drumming up his base and this coalition to get him over the line.
The Primary Election is on May 20.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
16 minutes ago
- E&E News
New megabill text revives land sales, axes IRA funding
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee's portion of Republicans' party-line bill proposes to sell off certain public lands and repeal billions of dollars for energy programs in Democrats' 2022 climate law. The committee's proposal, unveiled Wednesday evening, contains many of the provisions in the House-passed H.R. 1, the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act' — including ones that would target the Department of Energy's Loan Programs Office or charge a one-time fee to speed up permitting for some natural gas projects. But there are some significant differences. Most notable is a new section favored by Chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) to revive the sale of public lands, reigniting a firestorm of opposition from advocates. The provision goes further than an abandoned proposal in the House, encompassing Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service lands across 11 Western states. Advertisement ENR's text comes as the Senate is racing to tweak and quickly vote on tax, energy and national security legislation after the House approved its version last month. Republicans are working through the reconciliation process, which will allow them to skirt the Senate filibuster and pass the budget-focused bill with simple majorities.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ
Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are pushing for an investigation into top Justice Department official Ed Martin over his stated plans to "shame" political opponents of President Donald Trump who he's unable to charge criminally, as well as a host of other politically charged matters Martin has publicly pledged to pursue in his new position. "I write to express my grave concern about Ed Martin's stated intention to abuse his new roles as lead of the so-called 'Weaponization Working Group' you constituted at the Department of Justice (DOJ) and as DOJ's Pardon Attorney," Sen. Dick Durbin, the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter transmitted to the Justice Department, which was first obtained by ABC News. "Following his disgraceful tenure as Interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Mr. Martin apparently plans to continue his misconduct in his new roles at DOJ." The DOJ did not immediately respond to an ABC News request for comment on the letter. MORE: Ed Martin, Trump's DOJ pardon attorney, says he'll review Biden's outgoing pardons Martin's controversial tenure as the interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., in the opening months of Trump's presidency thrust the office into turmoil and led several Senate Republicans to state publicly they wouldn't support his permanent confirmation in the role. But once the White House announced they were pulling Martin's nomination, Trump said Martin would instead be appointed to several top positions working out of DOJ's main headquarters -- serving as an associate deputy attorney general, the U.S. pardon attorney and director of the so-called "Weaponization Working Group." Martin celebrated the news on his X account, posting 'Eagle Unleashed,' and in various interviews celebrated what he described as a mandate from Trump directly to target the alleged 'weaponization' of the department under the Biden administration. 'It's classic Donald Trump, right? That somebody tries to block him and block his pick, and he decides to double down,' Martin told Breitbart News last month. 'This is probably the greatest job I could ever envision.' MORE: Trump US attorney nominee distances himself from antisemitic Jan. 6 rioter he once praised In a news conference announcing his departure from the D.C. U.S. Attorney's Office, Martin confirmed he planned to launch a probe of last-minute pardons issued by former President Joe Biden just before he left office -- and suggested that officials he's unable to charge would instead be publicly "shamed." "There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people," Martin said. "And if they can be charged, we'll charge them. But if they can't be charged, we will name them ... And in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are shamed. And that's a fact. That's the way things work. And so that's how I believe the job operates." The approach would directly conflict with longstanding DOJ policy that prohibits prosecutors from naming or disparaging individuals who they don't intend to charge criminally. When asked about that policy by ABC News during the news conference, Martin said he would "have to look at what the provision you're referring to, to see -- we want to square ourselves with doing the things correctly." The letter from Senate Democrats said Martin's statements "are a brazen admission that Mr. Martin plans to systematically violate the Justice Manual's prohibition on extrajudicial statements by shaming uncharged parties for nakedly partisan reasons. Weaponizing DOJ in this manner will further undermine the public's trust in the department in irreparable ways." MORE: Bondi, as new AG, launches 'Weaponization Working Group' to review officials who investigated Trump In his early days as pardon attorney, Martin said he advised the president in his pardon of former Virginia county sheriff Scott Jenkins, who had been sentenced to ten years in prison for a federal bribery conviction. "No MAGA left behind," Martin posted on X in response to the pardon. Durbin's letter further cited reports Martin has "personally advocated" fast-tracking pardons for members of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers who were convicted of seditious conspiracy stemming from their roles leading up to the attack on the Capitol, after President Trump initially opted to commute their sentences in his sweeping clemency action for the nearly 1600 individuals charged in connection with Jan. 6. Durbin's letter requests Bondi provide a host of records related to Martin's appointment and early days as head of the Weaponization Working Group and Pardon Attorney's Office. It's unclear whether DOJ will ultimately respond to Durbin's demands given Democrats' minority position on the committee. Senate Democrats demand probe of Ed Martin's pledge to 'shame' Trump's opponents, other actions at DOJ originally appeared on


E&E News
16 minutes ago
- E&E News
GOP says Clean Air Act must change to keep pace with AI
House Republicans are again pushing legislation to rewrite the Clean Air Act, but with a fresh argument: that a battery of changes are needed to keep up with the explosive demand for data centers and the power plants to run them. Overly restrictive air regulations 'could jeopardize America's ability to be able to compete in the global artificial intelligence race,' Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) said at the outset of a Wednesday hearing of the House Energy and Commerce Environment Subcommittee that he chairs. On the table were two draft bills that together would profoundly reshape a critical EPA regulatory task: setting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for soot, smog and four other pollutants. Advertisement Reviews of those standards take years and incorporate sheaves of scientific research. For decades, that framework has helped drive progress towards dramatically cleaner air and huge public health gains. On Wednesday, subcommittee Democrats repeatedly labeled the draft legislation a boon to polluting industries.