Evergrande tycoon's ex-wife spent millions on luxury homes after property giant defaulted on loans
Evergrande, once China's largest property developer, was forced into liquidation in 2024 with US$300 billion in debt. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
HONG KONG – The ex-wife of China Evergrande Group's chairman spent millions on luxury apartments in London, nine months after the country's once largest property developer defaulted on its loans.
While a court document in January unveiled her ownership of 33 units at the high-end residential development Thames City, it didn't include the timing of the purchase. The properties worth £49.8 million (S$86.3 million) were acquired in September 2022, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News based on UK land registry filings. That's almost a year after Chinese authorities asked Evergrande chairman Hui Ka Yan to pay debt with his personal wealth.
Ding Yumei holds the homes through five British Virgin Islands companies. She has hired Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) as a letting and management agent, according to a UK court filing in January. The 68-year-old is living in one of the most expensive homes she purchased, worth £5.4 million, with two of her children and two grandchildren, according to court filings.
She was no longer listed as a spouse of Mr Hui in Evergrande's filing in August 2023, while it's unclear when the two divorced.
The properties add to a list of more than US$350 million global assets that Ms Ding amassed, including a record-breaking mansion at the heart of London in 2020 and other ones in Vancouver. It underscores the challenges liquidators face in gaining full view of the assets held by Mr Hui and his confidantes, and the obstacles to asserting control across multiple jurisdictions.
Once Asia's second richest, Mr Hui and Evergrande exemplify China's real estate boom and bust. His sprawling empire was forced into liquidation in 2024 with US$300 billion in debt, as China's property meltdown continued into a fourth year.
In 2024, JLL sought permission from the Business and Property Courts of England and Wales to continue managing Ms Ding's properties, following an injunction issued against her – a request that was granted by a UK judge. The move came after courts in both Hong Kong and London imposed worldwide asset-freeze injunctions on Ms Ding in July, part of a broader effort to recover US$6 billion from her, Mr Hui, and former Evergrande executives.
Ms Ding has been told to provide detailed asset disclosure to liquidators in Hong Kong, yet she has delayed the process by applying for confidentiality summons and asking for other technical clarifications. Ms Ding's representatives have argued that she didn't hold a management role in the company and wasn't involved in operations.
Ms Ding's representatives didn't respond to requests for comment. Mr Hui couldn't be located, as he was taken away by Chinese police in 2023 and put under control.
The monthly rental for the Thames City apartments go from about £3,800 for a one-bedroom flat to more than £34,000 for a five-bedroom penthouse, according to listings from property platform Zoopla.
The Thames City project was co-developed by Guangzhou R&F Properties and C C Land Holdings, run by Cheung Chung Kiu, a poker-playing friend of Mr Hui. In April 2022, R&F sold a 50 per cent stake in the project to a private vehicle wholly owned by Mr Cheung at a loss of HK$1.84 billion (S$302 million).
Later in 2022, R&F's co-founder Zhang Li chose to stay confined in one of the project's penthouses when he was on bail after facing bribery charges from the US. BLOOMBERG
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
S'pore app using AI to combat illegal wildlife trade acquired by US start-up
The app was born from a collaboration between NParks, Microsoft Singapore and non-profit group Conservation International. PHOTO: ST FILE S'pore app using AI to combat illegal wildlife trade acquired by US start-up SINGAPORE - A mobile application launched in Singapore in 2022 to combat illegal w ildlife trade has been acquired by a US-based biodiversity technology firm. The app, called Fin Finder, is the first-of-its-kind in Asia which uses artificial intelligence (AI) to help border enforcement officers identify illegally traded shark and ray fins. Users are able to upload a photo of a fin on the app and its algorithm will analyse its shapes and patterns to identify the species of origin. Born from a collaboration between Singapore's National Park Board (NParks), Microsoft Singapore and non-profit group Conservation International, the app was acquired by Washington-based Conservation X Labs in April 2025. Since its launch, the app has been adopted by law enforcement agencies in 32 countries, and has an accuracy level of 89.4 per cent, NParks said in response to The Straits Times' queries. Over the years, it has also been regularly updated with the appendix status of each species in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites), which outlines its level of protection under international trade laws, the agency added. While Conservation X Labs will manage the app, moving forward, NParks said that it remains an implementing partner and user. Dr Anna Wong, NParks' senior director of wildlife trade, said: 'Using technology like Fin Finder can strengthen enforcement against the illegal trade of shark and ray species, and enhance Singapore's capabilities in conserving biodiversity.' She added that the app' s creation has highlighted the importance of cooperation between the public and private sectors in fighting illegal wildlife trade. In an April 2025 statement to app users, Conservation X Labs, which helped to build Fin Finder's machine learning models, said that the acquisition may enable further development in its image analysis technology, and the expansion of the app's reach. A free, rapid identification tool Fin Finder's biggest strengths, said its founders, is that it is a free-to-use, rapid identification tool. In the shark's fin trade, fins are often imported in containers with mixed shipments, said Dr Andrew Rhyne, a professor of marine biology at the Roger Williams University and one of the app's founders. As a result, a percentage of the shipment are often fins of Cites-protected species, which are nestled among those that are not. Dr Rhyne said: 'High-quality, rapid identification tools that are inexpensive and accurate would be very useful for customs and border agents.' Fin Finder is part of a two-step process, he explained, where enforcement officers first use the app to identify species that have been illegally traded before confirming this through DNA testing. This is crucial given the sheer volume and diversity of wildlife products that pass through country borders, said Dr Michael Tlusty, a professor of sustainability and food solutions at the University of Massachusetts Boston and another of the app's founders. Citing a recently published paper which found that nearly 30,000 species of animals were imported into America over two decades, he said: 'Nobody's going to know 30,000 species, so these automated tools make the job of customs agents much easier.' The app's usage over the past years has also resulted in over 4,000 photos of shark fins, which Dr Rhyne said is valuable information that can help its developers fortify its AI model. Scaling up for global use Looking ahead, Fin Finder's founders said possibilities for the app are limitless. Mr Eric Fegraus, a former senior director of technology at Conservation International who led efforts to develop the app, said: 'It could scale to other species – certainly, more sharks – and be implemented in other areas in the world where it's needed.' Dr Tlusty, likewise, believes that the app's technology can be modified to identify other animal derivative products. He said: 'As we build more identification algorithms, such as edge detection and spot recognition, we can even start combining them.' Ultimately, Mr Fegraus said it is about developing flexible technology that can be used to enforce the regulations of the day. While he acknowledges that ideological debates on whether mankind should even fish for animals, like sharks, remain necessary, he said having the tools to aid in enforcement are equally important. 'Particularly around wildlife, we've got to, at the minimum, enforce the rules, and then eventually, we have to change the rules,' he said. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Japan won't fixate on July 9 in US trade talks
[TOKYO] Japan won't fixate on the looming date for so-called reciprocal tariffs to go back to higher levels, Tokyo's top trade negotiator said, signalling that the Asian nation stands ready for the possibility that talks will drag on. 'To avoid any misunderstanding, I would like to confirm that I have not said at all that July 9 is the deadline for negotiations between Japan and the US,' Economic Revitalisation Minister Ryosei Akazawa told reporters on Friday (Jun 20) in Tokyo. 'Japan and the US are in regular communication through various channels, and we will continue to consider what is most effective and engage in appropriate consultations.' Akazawa deflected a question over whether Japan will seek an extension of the deadline for the across-the-board tariffs. The US is poised to return the duties to their original levels on July 9 for many nations, which would mean an increase to 24 per cent from 10 per cent at present for Japan. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has indicated the US may grant an extension to countries that are negotiating in good faith. Asked what Japan would do if the levy returns to 24 per cent or the US puts out a different level unilaterally past the deadline, Akazawa hinted at optimism for an extension. 'We are proceeding with the negotiations in good faith and so we understand that various matters will proceed under that premise,' he said after attending a ruling Liberal Democratic Party's tariff task force meeting. The task force didn't urge him to seek an extension of the July 9 deadline, either, Akazawa said. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'In negotiations, setting a deadline and trying to wrap things up by a certain date weaken your position,' he said. 'Once you try to wrap up negotiations, you will have no choice but to accept the outcome.' Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and US President Donald Trump failed to reach a deal earlier this week on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders' summit in Canada, despite holding three phone calls to discuss the tariffs prior to their in-person meeting. Akazawa on Friday said he's yet to schedule the next round of negotiations with his US counterparts and that Japan won't set a specific deadline for the talks. He once again described the trade discussions as similar to 'walking through fog,' a phrase he used before the G-7 gathering. The Japanese trade negotiator also hinted at some trouble in vying for time with the US when various matters including rising tensions in the Middle East compete for Washington's attention. 'It is also possible that the US side may find it difficult to allocate sufficient time domestically to make substantial progress in the Japan-US negotiations,' Akazawa said. 'This is truly the case for both sides. We are not solely doing the tariff negotiations.' Akazawa spoke a day after Ishiba met with opposition party leaders, who came away from the conference with the notion that Japan's trade surplus in autos with the US is a sticking point between the two sides. As with other nations, Japan has also been slapped with a 25 per cent tariff on cars and related parts as well as a 50 per cent levy on steel and aluminium. 'Both Japan and the US have national interests that can't be compromised,' Akazawa said. 'Protecting the profits of the automotive industry, which is our key industry, is in Japan's interest.' BLOOMBERG
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Who are the world's best investors?
IF FINANCE has a single rule, it is that arbitrage should keep prices in line. If they do stray from fundamentals, so the argument goes, savvy investors should step in to correct them. All good in theory. In practice, less so. Markets can be swept by sentiment, detaching valuations from fundamentals. Economists have surgically documented persistent distortions. Purely mechanical flows, for instance, move markets even when they are known to investors in advance and unrelated to earnings prospects. When a stock is added to an index, its price inflates. Predictable dividend reinvestments also push up prices. Why does this happen? And who, in time, might correct the market? Ask on Wall Street for the identity of such arbitrageurs, and you get the usual suspects. Hedge funds and quant shops, armed with analysts and algorithms, are the most natural candidates. The industry has ballooned from overseeing US$1.4 trillion to US$4.5 trillion in assets over the past decade, and is well positioned to spot mispricings. Others suggest short-sellers, ever alert to signs of froth, or retail investors, now keen dip-buyers. One candidate gets mentioned rather less often: staid corporates. Such businesses are normally seen as passive capital-raisers, not active market participants and certainly not market disciplinarians. Even though they can act on perceived mispricings, firms typically focus more on expanding their own business than on searching for alpha. Bosses have operational backgrounds. They are more fluent in capital spending than capital markets. And when financial officers do wade into the market – to issue or buy back shares, for example – valuation is just one of many considerations, alongside avoiding taxes, ensuring a healthy credit rating and making sure the firm does not take on too much leverage. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up And yet, a growing body of work suggests that corporations, far from being passive observers, are some of the market's most effective arbitrageurs. In 2000, Malcolm Baker of Harvard University and Jeffrey Wurgler, then of Yale University, found a tight connection between firms' net equity issuance and subsequent stock-market returns. Years in which companies issued relatively more stock were typically followed by weaker market performance. More tellingly, companies seemed to issue precisely when valuations were rich, and especially when other frothy signals, such as buoyant consumer sentiment, were drawing attention. Timing the market is impressive; out-trading the professionals is even more so. Yet, firms that issue or retire their own shares routinely do exactly that. In 2022, David McLean of Georgetown University and co-authors showed that corporate-share sales and buy-backs forecast future returns more accurately than the trades of banks, hedge funds, mutual funds and wealth managers. What explains this prowess? Part of the answer lies in firms' access to private information. Few are better placed to forecast a company's future cashflows than insiders. When a company begins buying back its own shares – or employees convert their options into stock-holdings – investors should pay attention. But informational advantages go only so far. They do not explain why firm-level issuance predicts aggregate stock-market returns. And firms' decisions are publicly disclosed: if they were merely signals of private insight, copycat investors quickly ought to arbitrage away any return. Instead, the success of companies may reflect not just what they know, but what they are able to do. They are unusually well-placed to act on mispricings. Start with short-selling. Firms have a natural way to take a contrarian view: when they believe their shares are overpriced, they can issue more of them. For a hedge fund to express a similar view, it must sell short the stock or purchase more complex products, such as put options. These strategies are not only expensive, requiring the payment of borrowing fees or option premiums, but also expose the investor to large losses and margin calls if the stock price rises. Risks become particularly acute during bouts of volatility, such as in January 2021, when retail investors sent GameStop's share price to astonishing heights. Hedge funds hesitated to short-sell for fear of making losses as investors piled in. GameStop's boss, by contrast, simply issued new shares. Companies also operate across markets. Almost every business finances itself with some combination of debt and equity. If one becomes unusually expensive, it can easily switch to the other. Yueran Ma of the University of Chicago finds that firms routinely move towards whichever market looks cheap. Such flexibility is rarely available to institutional investors, which are constrained by benchmarks and mandates. Only 28 of Vanguard's 267 funds can trade both bonds and stocks, for instance. Last, businesses benefit from insulation. They may face unhappy shareholders, but they do not face redemptions. When institutional investors mess up, their own investors pull out, forcing them to sell at just the wrong time. Firm hand The agility this engenders makes companies valuable providers of liquidity, too. As passive investing has grown to make up a fifth of the market, so has demand for stocks in the big indices. Who meets that demand, helping anchor prices? Marco Sammon of Harvard and John Shim of the University of Notre Dame suggest it is, once again, companies. Intermediaries such as active managers and pension funds buy alongside their passive peers. Firms step in to take the other side of the trade by issuing new shares. Similarly, when governments flood the market with short-term debt, firms respond by issuing longer-dated bonds. As asset managers become more passive, specialised or tied up by mandates, it is the firms they invest in that keep the market ticking. So thank your nearest chief financial officer. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
