
Readers write in about caring for the elderly, what's in store for colleges
Sandra Batra
Needham
Taking Attendance
As we confront shrinking college enrollments and a looming talent shortage, we must be proactive in cultivating the next generation of STEM workers (
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Dr. Bonnie Bertolaet
Executive director, Science Club for Girls
Advertisement
I think that AI has come at the right time. With [fewer] educated workers, more productive use of AI may prevent the dive over the demographic cliff.
Notmdny
posted on bostonglobe.com
I don't buy it. We have known for decades that the demographic cliff was coming. I've been reading articles about it since 2000 at least. And everyone understood at the time that the solution was to have a higher percentage of students attend college. That required making college less expensive and more useful. Instead, colleges have gone the other way, turning themselves into pricey resorts.
Working Wizard
posted on bostonglobe.com
Every country that becomes more educated and more wealthy ends up having fewer children. . . . You can see this in Japan and in wealthier countries in Europe — they saw this drop in children before the US did and it had nothing to do with any economic downturn, people simply chose to have fewer children. Is this a bad thing? The world is full of people who want to come here for work and college.
NicksterNH
posted on bostonglobe.com
[America's low birth rate] can and does lead to problems because, as the population ages, we won't have enough people working and paying taxes to support a vibrant society. This is where immigrants can help tremendously. Even temporary workers help the US because they pay taxes, including FICA, from which they may well never earn enough points to collect anything from Social Security. So, it's not just schools that will be hit by a drop in population; schools need students just as business needs workers and there's going to be a shortage of both.
garymichael
posted on bostonglobe.com
Advertisement
CONTACT US:
Write to magazine@globe.com or The Boston Globe Magazine/Comments, 1 Exchange Place, Suite 201, Boston, MA 02109-2132. Comments are subject to editing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
43 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Scott Galloway sends strong message on Morgan Stanley and work
Scott Galloway, the popular podcaster and New York University professor, spoke with LinkedIn CEO Ryan Roslansky on June 3 and revealed his path to success. The discussion involved some words of weakness and strengths that Americans may find important and inspiring. Significantly, Galloway revealed why he decided to leave Morgan Stanley. Don't miss .the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter "The reason I left the corporate world was I literally recognized, 'I don't have the skills for this.'" Galloway told Roslansky on LinkedIn's The Path. "I was too insecure. People would go into a conference room at Morgan Stanley, and I would assume they were talking about me." "I couldn't handle people getting promoted that I didn't think were smart," Galloway continued. "It was a jambo of nerves and insecurity and I realized I am not cut out for the corporate world. I'm just not good at it. It wasn't because I thought, 'I'm so awesome. I need to let my freak flag of entrepreneurship fly.' I just knew I wouldn't be successful at a big company." Related: Scott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threat Galloway talked more about how he found his calling, including some bad advice from wealthy people that he suggests people might not want to follow. "The worst advice the billionaires give is 'follow your passion.'" Galloway said. "Anyone who tells you to 'follow your passion' is already rich." "What I would say to anyone in their twenties is: 'Your job is to workshop.' If you're one of those people who knows exactly what you want to do and gets traction in it right away, that puts you in the 2% most fortunate," he said. "The key is just to keep trying, be resilient until you land on something you think you could be great at." Galloway explained his personal past and how it led to making choices that many would see as out of the ordinary. "I was raised by a single immigrant mother who lived and died as a secretary. Neither of my parents graduated from high school," Galloway explained. "Our household income was never over $40,000, so it wasn't a given that I was going go to college." Galloway talked more about his weaknesses and the fact that those problems did not discourage him. "I was remarkably unremarkable but America used to love unremarkable people," he said. "I got into UCLA with a 2.27 GPA and spent most of college watching Planet of the Apes. Now, you have to weigh off your economic situation, the value of the degree and if you could go out and make more money on your own." More on the U.S. economy: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Galloway also discussed his warnings and about being an entrepreneur, particularly about romanticizing the notion. For Galloway, it appears he had some fears about leaving the Morgan Stanley and the corporate world. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary sends strong message on Social Security Galloway explains his experience with teaching college students about their hopes and dreams. "A ton of kids come to my office hours and they'll say, 'I have offers from Google and Salesforce, but I really want to start my own business,'" he said. "And I'll say, 'Don't be an idiot, go work for Google.'" Galloway clarified more about his thoughts on advising students. "They don't expect to hear that from me. We have a tendency to romanticize entrepreneurship," he said before asking a vital question. "Just ask yourself, 'Are you willing to risk public failure? Are you willing to be emotionally stressed? Are you willing to strain your relationships? Are you willing to borrow money from your in-laws?'" "With a prospect, you might have to show up at Thanksgiving having lost it," Galloway stressed. "Are you willing to sell everyone all the time?'" Related: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds charge U-M student from China with voting illegally, fleeing US
The FBI is on the hunt for a former University of Michigan student from China who allegedly voted illegally in the 2024 presidential election, then fled the country one day before Donald Trump took office, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Detroit. The fugitive, Haoxiang Gao, now faces federal charges for allegedly voting illegally, and fleeing the country to avoid prosecution. According to a criminal complaint filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, he was already facing state charges for voting illegally and was released on a $5,000 personal bond last fall with conditions: He had to surrender his passport and not leave the state. While Gao did surrender his passport, the complaint states, he jumped bond on Jan. 19 and fled the country on a Delta flight to Shanghai, China. According to Customs and Border Protection records, he passed through Detroit Metro Airport security using a passport that was in his name, but bore a different number than the one on the passport he initially surrendered to police. He is now facing federal charges of filing false claims to register to vote, unlawfully voting as an undocumented immigrant, and fleeing to avoid prosecution. "I hope that today's charges send a message to foreign nationals — including those who are students at our universities — that we will not tolerate illegal voting," U.S. Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon Jr. said in a statement Tuesday, in which he expressed particular concern over the defendant's nationality. 'Illegal voting is a serious crime that casts doubt on our elections and serves to disenfranchise United States citizens by diluting their power at the ballot box. But illegal voting by a foreign national who is from a country controlled by a communist party dictatorship — with no modern history or tradition of democratic government — is beyond the pale," Gorgon states. According to the criminal complaint, here is how Gao fell on the FBI's radar after the 2024 presidential election: In October 2024, Gao was living in room 4515 at a student dormitory on Observatory Street when he cast an early ballot in the 2024 presidential election. At the time, he held a Green Card, a Florida driver's license and a Social Security number. More: Criminal charges filed after noncitizen allegedly voted in Michigan On Oct. 28, U-M Public Safety & Security received information from the Ann Arbor Clerk's Office that a Chinese national may have cast a ballot in the 2024 presidential election. The Clerk's Office stated that in the late afternoon of Oct. 27 an unidentified male caller contacted the office and asked whether voting with a green card at the polling place across the street from the U-M Student Union building was OK. The Clerk's Office representative said that only U.S. citizens can vote, and that green card holders cannot. Before the caller got off the phone, the Clerk's Office representative took a photograph of the caller's telephone number, which was the same number that Gao had listed on his fraudulent state of Michigan Voter Registration Application. Gao then called the Clerk's Office a second time, identified himself and "admitted that he cast a fraudulent vote. GAO asked if he could 'pull back his vote,' " the complaint states. "(He) stated he was 'freaking out because I wasn't supposed to vote,' before concluding the call," the complaint states. More: FBI visits Hamtramck amid several investigations into alleged wrongdoing by officials "GAO claimed that he later tried to 'make things right' by contacting the city of Ann Arbor and the Washtenaw County Clerk's Office," the complaint states. Charges, however, followed. According to the complaint, police matched Gao's scribbled signature on his voter registration application to his Florida driver's license. They also interviewed his roommate, who told police that "Gao had talked about going to vote in the 2024 Presidential Election on October 27, 2024, during a bus ride to the University of Michigan Union" before he actually voted. The roommate also told police that after Gao voted, he posted "a message that he voted in the 2024 Presidential Election on a Chinese application, WeChat, from his cell phone." Gao, however, did not disclose these details to police, the complaint states. Criminal charges followed. On Nov. 8, Gao turned himself in via Zoom and was arraigned in 14A District Court in Ann Arbor on felony charges of lying to register to vote and being unqualified to try to vote. He was released on bond and ordered to return to court on Jan. 17 for a probable cause hearing, which was pushed to March 5. Gao, however, was gone by then. According to U.S. Customs and Border Patrol, on Jan. 19, Gao boarded Delta Flight No. 389 bound for Shanghai at Detroit Metro Airport using a second passport he had obtained. He has not been seen since. An attorney of record has not been listed for Gao. His whereabouts are unknown. Contact Tresa Baldas: tbaldas@ This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Feds charge University of Michigan Chinese student with illegal voting


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration backs off effort to collect data on food stamp recipients
The Agriculture Department released guidance outlining the federal government's intentions in May. The document referred to states and territories, which administer the program independently, as 'a SNAP information silo' and directed state agencies to begin providing personal data on recipients under an executive order that President Donald Trump signed in March. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The data the department requested from state administrators includes identifying details on recipients including home addresses, federal tax returns and Social Security numbers. Advertisement A group of individuals and nonprofits quickly filed a lawsuit challenging the policy on personal privacy grounds, represented by lawyers from public interest groups including the Protect Democracy Project and the National Student Legal Defense Network. The lawsuit raised broader concerns about the data-collection efforts driven by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency team he has left in place, which have spawned multiple legal challenges. At the same time the Agriculture Department was canvassing data from states, Musk's team was also contacting third-party companies that process bank transactions tied to the benefits in an attempt to build out the database, according to emails first reported by NPR. Advertisement Musk's team has in recent months taken steps to merge and centralize sensitive data maintained by multiple federal agencies, including the Social Security Administration, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Education and others. The Trump administration has also quietly enlisted Palantir, a data analysis firm, to organize and interrogate that data in order to piece together holistic portraits of individual Americans based on the totality of the information stored on them across the federal government. The lawsuit against the Agriculture Department argued that the demand for up-to-date information on SNAP recipients fit the larger pattern, and promised to put tens of millions of people who rely on the program into a system where they could be scrutinized over eligibility requirements. In a filing, the groups suing noted that Alaska, Arkansas, Iowa and Ohio had already started producing data and that all other states were already facing pressure to comply in violation of federal privacy laws. 'This case concerns the executive branch's attempt to round up the sensitive personal data of tens of millions of economically vulnerable Americans with callous indifference for the mandatory privacy protections enshrined in federal law,' the groups wrote. The concerns raised in the lawsuit have been compounded by proposals by Republicans in Congress to dramatically shrink SNAP and other federal anti-poverty programs as part of sweeping cuts that lawmakers have used to justify tax cuts concentrated on the wealthiest Americans. An analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that the provisions of the tax cut bill could result in 1.3 million people losing access to SNAP benefits. Advertisement After the groups suing moved to block the Agriculture Department from implementing the policy, the government said in its filing that it had yet to receive any data and would not proceed until it had taken steps 'to satisfy all necessary legal requirements.' This article originally appeared in