Madonna Responds to Donald Trump's ‘King' Post: ‘If This Is a Joke, I'm Not Laughing'
Madonna has shared her latest thoughts on the current activities of U.S. President Donald Trump.
The Queen of Pop's latest comments on Trump came following a controversial post from the official White House X account on Wednesday (Feb. 19). Sharing a fake Time magazine cover, the title was altered to feature Trump's name, while a caption reading 'long live the king' appeared above a smiling of the President, adorned with a crown.
More from Billboard
Djo Reimagines Haim's 'Gasoline' for Australia's 'Like a Version'
Selena Gomez & Benny Blanco Team Up With Gracie Abrams for 'Call Me When You Break Up': Stream It Now
Big Time Rush Announce 'In Real Life' Tour Playing Every Song From Their TV Show
The post, which was shared after his administration ordered New York to end congestion pricing, was also accompanied by a quote attributed to Trump, 'CONGESTION PRICING IS DEAD. Manhattan, and all of New York, is SAVED. LONG LIVE THE KING.'
Understandably, the post drew swift criticism from those who recognized the irony of the White House's reference to Trump as a monarch, given the very circumstances upon which America was first founded. Madonna was one of those very people, who took to her Instagram Stories on Thursday (Feb. 20) to criticize the post.
'I thought this country was built by Europeans, escaping living under the rule of a King, to establish a New World governed by the people,' she wrote. 'Currently, we have a president who calls himself our King. If this is a joke, I'm not laughing.'
This is far from the first time that Madonna has responded negatively to actions from the Trump administration. Following Trump's first inauguration in Jan. 2017, the musician addressed a crowd of over 500,000 women and men at the Women's March on Washington, with her expletive-laden speech airing uncensored on C-Span, CNN and MSNBC.
'Welcome to the revolution of love, to the rebellion, to our refusal as women to accept this new age of tyranny, where not just women are in danger but all marginalized people, where being uniquely different right now might truly be considered a crime,' she told the gathered masses. 'It took this horrific moment of darkness to wake us the f— up.'
More recently, Madonna responded to Trump's myriad executive orders eliminating diversity, equity and inclusion positions within government branches and agencies, and numerous orders repealing protections for LGBTQIA+ individuals and members of other marginalized communities.
'It's so sad to watch our new Government slowly dismantling all the Freedoms we have been fighting for and WON over the years,' she wrote, accompanying her post with a pride flag and a broken heart emoji. 'Don't give up the Fight!'
Best of Billboard
Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1
Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits
H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
35 minutes ago
- New York Post
What will it take for Gavin Newsom to focus on his day job?
President Donald Trump rightly took the ruling upholding his National Guard deployment to Los Angeles as a 'BIG WIN,' but it can be a winner for Californians, too — if it inspires their governor to focus on the job they elected him to. Gov. Gavin Newsom vows to litigate on, but if necessary the Supreme Court will slap him down, too. What will get him to quit his near-nonstop posturing to set himself up for a 2028 presidential run, and get his nose to the gubernatorial grindstone? It's bad enough that he sided with LA Mayor Karen Bass in obstructing ICE efforts to deport child predators, murderers and other worst-of-the-worst 'asylum seekers' — posturing that all but invited the riots that Trump deployed the Guard to shut down. Worse that this rush to the left came after Newsom's fake to the right with a series of podcasts where he pretended sympathy to centrist criticisms of the far-left agenda. That follows his haplessness during the Los Angeles fires — a disaster Trump credibly tied to Newsom's green obsessions. Other Gavin grotesquerie included rushing to meet the president on Trump's LA visit bare weeks after prepping for all-out legal #resistance to the new prez. California is plagued with soaring homelessness, elevated crime rates and brutally high costs of living: Even its welcome to illegal immigrants hasn't prevented a historic switch from growth to decline. That is: On Newsom's watch, Cali is for the first time ever losing seats in the House of Representatives because so many residents are fleeing to less-toxic jurisdictions. The Golden State is a natural near-paradise, but Newsom & co. are destroying it. That governor is still devoting his time and energy to a years-off national run is damning proof that he doesn't care a whit for the people of California.
New York Times
39 minutes ago
- New York Times
Where the Legal Fight Over the California National Guard Stands
President Trump's decision this month to send National Guard troops to Los Angeles against the wishes of Gov. Gavin Newsom has sparked a legal battle that could reshape how much latitude a president has to deploy the military on U.S. soil. On June 10, days after Mr. Trump federalized the California National Guard in response to protests over immigration raids, the state filed a lawsuit calling the move illegal. Even as the Trump administration added active-duty Marines to the mix, a judge ordered it to return the National Guard to the control of Mr. Newsom. But an appeals court blocked that move, and Mr. Trump maintains authority over those troops today. Mr. Trump's decision to deploy troops came after Immigration and Customs Enforcement started carrying out raids at workplaces in the city, sweeping up hundreds of migrants for potential deportation and drawing protesters. While the majority protested peacefully, a subset committed violent acts like throwing objects and burning vehicles. Here's where things stand in the case. What made Trump's decision to deploy troops significant? Normally, governors control their state's National Guard and dispatch such troops themselves when there is a need to quell civil disorder or fight a natural disaster. On rare occasions, the president may take control of a guard or otherwise deploy troops under federal control on domestic soil, but in recent decades that has happened only at a governor's request. Mr. Trump's move was the first time in more than six decades that a president had taken control of a state guard over a governor's objections, raising profound questions about presidential power, state sovereignty and civil liberties. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump and the Great Wait for Israelis and Iranians
When it comes to foreign conflicts, there are two President Trumps. There is the firebrand isolationist of the 2016 presidential campaign, who as president set the stage for the American withdrawal from Afghanistan and, in 2019, called off an airstrike on Iran with only 10 minutes to go. And there is the president who, in early 2020, authorized a drone strike to kill Iran's top security and intelligence commander. This week, Trump gave himself up to two weeks to decide which approach he will take toward the war that Israel began last week by attacking Iran. The extra time could allow him to expand his arsenal of options and calibrate the thorny politics of any decision. But it will also come with real consequences for Israelis and Iranians. Today, I called my colleague Patrick Kingsley, The Times's bureau chief in Jerusalem. He explained how Trump's delay is shaping calculations on both sides — and how, for civilians, two weeks could feel like a very long time indeed. Can you describe life for Israeli and Iranian civilians in this moment? There's a mood of terror and fear in both countries as the airstrikes come down. In Israel, civilians are rushing, sometimes several times a day, into bomb shelters to avoid getting hit by Iranian missiles that have regularly been fired into civilian areas. At least two dozen Israelis have been killed. In Iran, where there are far fewer shelters, the death toll is higher than 200, which includes many civilians. Following Israeli evacuation orders, often issued at very short notice, huge numbers of Iranian civilians have been forced to flee Tehran — a city of roughly 10 million. That has led to massive traffic jams and gas shortages, all against the backdrop of prolonged internet blackouts. We don't know if an American strike would end the suffering. But two weeks of diplomacy doesn't immediately end it, either. It locks us in for up to two weeks of continued fighting between Israel and Iran, killing civilians in both countries. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
