Trans pilot falsely blamed in Potomac plane crash sues conservative influencer
A transgender military pilot filed a defamation lawsuit Wednesday against a conservative influencer who falsely claimed on social media that she was flying the helicopter that collided with a commercial jet near Reagan National Airport in January, killing 67 people.
'I want to hold this person accountable for what they did to me,' Jo Ellis, a pilot who has served more than 15 years in the Virginia Army National Guard, said in a statement to NBC News. 'It's become too common that people can say horrible things about someone, profit at their expense, and get away with it.'
On Jan. 30, less than 24 hours after the crash, conservative influencer Matt Wallace, who has 2.2 million followers on the social media platform X, shared a post from another account he operates stating that the helicopter pilot was transgender, according to the lawsuit. Wallace included a photo of Ellis, and the post went viral, the lawsuit states.
Wallace deleted that original post, according to the lawsuit, and then shared two others linking Ellis to the crash. One referred to an interview that Ellis did with The Smerconish Podcast, in which she said President Donald Trump's executive order barring trans people from serving and enlisting in the military made her nervous.
The second post included photos of Ellis and said she might have participated in 'another trans terror attack,' according to the lawsuit. That post received 4.8 million views on X, the suit states.
Wallace did not immediately return a request for comment regarding the allegations in the lawsuit.
On Jan. 31, after Ellis learned about the rumors, she shared a 'proof of life' video on Facebook.
'I understand some people have associated me with the crash in D.C., and that is false,' Ellis said in the Facebook video. 'It is insulting to the families to try to tie this to some sort of political agenda. They don't deserve that. I don't deserve this. And I hope that you all know that I am alive and well, and this should be sufficient for you all to end all the rumors.'
Soon after Ellis' statement on Facebook, Wallace shared another X user's post with Ellis' video, writing that it was an 'Important Update!' and adding that Ellis was not piloting the helicopter and is still alive. Wallace also wrote in another X post that the original rumor that Ellis had been flying the helicopter involved in the crash came from another account with the handle @FakeGayPolitics, which is no longer active. Wallace said the rumor 'seemed credible' because Ellis, whom Wallace misgendered in his posts, 'wrote an article calling out Trump's trans military ban only a few days ago.'
Ellis was not involved in the midair collision, the lawsuit states, did not write an article 'calling out' Trump's trans military ban and did not engage in 'another trans terror attack.'
Equality Legal Action Fund, an LGBTQ legal organization representing Ellis, argues in the complaint that Wallace 'concocted a destructive and irresponsible defamation campaign' against Ellis.
'The damage caused to Plaintiff by Defendant was instantaneous and immense,' the lawsuit continues. 'Prior to Defendant's campaign, Plaintiff was a private citizen who led a private life away from social media and the limelight. When Plaintiff awoke on January 31, 2025, she discovered she was the second most-trending topic in the United States on X with more than 90,000 posts mentioning her name or her likeness. Plaintiff was forced into the public sphere and can no longer remain a private citizen due to Defendant's lies.'
Ellis said her life was 'turned upside down' by Wallace's posts.
'I feared for the safety of my family and myself and had to arrange private armed security,' she said in her statement to NBC News. 'I'm now recognized in public and forever associated with that terrible tragedy over the Potomac. When I go out in public I have to look over my shoulder now.'
Ellis' suit seeks damages for the injury to her reputation, though Ellis said she plans to donate any money that she wins from the suit to the families of the people who died in the crash.
Trans people have increasingly been falsely blamed for tragedies and violence in recent years, particularly after mass shootings. Since 2022, false or unconfirmed claims have linked trans people to mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas; Nashville, Tennessee; Philadelphia; Madison, Wisconsin; and Des Moines, Iowa.
In addition, since January, the Trump administration has enacted several policies targeting trans people, including the trans military ban, which states that being openly trans 'is not consistent with the humility and selflessness required of a service member.' Two judges have temporarily blocked that policy from taking effect.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trans Texans brace for life under strict sex definition law
It was in a San Antonio courtroom in 2015 that Leo Tyler felt he became who he was always meant to be. The 17-year-old had long known he was trans, but it didn't feel real until a judge agreed to change the name and gender on his government documents. 'It was euphoric,' Tyler, now 27, recalls. 'Walking out of that courtroom, I felt so seen.' Tyler was the youngest in a group of people changing their gender markers that day. On the steps of the courthouse, they all embraced him, crying tears of joy over the idea that he'd get to live his whole adult life on his own terms. ''This is something no one can ever take away from me,'' he remembers thinking. But now, just a decade later, Tyler finds himself in limbo, waiting to see whether the state of Texas will require him and other trans people to live as the sex they were assigned at birth, rather than the gender they identify as. House Bill 229, which the governor is expected to sign into law, enforces a definition of sex based on the reproductive system someone was born with — women produce ova, men fertilize them. This definition could now be applied across state statute, leaving trans people and lawyers rushing to understand what exactly will change as a result of this law. 'The question of the hour is how will [HB] 229 be enforced and applied,' said Sarah Corning, a legal fellow at the ACLU of Texas. 'What we do know is that it's incredibly disrespectful to so many Texans the Legislature represents, and completely disregards their identity.' Compared to past legislative sessions, where battles over bathrooms, drag shows and gender-affirming care sparked dramatic showdowns between lawmakers and community members, the 2025 session was remarkably quiet. But HB 229 and the handful of other bills that passed may end up having even more significant consequences for LGBTQ people than many people realize, Corning said. The ripple effect will likely take years to sort out. Tyler, who works at a shelter for LGBTQ youth and runs support groups for trans people, is struggling to provide his community with answers he himself doesn't have. Carrying a driver's license that says he's a woman would 'be like I'm carrying an ID of some random person,' Tyler said. 'That name, that photo, that doesn't reflect who I am. I could just see it causing a lot of confusion, and for what?' LGBTQ advocates went into this legislative session unsure of what to expect. It had been a bruising few years, with Texas lawmakers pushing more, and more aggressive bills than any other state. In 2023, they banned trans athletes from playing college sports, as they'd done for K-12, prohibited children at drag shows and banned certain gender-affirming medical care for minors. Protesters turned out in full force, leading to arrests in the House chamber. The issue only became more prominent during the 2024 presidential election, where Republicans spent more than $200 million on round-the-clock anti-trans ads hammering Vice President Kamala Harris and other Democratic candidates. Immediately after entering office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order asserting there are only two sexes, male and female. Texas Governor Greg Abbott followed with a similar order for Texas, and the Texas Department of Public Safety began refusing to change gender markers on drivers' licenses, even with court orders. Amid all this upheaval, it wasn't immediately clear what Texas legislators' next priorities would be on this front, Jonathan Gooch, communications director at Equality Texas, said in April. 'Having had such an aggressively anti-trans legislative session in 2023, they accomplished a lot of things they wanted to do, and now the federal government is doing a lot of what they'd hoped,' he said. 'That's left Texas [lawmakers] to dig into some of the finer details, which are less obvious to most people.' The bills that gained traction this session were more nuanced and harder to understand, which Brad Pritchett, CEO of Equality Texas, said was intentional. 'This year, they have tried to hide the discrimination in bills that are more and more complicated,' he said at a rally, adding that legislators were hoping people's 'eyes glaze over' as they chipped away at health insurance and discrimination protections for trans people. One new law will require health insurers that cover gender-affirming care to also cover all costs related to detransitioning or any adverse effects. Or, as bill sponsor Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Allen, summarized it, 'if you take somebody to the dance and they want to go home, then you have to take them home.' Democrats argued that this would disincentivize health insurers from covering gender-affirming care by significantly raising the costs, and filed more than half a dozen amendments to narrow the scope of the bill, to no avail. A related bill that passed will require medical records to list someone's birth sex, even if they've transitioned, which advocates worry will lead to discrimination. 'However you couch it, [this legislation] is about eliminating the existence of trans individuals in Texas,' Rep. Ann Johnson, a Democrat from Houston, said during the debate. 'Stop pretending that you're for freedom. Stop pretending that this is about the kids." The most high-impact bill, though, was HB 229, the 'sex definition' bill. The preface to the bill said this strict sex definition would be applied across bathrooms, prisons, shelters and sports teams, although legal experts say it is likely contained to anywhere sex is already explicitly mentioned in statute. Supporters call it the 'Women's Bill of Rights,' and said it was necessary to protect women-only spaces from the intrusion of men. 'If we can no longer define what a woman is, we cannot defend what women have won,' Rep. Ellen Troxclair, an Austin Republican, said on the floor. 'We cannot protect what we cannot define.' But for trans people, this strict definition leaves them in purgatory, unsure what exactly will change and where exactly they belong. Ian Pittman, an attorney who has helped dozens of trans people change their gender markers, said it's hard to imagine the state combing back through every individual drivers' license and birth certificate to find ones where the gender marker was changed. He anticipates this might come up when people renew their licenses, but it would depend on each individual case. He's more worried about the 'butterfly effect' of how this definition will come to be used across state and local laws, whether or not HB 229 actually applies to that particular statute. While many trans people celebrated the fact that a 'bathroom bill,' which requires people to use the bathroom that aligns with the sex they were assigned at birth, didn't pass this session, Pittman said the sex definition law could potentially end up having the same impact on the ground. 'There may not be a bathroom ban, but someone might say, since we have 'woman' defined in the government code, this courthouse bathroom is now only for people who are women by the government code definition,' he said. 'It's going to be used as a sword, not a shield.' For trans people like Tyler, who are living fully as the gender they identify with, carrying documents that say they're a different sex would require outing themselves anytime they fly, apply for a job, try to get a loan, are pulled over, or go to a bar, he said. 'I feel like, this is me, and I just want to have a job, and put food on the table, and pay bills, and it's very upsetting that they just threw this bill … down and now it could impact all of that,' he said. 'I've had to take time away just to cry because it gets very depleting.' Ryan McBride has been on testosterone and living as a man for two years. But he hadn't yet changed his gender marker, in part due to fear that he would face discrimination at the doctor's office. Now, he worries that he missed the window. He watched the Legislature closely this session, refreshing its website multiple times a day to see what bills were passing, and what they might mean for him and his community. When lawmakers gaveled out on June 1, he breathed a sigh of relief, taking a moment to celebrate that they didn't go further than they did. 'Weird start to Pride Month,' he said wryly. But even before any bills have gone into effect, living as a trans person in Texas has already become harder, he said. He's faced an uptick in unwanted attention, which he attributes to everyday people who previously had no awareness of, let alone opinion on, trans people suddenly becoming hyper-aware of any gender diversity. 'I've been ma'am-ed a lot more, and I was worried I'm not passing as well anymore, but I've heard this from other trans people that they're getting it too,' he said. 'No one is neutral anymore, it seems like, everyone is either really supportive or really opposed,' This is part of the long-term goal of all the bills that passed this session, Pittman said. Even if they don't change everything overnight, it's part of a campaign to make Texas inhospitable to trans people, to make them move, or live as the sex they were assigned at birth. 'It's more about creating confusion and it's meant to foment a divisive atmosphere and just make people wonder, do I really want to live in Texas as a trans person, where everything is becoming so hostile?' he said. Disclosure: Equality Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here. Big news: 20 more speakers join the TribFest lineup! New additions include Margaret Spellings, former U.S. secretary of education and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center; Michael Curry, former presiding bishop and primate of The Episcopal Church; Beto O'Rourke, former U.S. Representative, D-El Paso; Joe Lonsdale, entrepreneur, founder and managing partner at 8VC; and Katie Phang, journalist and trial lawyer. Get tickets. TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Clip shows fatal shooting in Brazil, not India's Bihar state
"In the era of good governance in Bihar, Pawan Dusadh was shot dead in broad daylight. If this murder took place during the reign of Tejashwi Yadav, every media channel would have said 'lawlessness has returned to Bihar'," reads a Hindi-language Facebook post. The clip, shared with captions raising concerns over public safety in Bihar, shows two people on a motorcycle shooting another person before fleeing the scene. It has been watched over 112,000 times since it was uploaded on May 30. Yadav will lead the state opposition Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) party to challenge the coalition government -- mainly made up of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar's Janata Dal (United) party and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) -- in elections in Bihar expected later this year (archived link). Leader of India's largest opposition Congress party Rahul Gandhi has accused Kumar of turning Bihar into the country's "crime capital", while BJP leaders in the state said the RJD was responsible for the increasing crime rate (archived here and here). The footage has circulated with similar claims on Facebook and X. Comments from users suggest they believed the claim to be genuine. "Young people who speak up and raise their voices in Bihar are being murdered in this manner to silence them and spread fear, so that the entire society remains intimidated", reads a comment. Another user wrote, "The common people are not safe at all in Bihar." But the video shows an incident from Brazil, not Bihar. A reverse image search on Google using keyframes found the video was published in a report by Brazilian broadcaster TV Tambau on October 4, 2024 with a headline that reads, "Man is killed on the road while riding a motorcycle in Mandacaru" (archived link). Further keyword searches show Brazilian website O Povo PB published a longer clip on October 8, 2024 showing the same scene from a different angle at the 3:09 mark (archived link). The website identified the victim as 22-year-old Gabriel Junior de Oliveira Medeiros, who was shot dead in the Mandacaru neighbourhood in Joao Pessoa. Images on Google Street View also show that the video was captured along the Avenida Dom Manoel Paiva in the city (archived link). AFP has debunked other false claims related to Yadav here and here.
Time Business News
3 hours ago
- Time Business News
Watch Political News On-Demand & Real-Time Election Coverage
In the ever-evolving world of politics, staying informed is essential—not just for voters, but for students, analysts, and every concerned citizen. That's where comes in: a next-generation political reporting platform offering video-on-demand political content, real-time updates, and sharp insights into domestic and global events. Tired of biased headlines and clickbait journalism? delivers reliable breaking political news with an emphasis on factual reporting and balanced perspectives. Whether you're tracking a presidential campaign, legislative reform, or international diplomacy, this platform provides the clarity and depth you need. Get real-time updates and watch political news videos anytime, from any device—thanks to a streamlined and responsive video-on-demand (VOD) system. One of the platform's standout features is its political video content, available on-demand. With over a million followers on social platforms, the channel publishes exclusive interviews, daily briefings, and documentary-style clips—perfect for those who prefer watching over reading. High CPC Keywords Featured: Watch political commentary online Election campaign video coverage Dan Bongino FBI reform news Lily Tang Williams interview US political video updates Whether you lean conservative, libertarian, or independent, delivers curated news for audiences seeking alternatives to mainstream outlets. With consistent updates on major events like election cycles, policy shifts, SCOTUS rulings, and congressional debates, you'll always have context behind the headlines. It's a smart destination for: Students researching political science Small business owners tracking economic policies Voters preparing for local and federal elections 👉 Read their latest political commentary blog posts. covers high-interest, high-CPC topics including: US elections 2024 news Government policy changes FBI and CIA reform Second Amendment updates Free speech and censorship in media Global political conflicts These topics not only generate heavy traffic but are also critical to shaping public opinion. is more than just a website—it's a growing digital media brand with active communities on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. Subscribe or follow for real-time alerts and trending video content. Start watching exclusive political videos now → Watch on If you're serious about staying informed in today's chaotic political landscape, is your go-to source for truth-driven, timely, and thought-provoking reporting. Don't just skim headlines—dive into political analysis, understand the issues, and form your own opinions based on facts, not noise. 🔗 Visit now and elevate the way you consume political news. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
