logo
Pentagon Diverts $1 Billion from Army Barracks to Fund Border Mission

Pentagon Diverts $1 Billion from Army Barracks to Fund Border Mission

Yahooa day ago

The Pentagon is shifting $1 billion meant for maintaining and renovating Army barracks to instead fund its surge of troops to the U.S.-Mexico border, a move that coincides with the service's gradual deprioritization of quality-of-life initiatives for soldiers.
Redirecting the barracks funding erodes much of the additional money the Army started pouring into living quarters during the previous administration. The funding could be partially replaced by a separate $1 billion in proposed barracks investments across all services in Congress' so-called "One Big Beautiful Bill,' but that legislation, designed to enact President Donald Trump's agenda, would still leave the Army with an enormous financial loss on maintaining living quarters for junior troops.
The shift of Army barracks money to the border mission was laid out in a wide-ranging Defense Department plan, sent to Congress on May 8, to move funding between various programs. The service declined to comment on how the cut might affect ongoing projects.
Read Next: Hegseth Restricts Press Access at Pentagon, Says Journalists Will Be Required to Sign Pledge
The Pentagon has broad flexibility to move money between accounts, a move called 'reprogramming,' without an act of Congress.
The diversion of funds away from soldier housing contrasts with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's public persona. Having served 11 years as an Army National Guard officer, Hegseth has frequently portrayed himself as a champion for the rank and file, telling troops at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, last week, "I've been in your boots."
"The message from the commander in chief, straight from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, is he has your back," he added.
The shift also reflects a change in the Army's priorities. During the previous administration, service planners made a point of tying soldier well-being to the Army's ability to fight. The idea was that quality-of-life issues were part of preparing for war, that when troops and families are taken care of, soldiers are more focused and ready to deploy to combat.
Current service leadership has moved away from that framework, scrubbing the Army's mantra of 'People First,' focusing more narrowly on traditional warfighting priorities such as weapon systems and acquisition reform.
The funding move is déjà vu for those watching defense budgets under Trump. During his first term, the Pentagon transferred $1 billion from its military personnel budget to fund 57 miles of border wall, siphoning funds away from the pot of money that includes troop pay and enlistment bonuses.
At the time, the reprogramming of the money to the border wall drew sharp backlash from Democrats, who accused the administration of sidestepping congressional authority. Trump had also claimed that Mexico would pay for the construction of the wall, though that never happened.
"Taking money out of facilities to fund near-term readiness isn't new; it's how the military got into this hole in the first place," Jacob Freedman, who was chief of staff to former Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, told Military.com. "Instead of digging out of it, we're now digging even deeper."
Many buildings that house junior enlisted troops are decades old, with persistent issues ranging from mold and pests to failing plumbing and broken HVAC systems.
In some cases, those issues have led to soldiers getting sick from constant exposure to mold and other unsanitary conditions. According to an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office, the Army has a backlog of $20 billion worth of repairs and renovations to its facilities, a figure that continues to climb, worsened by inflation, with the average building being 47 years old.
'It's shameful for the Defense Department to divert resources dedicated to improving living quarters for military personnel for a political stunt,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee, told Military.com in a statement.
The Army has acknowledged that some barracks have been allowed to deteriorate due to funding shortfalls and shifting priorities. Maintenance teams have struggled to keep pace with demand, and soldiers have reported lengthy wait times to fix basic issues like non-working air conditioning in the sweltering summer months.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon has deployed more than 9,000 troops to the border since January, including part of the 4th Infantry Division with armored Stryker vehicles out of Fort Carson, Colorado. The surge is part of Trump's crackdown on border crossings, which is itself part of a wider national effort at large-scale deportations.
The border has always had some level of troops for decades, most notably the Texas National Guard through Gov. Greg Abbott's troubled Operation Lone Star mission. Trump's megabill includes an $11 billion provision to reimburse the state of Texas for its mission that started in 2021.
"This, now with the lack of comments on quality-of-life improvements … it really gives the impression it's not a priority," said Rob Evans, who runs Hots & Cots, a Yelp-style app for troops to review barracks and dining facilities.
Related: Over $151 Million Taken from Soldiers' Paychecks for Food Costs Spent Elsewhere by the Army

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SMU researcher says proposed Tarrant County redistricting 'diminishes' voting power
SMU researcher says proposed Tarrant County redistricting 'diminishes' voting power

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SMU researcher says proposed Tarrant County redistricting 'diminishes' voting power

The Brief Tarrant County commissioners are set to vote on new district maps within days, a process led by Republican County Judge Tim O'Hare. Critics say the proposed maps violate racial protections in the Voting Rights Act by concentrating non-White voters into one district, diluting their voting power. An SMU researcher's analysis appears to suggest the new maps may be biased against non-White voters. TARRANT COUNTY, Texas - The Republican-led Tarrant County Commissioners Court is days away from voting to redraw district lines. Critics say the proposed maps violate racial protections in the Voting Rights Act. Now, an SMU researcher is applying her own mathematical review to the maps. The Latest SMU mathematics professor and researcher Dr. Andrea Barreiro has dissected and analyzed the newly proposed maps for Tarrant County districts, the work of a county-hired consulting firm and the public legal interest foundation. The researcher uses mathematics and technology to analyze the redistricting models. She says she was drawn to Tarrant County's current process as attention surrounding the topic began to grow. Barreiro looks for signatures of partisan and racial gerrymandering, she says. The current process to redraw the county's lines is led by Republican County Judge Tim O'Hare. At the center of the controversy are District 1, held by Commissioner Roderick Miles, and District 2, a seat now held by Commissioner Alisa Simmons, both Democrats. What they're saying "It looks like they made small modifications on this basic template where they swap the purple and the blue to get their desired outcome," Barreiro said. Barreiro says a randomly unbiased generated map based on the latest census data would have 60 to 65 percent non-White voters in each of those districts. "The proposed maps do something very different," Barreiro said. "They take a lot of those non-White voters in District 2, and they pack them into District 1, leaving District 2 to be majority White." Barreiro uses advanced software, applying a method known as Markov Chain Analysis. Her experience using the same technology includes similar analysis her team prepared during the state legislative redistricting cycle. "We have continued to reach out to Judge O'Hare for his response to allegations of racial gerrymandering by Simmons, Miles, as well as U.S. Congressman Marc Veasey and ten Tarrant County mayors," Barreiro said. Barreiro stops short of making a legal opinion on whether the proposed maps violate state and federal law. She does say it is clear what the consultant map-maker's mission is. "If black voters could be a large presence in two districts, but instead you pack all those people by picking your map cleverly, you get all those people into one district, then you diminish the voting power of that population," Barreiro said. "There are interesting methodological and mathematical questions about this whole process that I'm eager to explore, and I'm also just interested in basic fairness." What's next Late Thursday afternoon, O'Hare agreed to an interview with FOX 4. The meeting is set for Friday morning. A vote on Tarrant County's redistricting process is set for Tuesday. The backstory The mayors of 10 Tarrant County cities, including Fort Worth, Arlington, Mansfield, and Grand Prairie, have signed a letter expressing their opposition to the proposed map. The group called the effort ill-timed because it's the middle of the decade and, in their opinion, the census data from 2020 is outdated. In early April, the commission voted three to two, with commissioners Alisa Simmons and Roderick Miles opposing, to approve a contract with the Public Interest Legal Foundation to provide consultation with re-drawing district lines. The Source Information in this article came from SMU researcher Dr. Andrea Barreiro and previous FOX 4 reporting.

Gold slips as dollar ticks higher, US inflation report in focus
Gold slips as dollar ticks higher, US inflation report in focus

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Gold slips as dollar ticks higher, US inflation report in focus

By Anmol Choubey (Reuters) - Gold prices fell on Friday amid a slight uptick in dollar, while investors awaited a key U.S. inflation report that may provide further insight into the Federal Reserve's policy trajectory. Spot gold was down 0.5% at $3,300.59 an ounce, as of 0313 GMT. Bullion is down 1.7% so far this week. U.S. gold futures fell 0.5% to $3,298.30. The dollar index rose 0.2%, making gold more expensive for overseas buyers. "Gold prices are more or less consolidating at this point of time... what we see is that these are normal market occurrences just at the range now is slightly wider mainly due to the confidence in the U.S. dollar," said Brian Lan, managing director at GoldSilver Central, Singapore. Investors are awaiting the April U.S. personal consumption expenditures (PCE) price index report, the Fed's preferred inflation measure, which is due at 1230 GMT. According to a Reuters poll, the U.S. PCE is expected to remain at 0.1% month-on-month, while the year-on-year figure is anticipated to be at 2.2%. San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said on Thursday that policymakers could still reduce interest rates twice this year, but rates should remain steady for now to ensure inflation is on track to reach the central bank's 2% goal. Non-yielding bullion tends to benefit in low-interest-rate environments. Meanwhile, a federal appeals court temporarily reinstated President Donald Trump's most extensive tariffs on Thursday, following a U.S. trade court's ruling on Wednesday that Trump had overstepped his authority by imposing these duties and subsequently ordered an immediate halt. U.S. trade talks with China are "a bit stalled" and getting a deal over the finish line will likely need the direct involvement of Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday. Spot silver fell 0.8% to $33.07 an ounce, platinum was steady at $1,081.93 and palladium dropped 0.3% to $970.43. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump's Lawyers Claim Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview Caused Him 'Mental Anguish'
Trump's Lawyers Claim Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview Caused Him 'Mental Anguish'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Lawyers Claim Kamala Harris' '60 Minutes' Interview Caused Him 'Mental Anguish'

President Donald Trump has apparently suffered from 'mental anguish' as a result of a CBS News '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris last year, his lawyers alleged in court documents. Trump's attorneys made the claim Wednesday in a motion to deny Paramount Global's request to dismiss Trump's lawsuit, which First Amendment experts have called 'frivolous and dangerous,' against CBS over the editing of the interview. (Paramount Global is the parent company of CBS.) In the October-filed lawsuit obtained by HuffPost, Trump accuses the network of 'partisan and unlawful acts of election and voter interference through malicious, deceptive, and substantial news distortion.' This, according to the suit, was exhibited through two slightly differing clips of Harris discussing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with journalist Bill Whitaker. According to court documents filed Wednesday, Trump's attorneys claim 'this led to widespread confusion and mental anguish of consumers, including plaintiffs, regarding a household name of the legacy media apparently deceptively distorting its broadcasts, and then resisting attempts to clear the public record.' The interview 'forced' Trump to 'redirect significant time, money and effort to correcting the public record,' the document said. The motion also called the president a 'content creator,' whose content creation 'was damaged by the attention diverted to Defendants' distorted programming.' The network maintains that the interview was 'not doctored or deceitful.' 'In reporting the news, journalists regularly edit interviews – for time, space or clarity. In making these edits, 60 Minutes is always guided by the truth and what we believe will be most informative to the viewing public – all while working within the constraints of broadcast television,' CBS said in a February statement. The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the president turned down a $15 million settlement offer, which falls short of his desired compensation: more than $25 million and a CBS News apology. The president has also threatened to file another lawsuit against the company over what he claims is biased reporting, according to the WSJ. Trump has repeatedly gone after '60 Minutes' and has so far unsuccessfully called on CBS to lose its broadcast license on multiple occasions. In one of his countless social media rants in April, he slammed the show after choosing to hate-watch it. 'They are not a 'News Show,' but a dishonest Political Operative simply disguised as 'News,' and must be responsible for what they have done, and are doing,' the president wrote at the time. 'They should lose their license!' At least two top executives, including CBS News CEO Wendy McMahon and '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens, have stepped down as the network seeks to make a deal with Trump. SEC Dismisses Lawsuit Against Binance As Trump Continues To Cozy Up To Crypto Trump Turns Down $15 Million Offer To Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit: Report The Extremely Dumb Excuse That Republicans Are Using To Justify Trump's Corruption The Trump Administration Is Trapping Migrant Kids In Shelters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store