logo
America's Children Are 'Ready To Learn' With PBS KIDS. Will the Trump Administration Listen?

America's Children Are 'Ready To Learn' With PBS KIDS. Will the Trump Administration Listen?

Newsweek16-05-2025

For the past 30 years and with broad bipartisan support in Congress, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) has funded competitive Ready to Learn (RTL) grants, authorized under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. RTL includes all kids in maximizing the benefits of publicly funded children's media, with proven evidence-based educational impact from PBS KIDS shows like Sesame Street, Reading Rainbow, and Clifford the Big Red Dog. On the evening of Friday, May 2, the DOE abruptly terminated the 2020-2025 RTL grants, and a 2026 budget proposal eliminates the program altogether.
I am extremely proud of having served as an advisor for a decade on RTL grants to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds PBS KIDS programming, digital games, and community outreach. RTL provides a safety net for U.S. children who are traditionally underserved educationally. The current federal administration just slashed those nets.
The 1-2-3 Sesame Street float heads down the parade route during The 97th Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade in New York, on Nov. 23, 2023.
The 1-2-3 Sesame Street float heads down the parade route during The 97th Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade in New York, on Nov. 23, 2023.In a statement, Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communication at the DOE, explained the Trump administration's rationale: We "cancelled 'Ready to Learn' grants to PBS that were funding racial justice educational programming for 5-8 year-old children. This is not aligned with Administration priorities. The Trump Department of Education will prioritize funding that supports meaningful learning and improving student outcomes, not divisive ideologies and woke propaganda."
In my capacity as a professor at Northeastern University, I teach an undergraduate course on youth and communication technology, in which students learn about the developmental psychology behind how children learn from media and the impact of technology on their lives.
The semester is over, but if we were still in class, I'd ask students to break down the DOE statement above based on what we've discussed and what they've read during the course.
In class, we study how history (including political, social, and economic factors) shapes the youth media landscape. RTL grants have traditionally been announced every 5 years and reflect federal priorities. In 2020 (during the first Trump administration), the DOE's RTL solicitation included a call for "literacy content [that goes] beyond vocabulary and basic reading skills" and programming exposing children to future career options. RTL-funded PBS KIDS shows like Work it Out Wombats! and Lyla in the Loop have equipped young learners with functional literacy and collaboration skills for a rapidly evolving global economy.
RTL ensures that underserved kids—such as those living in rural areas, young people from low-income households, and students with disabilities—have access to media that meets the highest standards of both education and entertainment. In our class on disabled young people and their media use, we learn how inaccessible digital experiences and disability stereotypes on TV can negatively impact their cognitive and emotional development. Many RTL-funded programs such as Hero Elementary feature and portray children with disabilities in a positive manner, and PBS KIDS digital games incorporate universal design principles that support learners of all abilities.
For our session on culture, race, and ethnicity in children's media, we discuss Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory, which in part explains how children learn better when they can identify with characters on screen, with racial and ethnic identity potentially being one aspect depending on the child. Not all kids get the equal chance, though, to identify with characters in that respect. PBS KIDS series funded by RTL, like Molly of Denali, allow more children to learn in a meaningful and authentic manner.
On our day on educational media, we learn about the origins of Sesame Street, as well as its reception at the time of its debut in 1969. Despite the show being an instant hit, the public TV station in Mississippi refused to air the show because it depicted a racially integrated neighborhood. Letters from parents in Mississippi poured into the station, not wanting their kids to miss out on the Muppets. Maligning RTL programming as "woke propaganda" suggests a desire to turn back the clock on diverse representation.
And over the course of the semester, students in my course put together print guides for parents to help them support their children's learning from high-quality children's media, using PBS KIDS RTL outreach materials for caregivers, teachers, and community groups as models. In selecting a TV show to evaluate, students think critically about the evidence behind media's claims to be "educational." Most content created by random YouTubers and app developers cannot compare. Students frequently end up choosing to focus on RTL-funded shows like Super WHY! because PBS KIDS is the gold standard for promoting "meaningful learning" and "improving student outcomes" that the administration claims it is newly prioritizing.
In short, this decision from the DOE is purely punitive. Considering RTL's robust backing by both Republican and Democrat administrations, the only "divisive ideologies" being put forth seem to be coming from the DOE itself. While it is likely that the RTL termination will be challenged, the impact of dismantling important human and material infrastructure that helps to run RTL is already profound.
American's children stand at the ready to learn, but is the current Trump administration and Department of Education willing to listen to the desires of kids and parents, as well as decades of research?
Meryl Alper is an associate professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Northeastern University. She studies and teaches about the social, cultural, and health implications of media and technology for youth with disabilities. Her most recent book is Kids Across the Spectrums: Growing Up Autistic in the Digital Age (MIT Press, 2023).
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DHS wants National Guard to search for and transport unaccompanied migrant children
DHS wants National Guard to search for and transport unaccompanied migrant children

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DHS wants National Guard to search for and transport unaccompanied migrant children

A Department of Homeland Security request for 21,000 National Guard troops to support "expansive interior immigration enforcement operations" includes a call for troops to search for unaccompanied children in some cases and transport them between states, three sources briefed on the plan tell NBC News. Having National Guard troops perform such tasks, which are not explained in detail in the DHS request, has prompted concern among Democrats in Congress and some military and law enforcement officials. The tasks are laid out in a May 9th Request for Assistance from the Department of Homeland Security to the Pentagon. The document states that, 'this represents the first formal request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for the deployment of National Guard personnel in support of interior immigration enforcement operations.' The request calls for National Guard troops to be used for 'Search and Rescue for UACs [Unaccompanied Alien Children] in remote or hostile terrain,' and 'Intra- and inter-state transport of detainees/ unaccompanied alien children (UACs)," without clearly explaining what that would entail. Most of the troops, about 10,000, would be used for transporting detained individuals, the DHS said. Roughly 2,500 troops would be used for detention support but the document does not specify where. Another 1,000 troops would be assigned to administrative support, such as processing detainees. The request also asks for up to 3,500 troops to 'Attempt to Locate — Fugitives' and to conduct 'surveillance and canvassing missions,' as well as 'night operations and rural interdictions.' It also asks for support for ICE in 'joint task force operations for absconder/fugitive tracking,' according to the three sources familiar with the plans. NPR first reported the details of the DHS request. Democrats in Congress and military and law enforcement officials have expressed concern about the use of National Guard troops to perform what they say are civilian law enforcement duties. One characterized the plan as the Trump administration 'finding a way to get the National Guard into the streets and into American homes,' saying, 'I fear it's going to look like a police state.' A second source said, 'Trump has said he wants to use the National Guard for law enforcement, and the Pentagon and other entities have always said, 'Oh, don't worry, it will never come to that.' But this is it.' Defense officials say the request has not been approved and is being evaluated by Pentagon policy officials, the General Counsel's office, and other Pentagon leadership. The officials say the most likely course of action would be for some parts of the request to be approved and others rejected. But one source briefed on the plans said that Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth is close to approving some elements of the request and considering which state governors to approach first regarding National Guard units. 'We are so much closer to this being real,' said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. DHS is requesting the National Guard troops under Title 32 status, which means they would remain on state active duty under the command of their governor but would be federally funded. Title 32 status generally allows National Guard troops to conduct law enforcement activities without violating the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that bars the use of federal troops in law enforcement operations. A National Guard member who opposes troops performing such tasks told NBC News, 'I plan to leave the National Guard soon over this.' The Pentagon is also being asked by DHS to pay the full cost of deploying the 21,000 National Guard troops. That comes amid growing tension between the Pentagon and DHS over the cost of border and other immigrant-related operations. The DHS request for National Guard troops arrives when the Pentagon is already footing a $23-million-a-month bill to hold as many as 2,500 undocumented immigrants in a military facility in Texas. Defense officials say they are frustrated that the camp is holding far fewer individuals than they were told to expect and they would like a reprieve. The Defense Department is in a contract with the DHS to help support DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, officers who are under pressure from Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller to arrest 3,000 undocumented immigrants a day. But it has been slow going for ICE agents, resulting in fewer arrests of undocumented immigrants across the country. That has resulted in many empty beds at facilities like the one in El Paso, owned and operated by the Defense Department. Military officials say the facility has been holding an average of 150 undocumented immigrants each day over the last several weeks — a fraction of its 2,500 beds. On one recent day, they said, the facility housed fewer than 80 people. Pentagon officials are asking to cut the number of beds in the facility from 2,500 to about 1,000, which they say would save $12 million per month. It is not clear if the DHS request for National Guard troops will increase the need for beds in the El Paso facility. The DHS request also comes as the Pentagon is struggling to fund critical projects to support U.S. troops. 'Congress is aware that the department is redirecting funds from existing military construction projects like barracks improvements for lower enlisted personnel and longstanding infrastructure projects elsewhere in the world in favor of southwest border missions,' a Senate aide who spoke on condition of anonymity told NBC News. 'They are pretty frustrated with the way that the department is ordering them to support DHS out of their own pockets for a grossly disproportionate cost compared to what ICE facilities would cost the government,' added the aide, referring to military officials. Last month, the Pentagon notified Congress that it planned to transfer more than $1.74 million in the current DOD budget to the southwest border mission, as step that will take money away from renovating barracks and base facilities. Service member advocacy groups have criticized the move. Rob Evans, the founder of Hots&Cots, where services members can post reviews of barracks, dining areas and other facilities, says he sees evidence daily of barracks with sewage leaks, mold, failing HVAC systems, and more. 'When funding is pulled from this line, troops pay the price in real ways: delayed repairs, worsening conditions, and a growing sense that their well-being comes second to optics and operations,' Evans said. 'Service members deserve clean, safe, and dignified living conditions. They've earned at least that much.' This article was originally published on

Trump Ready to Ditch His Tesla Car amid Musk Fallout: 'I Might Just Get Rid of It'
Trump Ready to Ditch His Tesla Car amid Musk Fallout: 'I Might Just Get Rid of It'

Business Insider

time37 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Trump Ready to Ditch His Tesla Car amid Musk Fallout: 'I Might Just Get Rid of It'

WASHINGTON — June 7, 2025 President Donald Trump is distancing himself from Elon Musk—publicly and materially. According to The Washington Post, Trump has told aides in recent days that he is considering selling or giving away the red Tesla (TSLA) Model S he purchased in March, a gesture that once symbolized his support for Musk. Confident Investing Starts Here: 'I might just get rid of it,' Trump told aides, according to a senior White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The car, still parked near the White House as of this week, has become a visible casualty of the rapidly souring relationship between Trump and Musk. The split followed Musk's harsh criticism of the administration's latest domestic policy bill, which he publicly called a 'disgusting abomination.' That comment triggered a sharp response from the president, both publicly and privately. On Air Force One, when asked by a reporter about Musk's alleged drug use, Trump replied: 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know what his status is.' 'I read an article in The New York Times. I thought it was, frankly, it sounded very unfair to me.' But privately, Trump has reportedly told associates that Musk is 'crazy' and blamed his behavior on drug use, according to The New York Times. Musk Gave No Public Comment on the Car—But a Hint at Peace? As of Saturday afternoon, Elon Musk has not issued any public statement specifically addressing Trump's decision to unload the Tesla. However, he did respond to a suggestion from investor Bill Ackman on X that the two men should reconcile for the good of the country. 'You're not wrong,' Musk replied—his only recent public comment that could be interpreted as a gesture toward de-escalation. Beyond that, Musk has been active on X in recent days, directing criticisms at others, including Steve Bannon and critics of Tesla, but has avoided commenting directly on Trump's actions regarding the car or federal contracts. Trump Weighs Tesla Breakup The sale—or symbolic disposal—of the Tesla would mark a final, visual severing of a political and personal alliance that once had significant policy weight. Musk had been one of Trump's most prominent business backers, and the March purchase of the Model S was, at the time, framed by aides as a nod of approval to the entrepreneur's role in the administration. Now, according to officials, the car is being referred to inside the West Wing as a political relic. And while no final decision has been made, staff say it's become a quiet but pointed symbol of Trump's intent to distance himself from Musk for good. Trump himself, speaking about Musk during a press gaggle on June 6, said: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Whether the car is sold, donated, or simply removed from view, it now stands as a monument to one of the most dramatic falling-outs in recent political history. Is Tesla Stock Still a Buy? Meanwhile, Wall Street isn't exactly bullish on Musk's flagship automaker. According to TipRanks, Tesla currently holds a 'Hold' rating based on 37 analyst reviews over the past three months. It's a split camp: 16 analysts rate it a Buy, 10 say Hold, and 11 recommend Sell — a clear reflection of the uncertainty swirling around the company. The market seems just as cautious. The average 12-month price target for TSLA is $284.37, suggesting a 3.7% downside from its current level.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store