Rampion 2: Decision on West Sussex wind farm expansion postponed
A decision on plans to expand an offshore wind farm has been pushed back.The decision on the Rampion 2 project was due by Thursday, but the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has pushed back the deadline to 4 April as it wants more information from the applicant in regards to piling restrictions.The project from Rampion Extension Development Limited would see the existing site of 116 turbines off the West Sussex coast expanded by up to 90 turbines. A project spokesperson said the Secretary of State had requested the information by 20 February and that deadline extensions were not uncommon.
When public hearings began on the plans, critics voiced concerns about the wind farm's impact on tourism.But operator RWE Renewables said the expansion of the existing windfarm, which opened in 2018, could generate enough electricity to power the equivalent of more than one million homes.If approved, construction is expected to start in 2027 and be completed by 2030.The expansion could be constructed between 13km (8.1 miles) and 26km (16.2 miles) from the coast.
The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero has been contacted for a comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
5 days ago
- New Statesman
Britain's fiscal doom loop
Labour entered office promising a 'decade of national renewal'. Keir Starmer's premiership, it was said, would be defined by landmark pledges such as building 1.5 million new homes by the end of the parliament and halving violence against women and girls. Yet almost a year on, ambition is colliding with reality. Rachel Reeves' Spending Review, which she will deliver on 11 June, threatens new cuts to unprotected departments including the Home Office, the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. It is not only cabinet ministers such as Angela Rayner who are warning that the government's pledges will prove impossible to meet without greater funding. Mark Rowley, the Metropolitan Police commissioner, has spoken of the 'scar tissue of years of austerity'. Along with the heads of MI5 and the National Crime Agency, he warned that without the 'necessary resources' from the Spending Review, the decision to release more prisoners early could be 'of net detriment to public safety'. Ms Reeves and the Treasury insist that any talk of a return to austerity is unjustified. The Chancellor did – commendably – use her first Budget to loosen the government's fiscal rules for capital spending. An additional £113bn will be invested in infrastructure projects such as a new Manchester-Liverpool rail link. But she remains trapped in her own fiscal straitjacket. First, in an attempt to achieve market confidence, she vowed to eliminate the current budget deficit by the third year of the forecast period rather than the fifth. Second, to maintain voter confidence, she reaffirmed Labour's pledge to freeze income tax, VAT, National Insurance (on employees) and corporation tax for the duration of the parliament. Both sets of policies are now hindering rather than helping the government. As Isabelle Mateos y Lago, chief economist at BNP Paribas bank, has warned, the strictness of Ms Reeves' rules 'damages the UK's credibility because they have to hurt themselves so much to meet them'. The Chancellor's supposed iron discipline has already been undermined by the government's planned U-turn on winter fuel payment cuts and the anticipated abolition of the two-child benefit cap. Rather than announcing other undeliverable cuts, Ms Reeves should adopt a more realistic time scale over which to balance the books. She must also review her approach to taxation. At her first Budget she raised taxes by £41.5bn, including a rise in National Insurance on employers from 13.8 per cent to 15 per cent, and introduced a panoply of wealth taxes: the abolition of non-dom status, VAT on private school fees, higher capital gains tax and increased inheritance tax for agricultural properties. But after a decade of austerity and stagnant economic growth, this was never likely to prove sufficient. Labour cannot fund the renewal of the public realm simply by relying on higher taxes on business and the wealthy. Instead, it must achieve a more resilient tax base of the kind seen in social democratic Europe. Though the overall tax take is at a postwar high, the average tax on labour income in the UK is among the lowest in the developed world (31st out of 38 OECD nations). A British employee on the average salary takes home more of their pay than an average-wage employee in the US, Canada, Japan or anywhere in western Europe. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Ms Reeves has ample grounds for arguing that the facts have changed. Donald Trump's election as US president has necessitated higher UK defence spending and led to renewed global instability, as he imposes the biggest tariffs since the 1930s. As the Strategic Defence Review made clear, the UK will need to go much further. The Defence Secretary, John Healey, declared in an interview with the Times that there was 'no doubt' Britain would spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence 'in the next parliament'. Yet in a symptom of the UK's fiscal bind, he was later forced to downgrade this pledge to an 'ambition' – an equivocation that will dismay allies and cheer adversaries. Labour's fiscal approach leaves it lacking the confidence of both the markets and the public (it now trails Nigel Farage's Reform UK by eight points). Mr Starmer's landslide victory a year ago reflected a profound desire for change among voters. If he and his Chancellor appear incapable of providing it, the electorate will look elsewhere. [See also: Dickens's Britain is still with us] Related
Scottish Sun
6 days ago
- Scottish Sun
Major fuel change for petrol, diesel and electric drivers kicks in – are YOU impacted?
New mileage rates take effect across UK, affecting petrol, diesel and electric drivers PUMP IT UP Major fuel change for petrol, diesel and electric drivers kicks in – are YOU impacted? A NEW fuel rate update from HMRC has come into effect today – and while it may help some companies cut costs, it could mean less money back in drivers' pockets for business mileage. The updated Advisory Fuel Rates (AFRs) apply across the UK and affect those using company cars, including employees who claim back mileage for work journeys or reimburse their employer for personal use. 2 In this latest update, reimbursement rates for many petrol and diesel vehicles have been reduced AFRs are reviewed and set quarterly by HM Revenue and Customs to reflect average fuel prices and typical consumption levels. They're intended to keep reimbursements fair and in line with tax regulations If employers pay no more than the official rate, there's no taxable benefit for the employee. However, anything above the AFR is treated as income and may be taxed. In this latest update, reimbursement rates for many petrol and diesel vehicles have been reduced. Petrol car drivers with engines between 1.4 litres and 2 litres will now receive 14p per mile, down from 15p. For petrol engines over 2 litres, the rate drops from 23p to 22p per mile. Diesel drivers with engines up to 1.6 litres will now receive 11p per mile instead of 12p. Other diesel rates remain unchanged. While these reductions may seem minor, they can have a noticeable impact over time. For example, a driver covering 10,000 business miles a year in a petrol car that now qualifies for 14p per mile will be reimbursed £100 less than under the previous rate. In that sense, the new rates may feel more like a cut in income than a cost saving. Electric car drivers won't see any change this time around. The reimbursement rate for electric vehicles remains at 7p per mile, which reflects their generally lower running costs. Though the rate may appear low compared to petrol and diesel, it aligns with current energy price trends and may encourage more businesses to consider switching to electric fleets as a long-term cost-saving strategy. These rates are based on data from the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, the Office for National Statistics, and the Department for Transport. The aim is to ensure that reimbursement remains fair and realistic, keeping both businesses and employees from being left out of pocket or facing unexpected tax consequences. The RAC has reminded drivers and employers that staying aligned with AFRs is essential not just for fairness but for staying compliant with tax regulations. With the potential for even small changes to add up significantly over time, especially for high-mileage drivers, it's crucial to use the correct rates. HMRC will review these rates again in September, taking into account future shifts in fuel prices and electricity costs. Until then, businesses and drivers are being encouraged to double-check their current mileage claims and reimbursement practices to avoid financial shortfalls or tax issues. Advisory fuel rates from June 1, 2025 For petrol vehicles, those with engines up to 1.4 litres can now claim 12p per mile. Vehicles with engine sizes between 1.401 and 1.6 litres, as well as those between 1.601 and 2 litres, are both eligible for 14p per mile. For larger petrol engines over 2 litres, the rate is set at 22p per mile. When it comes to diesel vehicles, drivers with engines up to 1.6 litres can now claim 11p per mile. Those driving diesel cars between 1.601 and 2 litres will receive 13p per mile, while vehicles with engines over 2 litres are now reimbursed at 17p per mile. These rates apply from 1 June 2025 and are intended to cover fuel costs only, not wear and tear or other expenses.
Scottish Sun
29-05-2025
- Scottish Sun
Big change to heat pump rules from TODAY – and it could benefit millions
Scroll down to find out the pros and cons of heat pumps ALL CHANGE Big change to heat pump rules from TODAY – and it could benefit millions Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR change to heat pump rules has taken effect today - and it could help millions save money on their energy bills. Households no longer have to ensure the devices are installed one metre or more away from a neighbour's property. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 A heat pump rule has taken effect today Credit: Alamy The rule was brought in so less noise produced by heat pumps leaked into nearby areas. However, it has been scrapped by the government as ministers look to encourage more take up of the environmentally friendly gadgets. The change comes as part of the government's Warm Homes Plan which aims to save households hundreds of pounds on their energy bills. A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: "The energy shocks of recent years have shown the urgent need to upgrade British homes and our Warm Homes Plan will make them cheaper and cleaner to run, rolling out upgrades from new insulation to solar and heat pumps. 'We are helping more people get a heat pump as they are three times more efficient than gas boilers, enabling families to save around £100 a year by using a smart tariff." Heat pumps work by taking heat from the air, ground or water and transferring it inside a property. They can also transfer cooler air in the summer. They can save you money on your energy bills and are better for the environment as they are powered by electricity not gas. However, take up of the potentially money-saving devices has been lower than expected. The government has set a target of 600,000 being fitted each year by 2028. How to cut energy costs and get help with FOUR key household bills But The National Audit Office (NAO) reported last year the number of installations by December 2023 was less than half planned by ministers. What are the advantages of heat pumps? The main advantage to heat pumps is that they are typically more energy-efficient than old-style gas boilers. The Energy Saving Trust says someone with an air source heat pump in a three-bedroom semi-detached house could save £240 a year on their energy bills compared to an old gas boiler. The savings can be worth hundreds of pounds more if you're switching over from an old electric storage heater. Because heat pumps use renewable energy like air, water or ground heat, they are better for the environment too. They can also provide both heating and cooling around your home, making them more versatile than gas heating systems. What are the disadvantages of heat pumps? The major disadvantage to heat pumps is the expensive up front cost. The amount you pay depends on the type of model you have installed but air source types can cost between £6,500 and £11,500. Households can get grants worth £7,500 to help towards the cost of having a heat pump installed through the Boiler Upgrade Scheme. This used to be £5,000 but was increased by the previous government, with a ban on gas boilers by 2035 also postponed. However, it means households do sometimes have to stump up thousands of pounds of their own cash to get one. Some heat pumps can be noisy as well, with air source models generally the noisiest of all three. Depending on which type you get, you might have to install it outside as well. What energy bill help is available? There's a number of different ways to get help paying your energy bills if you're struggling to get by. If you fall into debt, you can always approach your supplier to see if they can put you on a repayment plan before putting you on a prepayment meter. This involves paying off what you owe in instalments over a set period. If your supplier offers you a repayment plan you don't think you can afford, speak to them again to see if you can negotiate a better deal. Several energy firms have schemes available to customers struggling to cover their bills. But eligibility criteria vary depending on the supplier and the amount you can get depends on your financial circumstances. For example, British Gas or Scottish Gas customers struggling to pay their energy bills can get grants worth up to £2,000. British Gas also offers help via its British Gas Energy Trust and Individuals Family Fund. You don't need to be a British Gas customer to apply for the second fund. EDF, Octopus Energy and Scottish Power all offer grants to struggling customers too. Thousands of vulnerable households are missing out on extra help and protections by not signing up to the Priority Services Register (PSR). The service helps support vulnerable households, such as those who are elderly or ill. Some of the perks include being given advance warning of blackouts, free gas safety checks and extra support if you're struggling. Get in touch with your energy firm to see if you can apply. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
