logo
After weeks of silence, Erin Patterson begins to tell her side of the story to deadly mushroom lunch trial

After weeks of silence, Erin Patterson begins to tell her side of the story to deadly mushroom lunch trial

The Guardian2 days ago

Erin Patterson had been in the witness box for 142 minutes, a window to her right showing the rain falling outside in regional Victoria, when her barrister Colin Mandy SC said: 'I'm going to ask you some questions now about mushrooms'.
Patterson had already spoken to the court about her children and her family, her hefty inheritances, her relationship with her estranged husband, Simon, and their slow and gradual decoupling, in her evidence on Monday afternoon and Tuesday morning.
But this was the closest the triple-murder accused had come to being asked directly about the fateful lunch of beef wellingtons in July 2023.
From the first days of her trial, it had become clear the key issue was whether Patterson meant to put death cap mushrooms in the lunch she served to her husband's relatives (including her parents-in-law), and whether she meant to kill or cause serious harm to them.
Now Patterson was being asked about whether she liked to eat mushrooms more generally, and whether she had ever picked, eaten and cooked wild varieties of the popular ingredient.
Yes, she told the court, to all of the above. Once, she revealed, she had found some growing outside at the property she lived at in Korumburra before moving to the house, in the nearby town Leongatha, where the fateful lunch took place.
She said she had fried up what she was confident were field and horse mushrooms with butter, ate them, and, when she discovered they were safe, used them in other meals.
That included in food fed to her two children, Patterson told the court.
Erin Patterson hosts lunch for estranged husband Simon's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt and uncle Heather and Ian Wilkinson. Patterson serves beef wellington.
All four lunch guests are admitted to hospital with gastro-like symptoms.
Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson die in hospital.
Don Patterson dies in hospital. Victoria police search Erin Patterson's home and interview her.
Ian Wilkinson is discharged from hospital after weeks in intensive care.
Police again search Erin Patterson's home, and she is arrested and interviewed. She is charged with three counts of murder relating to the deaths of Don and Gail Patterson and Heather Wilkinson, and the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson.
Jury is sworn in.
Murder trial begins. Jury hears that charges of attempting to murder her estranged husband Simon are dropped.
Mandy's focus narrowed when he asked where the mushrooms in the beef wellington meal had come from.
'The vast majority came from the local Woolworths in Leongatha. There were some from the grocer in Melbourne,' she replied.
She accepted, however, that the meal had contained death cap mushrooms.
'Do you accept there must have been death cap mushrooms in there?' Mandy asked Patterson.
'Yes, I do,' she replied.
Throughout her answers, Patterson sat in an office chair faced towards Mandy, with Justice Christopher Beale to her left and the jury directly in front of her.
The court room was filled with almost a dozen members of the Patterson and Wilkinson families, homicide squad detectives including the officer in charge of the investigation, Stephen Eppingstall, and about 20 members of the public.
Behind those public seats was the now-empty dock where, until this week, Patterson had sat quietly observing former friends, family and experts testifying in her trial.
Earlier, Mandy had taken his client to expletive-laden messages she had sent in a Facebook group chat in December 2022 expressing frustrations about her in-laws – Don and Gail Patterson, who are now deceased – about a dispute with her estranged husband, Simon.
In the messages, previously shown to the jury, the Facebook user 'Erin ErinErin' wrote she was 'sick of this shit' and 'fuck em' about Don and Gail.
'Why did you write that?' Mandy asked.
Patterson released a slow exhale and sniffed before she answered.
'I needed to vent,' Patterson told the jury.
'The choice was either go into the paddock and tell the sheep or vent to these women.'
The group chat – which Patterson said had been running for four years by late 2022 – was a space to discuss food the women were cooking, as well as their children's lives and current affairs.
Asked if she meant the words, Patterson replied 'no' as she dabbed her eyes repeatedly with a tissue.
Of the message she sent which said 'this family I swear to fucking god', a visibly emotional Patterson said she wished she had never said it.
'I feel ashamed for saying it, and I wish the family didn't have to hear that I said that.
'They didn't deserve it.'
For five weeks, Patterson's voice in her triple murder trial has been confined to conversations recalled by other witnesses, pages of online messages and texts, and a 21-minute formal police interview played to the jury.
Dressed in a navy blue shirt with white polka dots, her reading glasses within easy reach to her right, Patterson started to tell her side of the story.
The jury who will decide her fate watched and listened.
Her evidence will continue on Wednesday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Erin Patterson makes new claims about fatal beef Wellington lunch - as she accuses the lone survivor of lying
Erin Patterson makes new claims about fatal beef Wellington lunch - as she accuses the lone survivor of lying

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Erin Patterson makes new claims about fatal beef Wellington lunch - as she accuses the lone survivor of lying

Accused killer Erin Patterson has refuted claims she told her lunch guests at an ill-fated lunch that she had been diagnosed with cancer. Entering the witness box for a second day on Thursday, Patterson further claimed she had never asked her guests over on the pretext of discussing with them a medical issue. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty to the murders of Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson. They died after consuming death cap mushrooms served in beef Wellingtons during lunch at her Leongatha home on July 29, 2023. In opening the trial in the Supreme Court of Victoria, sitting in the Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court in Victoria's east, Patterson's barrister Colin Mandy, SC told the jury on day one there was no dispute with the prosecution about how and why the guests came be at the lunch. 'It is not in dispute that Erin Patterson invited the guests over for lunch to her house in Leongatha. It is not in dispute that she invited her husband, Simon, over as well because she said she wanted to discuss a health issue that she was concerned about,' he said then. 'That is not in issue. The fact that she's never been diagnosed with cancer is not in issue.' But on Thursday, Patterson told the court she had never mentioned anything to her in-laws about a medical issue to entice them to accept her lunch invite. The jury heard previously evidence from child protection worker Katrina Cripps who claimed on August 1, 2023 at the Monash Medical Centre Patterson told her she had invited her guests over to discuss a medical issue. 'I wouldn't have put it like that because that wasn't the reason I invited people,' Patterson told prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers under cross examination. 'Ms Cripps is wrong, is she?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Yes,' Patterson responded. 'You deny that?' Dr Rogers continued. 'I didn't say that to her. I told her I had invited Don and Gail and Ian and Heather to lunch and I did confirm we had discussed some medical issues, but I did not tell her that was the reason for the lunch or the reason for the invitation, because it was not,' Patterson said. The jury had heard evidence in the opening days of the trial from Pastor Ian Wilkinson, who was the only person to survive the deadly lunch. Mr Wilkinson claimed Patterson told lunch guests she had undertaken a diagnostic test that showed a spot on the scan that was a tumour. 'I remember him saying that in his evidence, but I don't believe I said that,' Patterson said. 'Might you have said it?' Dr Rogers asked. 'I don't think so, no,' Patterson said. Slowly dying at Korumburra Hospital after the lunch, the court heard Don Patterson also claimed Patterson mentioned she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The court heard Don had told Simon: 'Mum doesn't want me to tell you this. It's about what Erin talked to us about at the lunch.' 'Donald asked if Simon thought he should tell him and Simon said 'yes'. Donald then said, 'Erin told us that she had tests for a medical term relating to something on her elbow 'and that they'd found ovarian cancer. She will probably need chemo and some surgery and she wasn't sure how to tell the kids',' Dr Rogers said at the trial's opening. Patterson told the jury she denied telling her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer. 'I don't think I put it that precisely, no,' she said. 'Well, how did you put it?' Dr Rogers asked. 'I don't remember saying I'd had a diagnosis,' she responded. In what became nothing short of a heated exchange, Dr Rogers bombarded Patterson with questions suggesting she told repeated lies about the deadly lunch. 'You told this lie, I suggest, as part of your efforts to get the lunch guests, and Simon, to attend your lunch; correct or incorrect?' Dr Rogers asked. 'Incorrect,' came the response. 'I suggest that you never thought you would have to account for this lie about having cancer because you thought that the lunch guests would die?' Dr Rogers said. 'That's not true.' 'And your lie would never be found out; correct or incorrect?' 'That's not true,' Patterson insisted. The trial before Justice Christoper Beale continues. . I

Australia v Japan: World Cup 2026 qualifying
Australia v Japan: World Cup 2026 qualifying

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Australia v Japan: World Cup 2026 qualifying

Update: Date: 2025-06-05T10:09:54.000Z Title: Content: The Socceroos have not beaten Japan for 16 years. Coach Tony Popovic insists that can change tonight. Every game is significant for the Socceroos. But, obviously, these last two games, for automatic qualification, we know what we need to do; we need to put that into action, and we're confident we can do that. Update: Date: 2025-06-05T10:06:05.000Z Title: Joey Lynch Content: My colleague is on the ground at Optus Stadium to bring you the match report later. #AUSvJPN Update: Date: 2025-06-05T10:04:42.000Z Title: Jack Snape Content: On to those pesky permutations. Here is where things stand: The general gist is the Socceroos can all but secure their place with a win tonight; a draw or loss make things a bit more complicated. has broken everything down in more detail here: Even if they win tonight, we won't know whether Australia have qualified automatically for absolute 100% fully certain sureness until after the Saudi Arabia v Bahrain match kicking off at Friday 2am AEST. Update: Date: 2025-06-05T10:00:45.000Z Title: Preamble Content: G'day and welcome to the Guardian's live coverage of the World Cup 2026 qualifier between Australia and Japan in Perth. My name is Jo Khan and I'm here to take you through the pre-game news, live football and some post-match analysis. At the moment my brain hurts from thinking about the Group C permutations and what it means for Australia but one thing is locked in – the Samurai Blue have already booked their spot at the North America tournament. However, it is most definitely a crunch match for Australia, can they lock in an automatic qualification? Looking back to the Socceroos most recent outing in this Asian qualifying campaign, it was goals from Jackson Irvine and Nishan Velupillay that gave Australia a crucial 2-0 win in China in late March. This solidified their spot just below Japan in the Group C table – I'll get to those details shortly. To the task at hand now, if you have any comments or questions feel free to send me an email. Kick-off is in just over an hour: 7.10pm local / 9.10pm AEST / 8.10pm JST Let's get into it!

Swedish court convicts one man of IS membership, acquits three
Swedish court convicts one man of IS membership, acquits three

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Swedish court convicts one man of IS membership, acquits three

STOCKHOLM, June 5 (Reuters) - A Swedish appeals court on Thursday found one man guilty of being a member of a terrorism organisation for swearing loyalty to the Islamic State, upholding the verdict of a lower court, while the conviction of three others were overturned. Sweden's security services arrested the men last year and prosecutors later charged them with being members of a terrorism organisation between September 2023 and March 2024. But the Svea Appeals Court said in a statement on Thursday it does not consider it proven that the three now acquitted acted on behalf of the Islamic State militant group. "However, the person who swore an oath of allegiance to IS is also convicted in the Court of Appeal," it said. All four men had pleaded not guilty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store