Iran Confirms Inmates Killed in Israel's Evin Prison Attack Last Week
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
An Israeli strike on Tehran's Evin Prison on Monday killed 71 people, including inmates, staff and visiting family members, Iran's judiciary spokesperson Asghar Jahangir said on Sunday.
Newsweek has reached out to the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) via email for comment on Sunday.
Why It Matters
In mid-June, Israel initially struck Tehran and several other cities in "Operation Rising Lion," a campaign it said was meant to preempt a planned Iranian attack and disrupt Iran's nuclear capabilities, which have long been a concern of Israel and the U.S.
Iran, which has said its nuclear program is for energy purposes and not nuclear weapons, retaliated. Israeli defense systems—bolstered by U.S. military technology—intercepted nearly all incoming missile fire, according to Israeli officials, although Iran did strike a hospital southern Israel last week. More than 600 Iranians were reported killed by Israeli strikes, and 28 Israelis killed by Iranian strikes, with thousands wounded it both countries.
Israel and Iran entered a fragile ceasefire on June 24, the day after Israel struck Evin Prison.
Last weekend, the U.S. joined Israel in its war against Iran by bombing three nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, in the largest B-2 bomber operation in U.S. history.
What To Know
On Sunday, Jahangir wrote in Mizan, the Iranian judiciary's outlet, that 71 people were killed in the Israeli strike on Iran's notorious Evin Prison. The update was republished on the official state news outlet, IRNA.
The English version of the Mizan article states that, "Prison administrative staff, conscript soldiers, convicted prisoners, families of prisoners who had visited for meetings or judicial follow-ups, and neighbors living near the prison," were killed. It noted that people had come to the prison that day for various follow-ups on legal proceedings.
The outlet confirmed that Judge Ali Ghanaatkar, who served as deputy prosecutor of Tehran and the detention center's top prosecutor, was killed in the strikes. It did not identify the others killed.
Mizan also reported that foreign journalists from several outlets, including Associated Press and Reuters, participated in a tour of the area.
On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of people filled the streets of Iran's capital for a state funeral honoring about 60 Iranians killed in Israeli strikes over the past few weeks, including top military commanders and nuclear scientists.
The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday.
The office building at the Evin prison sits damaged in Tehran, Iran, on June 29 after an Israeli strike on Monday.
AP Photo/Vahid Salemi
What Is Evin Prison?
Evin Prison holds many of the country's political detainees in Iran, housing dissidents, journalists, protesters, and foreign nationals accused of espionage. The prison is one of the apparatuses of the Iranian regime's domestic security apparatus.
Human rights organizations have long documented abuse, torture and arbitrary detention inside Evin Prison. Notable former detainees include Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, and Jason Rezaian, a Washington Post journalist who was held there for 544 days on espionage charges while serving as the paper's Tehran bureau chief a decade ago.
What People Are Saying
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar posted alleged footage of the bombing after the attack, writing on X, formerly Twitter: "We warned Iran time and again: stop targeting civilians! They continued, including this morning. Our response: Viva la libertad, c*****!"
Narges Mohammadi, a human rights activist and a Nobel Peace Laureate, said in a June 28 X post: "Israel's attack on Evin Prison, carried out in broad daylight in the presence of families and visitors, is undoubtedly a clear example of a war crime...Many families of the detained are unaware of the status or whereabouts of their loved ones. Prisoners from the general wards of Evin Prison have been transferred to prisons around Tehran and are being held in harsh, inhumane, and grueling conditions. Furthermore, no official information has been released regarding the status of prisoners previously held in security wards or solitary confinement."
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian wrote in a Persian in an X post on Saturday: "From the bottom of my heart, I thank you dear people; With love, you bid farewell to the martyrs of our homeland, and our voice of unity reached the ears of the world. We have learned from Husayn ibn Ali (peace be upon him) not to submit to humiliation and not to bow our heads before oppression. Serving such a noble nation is the honor of my life. Forever Iran"
What Happens Next
The ceasefire between Israel and Iran remains fragile. Trump said the U.S. and Iran are due to hold new talks about the country's nuclear capabilities.
"We're going to talk to them next week, with Iran," Trump said at the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. "We may sign an agreement. I don't know."
On Saturday, Araghchi posted on X, "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's bombs won't solve the nuclear proliferation problem
By bombing Iran's nuclear facilities, did President Trump just demonstrate a promising new approach to international arms control? Some conservatives seem to think so. They are wrong. National security strategist Matthew Kroenig suggested in The Washington Post last week that bombing other countries' nuclear facilities is a good way to keep them from joining the world's exclusive Armageddon Club. 'Leaders around the world must now consider that an attempt to start an illegal nuclear weapons program could very well result in a devastating confrontation with the Pentagon,' he argued. 'In fact, the United States could capitalize on this moment and declare a new foreign policy doctrine of counter-proliferation through military force. … This brutal reality will not only make any future leader think twice about going nuclear, but will strengthen global nonproliferation efforts and perhaps, paradoxically, make the world a safer place.' Dream on. In the first place, early damage reports indicate that dropping 14 of the world's biggest non-nuclear bombs with pinpoint accuracy did not destroy Iran's underground uranium enrichment facility. The Pentagon acknowledges the challenges of destroying military assets located deep underground. One of its most sensitive installations is located inside a Colorado mountain, where officials say it can be destroyed only by a nuclear missile. So, as impressive as it was, the mission may not turn out to be a 'devastating confrontation' with American power. Second, violence begets violence. The U.S. cannot expect to violate foreign airspace and bomb sovereign nations without retaliation. The Iran mission immediately led to an attack on a U.S. military base and speculation that it might activate sleeper cells for terrorist acts in America. Kroenig's 'bomb 'em' strategy would invite more violence, not less. As Hebert Lin, a national security scholar at Stanford University, put it: 'Going forward, no one knows what Iran will do next or when they will do it, but it's hard to imagine that U.S. citizens around the world are safer today than they were a week ago.' Third, the Iran mission depended on the element of surprise. But if bunker-busting bombs become America's preferred response to nuclear arms proliferation, countries with nuclear programs will prepare defenses. It's possible that the Iranians anticipated the June 21 attack and simply moved their equipment elsewhere. Lin cautions that 'any long-term solution will not lie in a military-only approach.' The next step should not be bigger and better bunker-busters. Rather, we should reopen global negotiations on complete worldwide nuclear disarmament with open inspections and severe sanctions against any nation that attempts to build or hide a nuclear arsenal. So long as some nations have nuclear weapons, it's unrealistic to expect that more won't try to acquire them. According to the Institute for Science and International Security, 30 countries have tried to acquire nuclear weapons, including Iraq and Libya. South Africa succeeded but dismantled them. Experts speculate that South Korea, Taiwan and Algeria may attempt to develop them due to security concerns. Ukraine was equipped with nuclear weapons under the Soviet Union. It returned them to Russia in 1994 after gaining independence and obtaining a security agreement from the U.S., United Kingdom, and Russia. It may regret giving the weapons back, now that Vladimir Putin has violated that agreement. Next month, we will mark the 80th anniversary of the Trinity test, the first nuclear-weapon detonation. We have lived under the shadow of Armageddon ever since. Now, the danger of proliferation is growing. The New START agreement is the only remaining arms control treaty between the two nuclear superpowers, Russia and the U.S. It is due to expire next February. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 'There are no signs of negotiations to renew or replace it.' Instead, the world is moving in the opposite direction. Last year, nearly all nine countries with nuclear arms upgraded and modernized their arsenals. The institute expects the U.S., Russia and China to deploy more nukes in the years ahead. Expert Hans Kristensen warns, 'We see a clear trend of growing nuclear arsenals, sharpened nuclear rhetoric and the abandonment of arms control agreements.' The institute also warns that artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities, space assets and new missile defenses are 'radically redefining nuclear capabilities, deterrence, and defense' and creating new instability. Trump is also a source of instability. Former President Obama reached an agreement with Russia on New START in 2010; seven years later, Trump called it 'one of several bad deals negotiated by the Obama administration.' In Trump's view, another bad deal was the agreement the Obama administration and the European Union reached with Iran in 2015 to curtail its nuclear arms program. Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018, then tried to negotiate something similar with Iran this year — before bombing Iran. The world's failure to abolish nuclear weapons, like its failure to stop climate change, is symptomatic of an unacceptable human extinction paradigm. Mutual assured destruction is not a defense strategy; it's a suicide pact. The psychological damage of these swords of Damocles has been profound, especially among children and adolescents. It is in every nation's interest, and every person's, to achieve verifiable and enforceable nuclear disarmament. From time to time, Trump laments that he hasn't received the Nobel Peace Prize like Barack Obama did. He won't get one by bombing other countries to maintain America's nuclear superiority. William S. Becker is co-editor of and a contributor to 'Democracy Unchained: How to Rebuild Government for the People,' and contributor to 'Democracy in a Hotter Time,' named by the journal Nature as one of 2023's five best science books. He previously served as a senior official in the Wisconsin Department of Justice. He is currently executive director of the Presidential Climate Action Project, a nonpartisan climate policy think tank unaffiliated with the White House.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Russia Predicts Why NATO Will Collapse
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia's foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, has predicted that the dramatic increase in NATO defense spending agreed last week will lead to its collapse. Responding to the statement on Thursday from Poland's foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, that an arms race between Russia and the West could result in the fall of Vladimir Putin, Lavrov said: "He can probably see—since he is such a wise sage—that the disastrous increase in spending of NATO countries will also lead to the collapse of this organization." "Meanwhile, Russia—as President [Vladimir Putin] said the other day in Minsk after the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council meeting—plans to reduce its military spending and be guided by common sense, rather than imaginary threats, as NATO member states do, including Sikorski," he said, according to Russia's state TASS news agency. In an interview with the AFP news agency last week, Sikorski said: "Putin should understand that he is on the path of (Soviet leader Leonid) Brezhnev. He himself once said that the Soviet Union collapsed because it spent too much on armament, and now he is doing exactly the same thing." This is a developing news story—more to follow.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Iran Bans Elon Musk's Starlink and Threatens Users With Flogging or Jail
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iran's parliament has voted to ban Elon Musk's Starlink satellite internet service, marking a sharp escalation in its crackdown on outside influence after U.S. and Israeli strikes. Users of the SpaceX-operated satellite service now face penalties of fines, flogging, or up to two years in prison if they are caught, according to state media. The law, which also toughens espionage rules, targets foreign-backed dissent. Though pending final approval, it reflects Tehran's growing alarm over Starlink's role as a digital lifeline during internet blackouts and a potent symbol in its information war with the West. Newsweek has reached out to Elon Musk via X for comment. Why It Matters The Starlink ban underscores how private tech firms such as Starlink have become entangled in global conflict. Coming after U.S. and Israeli strikes, the move highlights how satellite internet is now a tool of modern warfare—and a threat in the eyes of governments like Iran's. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition, March 9, 2020, in Washington. Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk speaks at the SATELLITE Conference and Exhibition, March 9, 2020, in Washington. Susan Walsh/AP Photo What to Know Iran's new legislation expands state powers over digital and foreign-linked activities. In addition to criminalizing Starlink, the law introduces sweeping penalties for espionage and cooperation with foreign adversaries. It defines "operational cooperation" with countries like the U.S. and Israel as "corruption on earth"—a capital offense under Iranian law. This includes actions such as cyberattacks, use of drones or sabotage tools, and accepting funds from foreign intelligence, even without taking action. Starlink in Iran On June 14—just one day after Israeli airstrikes first targeted Iran—Elon Musk posted a four-word message on X: "The beams are on." The post confirmed the activation of Starlink's satellite internet service over Iran amid a sweeping government-imposed internet blackout. Tehran's shutdown came as part of its crackdown following escalating regional conflict, severing much of the country's digital communication with the outside world. Musk's move instantly provided a high-speed, uncensorable connection, offering Iranians a potential lifeline to bypass state censorship and maintain contact during a period of intense unrest. The beams are on — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 14, 2025 Though exact numbers remain unclear, images circulated online throughout 2024 showed Starlink dishes installed on rooftops across Iran, often in direct defiance of strict local laws. According to Iranian tech outlet Zoomit, equipment costs range from IRR400 million ($673) to IRR2 billion ($3,367), with monthly fees around $40—making the service unaffordable for most Iranians. Amid heavy government censorship and widespread internet blackouts, many Iranians rely on VPNs and other tools to bypass restrictions and access the outside world. Starlink has emerged as one of the few reliable options during these shutdowns, offering a critical lifeline for protesters and dissidents. Espionage Arrests In the past few weeks, Iran has detained over 700 people accused of spying for Israel and the U.S., with state media reporting at least six executions, including three Kurds accused of aiding Mossad, Israel's foreign intelligence agency. Security forces dismantled multiple drone-surveillance cells, arresting 53 people for filming sensitive sites and allegedly sharing footage with foreign outlets. Human rights groups have condemned the arrests and executions as politically motivated and a severe violation of due process. An Iranian VPN service appears on a cell phone screen, Feb.20, 2024, Tehran, Iran. An Iranian VPN service appears on a cell phone screen, Feb.20, 2024, Tehran, Iran. AP Photo What People Are Saying ISNA News Agency: "Under the law, violations could be punished with fines, flogging, or up to two years in prison." Elon Musk: "The beams are on" What Happens Next Iran's Guardian Council is expected to approve the Starlink ban within days. Authorities may begin enforcement shortly thereafter, targeting users, distributors, and any entities suspected of collaborating with perceived hostile states.
