
Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone: Inside the mind of a serial winner
Sydney McLaughlin-Levrone is discussing what the night before a race at the Olympic Games is like.
'It's very broken-up sleep,' she says, smiling. 'For very big races, it's almost like (my body) is a race car revving up. It's just ready. Ready to get to it.'
And when McLaughlin-Levrone gets to it, that tends to be devastating news for her opponents. Still only 25, she has won four Olympic golds: two over 400m hurdles in Paris and Tokyo and two more in the 4x400m relay.
Advertisement
But track has not always been this straightforward for her. Over an absorbing half-hour on a video call with The Athletic, she provides a window into the mind of one of the planet's outstanding modern athletes. She explains how faith helped her overcome the anxiety that previously left her 'throwing up' before major races, as well as her fears that her value was wrapped up solely in winning and losing races.
Three years out from a home Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028, she has emerged as the most dominant U.S. female track athlete. Among the men's and women's track medallists who won gold for the United States in Paris, only Sha'Carri Richardson has more than her 1.5m followers on Instagram. McLaughlin-Levrone has won 12 consecutive 400m hurdles finals in the past six years — she was last defeated at the World Championships in 2019.
In that time, she has also broken the world record in the 400m hurdles six times. Between 1984 and 2019, the world record in the event was lowered by 1.42 seconds. But between the summers of 2021 and 2024, McLaughlin-Levrone trimmed 1.79 seconds off it — all by herself. By winning the 400m hurdles in Paris last summer, she became the first American to retain an Olympic gold in an individual track event since Michael Johnson's consecutive golds in the 400m in 1996 and 2000.
There is competition, most notably from her compatriot Anna Cockrell and the Dutch racer Femke Bol. But in Paris, McLaughlin-Levrone obliterated the field. Bol took bronze, and she was two seconds behind.
Is motivation a challenge? Does it ever feel like she is racing against herself?
'There's always something I can be doing better,' McLaughlin-Levrone says. 'There's always someone striving to be where you are. There's days where I'm more motivated than others. It's easy to get stuck in a rut or it can become monotonous, but I get to do what I love every day and I get to quite literally race a clock.
Advertisement
'It's fun to figure out how I can become the best athlete I can be and keep lowering my times. There's always the reality of competition that's going to push me. But when I am at practice, it is figuring out how I can be better than Sydney was yesterday.'
But how much 'better' can Sydney be? When she qualified to represent the United States in Rio de Janeiro in 2016 as a 16-year-old high-school student, she was the youngest to make the team in 36 years. Might she break Carl Lewis's U.S. record of nine American Olympic golds? Could she break the 50-second barrier for the 400m hurdles, having set a time of 50.37 seconds in Paris? Might she switch up events in 2028, having solely competed in the 400m hurdles and 4x400m relay in Paris?
At the NYC Grand Prix in 2024, she won the 400m flat in 48.75 seconds, which would have secured a bronze medal in Paris. Over the 200m flat in Los Angeles last year — her first time competing over the distance since 2018 — she ran a time of 22.07, which would have earned her silver in Paris. All of which makes one wonder what might be possible if she committed to different events in 2028.
This weekend, racing in Michael Johnson's Grand Slam Track in Philadelphia, McLaughlin-Levrone will run her first 100m flat in a professional setting, and will also contest the 100m hurdles.
She was one of the first to sign up to Grand Slam Track. While attendance was underwhelming at the first meet in Kingston, Jamaica, and McLaughlin-Levrone says there are 'wrinkles' to iron out, she insists GST 'is something that can grow.'
'All the athletes I've talked to have really enjoyed it,' she adds.
The event, in which racers compete in two disciplines at each meet, enables her to dabble in different events. And she says she is open to running on the flat in 2028.
Advertisement
'I'm starting to kind of like this sprinting thing,' she says, with a glint in her eye. She likes the buzz of feeling uncomfortable. She says it is 'humbling', describing the short sprints as akin to 'entering a lion's den.'
'It's a completely different energy system. It's so ballistic; shooting out of the blocks, toe dragging. To create this force in a linear line down the track is so different than the grace that the 400m gives if you don't have the best block start. That doesn't exist in the 100m.
'It's definitely been a shift these past few weeks, but it's been great to work on sprint mechanics, block start and hurdle technique, because those are all things — even though they aren't as important in longer races — which can still be of benefit down the line.'
She has been studying videos of short sprinters, tapping up Trayvon Bromell, the U.S. sprinter who has twice won world bronze, for advice. Bromell is a friend of her husband, the former NFL wide receiver Andre Levrone Jr.
'He was giving me a few pointers of how to set up in the blocks,' she says. 'I've watched a lot his starts, specifically, just trying to understand some of the shin angles. It is fascinating getting to learn something that I didn't know before.'
McLaughlin-Levrone's track journey began in Dunellen, New Jersey. Both of her parents were strong runners and her dad Willie, her coach growing up, made it to the semi-finals of the 1984 U.S. Olympic trials in the 400m.
'My dad took me and my three siblings and we were our own little track team,' she says. 'There was no pressure. That is how we were introduced into the sport.
'I didn't do any club. We didn't really even train. My dad gave us some drills for our arm swing, our high knees, agility drills and then it was just, 'Go run'. He wanted us to be kids. He didn't want to train us like pros.'
Advertisement
In her early teens, she even paused from competitive running altogether, instead focusing on soccer (she was a right-winger), basketball and dance. Might she have made a career out of soccer? 'I think so,' she nods. 'If I had stuck with it. I loved it — not quite as much as track — but it was up there.'
Track took over, as McLaughlin-Levrone won an under-18 World Championship at the age of 15 and then debuted in the Olympics at 16. When did she realize she might, to put it mildly, be onto something?
'In freshman year of high school, my first race was an indoors 300m. I broke the state record. I was like, 'OK, I think there's hope for you!'
'My parents used to say, 'You're special,' but I feel like parents are supposed to say that. But for me to see that come to fruition at 14, racing against some seniors, I was like, 'Wow, if I really train for this, I do think there's a future here.''
The exposure of the Olympics at just 16 brought rewards and pitfalls. She signed a six-year deal with New Balance. Agents and brands were quickly sniffing around. Her parents, she says, 'did a wonderful job of being that fence between me and all the other things.' Still, she acknowledges that returning to high school as an Olympian left her 'with a bit of a big head.'
Expectations created pressure, and the path to the top had troughs as well as peaks, such as a stutter on the eighth hurdle at the 2019 World Championships in Doha, where she finished third.
'I lived a lot of my life in fear,' she says. 'Fear of not pleasing the Lord, fear of not being loved by people, and I think that's why I gravitated so strongly towards track and field. I felt, if I was winning, I was being validated and people would like me and love me. But, obviously, you're not going to win every single race, you're not always going to have your best days. And so to put my trust, my hope and my identity in something that was changing was obviously never going to give me a firm foundation.
Advertisement
'I used to get so anxious and so nervous that I would just be throwing up. I would be a mess, honestly.
'For me, winning was the only option and it caused things inside that I didn't know how to handle or deal with.'
How did she deal with losing? 'Not very well. A lot of it felt like I wasn't valuable anymore. I felt like people didn't view me the same way, or I wasn't as special or whatever. And so it took quite a hit to my confidence, my view of myself.
'I would definitely would say I drew back. I was very closed off and didn't really talk. It was all in my head.'
She says that during the pandemic, she felt 'the Lord tugging' on her heart. She had grown up in the church, but says she previously had an incomplete view of her faith, and that the gospel now gives her greater security. She's writing a book about what she describes as her journey from fear to faith, and her husband Andre is also training to become a pastor.
'Whether that's reading before races, listening to worship music or even praying before workouts, it brings peace,' she says. She still experiences nerves, and the restless nights, but she takes comfort in believing that 'it is already written, whatever's going to take place.'
Her family, too, remain a key support. 'My dad always says, 'Be the butterfly, just go and do what you do.' After the race in Paris, my eldest brother said, 'I almost threw up watching you, that was stressful.''
'It was a huge moment for our family to go from being our own little track team at AAU (Amateur Athletic Union) events to the Paris Olympics.'
In Los Angeles in 2028, that pride will only increase. 'For the Olympics and for track to have been so strong back in the '80s and the '90s, it kind of fell off a little bit in the States with all the amazing sports that we have and the leagues that have just grown. For U.S. track athletes, L.A. 28 is a huge moment. It is just so special to have it here on home soil and to bring it back.'
(Illustration: Eamonn Dalton/The Athletic;)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
All that Jazz: 'Electric' Chisholm Jr. talks new approach for Yankees
NEW YORK – Arriving at a less-is-more revelation, Jazz Chisholm Jr. believes he's found that next-level key to personal success. That means an easier swing, a steadier running gait, a calmer approach in the field. Advertisement 'If I stay fundamentally sound at 70%, I'm a pretty good baseball player,'' said Chisholm, whose second straight three-hit night boosted the Yankees to a 9-6 victory Friday night. Chisholm's three-run homer and RBI single contributed to an early seven-run lead against the rival Boston Red Sox and starter Walker Buehler, knocked out after two innings. Of course, the last time Buehler was on the Stadium mound, he closed out the World Series clincher in Game 5 for the Los Angeles Dodgers. This time, the Yanks jumped Buehler for five first-inning runs – including Chisholm's three-run homer on an 0-2 changeup to straightaway center field and a two-run shot by Anthony Volpe. Advertisement Volpe left the game shortly after being plunked on the left elbow, forcing home a second inning run; X-rays and a CT scan were negative, and Volpe feels he'll be available Saturday. Meanwhile, Chisholm is batting .500 (8-for-16) with two homers, six RBI and three stolen bases in four games since coming off the injured list due to a strained oblique. Yankees' Jazz Chisholm Jr. at '70%' 'Electric is the only way to describe Jazz,'' said Yankees rookie starter Will Warren, who rebounded from a rough start last Saturday at Dodger Stadium by being more aggressive in the strike zone. As Chisholm reasons, 'you can be electric while being in control at the same time,'' though 'it's super challenging for me. The only thing I knew was how to go fast. Advertisement 'Basically, I was Ricky Bobby. That's all I knew.'' Chisholm's new approach had its first light-bulb moment on April 29, the day he was injured at Baltimore – doubling to right despite three small tears to his oblique. Before his brief minor league rehab assignment began last week, Chisholm convened with the club's hitting coaches and reviewed video of his minor league days. 'The swing looked so effortless,'' and a plan was hatched to dial back in some respect – inspiring more contact, less swing and miss. '(At) 70%, you're one of the best out there,'' said Chisholm, quoting a conversation with assistant hitting coach Pat Roessler. 'At 100 percent, I might be dog crap. I was hitting .171 at 100 percent.'' Aaron Judge's take on Jazz Chisholm's approach 'It's really just about slowing everything down and taking a nice easy swing,'' said Judge. 'And that's what I felt like I saw tonight, even the homer to center field.'' Advertisement Chisholm drove an 0-2 Buehler curveball an estimated 417 feet over the center field wall, a ball that just kept carrying in the warm, humid air. 'I'm looking forward to seeing more of that,'' Judge said of the at-bat that produced Chisholm's ninth homer of the year, in his 34th game. In his third time up, Chisholm rifled a single to center off a 1-0 changeup. 'Earlier I the season, I was pulling off that and hitting it foul or rolling over because I was trying to hit a home run,'' said Chisholm. 'I feel like a baseball player again.'' Maybe the 70-percent stuff sends a mixed message, so Chisholm emphasized, 'you can't be lackadaisical," but 'if I stay fundamentally sound at 70%, I'm a pretty good baseball player. Advertisement "I really heard that all my life," Chisholm said. "I need to tone down the way I play." This article originally appeared on Yankees' Jazz Chisholm on new approach for New York
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New $3 million addition could put Cowboys ahead of curve in revolutionizing red-zone play
It's not common practice to develop a specialist role for a key position such as quarterback in today's NFL. A starter is a starter and removing said player tips off intensions and frankly comes off as a little disrespectful. For the Dallas Cowboys and Dak Prescott, replacing the QB in select goal-line packages could be seen as both, even if it seems like a smart course of action for all parties involved. The Cowboys touchdown scoring percentage in the red zone was just 46 percent in 2024. That was second to last in the NFL, ranking only above the lowly Giants. The Cowboys' inability to get into the endzone was a season-long issue, dating back before Prescott's season-ending injury. It left points on the board and ultimately demoralized an already fragile unit. Advertisement Prescott is scheduled to return in 2025 with a full bill of health. In previous seasons, he's been an assassin from the red zone, guiding the Cowboys to a No. 12 ranking in 2023 and to No. 1 overall ranking in 2022. Given his past proficiency, it's not preposterous to think he can bounce back to those levels again in 2025, but is the risk worth it? A major part of Prescott's redzone efficiency lies in his ability to run the ball. As a ball carrier Prescott operated at a 0.40 EPA/play with a 100 percent success rate on two attempts in 2024. The season before he was at 0.16 EPA/play with a 71.43% success rate on 14 attempts. QBs are universally a highly efficient rushing option from the red zone; the only downside is such plays open them up to hits and potential injury. The Cowboys can ill afford to suffer and injury of Prescott's magnitude so alternatives need to be explored. Prescott, 32, is the highest paid player in the NFL and an irreplaceable part on the Cowboys' machine. He's not injury prone, per say, but having missed five or more games in three of the last five seasons, he's not exactly made of metal either. Using him as a runner might be more risk than the Cowboys want to take on and finding a replacement option may not be as crazy as it sounds when all factors are under consideration. After adding Joe Milton in an offseason trade, the Cowboys have an intriguing option as a situational replacement to Prescott. The highly gifted, yet severely underdeveloped, quarterback prospect is sure to drive headlines throughout the summer with dazzling throws and highlight runs. Milton, who has three years and $3 million remaining on his rookie deal, could be the answer in the red zone based on his skillset and dispensability. If Prescott gets hurt tucking and running the season might be over for the Cowboys. If Milton gets hurt running the rock, it's unlikely to have any impact on the success or failure of the season, and the financial investment in him is already minimal. At 6-foot-5, 246-pounds, Milton is built for the part. Coming from an RPO-rich offense in college, Milton is an ideal dual-threat inside the redzone. His reads downfield and accuracy as a passer leave something to be desired, but if cast into zone-read role where he can either handoff or run it himself, he offers something Prescott does not. Incorporating a single read as a passer is a great way to take that zone-read attack into a simple, but multifaceted, RPO. Advertisement Once upon a time the idea of having a dedicated closer in baseball seemed absurd. It wasn't until the late 1970s when teams started to designate specialists and from there it took years before it became the norm. In much the same way an occasional red-zone specialist could be normalized on early downs in the NFL. For teams with veteran QBs who are too important to risk and somewhat susceptible to injury, bringing in a dual-threat QB on early downs (non-obvious passing downs) could be a great way to take advantage of the game's highest leverage situations. QB runs are an important part of an efficient redzone offense but with a QB1 who's too important to risk, situational alternatives should be explored. Can Milton be that alternative? You can follow Reid on X @ReidDHanson and be sure to follow Cowboys Wire on Facebook to join in on the conversation with fellow fans! This article originally appeared on Cowboys Wire: Joe Milton could give Cowboys creative advantage in red-zone scenarios

Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Attorneys in NCAA antitrust case to share $475M in fees, with potential to reach $725M
The attorneys who shepherded the blockbuster antitrust lawsuit to fruition for hundreds of thousands of college athletes will share in just over $475 million in fees, and the figure could rise to more than $725 million over the next 10 years. The request for plaintiff legal fees in the House vs. NCAA case, outlined in a December court filing and approved Friday night, struck experts in class-action litigation as reasonable. Co-lead counsels Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler asked for $475.2 million, or 18.3% of the cash common funds of $2.596 billion. They also asked for an additional $250 million, for a total of $725.2 million, based on a widely accepted estimate of an additional $20 billion in direct benefits to athletes over the 10-year settlement term. That would be 3.2% of what would then be a $22.596 billion settlement. 'Class Counsel have represented classes of student-athletes in multiple litigations challenging NCAA restraints on student-athlete compensation, and they have achieved extraordinary results. Class Counsel's representation of the settlement class members here is no exception,' U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken wrote. University of Buffalo law professor Christine Bartholomew, who researched about 1,300 antitrust class-action settlements from 2005-22 for a book she authored, told The Associated Press the request for attorneys' fees could have been considered a bit low given the difficulty of the case, which dates back five years. She said it is not uncommon for plaintiffs' attorneys to be granted as much as 30% of the common funds. Attorneys' fees generally are calculated by multiplying an hourly rate by the number of hours spent working on a case. In class-action lawsuits, though, plaintiffs' attorneys work on a contingency basis, meaning they get paid at the end of the case only if the class wins a financial settlement. 'Initially, you look at it and think this is a big number,' Bartholomew said. 'When you look at how contingency litigation works generally, and then you think about how this fits into the class-action landscape, this is not a particularly unusual request.' The original lawsuit was filed in June 2020 and it took until November 2023 for Wilken to grant class certification, meaning she thought the case had enough merit to proceed. Elon University law professor Catherine Dunham said gaining class certification is challenging in any case, but especially a complicated one like this. 'If a law firm takes on a case like this where you have thousands of plaintiffs and how many depositions and documents, what that means is the law firm can't do other work while they're working on the case and they are taking on the risk they won't get paid,' Dunham said. 'If the case doesn't certify as a class, they won't get paid.' In the request for fees, the firm of Hagens Berman said it had dedicated 33,952 staff hours to the case through mid-December 2024. Berman, whose rate is $1,350 per hour, tallied 1,116.5 hours. Kessler, of Winston & Strawn, said he worked 1,624 hours on the case at a rate of $1,980 per hour. The case was exhaustive. Hundreds of thousands of documents totaling millions of pages were produced by the defendants — the NCAA, ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12 and SEC — as part of the discovery process. Berman and Kessler wrote the 'plaintiffs had to litigate against six well-resourced defendants and their high-powered law firms who fought every battle tooth and nail. To fend off these efforts, counsel conducted extensive written discovery and depositions, and submitted voluminous expert submissions and lengthy briefing. In addition, class counsel also had to bear the risk of perpetual legislative efforts to kill these cases.' Antitrust class-action cases are handled by the federal court system and have been harder to win since 2005, when the U.S. Class Action Fairness Act was passed, according to Bartholomew. 'Defendants bring motion after motion and there's more of a pro-defendant viewpoint in federal court than there had been in state court,' she said. 'As a result, you would not be surprised that courts, when cases do get through to fruition, are pretty supportive of applications for attorneys' fees because there's great risk that comes from bringing these cases fiscally for the firms who, if the case gets tossed early, never gets compensated for the work they've done.' ___ AP college sports: