logo
New Franco-German Tank Project Takes Shape With Industry Team Confirmed

New Franco-German Tank Project Takes Shape With Industry Team Confirmed

Yahoo04-04-2025

Four different European defense companies will come together in a joint venture to build a next-generation Franco-German main battle tank, under the Main Ground Combat System (MGCS) initiative. The tank, which will be part of a wider 'system of systems,' confirms something of a renaissance in Western European armor programs, with a notable emphasis on larger and heavier-hitting main armament.
The establishment of the joint venture, which comprises KNDS Deutschland, KNDS France, Rheinmetall Landsysteme, and THALES SIX GTS France, was confirmed today by the German government's Federal Cartel Office (or Bundeskartellamt), the country's competition regulatory agency. The joint venture, the MGCS-Projekt Company, will be based in Germany and will be charged with the industrial development of the MGCS tank, to be procured by Germany and France. The tank is planned to ultimately replace Germany's Leopard 2s and France's Leclercs, sometime in the 2040s.
Before the joint venture could be approved, the Federal Cartel Office had to ensure that it wouldn't have an adverse impact on competition between the firms. The agency concluded that, despite 'some overlap in the area of armored military vehicles,' the companies wouldn't be able to realize the aims of MGCS alone. It also confirmed that the firms would continue to compete against each other for different armored vehicle contracts.
The Federal Cartel Office also provided some more outlines of the MGCS program's aims, namely, to develop a modular main battle tank 'which fulfills various capability requirements as a multi-platform system.' As such, the program will provide 'an identical chassis on which different modules can be placed as required.' The agency adds: 'This flexible approach makes it possible to create several specialized vehicles that operate in tandem.'
Of the four different companies involved, KNDS is already a Franco-German concern, established through the previous merger of Krauss-Maffei Wegmann and the French armaments group Nexter. Rheinmetall is Germany's largest arms manufacturer, and the fifth biggest in Europe. Finally, Thales is a French aerospace and defense company specializing in electronics with a global footprint. Within this, THALES SIX GTS France handles communications and security technologies.
This significant step forward for the MGCS program comes soon after Germany determined that it would start work on a new main battle tank, which is already being referred to as the Leopard 3. In February of this year, the German Armed Forces procurement office issued a contract for technical studies of 130mm ammunition, as well as a powerplant, protection systems, and other equipment.
Intriguingly, all of these new technologies are intended to be compatible with the existing Leopard 2 main battle tank. Once integrated into that platform, the result will be a significantly different tank, likely to be designated Leopard 3, although Leopard 2 AX or 'the bridge solution' have also been mentioned. The interim tank is supposed to be ready to enter German Army service in the 2030s.
The German efforts in this direction underscore the value the country has assigned to modernizing its tank fleet. At the same time, it is quite possible that technologies developed for the Leopard 3 could also find their way into the MGCS main battle tank.
In particular, the 130mm ammunition — a study that will be conducted by Rheinmetall — would be a logical fit for the GMCS program. Reflecting a growing shift toward increased-caliber tank armament, a 130mm main gun has been planned for the MGCS for some time. This will offer much more kinetic energy — and penetrating power — than existing 120mm weapons.
However, the modular nature of the MGCS program means its scope is not limited to a main battle tank, although that will be its centerpiece. However, as a 'system of systems,' the Franco-German project is expected to field other crewed and uncrewed vehicles. Exactly what these will be is likely still to be determined. Nevertheless, the Federal Cartel Office's description of 'an identical chassis on which different modules can be placed as required' suggests a family of related fighting vehicles is planned.
These specialized versions could perhaps be tasked with electronic warfare, air defense, or as platforms from which to launch drones or loitering munitions or fire directed-energy weapons. At least one video, released by German electronics firm Hensoldt, shows MGCS platforms working alongside multicopter drones, which serve as reconnaissance platforms as well as networking the different ground vehicles together — as seen in the image at the top of this story.
At the same time, the MGCS family might include more traditional tank derivatives such as combat engineer vehicles, armored recovery vehicles, and bridge-layers.
As well as the 130mm ammunition, the German technical studies also involve a new engine block (including steering, manual gearbox, cooling system, combustion air filtration, and exhaust system) and an enhanced version of the Multifunctional Self-Protection System, to be developed by Hensoldt and KNDS Deutschland.
Again, some or all of these features could find their way into the MGCS program, or at the very least help determine its requirements.
The Leopard 3 study is not the only Franco-German tank that's currently being pitched as a stopgap until the arrival of the more ambitious MGCS.
Last summer, KNDS rolled out the latest Leopard 2 A-RC 3.0 version of the Leopard 2, which you can read about here.
This new version of the Leopard 2 features a completely uncrewed turret that can be armed with an even larger 140mm main gun. The tank also features a built-in anti-tank guided missile launcher and a remote weapon station armed with a 30mm cannon optimized for engaging drones, a threat that has now fully emerged thanks to the war in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Rheinmetall is also now marketing a next-generation tank, the KF51 Panther. This is armed with a 130mm main gun but retains a more conventional crewed turret. That turret also features a built-in launcher for missiles or drones and the option to install a remote weapon station on top. You can read more about the Panther's design and capabilities here.
In another binational European joint venture, Rheinmetall teamed up with Leonardo of Italy to develop and manufacture a version of the KF51 for the Italian Army. The two firms will also market the KF51 — alongside other armored fighting vehicles — to other potential customers.
Overall, Germany is very much back in business when it comes to developing main battle tanks, products in which it was for a long time one of the leading manufacturers.
The end of the Cold War, however, saw tank fleets slashed in general, and entirely done away with in some countries.
Increasing Russian belligerence, starting with the annexation of Crimea in 2014, and culminating in its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has been the prime driver behind a return to the primacy of tank warfare in Europe.
Now, both Germany and France are committed to regenerating their tank forces — and their wider armored fighting vehicle capabilities — via the MGCS program. However, this is an ambitious, multi-layered effort and many of its details and requirements are still to be defined. With service entry pitched for the 2040s, it's no surprise that Germany, in particular, is looking at interim tank designs to meet threats in the years before then. Already, the MGCS effort has seen delays, but there could be more ahead. After all, a technology demonstrator for the MGCS program, the Enhanced Main Battle Tank, combining Leclerc and Leopard 2 components, was unveiled in 2018, but there has been little in the way of hardware since then.
As it stands, there is still much to be determined about the MGCS program and the vehicles it will yield, but we do now have confirmation of the four companies that will be responsible for developing and manufacturing them.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Carney and Trump are holding private talks to drop tariffs
Carney and Trump are holding private talks to drop tariffs

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Carney and Trump are holding private talks to drop tariffs

Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump are having discussions out of the spotlight to reach a trade deal and lift tariffs. Sources with knowledge of the conversations first confirmed the calls with CBC/Radio-Canada and Industry Minister Mélanie Joly later told reporters that Carney and Trump are talking to each other. A source, who spoke on the condition they not be named, said the two leaders have had a few phone calls in the evenings and exchanged text messages about trade since Carney's visit to the White House last month. There have been no public readouts of the talks between Carney and Trump. Sources said the conversations are aimed at reaching an agreement on the trade war launched by the U.S. against Canada. Carney and Trump have talked openly about a desire to chart a new economic and security deal, but the Canada-U.S. relationship appeared to hit a snag earlier this week when Trump doubled tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports. The tariffs, now at 50 per cent, are a further blow to the Canadian industries that are the U.S.'s biggest supplier of the Wednesday, Carney only said "intensive discussions" were ongoing and that his government was readying reprisals if negotiations with the United States failed. Sources told CBC/Radio-Canada they are hoping for some sort of Canada-U.S. trade deal by the time Trump and Carney meet at the G7 summit — just 10 days from now in Alberta. Asked Thursday how close the two sides are to a deal, Canada-U.S. Trade Minister Dominic LeBlanc said he's not talking about it publicly. Speaking in French, Joly confirmed there have been talks and said it's normal during a trade war to have diplomatic discussions. "We won't negotiate in public," she added in English. "We'll let the prime minister do his work." A White House spokesperson told CBC News that Trump was "directly" involved in talks with Canada, but didn't mention Carney specifically. "Talks with Canada continue about trade, border security and defence matters. Any deal announcements, however, will come from President Trump himself," spokesperson Kush Desai said in a official with the U.S. embassy said "both the president and prime minister, or members of their teams, have publicly acknowledged that there are ongoing conversations. But this is not something that will be negotiated in public." Earlier this week, Trump's envoy to Canada, Ambassador Pete Hoekstra, told a crowd in Toronto the deal "is being settled at the highest levels of the U.S. government with the involvement of the highest elected officials." The direct conversations between Carney and Trump were first reported by the Globe and Mail. Carney, who campaigned on the promise he'd take on Trump, has been under pressure to respond to the president's latest tariff salvo. The Canadian Steel Producers Association called the doubled tariffs a "crushing blow" to the industry and said the move effectively blocks Canadian steel from entering the U.S. market. The association wants to see immediate counter-tariffs on U.S. metals. Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who said he's in daily talks with the prime minister, called for retaliation if an agreement can't be reached "in the next few days." "Let's hope they get a deal. But if they don't, let's come out guns ablazing," he told reporters Thursday at Queen's Park.

Quebec floats cutting services for non-permanent residents
Quebec floats cutting services for non-permanent residents

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Quebec floats cutting services for non-permanent residents

Quebec Immigration Minister Jean-François Roberge said he isn't ruling out the possibility of cutting services for non-permanent residents in the province if the federal government fails to halve its annual immigration targets. At a news conference on Thursday, Roberge presented a report outlining the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) government's potential immigration targets for 2026-29. "If we're forced to make difficult decisions, we'll make them. We're not at that point yet, and we don't want to get there" Roberge said, underlining that the provincial government spent $500 million last year to support asylum seekers. He added that the state of public services in the province is "unfair" to Quebecers "who pay taxes" and are already struggling to see family doctors and find housing. The report describes three scenarios the government is considering to bring down the number of permanent residents from this year's target of 66,500. Thresholds could be lowered to 45,000, 35,000 or 25,000 over the next four years. Roberge said that the government would focus its non-permanent immigration reduction efforts in Montreal and Laval to facilitate newcomers settling in regional areas, where French is less threatened. He said it also intends to prioritize current non-permanent residents for permanent residency. Immigrants admitted through the Programme des travailleurs étrangers temporaires (PTET), which is currently suspended until Nov. 30, could decrease from 72,000 to 65,000 over the same period. The government could decrease the number of international students from 128,000 to 110,00 by 2029, according to the document. 'Disconnect' between immigration targets, business sector The CAQ government's proposed targets come on the heels of the Institut du Québec suggesting an increase in the number of new permanent residents to lessen the province's reliance on non-permanent residents. The report by the Institut du Québec, published on Wednesday, outlines several scenarios, including one that suggested raising permanent immigration levels in the province to up to 90,000. According to the institute's study, focusing on permanent immigration is preferable to temporary immigration since "people who choose to settle permanently make a greater contribution to Quebec society and the economy." Véronique Proulx, president and executive director of the Fédération des chambres de commerce du Québec, said the ideas the CAQ government put forward today were surprising and disappointing. "There's really a disconnect between what the government is proposing today and what the companies in the regions of Quebec, but also in Montreal and Laval, are asking for," Proulx said. "The number one thing they're asking for is more immigration. Temporary immigration but permanent immigration as well." Arcelle Appolon, executive director of Maison d'Haïti in Montreal, said the government's immigration targets were "not realistic simply because for the past couple of years, the thresholds have not been respected." Quebec is projected to accept 10,000 more permanent residents in 2025 than it planned because of immigrants who completed the Programme de l'expérience québécoise (PEQ). "We are quite aware of the reality of what happens when people come and when we hear their stories, we see that the [government] narrative that is currently in place differs greatly from what they're telling us," she said. "We do hope that the government chooses to re-evaluate their numbers and consider the experts' opinions on the topic." Public consultations on the CAQ government's immigration plans will take place in August.

Every Popcorn Moment on the Day Musk-Trump Exploded
Every Popcorn Moment on the Day Musk-Trump Exploded

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Every Popcorn Moment on the Day Musk-Trump Exploded

President Donald Trump's relationship with former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk has devolved from well-wishes to war of the roses on the heels of the Tesla billionaire's blitzkrieg against the MAGA president. Yet according to corrosive comments shared by the two polarizing political figures, their bad blood has been brewing before they officially bid adieu in a strained May 30 press conference at the White House. In a June 1 CBS Sunday Morning interview, Musk soft launched the civil war, claiming that he was 'disappointed' by Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and alleging it 'undermines' his DOGE work by adding an estimated $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit. After ripping the bill as a 'pork-filled,' 'disgusting abomination' in a June 3 tweet, Musk followed with a tweet at 2:07 a.m. on June 4, commenting that the bill 'defeats all the cost savings achieved by the @DOGE.' By 9 a.m. Thursday morning, Musk's gloves were off and he was ready to wage war on X. He retweeted a post from the fake news parody account Babylon Bee that quipped, 'Congress Warns Failure To Pass Spending Bill Might Delay Destruction Of The Country.' At 10:41 a.m., he retweeted his Fox interview discussing fears that the government will 'go bankrupt' from overspending. He captioned the post: 'That's what it comes down to.' At 10:52 a.m., Musk retweeted a post by angel investor and entrepreneur Jason Calacanis, claiming that, 'The majority of republican *voters* strongly agree with Elon and want the BBB trimmed down.' The tweet added, '@elonmusk left the Democratic Party and sacrificed much in his relentlessly supported the GOP. The GOP leadership should give his counsel serious consideration. 🫡' Musk captioned the post with a 'yes' as he shared it. At 11:20 a.m., Musk appeared to be hoping to get Trump's attention by turning the president's previous statements against his current actions. He shared a 2013 post in which Trump said he was 'embarrassed' by Republicans under former President Barack Obama's tenure because they 'are extending the debt ceiling.' Musk quipped on X, 'wise words.' At 11:46 a.m., Musk followed with another old Trump tweet in which he declared 'no member of Congress should be eligible for re-election if our country's budget is not balanced---deficits not allowed!' To which Musk responded on X, 'I couldn't agree more! 🇺🇸🇺🇸' At 12:10 p.m., Musk tweeted, 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win 🥇' At 12:13 p.m., Musk continued taking shots at Trump and even tagging the president's X account, urging him to 'keep the good, remove the bad' in his mega bill. Around 12:10 p.m., Musk and Trump came to blows in real time as Trump was forced to answer questions about Musk's attacks in front of his Oval Office guest, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'Elon is upset because we took the EV mandate which was a lot of money for electric vehicles,' Trump told reporters. 'They're having a hard time the electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. Elon knew this from the beginning.' At 12:19 p.m., Musk began to respond on X to Trump's comment with, 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' At 12:25 p.m., Musk responded to Trump's comment that he 'knew' the 'inner workings of the bill' with, 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' A minute later, at 12:26 p.m., Musk retweeted comments from Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles in which he declared that the bill is 'not beautiful yet.' Ogles told host Matt Gaetz, 'The Senate's job is to make the bill better before sending it back to us. The House's job is to pass DOGE rescissions and EO codification bills that are collecting dust.' Musk seemed to like the comments with an American flag emojii. At 12:44 p.m., Musk doubled down on sharing Trump's old tweets on X, writing on X, 'Where is this guy today?? At 1:38 p.m., Musk added on X, 'Remember this?@realDonaldTrump,' sharing the video of Trump shilling for Tesla outside the White House. A minute later, at 1:39 p.m., Musk was attacking Trump's 'beautiful' bill as an 'ugly spending bill will make things much worse' for Americans paying interest rates to federal creditors. At 2:23 p.m., Musk claimed in a tweet, 'Not even those in Congress who had to vote on the Big Ugly Spending Bill had time to read it!' At 2:37 p.m., Trump entered the ring with Musk via Truth Social, hitting back against his posts with a claim that Musk was 'wearing thin' in the White House so he 'asked him to leave.' 'I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy his Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' wrote Trump in the post. In the same minute, Trump wrote that the easiest way for the government to save money would be to cancel Musk's 'billions and billions of dollars' in 'government subsidies and contracts.' He added, 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' At 2:45 p.m., Musk seemed to address a report that the nucleus of his rift with Trump began because he rejected billionaire astronaut Jared Isaacman from a top federal position. Musk wrote: 'This is what he said about Jared,' sharing a post of Trump's 2024 nomination of Isaacman. At 2:48 pm., Musk moved to countering Trump's Truth Social posts. About the 'wearing thin' claims, Musk wrote on X, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' At 3:10 p.m., Musk went scorched earth. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' he tweeted. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He added, 'Have a nice day, DJT!' At 3:20 p.m., he doubled down in a tweet, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' At 4:06 p.m., Musk called Trumps bluff about government contracts, announcing on X: 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' At the same time, Trump added on Truth Social, 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago.' He added, 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given.' Trump concluded, 'I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness.' At 4:11 p.m., Musk began responding to comments around calls for Trump to be impeached again. To a tweet urging that 'Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him,' Musk replied on X, 'Yes.' At 4:14 p.m., Musk began antagonizing Trump more by retweeting posts claiming that he shared a very close relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. Musk responded with a skeptical emoji to a post that said Trump's relationship with Epstein is 'well established.' At 4:26, Musk hammered Trump over the economy in an X post, writing, 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year.' After what appears to have been a short break, Musk came back with a tweet backing up his fears that America could go 'broke.' Although Musk's social media melee seemed to be helping him expel some much-needed gripes off his chest, Bloomberg reported that the Tesla billionaire's very public feud had sent its stock plummeting by 14% on Thursday, with a graph correlating Musk's comments with stock slumps. At 9:21 p.m., Musk resumed pressuring Trump, doubling down on his claims of fiscal concern by tweeting, 'If America goes broke, nothing else matters,' resharing an interview he conducted at CPAC in which he talked about the national debt. In the interview, Musk added, 'If the country goes insolvent, if all the money is just spent on paying interest on debt, there's no money left for anything. A country is no different from a person. Country overspends, country goes bankrupt, same as a person who overspends goes bankrupt.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store