logo
Arizona missing person alert system may go live by summer

Arizona missing person alert system may go live by summer

Yahoo11-04-2025

Shondiin SilversmithArizona Mirror
For years, Indigenous families have shared their experiences of reporting a missing loved one, highlighting how it is often met with a lack of response or urgency from the entities meant to assist them.
'We do know that there is a huge issue,' Capt. Paul Etnire, tribal liaison for the Arizona Department of Public Safety, said.
Etnire is Hopi and grew up on the Hopi Nation in northern Arizona. Since 2019, he has worked in ad hoc committees, task forces and federal committees focused on addressing the ongoing crisis of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Peoples.
'It was very heartbreaking hearing testimonies,' he said of the state and federal hearingsheld to allow MMIP victims to share their experiences.
The blame, he said, belongs across the board: law enforcement, prosecutors, social services, tribal governments, non-tribal communities and Indian Country.
'The whole system failed,' Etnire said.
'It was just heartbreaking that we failed in every single way for the victims and for the victims' families,' he added.
Finding ways to address and develop solutions for the MMIP crisis within Indian Country has been a priority for Indigenous women, leaders, advocates and communities for years.
Part of that work included advocating for the creation of a multijurisdictional missing persons alert system — something that is finally about to become a reality as states across the country, including Arizona, work to implement the Federal Communications Commission's new Missing and Endangered Person alert code.
In March, Gov. Katie Hobbs met with several key stakeholders, including the Arizona Department of Public Safety and representatives from tribal nations, to develop a plan for implementing the new alert code by summer.
'I know that so many families have been affected by this crisis and have fought for years,' Hobbs told the Arizona Mirror, adding that she hopes that, with the implementation of the MEP alert, these families will finally feel a sense of justice.
Hobbs said that when an Indigenous person goes missing, a lot of times their case does not rise to the level of getting an Amber, Silver or Blue alert, and the goal of the MEP alert is to 'fill in that gap.'
'As governor, I see my role as elevating those voices and making sure we're taking action on the issues that matter most to communities across the state,' Hobbs said. 'And this is just one example of that.'
The governor said that implementing the FCC's new MEP alert in Arizona was prioritized based on the recommendation from the MMIP task force, and seeing it come to fruition is great and validates the task force's work.
'It's important to keep the work going,' she said.
The MEP alert code will be used for missing and endangered persons who do not meet the Amber and Silver Alert criteria, according to the FCC, enabling a more rapid and coordinated response to these incidents.
The FCC adopted the new alert code in 2024, stating that it will be especially beneficial to tribal communities, where Indigenous peoples face a disproportionate risk of going missing, experiencing violence and murder.
More than 10,600 Indigenous people were reported missing in the U.S. in 2023, roughly 3,300 of whom were 18 or older, according to the FBI.
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System reported that more than 23,700 missing persons cases were in the database at the end of 2023, and 255 of those were for Indigenous people.
In 2021, Arizona was ranked as the state with the third-largest number of unresolved missing Indigenous people cases in the country, according to NamUs. There are currently 91 missing Indigenous people cases in the NamUs database for Arizona.
A study from the Urban Indian Health Institute found that Arizona also has the third-largest number of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls in the country.
That study reported 506 known cases in 71 urban areas across the country, 54 of which were in Arizona, including 31 in Tucson.
There is still no single database that provides accurate numbers or data related to missing and murdered Indigenous peoples across the country. With no centralized database among the thousands of federal, state and tribal entities, the information available is limited.
When looking at the numbers, it's important to note that Indigenous people make up only about 6% of the population in Arizona. The state has only three major metropolitan areas, all of which have large Indigenous populations, and each of the 22 tribal nations in Arizona has a large number of people living on their tribal lands.
In Arizona, the recommendation for a missing endangered persons alert was first made in 2022 by the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls ad hoc committee and has continued as a recommendation by the task force.
Jason Chavez, who leads Hobbs' Office on Tribal Relations, said there has been positive feedback from tribal leaders and tribal law enforcement regarding the implementation of the MEP alert.
Chavez said that tribal leaders and communities have long called for this type of alert, and the MMIP task force has advocated for it.
'Under the governor's leadership, we're finally ready to implement,' he said.
Increasing public awareness about MMIP is a challenge, Chavez said, but he believes that once this alert goes live, it will help shed some light on the ongoing crisis.
'This is one step in the right direction,' he added.
According to the FCC, the MEP alert is part of the nation's Emergency Alert System and Wireless Emergency Alert System.
It will be part of a set of codes utilized by tribal, state and local law enforcement agencies with access to the system, delivering a critical alert message to the public through television, radio and wireless phones.
The Arizona Department of Public Safety will utilize the IPAWS alerting system for MEP alerts. This system can send alerts to specific locations, as narrow as the cross streets where a person went missing or as broad as the state.
Once the alert is set up in the system and activated, it will immediately be pushed out to the public. The language in the MEP alert will closely resemble that of Amber and Silver Alerts.
Capt. Thomas Neve, with the Arizona Department of Public Safety Emergency Management District, oversees the operations of Arizona's alert system.
Neve has worked with the alert program for over a decade. He said the department has offered a Missing and Endangered Persons Advisory, but never an alert.
Neve said that DPS issues about 150 emergency alerts annually. In 2024, they dispatched 131 Silver Alerts, but no Amber Alerts and 16 missing endangered person advisories.
He said the MEP alert now allows them to send out an alert through TV broadcasts, radio and cellphones in real time when a person goes missing.
'It's a little bit of extra horsepower,' he said, adding that it sends the messages out all at once, which ensures consistency in the messaging.
The U.S. Department of Justice will release guidelines on pushing out MEP alerts, but they have not been released yet. Neve said they are preparing to fully establish the alert for Arizona so that they are ready when the guidelines are released.
In general, Neva said the agency's first step is to verify that the report does not fall into any of the other alert categories and ensure that the reporting agency has identified that the missing person has truly gone missing.
For instance, if the missing person is a minor, Neve said it needs to be verified that it is not a runaway or part of a custody issue where the biological parent may have taken the child, and that there isn't any danger to the child.
'Sometimes, people are reported missing because they didn't come home, but that doesn't mean they didn't go to another residence,' he said, which is why there are a lot of things that need to be done by the local agency before an alert is considered.
Neve said that agencies across the state have the potential to find that person without having to issue an alert, which is why part of the process of being eligible for an MEP alert is that the reporting agency needs to have exhausted all their available resources first.
'We recognize that some agencies are much larger than others that have better capability of doing that, but every agency has the basic capability of at least entering that person as a missing person,' he said.
Once that local agency has exhausted those resources and they otherwise meet the criteria, Neve said the final step would be an MEP alert.
The local agency would request an MEP alert from the Arizona Department of Safety. Once their criteria are approved, Neve said they evaluate the request and determine whether it qualifies.
'We're the gatekeepers,' he said. 'We would facilitate that activation on behalf of that agency, making the request.'
Neve said it is important to have a clear guideline for what constitutes an MEP alert because there is potential for overloading the public with alerts that it 'desensitizes the general public' to the point that they ignore the alerts.
'There are several thousand missing person cases a year in Arizona,' Neve said, and having an alert does not guarantee success in missing person cases.
However, Neve said having an MEP alert is a 'big step' because it solicits the public's help finding these missing people and bridges the gap in other alerts.
All Arizona tribes can make an MEP alert request, and Neve said they would work closely with any tribal agencies.
'It doesn't matter if the tribal person went missing on or off the reservation; we can do an activation for that person,' he said.
Etnire said that the MEP alert system is not the tool that will end the crisis of MMIP, and it should not be viewed as such.
'This is not the tool that will end this,' he said.
Etnire said implementing the MEP has been a long time coming and the alert technology is another tool they can capitalize on.
'This is not the thing that's gonna solve the issue of MMIP within this country (or) within the state,' he said, but it is a tool that law enforcement can use to hopefully fill in some of those gaps with the Amber Alert Program and the Silver Alert Program.
Etnire said that for a tool to be effective, it has to be used.
'It's not just incumbent upon local law enforcement to utilize,' he added. 'We have to work together as a whole.'
Navajo Nation Council Delegate Amber Kanazbah Crotty said she hopes that as Arizona works through implementing the MEP alert, there will be a clear idea of how the multiple agencies can work together to push the alerts.
'We need a collective effort to bring our relatives home,' Crotty said, noting that the first 24 hours are vital for missing people.
'It's another layer of collaboration and data because of the different jurisdictional issues that we chronically have,' she added, noting how the Navajo Nation spreads across three states and the tribe has a large population living on and off the reservation.
She said having an MEP alert available is crucial for tribal communities because it enables them to notify more people and potentially increases the number of individuals searching for the missing person, which 'hopefully decreases the trauma for the family.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Some P.E.I. lobster fishers want 'moderate livelihood' defined, after DFO seizes more traps
Some P.E.I. lobster fishers want 'moderate livelihood' defined, after DFO seizes more traps

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Some P.E.I. lobster fishers want 'moderate livelihood' defined, after DFO seizes more traps

Lennox Island First Nation says more lobster traps belonging to its moderate-livelihood fishery were removed from the waters along P.E.I.'s North Shore over the weekend. Chief Darlene Bernard said one fisherman had 58 traps seized by federal Fisheries and Oceans Canada enforcement officers on Sunday. The move comes after DFO removed what it said were 100 unauthorized traps from Malpeque Bay back in late May. Bernard is once again calling the removal illegal, though some non-Indigenous fishers in the area told CBC News they were pleased that DFO is taking action. Timothy Wall, a third-generation fisherman in the area, said there's too much pressure on Malpeque Bay's lobster stocks. "It's nice to see DFO… taking a stance in the name of conservation," Wall told CBC News. "There's been a lot of extra pressure on the resource, and you can only split the pie so many ways sometimes before your slices start to get smaller and smaller and smaller." The Mi'kmaq have a right to fish for a "moderate livelihood" outside of the commercial fishery that's rigorously regulated by the federal government, a right that was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of Canada's Marshall decision in 1999. Bernard said the traps seized Sunday belong to Lennox Island's self-governed, treaty-protected fishery that began in 2022. The First Nation set 1,500 moderate-livelihood lobster traps this year — 100 traps each for 15 fishermen from the community — but DFO has said it approved only up to 1,000. Calling DFO's latest seizure "extremely disappointing" and "despicable," Bernard said 58 traps have been placed back in the water. "If there's an issue with these traps, then give me the reason other than 'we didn't authorize them,'" she told CBC News on Tuesday. "Well, guess what? [DFO doesn't] have the ability or the authority to authorize anything when it comes to the treaty-protected fishery. It's a self-regulated fishery that is protected by the Constitution." As well as that fishery, the Lennox Island First Nation also operates a communal commercial fishery. Down the road, the community to hopes to expand that fishery by using a new program, the Community Based Access Acquisition Fund, to buy existing commercial licences from people from outside the First Nation who are getting out of the business. If that approach works, Bernard said Lennox Island will not have to expand its moderate-livelihood fishery. Fishers like Wall say part of the problem is that DFO hasn't defined what a "moderate livelihood" means. He said non-Indigenous fishers should have some kind of say in the future of the treaty-protected fishery, given that their own livelihood is at stake. "It's impossible to have real, true reconciliation 'til we can all move forward, and this is one of the biggest things that's stopping everybody from moving forward," Wall said. "Everybody would be better off and happier if we could just figure out what moderate livelihood means. It is time to define it." WATCH | Lennox Island First Nation says it will replace hundreds of lobster traps removed by DFO officials: DFO said it has no plans to do that in the near future. Connor Robinson, the department's acting director-general of Indigenous affairs, said DFO is "committed to reconciliation and working with partners to implement their rights in the fishery in a sustainable way that's mindful of conservation and pressure on fish stocks" About defining the moderate-livelihood fishery, he added: "While I understand the desire from many to define it and put parameters around it, what the court basically said is what's required to implement moderate livelihood will vary over time as fish stocks and communities change and grow and evolve." We are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community. — Chief Darlene Bernard, Lennox Island First Nation In the meantime, Lennox Island is considering legal action over the traps seized Sunday. Bernard said the 15 moderate-livelihood fishers from her community are only taking what they need — and it's far less than what the commercial fishery is hauling in. "We are going to continue to protect that right, and we are going to continue to fish 1,500 traps in this community," she said. "We've done our due diligence on it, we've done our engagements with the community, we've looked to see if there was any issues with regards to the stocks…. Right now, we are less than one per cent of the total allowable catch."

Electricity sector urges federal government to adopt national plan to meet rising power demand
Electricity sector urges federal government to adopt national plan to meet rising power demand

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Electricity sector urges federal government to adopt national plan to meet rising power demand

Electricity Alliance of Canada, an electricity industry coalition, outlines five priorities to secure clean, reliable energy and support Canada's economic future OTTAWA, ON, June 10, 2025 /CNW/ - Canada's electricity sector is calling on the newly elected federal government to develop a bold and immediate plan when it comes to electricity in Canada. This is urgently needed to meet growing demand, secure the country's economic future and become an energy superpower. Last week, the federal government introduced the One Canadian Economy Act, which highlighted the need for building projects in the national interest. There is no greater national interest project than building Canada's electricity grid. The electricity sector finds itself at a pivotal juncture. With climate change accelerating, global energy dynamics shifting, electricity demand increasing and potential U.S. tariffs looming, Canada cannot afford to lose its strategic energy advantage. Canadians expect affordable, reliable and secure power—and the electricity industry is committed to delivering it. Canada's economy was built on dependable power. Today, more than 60 per cent of electricity is generated from hydroelectric sources, with nuclear, wind, solar, and energy storage playing growing and essential roles. Yet current electricity production—around 630 terawatt-hours annually—will not meet future needs. As industries electrify, manufacturing returns, and the economy becomes more digital, pressure on electricity systems will grow significantly. To meet this growing demand, substantial investments in electricity generation, transmission and distribution are essential—not only to keep the lights on, but to create jobs and secure long-term prosperity. The electricity sector is urging the new federal government to act on five urgent priorities: Streamline project approvals and clarify investment incentivesThe One Canadian Economy Act promises to accelerate project approvals. This is desperately needed. Slow and uncertain approval processes hinder investment and delay critical projects. The industry needs an efficient, 'one project, one review' process for major electricity projects and a finalized version of the Clean Economy Investment Tax Credits. On carbon pricing, a flexible approach should support environmental outcomes while ensuring regional fairness and global competitiveness. Partner meaningfully with Indigenous communitiesThe proposed act also promotes the need for Indigenous voices to be heard. Indigenous partnership in clean energy projects is vital to Canada's future, and Indigenous voices must be heard when it comes to energy decisions. The federal government should also expand tools like the Canada Infrastructure Bank and the Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program to ensure Indigenous partners can participate fully and on their own terms, supporting reconciliation. Build interprovincial energy corridorsCanada must turn long-standing conversations about interprovincial grid connections into action. The federal government, provinces, Crown corporations and utilities must collaborate to support energy trade, infrastructure development and labour mobility in regulated occupations. Secure electricity supply chainsGlobal supply chains are facing disruption from tariffs, regulation and trade tensions. The federal government must help manage these risks and ensure the resilience of supply chains critical to electricity infrastructure. Invest in workforce developmentThe future grid requires a skilled, well-trained workforce. Continued federal investment in long-term training programs will help produce the tradespeople and engineers needed to support reliable, clean and resilient electricity systems. Affordable, reliable and clean electricity is a strategic Canadian advantage. The sector has already increased supply while reducing emissions, and is prepared to do even more. The One Canadian Economy Act indicates it's time to focus on "nation-building" projects. Building up the electricity sector—generation, transmission and distribution—not only represents a project in the national interest; it enables all other national interest projects. The electricity sector is ready to get to work on a strong, resilient system to meet growing demand and protect Canada's economic future. Canada needs a bold electricity plan—now. This statement was jointly issued by: Vittoria Bellissimo, President and CEO, Canadian Renewable Energy Association Francis Bradley, President and CEO, Electricity Canada Michelle Branigan, CEO, Electricity Human Resources Canada George Christidis, President and CEO, Canadian Nuclear Association Elisa Obermann, Executive Director, Marine Renewables Canada Lorena Patterson, President and CEO, WaterPower Canada About Electricity Alliance CanadaElectricity Alliance Canada is a coalition of six industry associations promoting the power of electrification to lead the way to a sustainable energy future. Our mandate is to enable, promote and advocate for the increased use of electricity throughout the Canadian economy to help achieve Canada's net-zero emissions target. SOURCE Electricity Canada View original content: Sign in to access your portfolio

University of Arizona faculty say administrator causing severe harm to Native students
University of Arizona faculty say administrator causing severe harm to Native students

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

University of Arizona faculty say administrator causing severe harm to Native students

Photo by University of Arizona After several Native students at the University of Arizona expressed their concerns about student safety regarding an assistant vice provost, multiple Native faculty members are calling for immediate action from university leadership to ensure that Indigenous students receive the support they need for success. The Native American Faculty Group wrote in a letter to UofA President Dr. Suresh Garimella and other top administrators that 'Tessa L. Dysart is actively causing and has caused severe harm to the UA Native American community' since she was appointed assistant vice provost for the Office of Native American Initiatives (NAI) in 2024. Six Native faculty members wrote that students have approached them since the fall of 2024 to voice their concerns about their safety on campus. 'In our culture, we allow our children to speak, and we listen,' the group wrote. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The faculty members who signed and sent the letter include Karletta Chief (Diné), Andrew Curley (Diné), Stephanie Russo Carroll (Ahtna-Native Village of Kluti-Kaah), Jameson D. Lopez (Quechan), Sheilah E. Nicholas (Hopi) and Valerie Shirley (Diné). As professors, they said that they have witnessed 'disturbing events' that do not align with leading protocols to support Indigenous students in higher education. The letter outlines the concerns raised by students since Dysart took office, including her lack of support for student-led academic work on the Land Back movement, community panels and discussions, and her physical attempt to silence a student during the Tribal Leaders Summit. Nearly 100 people — some faculty, some students, some alumni — have signed onto the letter to back the faculty calling on the university to remove Dysart as assistant vice provost. 'We find Dysart's actions to be unprofessional, misaligned with the interests of students, and, at times, clear attempts at intimidation — behavior that is unbecoming of a senior administrator who claims to advocate for Native American students,' the letter states. Several Native students and staff have shared with the faculty group how Dysart is 'sowing harm, district and division within the UA Native community.' Dysart lacks the qualifications to be the assistant vice provost, according to the faculty group, because she has never worked with Native American student admissions, retention or service programs in higher education, nor has she published any work related to Native American student retention or advancement. During Dysart's interview process, the faculty group alleged that she claimed to have longstanding relationships with Native law students, but they had consistently heard otherwise from the Native law community. 'Dysart's portrayal of her experience is misleading,' they wrote, adding that she has worked at UofA since 2017 but only became involved with the Native Faculty Group within the past three years. Dysart has no prior connection with the Native American communities at UA, in Tucson, Arizona or the Southwest, according to the faculty group. The faculty group also expressed concerns about leaders in the Native American Advancement and Tribal Engagement (NAATE) office, including Levi Esquerra and Kari McCormick. Due to the ongoing concerns involving NAI and NAATE leadership, the faculty group said they cannot in 'good faith' recommend UofA to Indigenous students. The group wrote that they would rather refer Indigenous students to Arizona State University and Northern Arizona University due to the well-qualified administrators running their Native American initiatives. Dysart lacks the stellar reputation and qualifications of the Native Higher Administrators at ASU or NAU, according to the faculty group, and she does not possess the qualifications of many researchers in Native American education. 'Dysart earns $167,116 per year, yet there is no accountability, review, or annual reports showing her performance serving Native American faculty and staff,' the letter states. 'We have no confidence in Tessa Dysart.' The Arizona Mirror reached out to UofA and Dysart for comment, but did not receive a response. As part of the letter, the faculty group shared their disappointment in the consolidation of the Native American Student Affairs cultural center and the termination of its director, Julian Juan. Under Juan's leadership, the faculty group said that the Indigenous community at the University of Arizona has had only positive experiences. 'As a tight-knit community, we have consistently witnessed Juan's advocacy in fostering a safe and supportive space at NASA even as Dysart, Esquerra and McCormick contribute to a climate of hostility,' the letter said, noting that Juan is one of only three Tohono O'odham directors in the history of Native American Student Affairs, which is commonly referred to as NASA. 'In contrast to Dysart, Juan has deep connections and experience with tribal leaders and the local community,' the faculty wrote. 'Juan understands the importance of creating culturally appropriate programs and activities that create a sense of belonging for Native American students struggling to find their place and belonging within the Wildcat community.' UofA fired Juan on May 27. The university wrote in his termination letter that he failed to fulfill his duties as director. The faculty group expressed appreciation that NASA will continue to exist, but they 'adamantly oppose' moving it under Dysart's supervision at NAI, citing students' consistent concerns about their safety around her and her limited experience in student affairs. The faculty group is calling on Patricia Prelock, the new provost and senior vice president of academic affairs at UofA, to return NASA under the office of the provost, remove Dysart, reinstate Juan, reopen the NAI assistant vice provost position, create a Native American Faculty Council and maintain the Native American Community Council. 'As members of sovereign tribal nations that have nation-to-nation relationships with the United States federal government, we ask you to respect our sovereignty and fulfill our requests,' they said. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store