‘Do You Like Tootsie Rolls?': Inside Trump's Hardcore Candy Addiction
Since the start of his second term, President Donald Trump has been busy triggering constitutional crises, setting due process and other basic rights on fire, rocking the U.S. economy with a trade war based on horrifically bad math, wielding the Justice Department and other agencies to target his political enemies, and bringing a level of lawlessness and corruption to the federal government not seen since, well, maybe ever — all while his lieutenants work around to clock to grant him the authoritarian powers of a mad 'king.'
He has also, in the words of one White House official, been consuming 'an insane amount of candy — just so much candy.'
It is fairly common knowledge that Trump is such an avid guzzler of Diet Coke that he had a 'Diet Coke button' installed on the Resolute Desk in the White House's Oval Office. Something many of his voters and biggest fans might not even know about their favorite 'dictator' on 'day one' is that Trump — according to various current and former administration officials and campaign aides, as well as other informal advisers and friends — is a longtime, self-described 'candy addict.'
During both of his administrations and on his presidential campaigns, seven sources attest, Trump has ensured that there is plenty of candy surrounding him. In his two presidencies, he has had aides keep bowls, or baskets, filled with different types of candy — Tootsie Rolls, Reese's, caramels, Life Savers, M&Ms, Starburst, Hershey's, Mars bars, Milky Ways, the works — around the West Wing. At times, there's a bowl or basket of candy right outside the Oval Office, and he'll summon close aides to bring it into the Oval whenever he has a craving.
The president, who describes himself as a lifelong teetotaller, at times jokingly refers to his candy as 'my alcohol,' according to three of the sources. In summoning the candy during his two different stints in the White House, Trump has been known to shout things like, 'Bring me the alcohol!' or, 'Gimme the alcohol.'
For years, certain top aides assumed the rotating role of, in the words of two sources close to Trump, the 'candy people,' so that Trump can have fast, easy access to his treats. As president, Trump has made a point of making light of his candy habit, while unwrapping and snacking on sweets, to senior administration officials and other allies during any number of high-stakes policy meetings, including in some that involved discussing potential bombing targets and military response plans, or Covid-19 death tolls, two sources with direct knowledge of the matter say.
Some of these current and former Trump officials say that the president also sometimes stress-eats his candy. One former senior adviser recalls Trump eating an 'unusually big' amount of candy during his months-long crusade to overturn the 2020 presidential election that he lost to Joe Biden.
'He eats a ton of candy,' another former senior Trump aide summarizes.
On March 10, weeks before Trump launched a massive new trade war on his so-called 'Liberation Day,' the president met in the Oval Office with Art Laffer, a famous Reaganite economist who's been an informal adviser and friend to Trump for years. Laffer says it was an hour-long sit-down to discuss economic policy and a wide range of other topics.
Laffer tells Rolling Stone that upon arriving in the Oval Office, as they were each sitting down at the Resolute desk, the president asked him: 'Do you like Tootsie Rolls?' At this time, Trump was brandishing what Laffer calls a 'big candy basket.'
'It had a lot of stuff. He was digging in it,' he recounts. 'He threw me two Tootsie Rolls, flipped them right across the desk.'
Trump also asked, 'Oh, do you like Milk Duds?' before slipping the economist a 'tiny box of Milk Duds.' Laffer says that later in the meeting, he 'somehow' ended up with 'some caramels,' though he can't be sure if or when the president slid those his way. 'He was eating candy, too, of course,' he says. 'It was very charming.'
'He says to me: 'You know, there are some people who are addicted to alcohol. But I'm addicted to candy.' I said to him — jokingly — that 'I'm addicted to both!''
The president chuckled in response, Laffer notes.
Reached for comment on Wednesday, the Trump White House's staff were not amused — or were they?
'While President Trump is working tirelessly everyday to work on behalf of the American people to Make America Great Again, there are Fake News outlets like Rolling Stone that seem more interested in peddling falsehoods and fabricating stories. That's why nobody reads them any more and they are rated lower than Candy Corn,' says Steven Cheung, Trump's White House communications director.
Trump — who now leads an international movement of right-wing authoritarianism — and his sweet tooth have been alluded to in past testimonials.
For instance, in January 2018, The Washington Post reported on how then-House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) acted as 'Trump's fixer, friend, and candy man,' and had noticed that 'when the president reached for a handful of Starbursts … the president was careful to pluck out and eat two flavors: cherry and strawberry.'
The Post adds that days after picking up on Trump's preference, McCarthy — eager to suck up — 'bought a plentiful supply of Starbursts and asked a staffer to sort through the pile, placing only those two flavors in a jar. McCarthy made sure his name was on the side of the gift, which was delivered to a grinning Trump, according to a White House official.'
Not everybody in the upper ranks of the second Trump administration, though, feels the same way about candy as the president does. Last month, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's secretary of Health and Human Services, told Trump during a televised Cabinet meeting that he was working on barring food-stamp recipients from using their benefits to buy candy.
More from Rolling Stone
Trump's Assault on Veterans Is Already Taking a Toll
Voice of America Will Be Fed OAN's Far-Right Coverage, Says Trump Admin
Lawyers Say Trump Is Trying to Send Asian Immigrants to Libya
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Canada plans to hit NATO spending target early and reduce US defense reliance, Carney says
TORONTO (AP) — Canada will meet NATO's military spending guideline by early next year and diversify defense spending away from the United States, Prime Minister Mark Carney said Monday. Carney said Canada will achieve NATO's spending target of 2% of gross domestic product five years earlier than it had previously planned. 'Our military infrastructure and equipment have aged, hindering our military preparedness,' Carney said. 'Only one of our four submarines is seaworthy. Less than half of our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational. More broadly we are too reliant on the United States.' According to NATO figures, Canada was estimated to be spending 1.33% of GDP on its military budget in 2023, below the 2% target that NATO countries have set for themselves. Canada previously said it was on track to meet NATO's spending target by the end of the decade. 'Our goal is to protect Canadians, not to satisfy NATO accountants,' Carney said. The announcement of increased spending came as Canada is about to host a summit of the Group of Seven leading industrialized nations in Alberta on June 15-17, and before the NATO summit in Europe. It also comes as NATO allies are poised to increase the commitment well beyond the 2% target. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said last week that most U.S. allies at NATO endorse U.S. President Donald Trump's demand that they invest 5% of gross domestic product on their defense needs and are ready to ramp up security spending even more. Carney has said that he intends to diversify Canada's procurement and enhance the country's relationship with the EU. 'We should no longer send three quarters of our defense capital spending to America,' Carney said in a speech at the University of Toronto. 'We will invest in new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery, as well as new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the seafloor and the Arctic.' Canada has been in discussions with the European Union to join an EU drive to break its security dependency on the United States , with a focus on buying more defense equipment, including fighter jets, in Europe. Carney's government is reviewing the purchase of U.S. F-35 fighter jets to see if there are other options. Carney said that the U.S. 'is beginning to monetize its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its (relative) contributions to our collective security.' 'Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu,' Carney said. Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st U.S. state have infuriated Canadians, and Carney won the job of prime minister after promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump. Carney said that the long-held view that Canada's geographic location will protect Canadians is becoming increasingly archaic. European allies and Canada have already been investing heavily in their armed forces, as well as on weapons and ammunition, since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.
Forbes
28 minutes ago
- Forbes
Travel Ban Reinstated By Trump With Mostly Muslim Countries
President Donald J. Trump, citing national security concerns, has reinstated and expanded the controversial nationality-based travel ban first introduced during his initial term. The new ban, formalized in a Presidential Proclamation that came into effect on Monday, June 9, 2025, suspends the entry of nationals from 19 countries, primarily targeting Muslim-majority and African nations. The proclamation fully suspends immigrant and nonimmigrant visa issuance to nationals of 12 countries: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. It imposes partial restrictions on B-1/B-2 tourist visas and F, M, and J student and exchange visas for nationals of Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. Exceptions apply to green card holders, dual nationals, certain special immigrant visa holders, athletes in international competitions, and immediate relatives of U.S. citizens. The administration relies on a section of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which authorizes the president to suspend the entry of any class of noncitizens deemed 'detrimental to the interests of the United States.' That authority was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii (2018), which ruled 5-4 that President Trump's third version of the travel ban was constitutional, emphasizing executive deference on immigration and national security. But critics argue that this expanded ban perpetuates discriminatory intent, noting the disproportionate impact on Muslim and African nations and the invocation of Trump's 2024 campaign pledge to 'restore the travel ban and keep radical Islamic terrorists out.' Stephen Yale-Loehr, a professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, predicts court challenges but warns that they may fail under the current precedent. 'Even if this expansion is legal, it is not good policy,' he said. 'Families will be separated, and we are not necessarily safer.' The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called the order 'ideologically motivated,' 'unnecessary,' and 'overbroad,' criticizing its chilling effect on lawful travel, academic exchange, and humanitarian reunification. Legal scholars have started to question the constitutionality of this policy. More specifically, they contend that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits governments from denying equal legal protection, while the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment forbids favouring or disfavoring any religion. Critics argue that Trump's policy, which targets specific nations commonly associated with certain religions, risks violating both clauses by enabling discrimination based on nationality and faith. Additionally, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 abolished national origin quotas to prevent such bias. By reinstating restrictions linked to religious or national identity, opponents claim the policy mirrors discriminatory practices that the law aimed to eliminate. Jeremy Robbins, Executive Director of the American Immigration Council, noted: 'Blanket nationality bans have never demonstrated any meaningful national security value. This ban hurts our economy and punishes immigrants who qualify to come legally.' According to the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) 'In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute.' Nationals from the banned countries represent more than 475 million people globally. Beyond family separations, the ban may deter students, scientists, and health professionals at a time when the U.S. is experiencing labor shortages in STEM and healthcare. Universities like Harvard have expressed alarm at the targeting of international students, as the administration simultaneously suspended new visas for foreign scholars at select institutions, further stoking fears of ideological purges in academia. The 2025 travel ban echoes policies from Trump's first term and extends their scope. The first 'Muslim ban' of 2017 was repeatedly struck down until a more narrowly tailored version survived judicial review. Today's ban, while more procedurally refined, raises the same fundamental concern: are Americans safer by denying entry based on birthplace? Lyndon B. Johnson's signing of the 1965 INA famously stated that 'the harsh injustice of the national origins quota system' would never return. Critics now argue that President Trump has revived that very shadow, using presidential proclamations instead of legislative quotas. 'This is not national security—it's national scapegoating,' said CAIR Executive Director Nihad Awad. 'It undermines constitutional values and stigmatizes entire populations for political gain.' The legality of the 2025 travel ban reinstated as it is may pass muster under Trump v. Hawaii, but its morality, logic, and long-term consequences remain in question. As lawsuits mount and civil rights groups prepare their defences, the nation must decide: do we protect ourselves by shutting doors or by standing firm in our values of openness, equality, and due process?
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk predicts Trump's tariffs will cause recession amid growing spat with president
Former presidential adviser and confidante Elon Musk escalated his growing feud with President Trump by saying the president's tariffs would result in a recession later this year. 'The Trump Tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year,' he wrote on his social media website, X. The remark is the latest dig at Trump's policies since the tech billionaire left his role in the administration last week as head of the government cost-cutting panel known as the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. Musk blasted Republicans' tax-and-spending-cut bill this week, which Trump helped to shepherd through the House last month, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Beyond the president's policies, Musk also attacked Trump personally, claiming Thursday that Trump is mentioned in files pertaining to Jeffrey Epstein, the convicted child abuser who died in jail in 2019. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: [Donald Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he wrote on X. Musk's efforts with DOGE during his time in the Trump administration stirred a flurry of controversy and led to resignations of top officials in multiple agencies, including the IRS and the Treasury Department. Concerns about his team's access to private data have resulted in lawsuits. 'DOGE's mission to advise OMB and the White House on how to slash regulations and cut expenditures puts at risk important consumer safeguards and public protections,' Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, an advocacy group that brought a lawsuit against the administration, said in a January statement. Controversies have also been swirling about Musk's personal life. A recent New York Times investigation found that Musk was 'juggling … a drug habit far more serious than previously known.' Musk's criticism is channeling concerns among economists and business leaders about the prospect of a recession resulting from tariffs. Trump's tariffs — notably his 'reciprocal,' country-specific tariffs and triple-digit tariffs on China — have been walked back, but a highly elevated overall U.S. tariff rate relative to recent decades has remained in place. The overall tariff rate is somewhere between 10 and 15 percent now, according to various estimates, and Trump's tariffs are expected to pull in about $2.5 trillion in federal revenues. The Federal Reserve has repeatedly painted a stagflationary picture of the economic outlook in recent months. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) factored a boosted inflationary prediction of 0.4 percentage points as a result of the tariffs into its budgetary calculations this week. However, a recession is far from guaranteed, and many predictions about the economy have grown more positive as trade negotiations have continued. The U.S. trade deficit narrowed by a record amount in April following intense front-running of tariffs by importers in the first quarter, causing a collective sigh of relief from many investors. 'The drop in imports should have a positive impact on GDP, quelling any fears of a recession in the near term,' Damian McIntyre, vice president at investment firm Federated Hermes, commented Thursday. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
