Apple must face consumer lawsuit over iCloud storage, US judge rules
June 16 (Reuters) - Apple must face a proposed class action accusing the iPhone maker of illegally monopolizing the market for digital storage and causing consumers to overpay for its iCloud service, a federal judge in California ruled, opens new tab on Monday.
U.S. District Judge Eumi Lee in San Jose, California, said the plaintiffs in the case had sufficiently alleged Apple violated antitrust law by requiring iPhone customers to use its iCloud data storage service to back up core data and device setting files.
Lee's new order revived the plaintiffs' lawsuit after she dismissed an earlier version of it. She said the consumers added substantial new allegations about the importance of data storage for all iPhone files, including restricted ones like settings data.
Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The company has denied any wrongdoing.
An attorney for the consumers had no immediate comment on the ruling.
A Los Angeles resident who said she was paying $2.99 monthly for an iCloud storage plan filed the lawsuit last year.
Apple allows third-party storage for photos and videos but not for some users' data files that are needed to 'restore' an Apple device.
Apple has defended its policy as designed to guarantee high levels of security. The company also urged Lee to dismiss the plaintiff's claims as untimely. Plaintiffs generally face a four-year window to bring claims under U.S. antitrust law.
In her ruling, Lee said it was premature to dismiss the claims as time-barred, but suggested the issue could be revisited later in the litigation.
The plaintiff's lawyers want to represent a nationwide class of at tens of millions of consumers who purchased iCloud storage plans.
The case is Felix Gamboa v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:24-cv-01270.
For plaintiffs: Steve Berman and Ben Harrington of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro
For Apple: Belinda Lee and Sarah Ray of Latham & Watkins
Read more:
Apple loses bid to pause app store reform order in Epic Games case
Google taps top Obama Supreme Court lawyer for search antitrust appeal
Apple hit with app developer class action after US judge's contempt ruling
US judge rules Apple violated order to reform App Store
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Israel-Iran truce hope in tatters
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Ankur Banerjee Investor hope of a quick resolution to the Israel-Iran conflict was swiftly dashed after the long-time rivals attacked each other again and U.S. President Donald Trump urged Iranians to evacuate Tehran. That, along with Trump reportedly calling the U.S. national security council and cutting short his visit to the Group of Seven summit, rattled investors leading to major risk-off moves. European markets are set to open deep in the red, futures indicated, while oil prices , jumped nearly 2% in Asian hours, taking gains to 7.5% since the conflict started on Friday. U.S. futures also fell but currencies were relatively stable - with the U.S. dollar reprising its role as a safe haven. The worry for markets and the world remains that of possible U.S. involvement, broadening the conflict. A White House aide said it was not true the U.S. was attacking Iran. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Fox News that Trump was aiming for a deal with Iran on the latter's nuclear-related activity, and said the U.S. would defend its assets in the region. Markets have generally been resilient to Israel-Iran developments since initial bouts of knee-jerk selling as investors look beyond the conflicts around the globe, keeping benchmark U.S. and European stock indexes close to record highs. Amid the geopolitical noise, investors are bracing for a slate of central bank meetings this week, starting with the Bank of Japan which held interest rates as widely expected. The focus was rather on what the BOJ would do to its bond-tapering programme. The BOJ decided to slow the pace of reduction of bond purchases from next fiscal year, signalling its preference to move cautiously in normalising still-easy monetary policy. The central bank faces fresh challenges in weaning the economy off decade-long stimulus that has kept rates ultra-low and left the bank with an economy-sized balance sheet. Market reaction to the BOJ's meeting outcome was muted, with the yen and bond yields glacial. As UBS analysts put it, "It's lots of mulling for not so much change." Key developments that could influence markets on Tuesday: Economic events: Germany's ZEW economic sentiment for June Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Florida budget puts millions in reserves as economic uncertainty brews. Here's a look by the numbers
On the 105th day of what was supposed to be a 60-day session, Florida lawmakers gave final approval to a leaner state budget totaling $115.1 billion, marking the end of a lawmaking season that was largely defined by inter-party clashes in the Republican-dominated capitol. The new budget lacks some of the top priorities of legislative leaders and Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, coming in $500 million less than the governor's proposed budget, and $3.5 billion less than last year's adjusted total, a goal of conservative lawmakers focused on scaling back state spending amid concerns of a broader economic slowdown. The state's legislative leaders had debated for weeks over competing tax cut proposals, initially pushing for broad sales tax relief for everyday Floridians before settling on a package that mostly benefits businesses. 'I don't view this on day 105 as a failure,' Republican Senate President Ben Albritton said. 'We dug in deep.' The budget now goes to the governor, who has the power to veto individual line items and is known for slashing into lawmakers' spending plans. Here's a look at Florida's budget by the numbers. A $115 billion budget While political and tropical storms loom on the horizon, Florida's legislative leaders have largely downplayed concerns about how President Donald Trump's aggressive and unpredictable economic policies could impact the state's budget, even as he pledges to phase out the federal agency that responds to hurricanes and other disasters that batter the state. But lawmakers have taken steps to shore up reserves, as forecasters warn of a busier than usual hurricane season and as economists fret over Trump's trade wars and a sweeping proposal to cut federal taxes and spending. Lawmakers crafted a compromise budget and tax cut package, which would save taxpayers and reduce state revenues by an estimated $1.3 billion a year, according to legislative staff. They've also taken steps to set aside an additional $750 million a year into a reserve fund for emergencies, pending voter approval. Republican House Speaker Daniel Perez said building up the reserves is about "being prepared for the unexpected." 'None of us know what the future holds,' Perez said. $750 million a year The legislature advanced a proposed constitutional amendment that would set aside $750 million a year — or an amount equal to up to 25% of the state's general revenue, whichever is less — into a reserve fund that lawmakers could only use for emergencies. The measure has to be approved by 60% of Florida voters to be implemented. The last time state officials tapped into the budget stabilization fund was in 2008, as the Great Recession blasted through Florida's tourism and development-heavy economy. Boosting the reserves is a prudent move, said Republican House Budget Committee Chair Lawrence McClure, and another way to cut state spending. 'We are doing this so that are we are truly prepared for a break the glass situation,' McClure said. Democrats have called the reserve fund a 'lock box' and said lawmakers should keep the funds on hand to support needy Floridians, at a time when many residents are priced out of their homes and schools and prisons are struggling to keep staff on the job. Tax breaks for families and corporate interests The Florida House had initially called for cutting the state's overall sales tax from 6% to 5.25%. A competing offer in the state Senate called for a tax break on clothing purchases under $75. Instead, the largest tax break lawmakers approved was for companies, by eliminating the state's business rent tax. They also approved tax cuts for a slate of special interests including casinos, airlines and NASCAR. Florida residents will get sales tax relief on hurricane supplies, sunscreen and bug spray, and a tax exemption on clothes and school supplies each August. $4 billion for school vouchers State lawmakers are setting aside $4 billion for scholarships for private and religious education, two years after the Legislature expanded the state's voucher program to make all K-12 students eligible, regardless of family income. Since then, the state's indirect spending on private school tuition and homeschooling costs has risen dramatically, which critics warn is burning through the state's budget. More than 2,200 state jobs eliminated Part of state lawmakers' push to cut back on what they see as government bloat is eliminating 2,238 vacant positions across state agencies from the department of health to the department of children and families. Many of the positions being cut have been vacant for three months. While the number of state jobs shrinks, state workers will receive an across-the-board 2% raise, while state law enforcement officers and firefighters will get a 10% total raise, and a 15% raise if they've been on the job for at least five years. $3 million for immigration detention at local jails The Legislature is also setting aside $3 million in grants for local jails that have contracted with the federal government to support immigration enforcement efforts. Florida has rushed to help the Trump administration carry out its mass deportation agenda and now leads the country in the number of local and state agencies signing on with the federal government to deputize their officers to carry out immigration enforcement. ___ Kate Payne is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Banks significantly increased fossil fuel financing in 2024, analysis finds
The world's biggest banks significantly increased their fossil fuel finance in 2024, according to an analysis. The top 65 lenders – which include UK giants Barclays, HSBC, Natwest and Lloyds Banking Group – committed 869 billion dollars (£639 billion) in financing to fossil fuels, the 16th annual Banking on Climate Chaos report said. A coalition of research and campaign groups, including the Rainforest Action Network and Reclaim finance, analysed the banks' lending and underwriting to 2,730 companies active across the fossil fuel industry. These were reported in sources such as Urgewald's Global Oil and Gas Exit List (GOGEL) and Global Coal Exit List (GCEL), Bloomberg and London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG). According to this year's findings, the top banks increased fossil fuel financing by 162 billion dollars (£120 billion) from 2023 to 2024. This marks a shift in direction after fossil fuel financing had been decreasing over the previous years since 2021. Since Donald Trump's election victory in the US last year, companies across many sectors have been weakening their climate commitments, cutting ESG investments and pulling out of climate groups. Major US lenders have left the Net Zero Banking Alliance, the sector's top climate coalition, and an increasing number of banks have watered down, or abandoned, past commitments regarding fossil fuels. The Banking on Climate Chaos report found that since the 2015 UN Paris Agreement – an international deal secured in 2015 in France to limit rising temperatures – banks have now financed fossil fuels by 7.9 trillion dollars (£5.8 trillion). The analysis also suggests that loans were the top form of financing last year, with an increase to 467 billion dollars (£343 billion) from 422 billion dollars (£310 billion) in 2023. The International Energy Agency has said that no new fossil fuel projects should be developed beyond existing fields to remain within the temperature limit. However, the report found that banks have financed companies that are expanding fossil fuels with 1.6 trillion dollars (£1.1 trillion) since 2021, and 429 billion dollars (£315 billion) alone in 2024 – a rise of 85 billion dollars (£62 billion) from the year before. The report also identifies JP Morgan Chase as the largest fossil fuel financier in the world, committing 53.5 billion dollars (£39.3 billion) to fossil fuel companies in 2024. British bank Barclays was the largest fossil fuel financier Europe in 2024, at 35.4 billion dollars (£26.0 billion), according to the report, which also found it to be among the top four with the largest absolute increase in fossil fuel financing. For the other UK banks on the list, HSBC provided a total of 16.2 billion dollars (£11.9 billion) in fossil fuel financing, Natwest provided 2.7 billion dollars (£1.9 billion), and Lloyds provided 1.6 billion dollars (£1.1 billion) – although the latter comes as a decrease from 2.3 billion dollars (£1.7 billion) in 2023, according to the analysis. Banking on Climate Chaos is authored by Rainforest Action Network, BankTrack, the Centre for Energy, Ecology, and Development, Indigenous Environmental Network, Oil Change International, Reclaim Finance, Sierra Club, and Urgewald. Allison Fajans-Turner, policy Lead at Rainforest Action Network, said: 'Even in the face of worsening disasters and increasingly dire warnings of scientists and policy experts, banks actually increased their financing to fossil fuels between 2023 and 2024 and still poured billions into expanded fossil infrastructure. 'Only rapid and robust binding government regulation and oversight can make banks change course. 'Without binding regulation, banking on climate chaos will remain banks' dominant investment strategy, tanking our economy and our planet.' Tom BK Goldtooth, executive director of the Indigenous Environmental Network, said: 'Despite their greenwashing and false promises, these banks continue to bankroll the expansion of the fossil fuel industry and the false solutions that deepen climate injustice, land grabbing, and human rights abuse. 'From carbon markets to carbon capture to geoengineering techno-fixes, these schemes are distractions from the real solutions rooted in Indigenous sovereignty, traditional Indigenous knowledge, land and oceans defence, and a just and energy transition away from extractive capitalism. 'Our lands and waters are not sacrifice zones, and our Peoples are not collateral damage.' David Tong, global industry campaign manager at Oil Change International, said: 'In 2025, banks have no excuse to keep financing fossil fuel companies. 'No major oil and gas companies we analyse plan to do anything even close to what is needed to hold global warming to 1.5C.' Lucie Pinson, director and founder at Reclaim Finance, said: 'This year, banks have shown their true colours — many have walked away from climate commitments and doubled down on financing fossil fuel expansion, even as global temperatures break records. 'A few European banks may have inched forward, but for most, the lure of dirty money has proven too strong.'
