logo
What the MAHA movement gets wrong about meat

What the MAHA movement gets wrong about meat

Vox03-04-2025

is a senior reporter for Vox's Future Perfect section, with a focus on animal welfare and the future of meat.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. visited West Virginia on March 28 to promote his 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) agenda at an event where he cruelly criticized state Gov. Patrick Morrisey's weight. Kennedy suggested that he would host a public weigh-in and celebration once Morrisey had shed 30 pounds, and Kennedy had an idea about how the governor could do it: 'We're going to put him on a carnivore diet,' Kennedy said.
Weeks before, science journalist and meat enthusiast Nina Teicholz argued in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece titled 'Meat Will Make America Healthy Again' that when the US government updates its dietary guidelines this year, it needs to keep meat firmly at the center of the plate.
This story was first featured in the Processing Meat newsletter
Sign up here for Future Perfect's biweekly newsletter from Marina Bolotnikova and Kenny Torrella, exploring how the meat and dairy industries shape our health, politics, culture, environment, and more.
Have questions or comments on this newsletter? Email us at futureperfect@vox.com!
'The Trump administration can ensure that federal dietary guidelines recognize the role of high-quality protein in improving Americans' health,' Teicholz wrote. (In her view, 'high-quality protein' comes from animals, while protein from plants is 'inferior.')
Meat industry groups, such as the National Cattlemen's Beef Association and the National Pork Board, have made similar pleas. Lucky for them, Kennedy and US Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins — who so far has acted in lockstep with the meat industry — are in charge of publishing the new federal dietary guidelines, which are updated every five years.
But the push to get Americans to eat more meat goes against what the government's own nutrition experts recommend. In December, a government-commissioned expert committee recommended the federal dietary guidelines be updated to encourage Americans to eat less red and processed meat and more protein from plant-based sources, like beans and lentils.
And it's unclear what era of meat supremacy Teicholz means to invoke when she says meat will make America healthy again. Americans are eating more meat — and other animal products — than ever, and it doesn't seem to be making us any healthier, though, as rates of diet-related diseases like cancer, heart disease, and Type 2 diabetes remain high.
Teasing apart cause and effect in nutrition research is notoriously messy and complicated, and our high levels of meat consumption alone can't explain America's high rates of chronic disease — other factors, like consumption of highly processed sugary and salty foods, along with rates of exercise, alcohol and tobacco intake, health care access, and exposure to pollution, also determine health outcomes. But study after study has found that high meat consumption can increase our risk of diet-related chronic diseases.
While many Americans might like to hear that our abnormally high levels of meat consumption is actually healthy and virtuous — and that we need to eat even more of it — nutrition research largely shows that we would be better off if we did the very opposite.
Make America eat more plants
Last week, a paper published in the journal Nature Medicine found that eating more plant-based foods — along with fewer animal products and ultraprocessed foods — is linked to a higher likelihood of healthy aging, defined as reaching 70 years of age without suffering from major chronic diseases and maintaining good cognitive, mental, and physical health.
'Our findings suggest that dietary patterns rich in plant-based foods, with moderate inclusion of healthy animal-based foods, may enhance overall healthy aging,' the researchers wrote. (There are many reasons to eat a fully plant-based diet, like animal welfare and environmental sustainability, but there isn't a strong case to be made that optimal health requires forgoing animal products entirely.)
Many MAHA supporters fall prey to the same fallacy of many liberal food reformers: the belief that only what is 'natural' is good.
Weeks earlier, a paper published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine found that butter consumption was linked to increased risk of both cancer mortality and mortality overall, while consumption of plant-based seed oils was associated with lower overall mortality, along with lower cancer and cardiovascular disease deaths.
The general consensus that more plants and less meat can improve public health has been promoted by the World Health Organization, the United Nations, and leading medical institutions. It has also driven the EAT-Lancet Commission, a large, global committee of nutrition and sustainability experts, to advocate for a diet that would reduce the average American's consumption of meat by about 75 percent.
For a time, going in that direction seemed like it might be possible. Americans ate less meat during the Great Recession, even if it was done primarily to save money rather than improve personal health. And through the 2010s, the term 'flexitarian' rose to prominence as a significant share of Americans told pollsters they were cutting back on meat while the benefits of plant-based eating entered the zeitgeist thanks to celebrities like Beyoncé and Lizzo. By the early 2020s, the hype around new-and-improved plant-based meat and milk products from startup darlings Beyond Meat, Oatly, and Impossible Foods became inescapable.
But this all proved to be more show than substance — American consumption of meat, dairy, and eggs has only increased over the last decade.
And the proverbial vibe has shifted from the days of buzzy Impossible burgers and skipping meat on Mondays. The health halo around 'plant-based' products has worn thin — in part due to flimsy science and a mass PR campaign funded by the meat industry — while meat consumption is once again culturally ascendant, as The Atlantic's Yasmin Tayag captured last week. The signs are everywhere, Tayag notes: declining plant-based meat sales, America's protein fixation, the rise of the 'manosphere,' and the belief of some of its loudest voices that masculinity requires eating lots of meat.
Messages of moderation in the annals of American nutrition research appear to be no match against the popularity of carnivore diet devotees, protein maxxing, and MAHA-aligned health influencers who rail against cooking with seed oils while praising butter and beef tallow.
After decades of government hesitance to confront the roots of America's biggest diet-related health crises, Kennedy and the MAHA coalition's promises to challenge large food companies and address chronic disease head-on is refreshing. But its prescription is more vibes and anecdotes than evidence. The MAHA coalition doesn't appear to ever question our high levels of animal product consumption, for example, but rather wants to increase it, and in supposedly 'natural' forms: raw milk over nondairy milk, butter and beef tallow over seed oils, and grass-fed beef over feedlot beef.
In this way, many MAHA supporters fall prey to the same fallacy of many liberal food reformers: the belief that only what is 'natural' is good. But milk is now pasteurized because raw milk can make people terribly sick, plant-based seed oils are likely healthier than butter, and grass-fed beef is worse for the planet and hardly better for you.
While beans and lentils are less protein-dense than meat — and are less easily digested, as Teicholz rightly points out in her op-ed, if only slightly — they're also free of cholesterol, extremely low in saturated fat, and loaded with fiber, which, unlike protein, more than 90 percent of Americans are deficient in. (And they're still a great source of protein.)
Calls to make America healthy again by eating more meat than ever may be politically popular — who doesn't want to feel empowered to do something that for so long people have been made to feel bad about? But there is a cost to this collective dismissal of nutrition and public health research: Some research has shown that countries would save on health care costs if their citizens ate more plant-rich diets.
If the Trump administration is sincere about cost cutting, and RFK Jr. is sincere about making America healthier, they both ought to take that advice to heart.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Talkiatry Chief Medical Officer and co-founder Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO named to Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives Class of 2025
Talkiatry Chief Medical Officer and co-founder Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO named to Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives Class of 2025

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Talkiatry Chief Medical Officer and co-founder Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO named to Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives Class of 2025

NEW YORK, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Talkiatry, a leading provider of high-quality, in-network psychiatry and therapy services, is proud to announce that co-founder and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO has been recognized by Modern Healthcare as one of the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives for 2025. Detailed profiles of all the honorees are featured in the June 9, 2025 issue of Modern Healthcare's magazine and online at This program honors licensed clinicians in executive roles who are recognized by the senior editors of Modern Healthcare and selected for their exceptional achievements in driving innovation, improving outcomes, serving their communities, and demonstrating exemplary leadership both within and beyond their organizations. "Becoming a clinician doesn't automatically prepare one for a leadership role, helping to guide an organization or an industry. The 50 clinicians chosen this year as the most influential, some newcomers and some we have recognized previously, are having an oversized impact," said Mary Ellen Podmolik, editor-in-chief of Modern Healthcare. "Their work is benefiting their own teams in terms of clinical advancements and financial results and is leading to better patient outcomes." With more than 600 licensed psychiatrists and 150+ therapists treating children, adults, and seniors for conditions including ADHD, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, OCD, and PTSD, Talkiatry has expanded to 47 states and reaches over 70% of commercially insured Americans through partnerships with more than 60 insurance providers, including Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aetna, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Humana. As access has increased, Talkiatry's dedication to high-quality care continues to lead to positive patient outcomes. In peer-reviewed clinical findings, two out of three patients saw their anxiety symptoms drop below clinically significant levels, and a similar portion experienced the same improvement with depression. Notably, one out of three patients achieved full remission in under 15-weeks. Among those who did not reach these thresholds, the vast majority still reported measurable improvement. Talkiatry is a physician-led practice where quality care comes first. Clinicians have the autonomy to make the best decisions for their patients, supported by structured clinical leadership, peer collaboration, and continuous education. To deliver these outcomes, Talkiatry has built an environment that prioritizes clinician support and sustainability. All clinicians receive structured onboarding, access to ongoing clinical education, and support from dedicated teams that handle scheduling, billing, and credentialing. Talkiatry is a community of like-minded, mission-driven peers. Through clinical chats, mentorship, grand rounds, and peer case consultations, the organization fosters connection, knowledge sharing, and a sense of belonging. "This recognition is a testament to the vital work the Talkiatry team is doing to expand access to high quality mental health care, regardless of a patient's geography or circumstance. Being named one of Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives reinforces the importance of our mission, and I am incredibly grateful to be part of a movement that is transforming the way mental health care is delivered in this country." - Dr. Georgia Gaveras, Co-Founder & Chief Medical Officer, Talkiatry. For information or questions about the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives program, please contact: MH Awards mhawards@ About Modern HealthcareModern Healthcare is the most trusted business news and information brand in the healthcare industry. Modern Healthcare empowers healthcare leaders and influencers to make timely and informed business decisions. To learn more or subscribe, go to About TalkiatryTalkiatry is a national mental health practice that provides in-network psychiatry and therapy. Co-founded by Robert Krayn and Georgia Gaveras, DO, Talkiatry is solving the core challenges patients and clinicians face in accessing and providing high-quality mental healthcare. With over 2 million patient visits delivered by a growing team of 600+ full-time psychiatrists and 150+ full-time therapists, Talkiatry is the largest dedicated psychiatry practice in the U.S. Our technology platform removes administrative burdens so clinicians can focus solely on patient care, resulting in strong clinical outcomes and significantly lower burnout. At Talkiatry, we're reimagining psychiatric care to be accessible, human, and responsible. Learn more at and follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. Media Contactpress@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Talkiatry Sign in to access your portfolio

Welcome to the Biocene: How ‘natural capitalism' can save America and the world
Welcome to the Biocene: How ‘natural capitalism' can save America and the world

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Welcome to the Biocene: How ‘natural capitalism' can save America and the world

Something much deeper than the price of eggs was at work when voters re-elected President Trump last year. Most Americans were unhappy with the country's direction; they still are. Last month, 59 percent said they were dissatisfied with 'the way things are going in the United States.' It's not just that people have very different opinions about the day's pressing issues. We lack a national vision or mission that transcends our differences. No one has articulated a compelling alternative to the country's unease, ennui and anger. We had purpose in the past. What is our purpose now? Trump's version of America definitely is not it. If most of us are unsatisfied, perhaps it is because America is not living up to its image as an opportunity society. The 90 percent may feel that their physical and economic security is less certain than it used to be. Science tells us, and weather disasters confirm, that civilization is careening toward a dystopian future. Trump is pressing the accelerator. However, the climate is only one of nine 'safe operating spaces' for life on the planet. We have already left the safety zones for six. What might our mission be? I'll suggest one for the sake of discussion. Its dual objective would be to (a) give everyone the tools to be the best they can be and (b) return society to safe operating spaces in this century. Regarding the first objective, let's assume we have a choice between three economic and social systems. The first is Darwinian capitalism — a dog-eat-dog economy that results in a permanent wealth gap between the haves and have-nots. Success in the Darwinian economy often is not based on merit. The rich get richer by controlling and rigging economic policies. They buy influence and pay accountants to find loopholes that allow them to avoid taxes. They oppose government regulations because they want unhindered profiteering. They believe it is their manifest destiny to rule. Meanwhile, less fortunate Americans remain that way because of inferior education, unaffordable health care, institutional barriers, less intergenerational wealth transfer, the inability to escape 'sacrifice zones,' uninsured losses to weather disasters, and a tax system that shifts wealth upward. It is exceedingly rare that any of them find, let alone climb, ladders to the top. If there are geniuses, artists, scientists, educators, saints and potential philanthropists in their midst, we will never know. The alternative is social capitalism, similar to systems found in the Nordic countries, whose people consistently rank as the happiest in the world. It combines a market economy with government services that offer everyone the basic tools for success: universal health care, free quality education through the post-secondary level, equal pay for equal work, child-care assistance for working families, social safety nets for people with genuine disabilities, and so on. Social capitalism ensures equal opportunity but not equal results. Each person's success depends on their willingness to use the tools and work hard. And yet social capitalism would be intergenerational, with each generation handing the next a world of ample natural resources and ecosystem services, a stable climate, and a robust economy. The U.S. Constitution would codify this obligation by recognizing the rights of future generations. A third economic alternative would return civilization to the planet's safe operating spaces. It is 'natural capitalism,' an economy 'in service to life,' as Hunter Lovins, one of its leading advocates, describes it. Its objective is society's productive harmony with nature Its goals would include the following: With these and other steps, the U.S. would model an evolutionary shift in humanity's relationship with the rest of the natural world. The Anthropocene era, a mea culpa on humanity's mistreatment of the biosphere, we would progress to the Biocene, where we recognize and respect our symbiotic relationship with the rest of the biological world. Then, if we choose to transcend the surly bonds of biology, we might know enough to do no harm. William S. Becker, a former U.S. Department of Energy central regional director, is executive director of the Presidential Climate Action Project. The project is not affiliated with the White House.

Soothing farm groups' MAHA tensions
Soothing farm groups' MAHA tensions

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Soothing farm groups' MAHA tensions

QUICK FIX — White House officials are meeting with farm groups after weeks of backlash to a Make America Healthy Again Commission report that targeted pesticides. — Employees who left USDA will be allowed to come back to help fight fires this summer. — The Senate is looking to unveil a scaled-back version of the House GOP-led reconciliation agriculture plans this week. HAPPY MONDAY, JUNE 9. Welcome to Morning Agriculture. I'm your host Grace Yarrow. Send tips to gyarrow@ Follow us at @Morning_Ag for more. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day HEALING MAHA WOUNDS: The White House is setting up meetings this week to discuss farm groups' concerns with a recent Make America Healthy Again report that targeted pesticides, according to two people familiar with the plans. Officials will meet with several groups at a time across the commodity, food manufacturing and pesticide industries for hour-long conversations, said the people, who were granted anonymity to share further details. The meeting invitations come after farm groups spent the last few weeks aggressively lobbying the Trump administration to open up public comment and gather industry input privately before releasing its final list of MAHA policy recommendations, which is due in August. One agriculture industry insider, granted anonymity so they could candidly share their thoughts, said that it's 'not clear' how this effort will influence the final recommendations. 'We're all very interested to see how these meetings play out over the next week and if it is a meaningful gesture or not,' the person said. 'Is this just an exercise in placating stakeholders?' How we got here: Groups that have kept quiet in the face of President Donald Trump's tariff plans and funding cuts drew the line at supporting HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s MAHA Commission report, which targets the use of glyphosate and atrazine, according to industry representatives and former and current administration officials, granted anonymity to discuss the behind-the-scenes tensions. The initial report, which came out in May, only briefly mentions that glyphosate and atrazine — two of the most widely used herbicides — could lead to adverse health impacts, and it notes that federal reviews of data have not established a direct link. But groups are nevertheless worried that the report could create the impression that U.S.-produced food products aren't safe. 'American agriculture does not feel sufficiently protected against government mandates that would outlaw chemicals they need,' said one agriculture advocate granted anonymity to share concerns about the administration's work. 'How do we know that the nanny-state side of RFK Jr.'s agenda isn't going to show itself?' The White House didn't respond to a request for comment about the meetings, but spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement earlier Friday that the MAHA Commission will 'continue to engage with stakeholders' as it drafts next steps. 'President Trump's initiative to Make America Healthy Again is a bottom-up movement, with stakeholders across the board — including farmers, everyday parents, local governments, and family physicians — having a role to play,' Desai said. A former Biden administration official, granted anonymity to discuss the private lobbying efforts, said farmers 'basically instinctively trust Trump' on tariff and other agricultural policies, but don't have the same belief in Kennedy. 'They think [Trump] has a master plan and that ultimately it will all work out,' the person said. 'That is not the feeling about this report.' Read more from your host here. AROUND THE AGENCIES SMOKEY BEAR BACKUP: Forest Service employees who accepted President Donald Trump's offer to resign will still be allowed to take on wildfire assignments this summer, according to a new agency memo obtained by our Jordan Wolman. The announcement comes as the U.S. barrels toward fire season and as officials around the country worry about the Forest Service's ability to staff response efforts now that thousands of employees have been fired from or have quit their posts under the Trump administration. More details: The option to return to fire assignments is targeted at employees who held some wildland-fighting qualifications, known as 'red cards.' Interested workers can register for fire assignments through Sept. 30, the expiration date for their administrative leave under the deferred resignation program, according to the memo. 'Many employees enrolled in the Deferred Resignation Program (DRP) expressed willingness to perform critical wildfire operations before their employment term ends,' the memo said. Forest Service and USDA officials worked to 'develop a solution that will allow employees on administrative leave to temporarily return to active service.' The memo outlines procedures for these workers to follow, including a call to bring their personal devices and computers 'to operate self-sufficiently' and to ensure dispatch centers have their personal contact information. The workers will be able to expense any flights, hotels or rental cars necessary for their fire assignments with proper approvals. 'Secretary [Brooke] Rollins has made it a top priority for the Department to ensure the entire agency is geared to respond to what is already an above normal summer fire season,' USDA spokesperson Alec Varsamis said in a statement when asked for further details. On The Hill LATEST IN SNAP CLASHES: The Senate Ag Committee is looking to release plans for their version of agriculture spending cuts to pay for farm bill programs and Republicans' policy megabill. They're looking to hit $150 billion in net cuts, and will need $220 billion in spending slashes to pay for $70 billion in farm bill programs. Several senators have privately raised concerns with the House's proposal to cut federal spending by forcing states to foot more of the bill for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Also this week: The Senate will vote to proceed with the confirmation process for Stephen Vaden to be deputy secretary at USDA. TRADE CORNER VIETNAM'S AG DEALS: Vietnam's agriculture officials announced plans to buy $3 billion in U.S. agricultural products after meeting with American ag leaders last week, which could give producers up to a 23 percent boost in exports to the Southeast Asian country. Do Duc Duy, Vietnam's minister of agriculture and environment, led a delegation of 50 ag agencies and organizations to Iowa, Ohio, Maryland and Washington, D.C., last week. Stepping back: Rollins is scheduled to visit Vietnam in the coming months on one of her overseas trade missions. Ag groups and lobbyists are especially watching her meetings in Vietnam and India, hoping for more opportunities in the two countries for high-value products like meat and ethanol. The U.S. had a $123.5 billion trade deficit with Vietnam in 2024. U.S. goods exported to Vietnam last year were valued at $13.1 billion. NEXT UP: The U.S. and China will hold their next round of trade talks in London on Monday as the two countries attempt to lower tensions and chart a path toward a trade deal, our Daniel Desrochers writes. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will meet with their Chinese counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng, Trump said Friday in a post on Truth Social. Row Crops — Eggs linked to a salmonella outbreak have made dozens of people sick in seven states in the West and Midwest. (The Associated Press) — Archaeologists in northern Michigan have uncovered what is likely the largest intact remains of an ancient Native American agricultural site in the eastern half of the U.S. (NPR) — ICYMI: Some Senate Republicans are angling to have their states reap benefits from Rollins' plan to spread more department employees across the country, our Samuel Benson reports. THAT'S ALL FOR MA! Drop us a line and send us your agriculture job announcements or events: gyarrow@ marciabrown@ jwolman@ sbenson@ rdugyala@ and gmott@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store