French Rafale Fighters Project Power Forward To Sweden
French Air and Space Force Rafale fighters are among the aircraft taking part in a power-projection exercise including operations over Sweden, which joined NATO a little over a year ago. The latest edition of the Pégase (Pegasus) drill comes as European NATO members look at bolstering their deterrence capabilities independent of the United States, with France very much at the center of these discussions. Notably, the maneuvers are also being accompanied by an exercise in which French military aircraft have been rapidly dispersed to alternative airfields, something that would be required in a large-scale conflict with Russia, for example.
Far North | PEGASE 25 kicks off
combat power deployed to Northern Europe.
A concrete commitment to European security, side by side with our allies, to deter and defend.Next stop:
pic.twitter.com/jcZ84pAQQQ
— The
Joint Staff – Military operations (@FrenchForces) April 22, 2025
The French Air and Space Force today published details of Pégase 25, which saw aircraft launch from the airbases of Mont-de-Marsan, Istres, Saint-Dizier, and Orléans yesterday. The aircraft involved comprise six Rafales, two A400M transports, and a single A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport (MRTT), known locally as Phénix.
The Pégase Grand Nord phase, described by the service as 'an unprecedented edition of our annual power-projection mission,' saw these assets heading for Sweden and 'demonstrating the Air Force's ability to deploy rapidly, far, and autonomously.'
Notably, the French Air and Space Force described this as a strategic exercise, designed 'to assert our presence, strengthen our partnerships, and demonstrate our commitment to European security, alongside our allies.'
Writing on X, Etienne Marcuz, an associate fellow of the French think tank FRS, who focuses on strategic systems and nuclear deterrence, noted that at least some of the six Rafales deployed on Pégase 25 have been drawn from the airborne component of France's nuclear deterrent. Specifically, this is the 4e Escadre de Chasse (4th Fighter Wing) of the Strategic Air Forces, home-based at Saint-Dizier.
It did not take long, we now have the answer, part of the 6 Rafale taking part of #PEGASE25 operation that flew yesterday to
Sweden belong to the
French strategic air forces
And the word "deter" is once again used (though without "nuclear")This is a significant…1/ https://t.co/D4eLORFxO7pic.twitter.com/4AJlcv9PJN
— Etienne Marcuz (@Etienne_Marcuz) April 23, 2025
As you can read about here, France has around 50 two-seat Rafale Bs assigned to the nuclear mission, armed with ASMP-A supersonic missiles and supported by a fleet of A330 MRTT aerial refueling tankers. These aircraft are dual-role, however, and are capable of a wide range of air-to-ground missions, and air defense onces, in addition to their strategic strike role.
At this stage, it's unclear what particular missions the aircraft are taking part in during Pégase 25, and we have reached out to the French Ministry of Defense for more details. As to the Pégase Grand Nord component, it appears that at least some of the French aircraft have landed in Sweden and will be operating alongside Swedish Air Force assets. However, it's not clear if they will remain deployed in Sweden for a period or if they will move on to another country.
| The six Air Force Rafales taking part in the PÉGASE 25 mission are part of the French deterrent. https://t.co/PgGq3SMUfRpic.twitter.com/mMqj6Xninz
— French Aid to Ukraine
(@aidefranceukr) April 23, 2025
Reflecting the overall strategic nature of the exercise, Pégase 25 is also being run concurrently with a second set of maneuvers, known as Exercise Jade (standing for Jaillissement d'Escadre, or 'wing burst').
In the Jade drills, the French Air and Space Force is training to disperse aircraft from their home bases to alternative airfields, reflecting the kind of thinking that was prevalent during the Cold War, but which fell out of favor in the years immediately after that.
Having aircraft dispersed over a larger number of bases, including ones that don't have a permanent combat aircraft presence, is also key to avoiding the destruction of these assets in any kind of initial attack launched by an aggressor and for sustained operations to keep ahead of the enemy's targeting cycle. These tactics have been critical to the Ukrainian Air Force's survival and are now underpinning U.S. air combat doctrine in the Pacific with the USAF's ACE and Marines' EABO playbooks.
In the latest Jade maneuvers, which began yesterday, all the operational Mirage 2000Ds and Mirage 2000Bs assigned to Nancy Air Base were ordered to disperse to five other airfields, without prior notice. These alternative airfields included two training bases that don't normally host fighter aircraft.
…le second exercice, JADE pour "Jaillissement d'Escadre"Il s'agit d'un type d'exercice qui était en vogue durant la Guerre Froide et qui vise à s'exercer à la dispersion des appareils d'une ou plusieurs bases aériennes vers d'autres terrains d'aviation pour éviter…8/ pic.twitter.com/8poNlE5qRv
— Etienne Marcuz (@Etienne_Marcuz) April 23, 2025
[Notre Défense] Ce 22 avril 2025, la 3e escadre de chasse de la BA 133 #Nancy
a reçu un ordre inattendu : dispersion de ses Mirage 2000D et 2000B vers cinq bases aériennes différentes
Une manœuvre sans avertissement baptisée « Jade »
https://t.co/dXOg8AqV8N
pic.twitter.com/tEKj8gwsxb
— Laurent Albaret (@laurentalbaret) April 22, 2025
Although nuclear-capable aircraft don't appear to be involved in the latest Jade drill, the ability to disperse aircraft at short notice is especially important for the Strategic Air Forces. This reduces the risk of nuclear-capable Rafales being knocked out on the ground in a pre-emptive strike, ensuring the credibility of the French deterrent.
Potentially, dispersal of aircraft in this way can also make use of civilian airfields, which opens up many more opportunities to ensure the security of French Air and Space Force assets, by making it that much harder for an adversary to target them.
At the same time, sending Rafales and support assets to Sweden opens up the possibility of dispersing these aircraft to airfields outside of France. This could have multiple advantages in times of tension. As well as further complicating an adversary's targeting plans, sending combat aircraft to Sweden, for example, puts them closer to potential targets in Russia. It also sends a clear signal that France will be willing to support its NATO allies should these come under attack.
It is likely no coincidence that Sweden, which is that much closer to Russia, and which is strategically located in the Baltic region and in proximity to the High North, was chosen for Pégase 25.
Taken together, Pégase 25 and Jade indicate that France is increasingly preparing for large-scale military contingencies that might be fought both on its own territory as well as elsewhere across Europe.
For Marcuz, it was not a surprise that the French Air and Space Force would send combat aircraft — specifically nuclear-capable ones — to Sweden, in light of broader security issues in Europe.
'At the end of February, I had identified the dispatch of Strategic Air Forces aircraft along Europe's eastern border as a possible first step towards extending our deterrent to our neighbors,' Marcuz said. 'At the time, I imagined a single long flight, but a mission such as Pégase 25 over several days offers the advantage of 'visiting' countries and training in greater depth with our allies.'
Depending on how long Pégase 25 continues, airbases in other countries could also be visited, increasing the opportunities for cooperative training as well as sending a deeper message to potential adversaries.
'However, we'll have to wait for further communications, probably at a higher level, to find out whether this mission has an official 'nuclear' character, or whether it's just implied (with a correspondingly weaker message),' Marcuz added.
Whatever the specific function of nuclear deterrence within Pégase 25, this is an area in which France is currently looking to expand, to meet the resurgent Russian threat.
Last month, TWZ reported on how France will establish another nuclear-capable air base — its fourth — that will be equipped with two squadrons of the latest version of the Rafale. The new nuclear base will be Luxeuil, in eastern France, which will join those already operational at Saint-Dizier, Istres, and Avord. Notably, the nuclear base at Luxeuil is planned to receive the advanced F5-standard Rafale as well as the ASN4G missile, the next-generation standoff nuclear weapon for the French Armed Forces, which will fly at hypersonic speed.
The fact that France operates an independent nuclear deterrent has brought this capability to greater prominence in recent months.
As TWZ has noted in the past:
France, meanwhile, has both submarine-launched ballistic missiles and air-launched nuclear missiles of its own design. More importantly, these weapons are technically independent of NATO nuclear planning, unlike the British nuclear deterrent, which is also closely intertwined with that of the United States. How this would all play out when confronted by the realities of a nuclear conflict involving NATO is unclear, but it does at least provide Paris with more flexibility when it comes to discussions of how its nuclear umbrella might be extended to European NATO allies.
Earlier this year, it was reported that France is looking at the possibility of deploying air-launched nuclear weapons to Germany, an idea driven by growing concerns that the United States may no longer guarantee European security under NATO. Before he was appointed German leader, Friedrich Merz meanwhile called talks with his British and French colleagues about European 'nuclear sharing or at least nuclear security.'
According to a report in the British newspaper The Telegraph in February, citing an unnamed French official, 'Posting a few French nuclear jet fighters in Germany should not be difficult and would send a strong message' to Russia, which would aim to bolster Europe's nuclear deterrent.
More generally, France is currently witnessing an increasing focus on building up Europe's capacity to provide a defensive bulwark against Russia, driven to a significant degree by concerns about U.S. security guarantees. Of course, this includes a wide range of conventional capabilities, underpinned by the nuclear-tasked Strategic Air Forces.
The importance of the Pégase 25 drills in the wider European security context is also made clear in the French Air and Space Force's own statement on the maneuvers: 'Pégase 25 is more than an exercise: it's a concrete commitment to European security alongside our allies. Deter, protect, act together.'
While we don't know for sure to what degree the Pégase 25 exercise is focused on nuclear warfighting, it's significant that nuclear-capable Rafales and their strategic support assets are involved. More generally, it's notable that the maneuvers are being highlighted as an explicit demonstration of French commitment to broader NATO security in Europe.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Uzbekistan Builds Where the West Withdrew
Uzbekistan's interest in connectivity with Afghanistan is driven by economic opportunity, energy cooperation, security needs, and geopolitical strategy - factors that will help Uzbekistan access new markets and stabilize the region. Ambassador Javlon Vakhabov of the International Institute for Central Asia in Tashkent, Uzbekistan, calls it 'Stability Through Connectivity.' That is, Uzbekistan favors pragmatism over trying to isolate Afghanistan, and a policy that balances humanitarian support and regional security. The Central Asia republics (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, the Kyrgyz Republic, and Turkmenistan) were on the border of the wars in Afghanistan, i.e., the Afghan civil war (1992-1996, 1996-2001) and the U.S.-led NATO occupation (2001 – 2021), which they consider 'lost decades' of economic growth and social development. The republics' leaders know they and Afghanistan are 'neighbors forever' and do not have the luxury of retreating to North America if things go wrong, so policy must acknowledge geography. Uzbekistan's engagement with the Taliban began long before NATO evacuated Afghanistan in August 2021. In 1997, then-Uzbek president Islam Karimov proposed the Six plus Two Group on Afghanistan,which grew from an understanding that dialogue and a political settlement, nor armed force, was the path to peace. The group was unable to persuade the warring sides – the Taliban and the United Front (formerly the Northern Alliance) – to pursue a March 2018, Uzbekistan hosted the Tashkent Conference that urged direct peace talks without preconditions between the Taliban and the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. Unfortunately, the Taliban said it would only negotiate with the United States, the "foreign occupying force,' and demanded the departure of foreign troops before the start of negotiations. In July 2022, Tashkent hosted a conference on Afghanistan, attended by representatives of 30 countries. It was an opportunity for the international community to take the measure of Taliban officials and for the Taliban to encourage investment in Afghanistan and seek the release of Afghan assets seized by the West after the fall of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. The tone of the event was forward-looking, but Uzbek president Shavkat Mirziyoyev, '…reiterated the international community's conditions for formal diplomatic recognition, namely 'forming a broad representation of all layers of the Afghan society in state governance, ensuring basic human rights and freedoms, especially of women and all ethnic and confessional groups.'' Tashkent has consistently called for engaging with Taliban-run Afghanistan, including unfreezing the $9 billion in state assets that were seized by American and European authorities after the ouster of the Kabul government in August 2021 Central Asia is a water-stressed region and Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are in the 'severe water stress' category. The construction of the Qosh Tepa canal in Afghanistan threatened to increase tensions between the Taliban-led Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan by reducing the water flow of the Amu Darya River by 15-20% - a disaster for Central Asia agriculture. (In Uzbekistan, agriculture accounts for 25% of GDP and about 26% of the labor force.) In April 2025, Uzbekistan and Afghanistan agreed to cooperate in sharing the water resources in the Amu Darya River Basin. The republics are concerned as 'a significant reduction in the Amu Darya's flow could lead to ecosystem degradation, increased soil salinity, and deteriorating living conditions for populations downstream…[and] could hinder efforts to restore the Aral Sea and further exacerbate the region's environmental challenges.' Though Uzbekistan has not recognized the government of Taliban-run Afghanistan, the agreement on transboundary water resources demonstrates bilateral relations are becoming 'increasingly institutionalized.' Tashkent prioritizes its interests to address not just water resources but the threat of terrorist groups, 20 of which may be sheltering in Afghanistan. This effort will require serious diplomacy by all parties and is an opportunity for Uzbekistan (and the U.S.) to provide technical assistance to ensure the canal is built to minimize excessive water loss and soil salinization. Uzbekistan should take the opportunity to substitute crops less thirsty than cotton for the country's growing textile sector which plans to grow textile exports to $10 billion, and continue to import cotton from Turkey, China, and Bangladesh. (Uzbekistan also imports cotton from Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan but should take the opportunity to lead the region away from crops that deplete its water supply.) One step to peacefully resolve the water problem is to make Afghanistan a party to the 1992 Almaty Agreement which regulates water allocations based on the Soviet-era shares of water among the then-Soviet Central Asia republics. The agreement is implemented by the Interstate Commission for Water Coordination of Central Asia (ICWC) and making Afghanistan a member of the ICWC is a way to make it part of the solution and not the problem. It will teach the Taliban the 'rules of the road' in Central Asia and ensure the republics' officials have a clear understanding of Taliban personalities, motivations, and priorities. Other connectivity initiatives are: The Termez free economic zone which offers a 2-week visa for Afghan visitors and features a customs office, a hotel, storage facilities, and capacity to handle 100,000 trucks and 900,000 tons of goods a year. Trans-Afghan railway, a $7 billion, 765-kilometer link to Pakistan's ports that is expected to cut transport costs by 30–40%. And Uzbekistan may soon conduct preliminary studies on extending the railway from Hairatan to Herat, a jumping-off point for trade with Iran and Turkmenistan. Surkhan–Puli-Khumri Power Line, a 1,000 MW line to support electrification of Afghan transport, and that may potentially link to the CASA-1000 power project, a joint venture between Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. (Uzbekistan is already the leading exporter of electricity to Afghanistan, supplying nearly 60% of Afghanistan's electricity imports.) Once operational, the line will increase Uzbekistan's electricity exports to Afghanistan by 70%, delivering up to 24 million kWh daily or 6 billion kWh annually. The project spans 245.6 kilometers, with 45 kilometers on Uzbek territory—already completed—and 200.6 kilometers in Afghanistan. The capacity of this line will not only enhance power availability but also facilitate the electrification of the Hairatan–Mazar-i-Sharif railroad, reducing transportation costs by replacing diesel-powered trains with cleaner electric locomotives. Uzbekistan sees many opportunities in Afghanistan and in 2024 trade climbed to $1.1 billion, most of that exports from Uzbekistan. There are commercial opportunities to be sure, but Tashkent does not want to contain Afghanistan, but to use it as a regional bridge, and not just for trade. There are concerns Afghanistan is a potential source of future transnational terrorism, though that may be stymied by intelligence sharing between the Taliban and the U.S., who share concerns about the Al-Qaeda (AQ) and the Islamic State – Khorasan Province (IS-K) presence in Afghanistan. More trade will not necessarily make Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State change their policies but more economic opportunity may make it harder for them to find recruits, and efforts like funding madrassas in Afghanistan may help detoxify the educational system. And the Taliban can build legitimacy if they are seen to be putting the peoples' welfare first by encouraging trade and business. That won't be favored by the U.S., but after two decades of mayhem in the Hindu Kush, much instigated by America, Washington should encourage action – by anyone - that allows Afghanistan to build infrastructure and make money by means other than poppy cultivation. Outside meddling in Afghanistan usually leads to tears, but if Tashkent can work with the moderate, outward-looking Taliban based in Kabul that want to improve the economy, it may subtly tip the balance against the hard-liners in Kandahar. (Yes, Siraj Haqqani and Mullah Omar are the 'moderates' but that is where we are right now.) Uzbekistan may have a role in the future exploitation of critical minerals in Central Asia and can help the U.S. build a secure critical mineral supply chain. According to Visual Capitalist, 'Out of the 50 minerals deemed critical by the U.S. government, the U.S. is 100% reliant on imports for 12 of them, and over 50% reliant for another 321 critical minerals.' Central Asia and Afghanistan are endowed with critical minerals but their isolated location presents a difficult transport problem. Also, mining and processing rare earths requires a lot of water which is in short supply in the region, though a new Chinese technology may triple production speed and reduce pollution, but will put China in a key position, something the U.S. will probably oppose. Andrew Korybko notes that partial completion of the Trans-Afghan railway may still benefit the republics if they can backhaul Afghanistan's minerals for processing in the republics or in Russia or China. The republics will need to secure investment for local, sustainable processing of the minerals (with off-take agreements), but Washington and Brussels must make serious offers to keep the stuff out of Russian and Chinese hands. (Exhortations by Washington to 'do the right thing' and not sell to China and Russia, backed by the hint of sanctions, are a tax on Central Asia and only diminish America's standing in the region.) Uzbekistan, a double-landlocked country, faces hurdles accessing global markets. Connectivity with Afghanistan offers a pathway to South Asia, particularly through Pakistan's seaports Karachi and Gwadar, though Uzbekistan is improving trade relations with Iran as its ports Bandar Abbas and Chabahar, and access to the North-South Transport Corridor, are 'Plan B' if the trans-Afghan route is untenable. Over the past decade, Tashkent has sought to make Central Asia a 'safe neighborhood,' and many of Uzbekistan's priorities, such as peacefully settling border disputes with the neighboring republics and encouraging a broad-based government in Kabul, are shared by Washington, but the Central Asia republics have a broader definition of the regional security, one that is grounded in diplomacy human development, and trade, and that includes trade and normal political relations with Russia, China, Iran, and Afghanistan. Central Asian is no longer a platform for the NATO campaign against the Taliban, but will it become a platform to engage the Taliban, who probably aren't going anywhere despite Washington's ongoing economic warfare. In April, Uzbek president Shavkat Mirziyoyev announced he is ready to work with the European Union (EU) and other international partners to support Afghanistan's development 'to overcome the current crises,' a policy that was welcomed by the Taliban. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and António Costa, President of the European Council, visited Uzbekistan in April with the intent, in von der Leyen's words, 'to take our partnership with Central Asia to the next level.' Aside from the standard fare of promoting European foreign direct investment to the region, securing access to critical minerals, and promoting educational exchanges, Central Asia's putative European partners should move smartly to work with the republics to ensure Afghanistan a productive member of the region and no longer a source of terrorism and narcotics. The failed NATO mission in Afghanistan, though it included European troops, is seen as an American loss, giving Europe more post-war maneuver room in Central Asia. And Europe will rely more than America on East-West trade from Asia via the Belt and Road and the Middle Corridor, so it may be the right partner right now for Central Asia. But the Central Asian republics aren't waiting for the EU and international partners to get to work. In May 2025, shortly after Mirziyoyev's announcement, Tashkent commissioned the Termez Dialogue on Connectivity Between Central and South Asia as a permanent platform for regional connectivity. Uzbekistan and Afghanistan both favor an 'economy first' policy with their neighbors, which the republics call "acceptance of reality" in the wake of the West's failed nation-building project in Afghanistan. The same week the republics' delegates convened in Termez, Uzbekistan to plan to boost Central and South Asian connectivity, Pakistan, China and Afghanistan agreed to expand the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to Afghanistan. CPEC has fallen short of the partners' expectations, so it remains to be seen if including Afghanistan is a smart move or will just burn more of China's money. And on the heels of the Termez meeting, Iran and China launched a railway route from Xian in western China to the Aprin dry port near Iran's capital, Tehran. The route will reportedly cut travel time from 30 days via sea to 15 days and will avoid the Strait of Malacca and the Hormuz Strait, chokepoints the U.S. Navy hoped to exploit in future conflicts. The route will not pass through Afghanistan but is Beijing's vote of confidence in the region as a connectivity space. Uzbekistan and the other Central Asia republics helped NATO in Afghanistan but it was all for naught, so now it's time for get back to basics - economic and social development - via initiatives like the Uzbekistan 2030 Strategy, and promoting good governance and increasing civic engagement through initiatives like the Center for Progressive Reforms. Washington should focus on how it can assist these sorts of efforts by the republics and not be distracted and agitated by their commonsense wish to not isolate neighboring Afghanistan. By James Durso for More Top Reads From this article on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Widely shared video claims to show Ukrainian soldiers shooting deserters. Here's what we know
In early June 2025, a video circulated online claiming to show Ukrainian soldiers shooting deserters near the Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk. The footage circulated amid reports of ongoing fighting near the city, a crucial transport hub in the Donetsk region. A posting (archived) of the video by the right-wing media personality Alex Jones had more than 4.6 million views at the time of this writing. (X user @RealAlexJones) Jones wrote: NATO backed, Ukrainian military caught by a Russian drones camera executing deserters. The Ukrainian soldiers shot their own deserters in the Pokrovsk sector As Ukraine slowly reaches the last stage before a collapse of combat capabilities. Exclusive footage from Russian scouts, who observed the AFU on the Shevchenko-Pokrovsk line while conducting aerial reconnaissance. Two Ukrainian "fighters" forced three fellow soldiers to their knees and shot them. The video shows that one of the unfortunate ones, hearing the first shots, rushed from the spot, but he did not manage to run far. Units of the 68th Jaeger Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces were stationed in this area. The video mainly circulated across (archived) X (archived) and on (archived) Facebook (archived). However, Snopes' investigation could not confirm exactly what the video, which was purportedly recorded near Pokrovsk, showed, nor the time or exact location it was recorded. A spokesperson for the General Directorate of Public Communications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine said via email that they could not verify the video in question but that it bore "all the hallmarks of falsification and manipulation of information." They added: "We emphasize that the Armed Forces of Ukraine, in particular the units performing combat missions in the Pokrovsk area, act exclusively within the framework of international humanitarian law, the Geneva Conventions, and other norms governing the conduct of war." Ukraine's criminal code punishes military deserters with up to 12 years in prison during periods of martial law. The code does not include capital punishment for desertion. We reached out to the Russian military to ask if they could confirm that the video was authentic, when it was recorded, where, and what it showed, and await replies to our queries. One early version (archived) of the footage circulated on June 4, 2025. The Telegram channel that shared the early version of the footage was called "Work, brothers," a phrase used to show support for Russian law enforcement. Searches on the Telegram channel of the Russian Ministry of Defense located a video (archived) posted on April 16, 2025, with similar graphics to the one shared around June 4. Both videos appeared to be recorded using thermal cameras (indicated by the lighter shade of people in the video compared to the landscape) and featured a matching rotating compass wheel at the bottom of the video. The Russian MOD said on Telegram that the April 16 video showed drone operators destroying "ammunition and fuel depots, equipment and personnel" in Luhansk and Donetsk, including near Pokrovsk. According to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Russian strikes hit near Pokrovsk on this date. Claims also said the June 4 video was recorded by drone. According to online AI detectors Sightengine and Hive Moderation, it was unlikely the video was generated by AI. (Sightengine/Hive Moderation/Snopes Illustration) The 68th Brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, mentioned in the footage caption, posted footage on its Facebook (archived) page (archived) which they said was recorded near Pokrovsk around the time the video circulated. The General Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces (archived) (archived) (archived) confirmed fighting in the area around June 4-5. Desertion has been an ongoing problem for the Ukrainian Armed Forces since Russia's invasion in 2022. The Associated Press reported in November 2024 that more than 100,000 soldiers had been charged under Ukraine's desertion laws since February 2022. 68 окрема єгерська бригада ім. Олекси Довбуша. "20 Хвилин На Ремонт Підбитого "Вампіра" Прямо На Позиціях – Для Бійців 68 Окрема Єгерська Бригада Ім. Олекси Довбуша Це Не Звучить Як Щось Нереальне." Facebook, 2 June 2025, ---. "Журналісти 11 Канал. Голос Дніпра Стали Свідками Знищення Противника в Реальному Часті Під Час Зйомок Бійців 68 Окрема Єгерська Бригада Ім. Олекси Довбуша у Покровську." Facebook, 31 May 2025, "Beginning of the End? Ukraine's Front-Line Soldiers Eye Russia Talks with Hope." BBC News, 14 May 2025, @btr80. "‼️🇺🇦 ВСУ Расстреляли Своих Отказников На Покровском Направлении." Telegram, 4 June 2025, General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. "Operational Information as of 08:00 04.06.2025 on the Russian Invasion." Facebook, 4 June 2025, ---. "Operational Information as of 22:00 03.06.2025 on the Russian Invasion." Facebook, 3 June 2025, ---. "Operational Information as of 22:00 04.06.2025 on the Russian Invasion." Facebook, 4 June 2025, ---. "Operational Information as of 22:00 16.04.2025 Regarding the Russian Invasion." Facebook, 16 Apr. 2025, Harward, Christina, et al. "Russian Offensive Campaign Assessment, June 4, 2025." Institute for the Study of War, Accessed 6 June 2025. KULLAB, SAMYA, and VOLODYMYR YURCHUK. "Desertion Threatens to Starve Ukraine's Forces at a Crucial Time in Its War with Russia." AP News, 29 Nov. 2024, @mod_russia. "🎮 Операторы БпЛА Методично Уничтожают Полевые Склады с Боеприпасами и Топливом, Технику и Личный Состав ВСУ На Краснолиманском и Покровском Направлениях." Telegram, 16 Apr. 2025, "Ukraine's Deserters Returning to the Front – DW – 04/18/2025." Accessed 6 June 2025. КРИМІНАЛЬНИЙ КОДЕКС УКРАЇНИ. РАДАВерховна Рада України, 2001, Новости, Р. И. А. "Убийство Нурбагандова — вызов всей полиции: как юрисконсульт стал героем." РИА Новости, 20180118T0800,

Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Officers in Minneapolis raid wore distinct patches. One was authorized, another wasn't, feds say.
A patch referencing St. Paul on an ICE agent's uniform was authorized, but that wasn't the case for an ATF agent's patch that people noticed during a federal law enforcement operation in Minneapolis this week, the agencies said Friday. A U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer wore a circular patch on the arm of his uniform reading 'St. Paul Field Office Special Response Team.' Each of the 25 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Special Response Teams across the U.S. has a unique patch, an ICE spokesperson said Friday. The St. Paul patch is intended to depict an 'ancient Scandinavian warrior and a Vegvisir, or 'wayfinder,' and ties into the regional identifiers for Minnesota including a nod to the Scandinavian heritage of many of the early European settlers in Minnesota,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The imagery raised questions for some people. Brandon Schorsch, who took video of the patch and posted a photo of it on social media, wrote: 'I am deeply concerned about this patch.' The vegvisir has been co-opted by some far right extremist groups, according to a senior research analyst with the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Project, though more information has to be known about a person's intentions to determine the significance of the image in a particular use. The ICE patch 'is in no way an affiliation to an extremist group,' the agency spokesperson said. On Tuesday, a large federal law enforcement presence drew protests in South Minneapolis from people concerned it was an immigration raid. Officials from the FBI, ATF and the Department of Homeland Security gathered with tactical vehicles at the corner of Lake Street and Bloomington Avenue late in the morning. Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey said it 'was related to a criminal search warrant for drugs and money laundering and was not related to immigration enforcement.' It was one of eight search warrants 'for a transnational criminal organization,' according to Hennepin County Sheriff Dawanna Witt. 'Federal investigators conducted a groundbreaking criminal operation today — Minnesota's first under the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) umbrella — marking a new chapter in how we confront complex, multidimensional threats,' Jamie Holt, ICE Homeland Security Investigations special agent in charge for St. Paul, said in a statement. Derrick Thompson guilty of all charges in Minneapolis high-speed crash that killed 5 young women Minneapolis man sentenced for stabbing, hanging St. Paul woman's dog after argument Stillwater: Lift Bridge rescue call was false alarm, authorities say St. Paul police name detective, officer, employee of the year Verdict awaits after closing arguments in Derrick Thompson's trial for crash that killed 5 Schorsch, of Minneapolis, heard from his wife about armored vehicles and the large amount of law enforcement gathered Tuesday. 'That's going to make people feel frightened,' he said. He went to the area and was recording video when he noticed the ICE agent wearing the patch. He had an audible, 'Ohhh,' reaction on the video when he saw it. 'In my job, I do look out for things like this,' said Schorsch, who works as the combatting hate organizer for Jewish Community Action, though he was not there in his work capacity on Tuesday. The Southern Poverty Law Center says there are Neo-Völkisch groups that 'rely on a romanticized Viking aesthetic and mythos — imagery they use to perpetuate their belief in white racial superiority. This adaptable and covert messaging, anchored by a nationwide network of 'kindreds,' has allowed these groups to grow in recent years.' More people are on the lookout for symbols that may have nefarious meanings, Schorsch said. An ICE agent was seen last week in Martha's Vineyard, Mass., with a tattoo of a Valknot on his arm. The symbol is used in Norse mythology. 'Some white supremacists, particularly racist Odinists, have appropriated the Valknot to use as a racist symbol,' according to the Anti-Defamation League. Schorsch also saw two ATF agents on Tuesday with a small patch on their uniforms that said, 'The Others,' and he photographed one of them. The agent seen in the photo is an ATF special agent assigned to a sheriff's office taskforce, said Ashlee Sherrill, a spokeswoman in the ATF's St. Paul Field Division, in response to a reporter's questions. 'The patch in question is not an authorized part of the ATF uniform and has been addressed internally,' Sherrill said, adding that she couldn't provide further information on personnel matters. It's not clear what the patch was meant to convey. St. Paul police name detective, officer, employee of the year Don't pay for traffic tickets over text: DPS warns of scam messages Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance DOC commissioner asks for patience from Stillwater prison families, dismisses idea of reopening Appleton prison Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US