
Famine in Gaza is hardening rhetoric in Israel
For three days in a row last week, some two dozen Palestinians were shot dead by Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) in or near the Israeli and American-run Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) site in Rafah in southern Gaza.
There are, however, disputes about the facts of what happened in the early days of last week. The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry reported that 20 to 30 people were killed with more than 100 injured, each day for those three days at or close to the Rafah aid site.
The IDF initially put out a statement that they were not aware of "injuries caused by IDF fire within the Humanitarian Aid distribution site." But later acknowledged that soldiers did open fire toward Palestinians who they say approached them roughly one kilometre from the aid distribution site.
Much of the mainstream Israeli media, Yedioth Heronot, Israel's largest daily newspaper, the English Language Jerusalem Post, and Channel 13 evening news continue to claim the international media is distorting the facts.
The Jerusalem Post went as far as labelling the reports 'Fake News' in a Sunday afternoon headline. The GHF itself put out a statement disputing the first mass IDF shooting, claiming that aid was distributed without incident; 'There were no injuries or fatalities, we have heard that these fake reports have been actively fomented by Hamas. They are untrue and fabricated."
Perhaps what is lost here in this back and forth tit-for-tat 'what happened where' between the Hamas-controlled Ministry of Health and the Israeli Defence Forces and the American-Israeli aid organisation the GHF, is the undisputed fact that dozens of Palestinians were shot dead every day over the past three days, within approximately one kilometre of the food aid distribution site.
What is not in doubt is that the humanitarian situation in Gaza is now dire. The Chief Executive of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) warned last week that half a million people in Gaza are at risk of famine, describing the situation as a 'catastrophe'.
On Friday last, the UN said Gaza is the 'hungriest place on earth' and that 'starving Gazans continue to be deprived of aid'. The report highlighted that 600,000 people have been displaced since mid-March and also the deaths of 30 aid workers since the beginning of May.
Palestinians carry boxes containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, on May 27. The Chief Executive of the UN World Food Programme (WFP) warned last week that half a million people in Gaza are at risk of famine. Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana
The GHF has been explicitly accused of politicizing aid distribution. The Secretary General of Doctors Without Borders, Christopher Lockyear, has accused the aid organisation of being used as a political tool to forcibly displace people as part of a broader strategy of ethnic cleansings.
But there is a wider context here. This has been a significant hardening of Israeli public opinion following the Hamas terror attack of October 7. A recent shocking opinion poll in Haaretz - the left leaning Israeli paper of record - has stunned even Israelis, well at least those on the centre and left.
The poll found that 82% of Israeli Jews support "the transfer (expulsion) of residents of the Gaza Strip to other countries".
Some 54% of Jewish respondents were "very" supportive of the idea of the expulsion of all Israeli Arabs from Israel. Israeli Arabs or Palestinian citizens of Israel make up around 20% of the Israeli population.
But the most disturbing finding of all was, when asked if they agreed with the position that the IDF, "when conquering an enemy city, should act in a manner similar to the way the Israelites acted when they conquered Jericho under the leadership of Joshua [admittedly an ancient biblical reference] namely, to kill all its inhabitants?" almost half, 47%, agreed.
Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. The rhetoric of the far right has increasingly permeated the public discourse here in Israel. The comments of Israeli screenwriter and actor Gil Kopatz was recently widely reported when he said that the Israeli war on Gaza was not 'genocide' but 'pesticide'.
In a Facebook post Kopatz further wrote: 'If you feed sharks, they end up eating you. If you feed Gazans, they end up eating you. I am in favour of shark extinction and in favour of exterminating Gazans.'
Palestinians carry boxes containing food and humanitarian aid packages delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, on May 27. The Secretary General of Doctors Without Borders, Christopher Lockyear, has accused the aid organisation of being used as a political tool to forcibly displace people as part of a broader strategy of ethnic cleansings. Photo: AP/Abdel Kareem Hana
Few in Ireland perhaps may be surprised by the depravity of the discourse. The rhetoric of senior politicians and ministers in the Israeli government have become increasingly bellicose and belligerent in recent months.
The far-right firebrand minister of national security, Itamar ben Gvir has in the past openly called for ethnic 'voluntary' cleansing in Gaza, saying that the war presented an 'opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza,' calling such a policy 'a correct, just, moral and humane solution'.
Just last month, Bezalel Smotrich, the Israeli minister of finance vowed 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed' as a result of an Israeli military victory. Smotrich earlier this year was reported as saying that whilst 'it may be just and moral' to starve two million Gaza residents until Israeli hostages are returned, but that 'no one in the world would let us'.
Despite the international outcry and global condemnation, Smotrich's apocalyptic threat of starving two million Palestinians appears to be unfolding, and frankly, the world may be letting Israel do just that.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Coining it: Donald Trump's love affair with crypto
Donald Trump once dismissed cryptocurrency as "a scam" but in recent months he and his family have become heavily involved in the digital currency marketplace and have reportedly made billions of dollars in the process. The Trump administration has cut regulations for the crypto industry, while the Trump family is simultaneously profiting from the sector. There are calls for investigations into the US President's crypto business dealings amid claims of conflicts of interest, and accusations that Mr Trump is abusing his position to enrich himself. From crypto critic to crypto fan In July 2019, during his first term as US President, Donald Trump made his dislike of cryptocurrencies very clear in a post on Twitter, now X. "I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air," Mr Trump wrote. "Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity," he added. In June 2021, Mr Trump told Fox Business that bitcoin "just seems like a scam". In another interview with Fox Business later that year, he said that investing in cryptocurrencies was like a "disaster waiting to happen." "I like the currency of the United States," Mr Trump said. He claimed that investing in cryptocurrencies "hurts the United States currency" and "we should be invested in our currency." In the space of just three years, Mr Trump's views on crypto had utterly changed. "Bitcoin mining may be our last line of defense against a CBDC," he posted on Truth Social in June 2024. CBDC refers to a central bank digital currency, which is a digital currency issued by a central bank rather than by a commercial bank. "Biden's hatred of Bitcoin only helps China, Russia, and the Radical Communist Left. We want all the remaining Bitcoin to be MADE IN THE USA!!! It will help us be ENERGY DOMINANT!!!" Mr Trump wrote. As the presidential election race ramped up last summer, the Trump campaign announced that it was starting to accept crypto donations. "Demonstrating President Trump's success as a champion of American freedom and innovation, we proudly offer you a chance to contribute to the campaign with cryptocurrency," the campaign website stated. In July last year, Mr Trump addressed a bitcoin conference in Nashville vowing to be an ally of the crypto industry if he was returned to the White House. "This afternoon I'm laying out my plan to ensure that the United States will be the crypto capital of the planet and the bitcoin superpower of the world and we'll get it done," Mr Trump told the conference. "The Biden-Harris administration's repression of crypto and bitcoin is wrong and it's very bad for our country," he added. World Liberty Financial In September last year, Donald Trump formally announced his support for a Trump family crypto venture called World Liberty Financial. The company's homepage describes itself as being "Inspired by Donald J Trump" and shaping a new era of finance. Visitors to the site can purchase a crypto token called $WLFI. In March 2025, World Liberty announced it would launch USD1, a dollar-backed stablecoin. "We're leading a financial revolution by dismantling the stranglehold of traditional financial institutions and putting the power back where it belongs: in your hands," the site states over a large photo of Mr Trump. The US President is listed as 'Chief Crypto Advocate' in the 'Meet our Team' section of the website, along with his sons Eric, Donald Jr and Barron. One of the co-founders of World Liberty Financial is Mr Trump's Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff. He has been accused of blurring the lines between diplomacy and business amid claims that he and his son have been promoting World Liberty's crypto interests while on visits to the Middle East. Last month, it was announced that an Abu Dhabi state-backed investment firm would make a major $2 billion investment using the USD1 stablecoin. $TRUMP meme coin In January 2025, days before his inauguration, Donald Trump announced the launch of his new meme coin $TRUMP. "Join my very special Trump Community. GET YOUR $TRUMP NOW," Mr Trump posted on Truth Social. Meme coins are cryptocurrencies inspired by internet memes, jokes, or cultural trends. "Their value is largely driven by community sentiment, social media hype, and celebrity endorsements," according to Forbes. Days after her husband announced his new meme coin, the US First Lady Melania Trump launched a cryptocurrency token of her own with $Melania being offered for sale. Last month, Mr Trump hosted a black-tie event at his golf club just outside Washington DC for the top buyers of his $TRUMP meme coin. Weeks earlier, the US President had begun promoting a competition that would reward 220 buyers of the crypto token with a private dinner. The top 25 investors were invited to an additional "exclusive private VIP reception" with Mr Trump. Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin, Ranking Member of the House Judiciary Committee, has demanded the release of the guest list of invitees at the dinner, claiming they had "purchased access to the President". Mr Raskin said a majority of the buyers were likely foreign nationals who would have been barred from donating to the Trump campaign. "I write today to demand that you release the names of all the attendees at this dinner and provide information about the source of the money they each used to buy $TRUMP coins, so that we can prevent illegal foreign government emoluments from being pocketed without congressional consent," Mr Raskin wrote in a letter to the president. "Publication of this list will also let the American people know who is putting tens of millions of dollars into our President's pocket so we can start to figure out what - beyond virtually worthless meme coins - they are getting in exchange for all this money," the letter stated. The White House has insisted that there is no conflict of interest for President Trump, as his assets are held in a trust managed by his children. Asked recently about potential conflicts of interest, Donald Trump Jr told CNBC that the family got into crypto out of necessity as they had been "de-banked". "We got into politics and all of a sudden (the banks) wouldn't take our call," he said. Trump's crypto assets valued at $2.9 billion A recent report from the US watchdog State Democracy Defenders Fund found that as of mid-March 2025, Mr Trump's crypto assets were valued at $2.9 billion, representing approximately 37% of his total wealth. This included assets from the $TRUMP meme and the $WLFI governance token. The State Democracy Defenders Fund said Mr Trump's entanglements with the cryptocurrency industry could pose serious risks to democratic institutions and public trust. The report entitled 'Trump's Crypto Conflicts of Interest' found that Mr Trump and his allies are embracing crypto as both a fundraising tool and policy agenda. "Rather than divest his crypto assets to avoid any possible conflict of interest, President Trump seems to have positioned himself to maximise profiting from them by adopting a less aggressive regulatory and enforcement programme than his predecessor," said Virginia Canter, Chief Anti-Corruption Counsel for State Democracy Defenders Fund. "Reduced oversight could undermine US national security interests by emboldening terrorists and extremists, who have increasingly used crypto for anonymous financing, while foreign governments may view his crypto businesses as an open invitation for corruption," Ms Canter said. The report concludes that the Trump administration has taken a more lenient approach towards crypto enforcement. It points to a change in criminal policy at the Department of Justice, and highlights recent cases being dropped or stayed by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), signaling a favorable regulatory and enforcement stance toward digital assets. During his first presidential campaign, Donald Trump successfully wooed blue-collar union members, coal miners and steelworkers who felt abandoned by the Democrats. Winning over these disaffected voters helped him to claim the White House in 2016. Eight years later, in a similar way, he focused on the crypto community, promising to undo the regulations and restrictions introduced by Joe Biden. He secured their votes and millions in crypto donations. But this was not just about getting elected. Mr Trump has deregulated an industry that his family now profits from, investors can get access to the president by buying his cryptocurrency and his envoy has been accused of blurring the lines between official Government diplomacy and business promotion. He may have once dismissed cryptocurrency as a scam used by criminals, but the man who likes to see himself as the ultimate dealmaker may well have found his biggest earner yet.


Irish Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Trumpugees moving to Ireland cite housing crisis and expenses as major drawbacks
Rising numbers of Trumpugees are exploring relocation to Ireland but they are finding the country's welcoming reputation doesn't extend to its immigration laws. While English-speaking countries likte Ireland, the UK and Canada top the list for prospective American emigrants, countries such as the Netherlands, Germany and Portugal offer far less restrictive entry pathways. So far this year, the number of US applicants for Foreign Birth Registrations – a pathway to Irish citizenship for those with Irish grandparents – has nearly doubled compared to the same period last year. By the end of May, more than 8,000 Americans had applied under the so-called 'granny rule,' hoping to secure the coveted Irish passport. Jana Sanchez, a former US congressional nominee and founder of GTFO Tours, says Ireland consistently ranks high on the wish list of Americans considering emigration. 'The first countries that most Americans would think of to move to are English-speaking countries, like Canada, the UK, Ireland.' But she added: 'They don't really want Americans. You're the hardest countries to go to, unless you're a nurse or a scientist.' A key obstacle is Ireland's high passive income visa requirement, which she says is used by about half of American emigrants. 'They are retirees or have made enough money. For a couple, you need €100,000 a year in passive income to get a visa,' Sanchez explained. 'Compare that to Portugal, where it's about €10,000 per person – around €15,000 for a couple.' 'Ireland also has a huge housing crisis, and it's just much more expensive.' Rosie O'Donnell – currently in the process of acquiring Irish citizenship through her Irish grandparents – credited her decision to Trump's second inauguration. Sanchez said many of her clients are from vulnerable communities. 'A huge number of LGBTQ, especially trans people, are really scared,' she says. 'In Texas, they're debating whether to make being trans a felony punishable by two years in prison and a $10,000 fine.' Miglena Ilieva, managing partner at ILEX Law Group, which specialises in Irish and UK immigration law, is advising a retired academic couple from Illinois hoping to relocate to Ireland. They are currently based in Portugal while they work on qualifying for Ireland's Stamp 0 visa for people with independent means. 'They're both at a university in Illinois and were looking for a way to retire in Ireland. They want to come to Ireland because it's so culturally similar to what they're used to, and they can navigate it. 'They're in Portugal right now, and they're having a nightmare with the language. They don't want to be there, they want to be in Ireland.' The couple is a few thousand euros a year short of the income requirement, but they are exploring investment options to close the gap. They remain positive despite housing and cost-of-living challenges, describing Ireland as 'friendly, vibrant and gorgeous'. Ilieva says there is growing interest from Americans, with dozens of recent inquiries but while many Americans have Irish ancestry, most don't qualify for citizenship. Other options include a working visa which requires a job offer. In recent weeks, the Irish Government has acknowledged the potential to attract top US researchers with its Global Talent Initiative. Minister James Lawless said Ireland would remain open to 'the best and brightest fleeing the US university system'. 'We are committed to supporting Irish researchers at home and to welcoming exceptional global talent who might now be questioning where they can further their work,' he said. He pledged €9 million in annual support for researchers in key fields like AI, semiconductors, digital healthcare, and food security. The UK already operates a Global Talent Visa that allows researchers and academics to move without a job offer, provided they are endorsed by an approved body. Ilieva believes something similar could help Ireland attract top global talent. Amanda Klekowski von Koppenfels, a US-born migration expert and academic coach who studied at Georgetown and Harvard, says Ireland isn't widely known in the US as an academic haven – yet. In her role as a coach to people in career transition or who wish to move out of the US, she sees 'huge interest in Ireland'. She added: 'It's English speaking. It's part of the EU. A number of people are actively trying to apply for jobs and in order to get an employer-sponsored visa. 'What I'm finding, though, is that not everybody has a really strong knowledge of what even visas are, what the European Union is. 'It's not something they've ever had to think about before.' Klekowski von Koppenfels has worked with everyone from climate scientists to psychotherapists and journalists considering a move to Ireland. Often, they're professionals seeking a less stressful life. She said: 'Ireland is progressive, and since we have so many Irish in the United States, it's a bit of a known quantity.' In terms of people considering Ireland, it is in the 'dozens ' or 'possibly in the hundreds|', and from areas such as the east coast to Ohio. She estimates 1% to 2% of Americans – potentially 3 to 6 million people – are seriously considering leaving the US. 'Certainly, people are applying for Irish passports and getting those recognised. It's something I do hear quite a lot of.'


Irish Independent
5 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Eilis O'Hanlon: Punishing Israeli students for what their government does is unfair
The decision by Trinity College Dublin to cut links with Israeli academics and students is shameful If Einstein was alive today, he would no longer be welcome at Trinity College Dublin. That's because, as one of the founders and early governors of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, the proudly Zionist space botherer would fall foul of a new edict from TCD severing ties with academic institutions in Israel in protest at the war in Gaza.