Some Tories privately support PM's stance on Israel and Gaza, Conservative says
Conservative MPs privately support calls by Sir Keir Starmer and the UK's allies for Israel to cease its war in Gaza, one Tory has claimed.
Mark Pritchard, Conservative MP for the Wrekin, also said he believed that the Prime Minister was on the 'right side of history' and humanity, in an interview with broadcaster LBC.
Mr Pritchard would not be drawn into attacking his party leader Kemi Badenoch, who has criticised the Prime Minister's sanctions on Israeli settlers, as well as his joint statement made earlier this week with the leaders of France and Canada on the Gaza conflict.
Sir Keir, Emmanuel Macron and Mark Carney condemned the Israeli government's 'egregious' actions in Gaza, warning the UK and allies will take 'concrete actions' unless Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu changes course.
In a post on X on Thursday, Mr Netanyahu said Hamas wants to 'destroy the Jewish state' and 'annihilate the Jewish people'.
He claimed the leaders of the UK, France and Canada were on the 'wrong side of justice' and the wrong side of history.
Speaking to LBC, Tory MP Mr Pritchard said: 'Half the population of Gaza are children. They are being literally bombed to bits every single day. They are being slowly starved.
'It's absolutely right the UK Prime Minister, who so happens to be a Labour Prime Minister right now, would stand up on the right side.
'I push it back to the Israeli prime minister. I think Keir Starmer and those standing up for the children of Gaza are on the right side of history, the right side of humanity and are making the right moral judgment.'
The Conservative MP, who self-describes as strongly pro-Israel, said he had 'changed to a position where I think we need to recognise a Palestinian state' immediately, having previously thought detailed groundwork was needed before this step was taken.
He said: 'It may be symbolic, but I think it will be a huge symbol of support both for the Israelis that want to see that and also for the Palestinians. But the key point at the moment is the Israeli government need to be held to account.
'I support the UK Prime Minister and many more, by the way, in the British Conservative Party are coming up to me privately at the moment.'
On Friday, Mrs Badenoch told broadcasters she was 'not surprised' Sir Keir had been criticised by his Israeli counterpart.
She suggested that breaking off trade deal talks with Israel over the conflict in Gaza and settler violence in the West Bank were not the 'right way' to send a message to Mr Netanyahu's government.
Mr Pritchard told LBC he was 'not coming here to attack' his party leader.
'I'm coming on to support Kemi on the comments on antisemitism, supporting the Prime Minister on his strong stand, finally, on what's going on in Gaza,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
20 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Parliament moves closer to setting up Iraq war-style inquiry into Gaza conflict
Parliament moved a step closer to setting up a probe after MPs agreed that the Gaza (Independent Public Inquiry) Bill should be listed for a debate later this year. The draft new law would 'require the inquiry to consider any UK military, economic or political co-operation with Israel since October 2023', the month when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel and killed around 1,200 people and kidnapped more than 250 others. Israel's retaliatory offensive has seen more than 54,000 people in Gaza killed, according to the territory's health ministry. Smoke from an Israeli bombardment in the northern Gaza Strip (Maya Alleruzzo/AP) 'Our future history books will report with shame those that had the opportunity to stop this carnage but failed to act to achieve it, and so we will continue our campaigns in this House and outside because we're appalled at what is happening,' the former Labour Party leader told the Commons. Mr Corbyn, the Independent MP for Islington North, had earlier said: 'In the aftermath of the Iraq war, several attempts were made to establish an inquiry surrounding the conduct of the British military operations. 'The government of the day spent many years resisting those attempts and those demands for an inquiry, however, they could not prevent the inevitable and in 2016 we had the publication of the Chilcot Inquiry, which Sir John Chilcot had undertaken over several years.' Mr Corbyn added that when he was the Labour leader, when the 12-volume report came out, he 'apologised on behalf of the Labour Party for the catastrophic decision to go to war in Iraq' and added: 'History is now repeating itself.' He warned that 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever – entire families wiped out, limbs strewn across the street, mothers screaming for their children buried under the rubble, human beings torn to pieces, doctors performing amputations without anaesthetic, children picking grass and dirt from the ground thinking they might find something edible to eat'. Jeremy Corbyn said 'human beings have endured a level of horror and inhumanity that should haunt us all forever' (PA) Mr Corbyn alleged that the UK had a 'highly influential role in Israel's military operations', including by supplying weapons, and also said a future inquiry should seek the 'truth regarding the role of British military bases in Cyprus' and Government 'legal advice over an assessment of genocide'. He said the inquiry would uncover the 'murky history of what's gone on, the murky arms sales and the complicity in appalling acts of genocide'. Deputy Speaker Nus Ghani called 'order' when several MPs applauded, as Mr Corbyn presented his Bill. The Bill will be listed for its next debate on July 4.
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Israel's choice for Gaza's people: risk their lives for supplies, or starve
A full, independent investigation into the killings of Palestinians attempting to collect food for their family, and accountability for their deaths, is essential. But no investigation is needed to establish that Israel is ultimately responsible, by starving people and then implementing a food-collection scheme that cannot solve the humanitarian crisis, and which is known to be dangerous. The US, which promoted that scheme, is complicit. Health officials in Gaza say that at least 27 people were killed by Israeli fire as they awaited food on Tuesday – the third such incident in three days. (The Israeli military said troops fired at people 'moving towards [them] … in a way that posed a threat'.) Officials previously said that Israeli forces killed more than 30 Palestinians on Sunday, and another three the following day; the military said they did not shoot civilians, but fired 'warning shots'. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – the American private organisation running the scheme – suspended operations on Wednesday for 'update, organisation and efficiency improvement work'. No update can fix this: the food scheme itself is the problem. The UN and aid agencies feared that it breached international law and refused to work with the GHF; the founding director resigned, saying that GHF would not be able to deliver aid while adhering to humanitarian principles. Senior Israeli military officials reportedly raised concerns. Many people cannot reach the sites. Those who do face a greater risk of having meagre supplies snatched by other desperate people. Essential non-food goods such as medications are not included. The risk of shootings was clear: armed American contractors run the three sites and Israeli troops control the surrounding areas. Palestinians are forced to choose – risk their lives or watch their children starve. After 11 weeks of total siege, followed by a trickle of supplies, Gaza is the hungriest place on Earth, says the UN. It was never plausible that this scheme could feed it. It is a fig leaf for Israel's continued starvation of civilians, and helps displace them to an ever smaller area. The far-right minister Bezalel Smotrich has said that Gaza will be 'entirely destroyed' so that its population will 'leave in great numbers to third countries'. In short, ethnic cleansing. The use of food as a weapon comes in addition to strikes on schools being used as shelters, the destruction of hospitals and the killing of tens of thousands of civilians. Israel's war crimes have caused public support to plummet in western Europe and fall markedly in the US. Yet politicians are lagging. Sir Keir Starmer calls the situation 'intolerable', but until the UK acts decisively it is, in reality, tolerating it. The UK, France and Canada warned of 'concrete measures' and must follow through. The US could stop this conflict tomorrow, but the European Union, Israel's biggest trading partner, also has real power. It is now reviewing its trade agreement with Israel; it should suspend it. Improving aid is a necessary but not sufficient demand. The need is created by the war. The real solution is still a ceasefire and release of the hostages seized by Hamas on 7 October 2023. As Mirjana Spoljaric, president of the International Committee of the Red Cross, has warned, international law itself is being hollowed out – with profound implications for conflicts to come. As long as Israel enjoys impunity, more Palestinians die and human lives everywhere are cheapened. It must be held accountable.
Scotsman
40 minutes ago
- Scotsman
How slaughter and starvation of Gaza's children are creating a sinister new world order
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The war of words between European and Canadian political leaders and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu provides a timely reminder of how any semblance of a positive vision for global governance continues to die in a world of division, anger, fear, and hate. October 7, 2023 is a date that will live in infamy. Israel has the right to defend itself and deal with Hamas following its attacks on that day. But Israel as a country is unfortunately hurtling towards pariah status in a world tiring of Netanyahu's apparent hatred of Palestinians and his desire to obliterate Gaza, annex the West Bank and destroy any prospects of a two-state solution. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Two other factors are placing Netanyahu on the wrong side of history. His political survival now depends on extending court proceedings about corruption charges for as long as possible and the support of far-right, anti-Arab, ultranationalists in his government. A girl appears to be in distress after receiving food at Jabalia refugee camp, Gaza City, earlier this month (Picture: Abood Abusalama) | Middle East Images/AFP via Getty The real pariah To suggest that Keir Starmer, Canada's Mark Carney and France's Emmanuel Macron, who called for Israel to halt its latest offensive, are in any way responsible for the tragic and brutal murders of two Israeli embassy staff in Washington DC and accuse them of emboldening Hamas speaks volumes about this desperate Prime Minister. Netanyahu is the real pariah in this story. Israel is a democracy, a friend and an ally. But Netanyahu is using claims of antisemitism – a real and unacceptable problem – as a shield to defend his government's indefensible actions. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad People are angry and sickened by the images of destruction and death being shown nightly on TV screens worldwide, but downplayed in Israel. This is a moral issue. Netanyahu should feel emotionally challenged by emaciated children and babies being starved to death in Gaza, a young girl smashed to smithereens in her wheelchair, hospitals and medical staff bombed and denied vital medicines, humanitarian aid halted, innocents slaughtered, whole families wiped out and homes turned to rubble, while the West Bank is terrorised by Israeli settlers. And yet on Netanyahu's watch, it goes on and on. Deaths are dismissed by the Israel Defence Force as 'targeted strikes'. Within the dark recesses of Netanyahu's mind, moral bankruptcy is imperilling his impressive country – and it is spreading. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Starvation of children deemed 'desirable' In a remarkable and distressing meeting in the Israeli parliament, its Foreign Affairs and Defence Sub-committee discussed Gaza. Israeli's left-leaning Haaretz newspaper reported the proceedings in an article headlined, 'Knesset debate reveals not everyone thinks starving Gazan children is a bad thing'. Giving evidence, Dr Sharon Shaul, of Israeli humanitarian organisation Natan, said she thought that 'even everyone sitting around this table doesn't want a suffering child to be unable to receive painkillers or minimal medical treatment'. This sparked a barrage of protest from MPs. 'I'm not sure you're speaking for us when you say we want to treat every child and every woman,' said one. 'You are the sickest doctor I've ever seen,' said another. Haaretz journalist Nir Hasson wrote that 'many around the table indeed thought that the starvation and torment of Gazan children is not only legitimate but even desirable'. Even more alarming was the comment of Moshe Saada, a Likud party MP and ally of Netanyahu, who told Israel's Channel 14 he was "interested" in starving an entire nation. "Yes, I'll starve Gazans, yes, this is our obligation,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The failure of the League of Nations How should the world respond? History provides little in the way of hope. The League of Nations was established in 1920, following the First World War, to promote international cooperation, encourage disarmament, improve global living conditions and prevent wars. But it faced significant challenges. Europe remained unstable and, in Germany, resentment grew over the imposition of severe reparations by the war's victors. The weak League, which infamously failed to achieve its aims and stop another world war, was dissolved in 1946. We are now a few weeks away from the 80th anniversary of the signing of the 'Charter of the United Nations', the League's successor organisation, in San Francisco in June 1945. Comprising nearly 200 nations, the UN has, for decades, played an important role in peacekeeping, human rights, international law, refugee crises, health, education and climate change. United Nations' weakness But the return of a world of sovereign nations, powerful political alliances, an emphasis on national self-interest, growing military strength and populist leaders has made pursuing and enforcing international stability difficult and, at times, impossible. The world needs Abraham Lincoln's 'better angels of our nature' to show themselves if the UN is to find success. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UN Security Council has 15 members but the five permanent members – China, France, Russia, the UK and the US – can veto any resolution. The International Criminal Court was designed to have global authority but has been hampered by the US, India, China, Türkiye, Russia and others not being signatories. Israel signed up but never ratified its membership, putting it outwith the court's jurisdiction. The crumbling of the international order into further chaos is likely to continue but let's hope the UN does not face the same fate as the League. And hopefully it will not take the threat or reality of a Third World War for countries to recognise again the need for order, and the benefits of peace, tolerance and respect. The prospects remain grim. Until a new way forward for international cooperation is found, we will have to depend on 'coalitions of the willing' forming in response to pressing issues in world affairs, like the statement issued by the UK, the EU and Canada on the situation in Gaza. This week US President Donald Trump has described Russia's Vladimir Putin as 'crazy' following a major attack on Ukraine, so what about Netanyahu? Does the systematic slaughter and the starvation of children in Gaza not meet the criteria for similar condemnation – or is it much worse? Welcome to the new international order.
