One of L.A.'s oldest restaurants is at risk of closing. Could a new bar save it?
After an onslaught of recent restaurant closures, one of L.A.'s longest-running restaurants might join the ranks. Owners of Chili John's, a Burbank institution since 1946, say they'll have to close or sell the restaurant if business doesn't increase. But a new, adjacent bar could help the legendary chili diner stay afloat.
'People will tell me, 'Oh, you guys can't go out of business because you've been here so long,' but it doesn't actually work that way,' said co-owner Steve Hager. 'It is a business and it needs to make money and sustain itself in order to stay. …You can't keep a restaurant open when people only come once every year.'
According to Hager, who owns Chili John's with his wife, Claudine, the business never recovered from COVID losses; currently they're grossing only 20% of pre-pandemic sales.
Read more: Red Hot: Jonathan Gold reviews Chili John's
Guests have dined on the famous chili for decades at the diner's U-shaped counter, at times flocking to try the long-simmered stew or sample the lauded icebox pie — both of which were served at the first Chili John's (and original bar) in Green Bay, Wis., before making their way out west.
'We have amazing chili in my opinion,' Hager said, 'but people aren't coming in to buy amazing chili — at least not enough in order for us to stay.'
That chili recipe was written down by founder John Isaac roughly 130 years ago, a spin on chuck-wagon meat preservation that he served at his Wisconsin bar and restaurant. In 1946 his son moved west and opened his own outpost in Burbank.
Claudine Hager's uncle, Gene Loguercio, purchased the business in the '80s as a longtime family friend to the Isaacs. In 2016 she and her husband began helping Loguercio's widow and Claudine's cousins with the business, and around 2019 they formally took the reins.
Today she and her husband grind beef suet in-house, clarify it for four to six hours, then add the meat and simmer for an additional 16 to 20 hours. The tart but creamy icebox pie, another signature, is the same as it was in 1900 when it was served in Isaac's Wisconsin bar.
'It is wonderful chili, dense and comforting, lean and hearty, with a cumin wallop and a subtle, smoky heat that creeps up on you like the first day of a Santa Ana wind,' Jonathan Gold wrote in 1991. 'It's the kind of stuff that stays with you for a while, flavoring your breath for half a day even if you don't pile on the onions.'
From 2017 to 2019, Hager remembers a line of guests out the door and down the block, there to buy chili and sit at the restaurant's U-shaped counter. Now, he said, he's lucky if 10 people are filling the 25 swiveling orange stools along the horseshoe.
On March 20 the Hagers launched a GoFundMe campaign, hoping to crowdsource finances to keep the historic restaurant afloat. They're also banking on the launch of the Taproom at Chili John's, an adjacent bar that's taken four years to open. But, he said, they might not have enough funds to last through the bar's opening.
A Thursday Instagram post announcing the fundraiser elicited concern from fans and community members, including longtime supporter and comedian Patton Oswalt.
'The only thing that can tame the summer heat of Burbank are the harsh chilies and creamy pastas on hand at Chili John's,' Oswalt wrote in a message to The Times. 'Once that place goes, it's the apocalypse.'
A 2021 appearance on reality show 'Restaurant Recovery' helped diversify the menu with burgers, specialty hot dogs, chicken sandwiches and fries, and began the bar's renovation next door. It also provided a bump in business due to the exposure, but those visits have come and gone.
'We're doing worse now than we did during COVID,' Hager said.
Many L.A. restaurants trying to remain afloat from pandemic losses continued to struggle during the 2023 entertainment industry strikes. Many still have not recovered from the ripple effects of the strikes and the general downturn in local production. For a frequent filming location like Chili John's — which has appeared in 'Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood,' 'Twin Peaks,' 'Star Trek' and 'I Am the Night,' among others — the drop in business proved devastating.
For years, the restaurant served as a filming locale once or twice a month. Last year, it wasn't rented for filming at all. Hager said that the previous year it was rented for two commercials, which typically do not pay as much as a feature film or miniseries.
He added that the restaurant's clientele primarily work in the entertainment industry at nearby studios; without a pickup in production, its client base nearly vanished.
Read more: This must be Burbank: A neighborhood guide
The restaurant might have already closed had it not been for Hager's disability pension from his years in the military. Last year he received a retroactive deposit for two years' worth of payments; without much income from the restaurant, the Hagers have been putting the pension money into paying staff and the restaurant's bills.
Recently, they ran through their retroactive lump sum. Soon their property taxes will come due. There's not much more they feel they can do to sustain, and Hager told The Times he hasn't paid himself in years.
'Right now is basically when all my savings went to zero,' he said.
They're hoping that the adjacent Taproom at Chili John's — which is currently soft opening on weekends and set to fully debut in April — could change their future and be more relevant for the neighborhood.
Chili fans, fear not: Bowls of the signature beef chili will be available at the bar alongside the chicken chili and the organic lentil-and-quinoa versions — even in flight, or sampler, form — alongside the chili spaghetti, chili dog and chili burger.
But the taproom also will serve new burrata salads, charcuterie boards, a salmon plate, a steak sandwich and gourmet s'mores, with dishes inspired by Hager's 15 years spent traveling in the Coast Guard through Sonoma County, New Orleans, New England and beyond. (A favorite of his, a beloved New Orleans peanut butter burger, also is planned to make an appearance.)
Local craft beer, calimocho and wine — keeping glasses around $10 — also can be found at the taproom.
'We're excited, it's just that we don't know if we're even going to be able to [financially] last through the opening,' Hager said. 'We've been putting a lot of money out for equipment and the kegs of beer for our tap system, our cases of wine and the food. We have reached a point where we're almost completely out of money, and we're not going to be able to pay the property taxes or the mortgage.'
The Hagers hope to not only maintain the cherished restaurant for history's sake but to keep the restaurant in the family.
Read more: The 25 best classic diners in Los Angeles
The restaurant is set to turn 80 next year. With renewed support from the community, they're hoping guests will be able to gather around that horseshoe counter for from-scratch chili made from a century-old recipe at Chili John's 80th birthday, and for years to come.
'Even if people don't want to give us donations for the GoFundMe, I was hoping that maybe that would just make people aware,' Hager said. 'The problem would fix itself if we can just have enough people come and enjoy our food.'
Chili John's, 2018 W. Burbank Blvd., Burbank, open Monday to Saturday from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
Sign up for our Tasting Notes newsletter for restaurant reviews, Los Angeles food-related news and more.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. imports see largest plunge on record in April
U.S. goods imports plummeted in April, per data out Thursday, as President Trump's tariff policies rocked the global trade system. Why it matters: The decline is a sharp reversal of the front-loading effect the previous month, when firms raced to import stuff before the tariffs took hold. Zoom in: The monthly drop in imports is the largest on record, per the Commerce Department. Imports were still up from this time last year, however. The big picture: Trade with China fell to its lowest point since a historic pandemic shut the global economy. April imports from China, at $25.4 billion, were the lowest since March 2020 ($19.6 billion). And U.S. exports to the country also fell off a cliff to $8.2 billion — compared to $7.9 billion, as COVID-19 first hit the U.S. What they're saying: "It sure looks as though triple-digit tariff rates made a difference to trade flows, eh?" writes Carl Weinberg, chief economist at High Frequency Economics, in a note Thursday morning. The data is not really a sign of a weakening economy — unlike in the pandemic, companies stockpiled ahead of the tariff shock, and are now going to be drawing down elevated inventories of goods, he writes.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Saia's tonnage turns negative after 22-month run
After 22 months of consecutive tonnage increases following Yellow Corp.'s shutdown, less-than-truckload carrier Saia reported a modest decline in volume during May. Saia (NASDAQ: SAIA) announced Thursday that tonnage per day dipped 0.4% year over year in May following a 4.4% increase in April (and a 12.8% increase in the first quarter). The May decline was the combination of a 3.2% drop in shipments, which was largely offset by a 3% increase in weight per shipment. The Johns Creek, Georgia-based carrier was very aggressive after Yellow's (OTC: YELLQ) exit, acquiring 28 of the defunct company's terminals and quickly onboarding its customers. (A filing with a federal bankruptcy court in Delaware last month showed it was acquiring three more service centers from Yellow's estate.) In the months that followed the acquisitions, Saia's volume growth significantly outpaced the rest of the industry even with a freight recession as the backdrop. But after nearly two years of increases, and further protraction of the downturn, the comps are increasingly more a two-year-stacked comparison, Saia's tonnage was up 9.4% in May following a 12% increase in April. The stacked comps peaked in February at plus-23.2%. Manufacturing activity, which generates nearly two-thirds of the LTL industry's freight, slumped again in May. The Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index remained slightly in contraction territory at 48.5 (a 50 reading is neutral). The new orders subindex, which is indicative of future near-term demand, remained in decline at 47.6. The Thursday update from Saia was its first since late April when it reported first-quarter results significantly worse than analysts were expecting, pushing shares 30% lower on the day. An unfavorable lane mix and costs from getting new terminals up to speed pushed its operating ratio (inverse of operating margin) 670 basis points higher y/y to 91.1% – its worst operating performance since the COVID-marred second quarter of doesn't provide any revenue-based metrics in its intraquarter updates. During the first quarter, yields were negative (down 5.1% y/y excluding fuel surcharges). Heavier shipment weights were a headwind to yield (revenue per hundredweight) in the quarter, but when adjusted for weight and length of haul, yields were likely still negative in the period. However, management said on the call that it hadn't changed its approach to pricing and noted that contractual rate increases averaged 6.1% in the period. The stickiness of those rate increases, however, remains to be seen. The company previously guided an 89% OR for the second quarter, which would be 570 bps worse y/y. Shares of SAIA were off 3.9% at 10:46 a.m. EDT on Thursday compared to the S&P 500, which was up 0.2%. More FreightWaves articles by Todd Maiden: XPO sees modest tonnage decline in May Old Dominion's May update in line with prior Q2 guide Transportation pricing grows faster than capacity again in May The post Saia's tonnage turns negative after 22-month run appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - What globalists get wrong about free trade
Since at least the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, major media outlets have decried the impending end of globalization. These lamentations have only accelerated since the Trump administration declared April 2 'Liberation Day,' with our trading counterparties' unfair practices to be summarily addressed through increased and partially reciprocal duties (along with a minimum tariff level). To hear the media tell it, such tariffs are the death knell for a beneficial global trading order and will immiserate billions. But such valedictories for the end of globalization advance a straw-man fiction about what is now supposedly lost: namely, that President Trump's policies contravene an agreed framework whereby goods, capital and labor move across national boundaries in a mostly unencumbered manner. If one believes in the merits of free trade and cross-border capital flows, it is essential not to confuse the ideal with the real. In truth, there have always been (often significant) friction and costs associated with such movements. Today's so-called free trade regime recalls Western support for Soviet communism, snarling 'real communism has never been tried' in defense of its myriad failures. Love it or hate it, what exists today is hardly real free trade. If what we have today isn't it, what does free trade closer to its Platonic ideal look like? This notion, that trade conditions are rarely wholly free or unfree, also confuses the media. The reality is that trading conditions sit uneasily along a continuum, and relatively free trade only occurs under certain conditions. These include (among others): Mutually agreed-upon rules for international commerce, consistently applied or at least generally observed, allowing for relatively open and reciprocal market access; Exemptions for strategic industries, a form of insurance for nations, insulating them from being caught short in a subsequent conflict with trading partners; Reliable cross-border supply chains, allowing for the disaggregation of production into its constituent parts (trading resource control for cost efficiency) and An ideologically unipolar historical moment, or a multi-polar world in which international trade largely occurs within the poles. These and other trade-friendly conditions were largely obtained in the decades leading up to the First World War, and in the 20 or so years following the end of the Cold War. While a world war is an obvious culprit ending an earlier era of globalization, what explains its current travails? A rules-based trading order can withstand certain restrictions (tariffs, regulations, quotas) — in fact, protecting strategic sectors demands some of them. But excessive use, along with outright cheating — subsidies, intellectual property theft and currency manipulation, as in the case of China — gives rise to a prisoner's dilemma with suboptimal outcomes. Similarly, the extended supply chains that proliferated over the last 30 years assumed the only national interest that mattered was economic advancement. Consider the terms made fashionable over the last three decades: 'a borderless world,' 'global citizens,' 'the end of history' and 'soft power.' The disaggregation of business models previously housed under a single corporate roof never anticipated revisionist challenges to Pax Americana, such as the retrograde gunboat diplomacy of China's Belt and Road Initiative, much less the rise of transnational terrorist organizations disrupting commerce and producing failed states. Moreover, the unipolar moment has ended. As China, under the rule of the Communist Party, displaced the Soviet Union as our primary geopolitical adversary, its admission to the World Trade Organization in 2001 conferred upon it a degree of economic leverage over the United States that Joseph Stalin could only have dreamed of. The return of history, with not only China but Russia, Turkey and others asserting spheres of influence and advancing parochial interests while embedded within a global economic system and multilateral institutions, further vitiates unfettered trade and capital movements. Failing to understand that globalization — the mutually beneficial interdependence and integration among nations, entailing a largely unrestricted flow of goods, capital, information and people — only flourishes under certain conditions, is only half of what the media and establishment elites get wrong. The other is the fetishization of globalism as an ideology. One can support globalization without being a globalist. Free trade and capital flows do not themselves comprise a belief system, but are rather a means to an end: actualizing individuals' aspirations and the nations that represent them. Free trade is the handmaiden of liberty, not vice versa. Reifying trade at the expense of other liberal values risks perverse outcomes; offshoring a nation's pharmaceutical production capacity to potentially belligerent nations is but one example. Another danger in globalism as an ideology is that of falling prey to historical determinism. Seeing deepening global integration as inevitable presents several risks. Believing it impervious threatens underinvestment in its sustenance (see the collapse of the WTO's Doha Round); competing objectives such as national self-determination and defense of borders may also be subordinated to globalism's tenets, destabilizing the very nations seeking to benefit from globalization. The proposed Trump tariff regime is not the full-throated attack on a functioning trading order critics make it out to be. To acknowledge this is not to defend blindly the administration's policies. Tariffs have their place as leverage against trading counterparties with onerous trade restrictions of their own. They are also useful to support strategic sectors in an increasingly dangerous world. What tariffs won't do is revive a rust-belt economy, which isn't coming back. Comparative advantage, alas, remains undefeated. Nor should tariffs be sold to the public as a governmental revenue-generator while incumbent income, sales and other tax regimes remain firmly in place. Globalization improves lives and should be promoted. Free trade and capital movements have consistently shown themselves, when the requisite conditions are present, to be mutually beneficial. How these benefits are distributed and whether the unchecked movement of people across borders is similarly beneficial are more complex matters. But the promotion of globalism as an inviolate creed, either for its own sake or as a counterpoint to 'America First' policies, fails to appreciate that globalization cannot be summoned by magical thinking and that it is the servant of liberty, not its master. Richard J. Shinder is the founder and managing partner of Theatine Partners, a financial consultancy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.