logo
What do Trump's executive orders mean for LGBTQ+ Mainers?

What do Trump's executive orders mean for LGBTQ+ Mainers?

Yahoo27-01-2025

Participants in the Portland Pride Parade head down Congress Street. June 15, 2024 on June 15, 2024. (Photo by Jim Neuger/ Maine Morning Star)
On the first day of President Donald Trump's second term, he used his executive power to remove protections for LGBTQ+ people, including a declaration that the federal government would not recognize trans and nonbinary people.
'It's really turning back the clock on decades of sex discrimination protections,' said Hannah Hussey, attorney for GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, otherwise known as GLAD Law. 'This is really an attempt to regulate and control people's lives.'
However, Hussey explained, 'An executive order can't just erase state law. An executive order also can't undo a federal statute, and it can't change how courts have interpreted the federal statute.'
Many of Trump's executive actions are expected to face legal challenges. His order to end birthright citizenship already has. If his orders are eventually upheld, the country is likely to see a piecemeal landscape where protections fall to the states, much like with abortion after the overturn of Roe v. Wade ended federal protections, according to Hussey and other legal experts.
Federal power wins out over state authority in some cases, such as the issuance of federal documents like passports. Federal spending power could also be wielded in an attempt to try to force state compliance. Health care providers in Maine already saw that during the last Trump presidency, when he essentially barred providers that rely on federal funding from so much as mentioning abortion care to patients.
Legal minds and leaders of LGBTQ+ organizations in Maine cautioned that there remain many unknowns about how these executive actions, and likely others forthcoming, will settle. GLAD Law is prepared to defend equal protection under the law without exception, Hussey said. Local leaders have been preparing since before the November election to shore up LGBTQ+ protections in Maine law, which already offers some of the strongest in the country.
'Whatever the president says doesn't change who you are as a person or your identity,' said Gia Drew, executive director of EqualityMaine, the oldest and largest LGBTQ+ statewide organization. 'And, we're going to do everything possible to make sure to cushion any blow that comes our way.'
The authority to issue executive orders falls under Article Two of the U.S. Constitution, so the president's executive orders can't contradict the Constitution or federal statute, said Dmitry Bam, who teaches in the fields of constitutional law and the judiciary at the University of Maine School of Law.
Trump orders withdrawal from Paris climate agreement, erases actions on LGBTQ+ equality
'The theory behind the orders is that either there's an area that Congress has left unregulated, so the president is using his inherent authority to fill in those gaps, or areas that are inherently assigned to the president,' Bam said.
One example is federal documents, such as passports, Bam said.
The U.S. State Department has already frozen applications for passports with 'X' sex markers and changes to gender identity on existing passports in response to Trump's executive order declaring the federal government would only 'recognize two sexes,' according to an internal cable obtained by the Guardian.
A White House official told a reporter for NOTUS that the order won't impact passports that have already been issued and doesn't invalidate current passports but would impact those documents when they need to be renewed.
Maine offers a third gender option, 'X,' on state forms, and the executive order does not override that state-level option. Drew with EqualityMaine said she's been fielding questions about whether having an 'X' gender marker on federal or state IDs could put people in harm's way.
'I'm not sure,' Drew said. 'Those are things that we don't have complete answers to for people.'
Another early action in Trump's presidency was withdrawing an executive order issued by former President Joe Biden that directed federal agencies to apply the conclusion of the Bostock v. Clayton County U.S. Supreme Court ruling to all laws that prohibit sex discrimination. That 2020 ruling concluded that discrimination against someone because they are LGBTQ+ is sex discrimination under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
During the end of Trump's first term, his administration claimed the ruling didn't apply to Title IX, a landmark federal civil rights law on education, but Biden had reversed that guidance.
Bam, Hussey and other law experts expect many of the executive orders to be challenged in court, and perhaps make their way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
'More and more, the Court will be deciding these really controversial political issues that don't necessarily have a clear cut answer, or even some where we thought there was a clear cut answer,' Bam said.
In most cases, the executive orders will likely take a while to implement. For example, the order declaring there are 'two sexes' which Hussey called broad and in many ways without clear instruction, has myriad downstream impacts.
The order directs federal agencies to enforce laws governing 'sex-based rights, protections, opportunities, and accommodations' using definitions for 'man' and 'woman' based on whether a person 'at conception' belongs to the sex that 'produces the large reproductive cell' or 'produces the small reproductive cell.' The order also includes a broad declaration to 'end the federal funding of gender ideology' but doesn't provide instruction for how to accomplish that.
While Trump can in many ways regulate what federal agencies do, executive orders don't limit state power over their work that is separate from federal agencies.
'That's the value of federalism,' Bam said. 'Some state might say, 'You know what, we are happy with just the federal protections. We don't want to go any broader than that. And some state might say, we want to protect other groups and the states can do that.''
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Maine offers greater protections than federal law when it comes to anti-discrimination and gender-affirming health care.
For example, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in employment on a number of characteristics such as race, national origin and sex. The Maine Human Rights Act also prohibits discrimination based on the characteristics in Title VII but also includes more categories, including sexual orientation. Individual municipalities may go even farther with added protections.
'Folks in Maine should know that state laws cover many areas of concern for LGBTQ people and their families, and an executive order can't just erase state law, ' Hussey with GLAD Law said.
In addition to the anti-discrimination laws that cover education, jobs, housing, and access to services, among other parts of life, Hussey pointed to state protections for gender-affirming care, as well as the 'shield law' passed last year to protect providers of such health care from other state bans.
Drew said EqualityMaine and other LGBTQ+ organizations are eyeing ways to expand the protections in that law, specifically around patient, provider and pharmacy data privacy.
'I know they're more organized than they were eight years ago,' Drew said of the Trump administration. 'But we are more prepared now too, because they told us what they were going to do and we believed them.'
What does it mean to live in blue Maine under Trump 2.0?
Medicaid, a federal-state health insurance program for low-income people, covers gender-affirming care in some states, including Maine. Drew is expecting federal money for such health care to be restricted, so another focus of EqualityMaine is ensuring the state has available funds to cover any of those losses.
The state is currently trying to fix an immediate Medicaid shortfall and will be debating a longer-term fix in the biennial budget.
When considering possible changes to gender-affirming care, Aspen Ruhlin, community engagement manager at the Mabel Wadsworth Center in Bangor, said it is important people understand what gender-affirming care includes.
While gender-affirming care is often discussed in the ways it is used to help transgender people, Ruhlin pointed to research that found this type of health care is most often used by cisgender people, meaning people whose gender identity matches their sex assigned at birth.
Gender-affirming care includes hormone replacement therapy for menopause, breast reconstruction after mastectomies, penile implants after testicular cancer, among other procedures.
Ruhlin also pointed out that only recognizing 'two sexes' discounts people who are intersex, meaning people who are born with several sex characteristics, such as primary sex glands or chromosome patterns.
'There is a wide range of human experience, and that is true when it comes to talking about sex,' Ruhlin said.
Overall, Ruhlin said it is important for Mainers to know their rights in the wake of the executive orders. Mabel Wadsworth has client advocates who, among other things, help transgender people navigate barriers to accessing the care they need, which includes things such as legal name changes.
'It's a lot easier to violate someone's rights if they don't know what rights they have,' Ruhlin said.
While the executive orders don't immediately change most policies, Hussey with GLAD Law said they are 'certainly intended to cause chaos and confusion and fear.'
The Trevor Project, the leading suicide prevention and crisis intervention organization for LGBTQ+ young people, saw a 33% increase in crisis line volume on Inauguration Day, which Drew said reinforced what she's been hearing anecdotally from LGBTQ+ people in Maine.
'I've been hearing from folks, especially older LGBTQ people, who are like, 'Oh, we've fought this. We'll fight this again. We're going to get through this,'' Drew said. 'Yes, that's true. We have fought for equality for decades, but this is different. It's different when we've been given rights, the freedom to be ourselves in so many places, and now have them be taken away.'
While Drew said EqualityMaine and its network both state-wide and nationally are preparing for legal battles, she also said community support is vital, including as a means to ensure everyone has accurate information.
'I think what the president and his supporters want is us to be scared, freaking out, running in every direction,' Drew said. 'It's really important to take a breath, step back.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

Politico

time29 minutes ago

  • Politico

Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges

At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more

Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.

Immigration raids confirmed in Orange County, congressman says ICE is ‘inciting fear'
Immigration raids confirmed in Orange County, congressman says ICE is ‘inciting fear'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Immigration raids confirmed in Orange County, congressman says ICE is ‘inciting fear'

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids took place in Orange County on Monday, officials confirmed. 'We are aware of ongoing immigration enforcement activity in the Santa Ana Civic Center area,' announced the Santa Ana Unified School District in an X post Monday evening. 'We do not condone actions that disrupt our community or separate families.' The Santa Ana Police Department and city officials also issued a joint statement on Instagram, acknowledging the ICE activity and stating that they are aware the news causes 'fear and uncertainty' for community members. L.A. Protests: Live Updates A spokesperson for the police department told KTLA that they were made aware of the ICE activity in their city because of 'social media posts.' SAPD, similar to most other police departments in Southern California, has reinstated its policy of not participating in immigration enforcement efforts. Although federal or law enforcement officials have not revealed the specifics of the ICE raids, Rep. Lou Correa (D-Orange County) said he received reports that individuals in his district were being arrested for 'doing nothing but standing outside and being profiled.' Upon landing in Washington, D.C. on Monday, Rep. Correa issued a statement about the raids, saying, 'It's unacceptable, and shocking, that this is happening in my hometown of Santa Ana.' 'It appears agents are picking up hard-working, law-abiding taxpayers. Why?' read Rep. Correa's press release, which also shared that the congressman would be immediately returning to O.C. 'Yesterday, everything was good and boring in Santa Ana. Everyone was going to church and going to the grocery store—it was a beautiful day. Today ICE is coming in to raid and disrupt our neighborhood? These are the parents whose children went to school with my kids. They take care of our elderly, mow our lawns, and are a part of the fourth largest economy in the world. This is inciting fear in our community,' continued the release. Rep. Correa also urged those who resist 'unjust, illegal activity' to do so peacefully, referring to the lessons taught by Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Glendale terminates 'divisive' detainee holding contract with ICE 'You don't take on a tank or an M16 by walking into it—you do it in a smart, legal, and safe way. Our future depends on a strategic, effective response. One that protects our kids, their future, and their rights.' The congressman concluded his statement by asking the federal government to use restraint and 'common sense' to adhere to the Constitution and provide everyone with due process. In a Monday evening press conference with Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, she shared these values, saying, 'Stop the raids, and give the power back to our Governor.' SAUSD offered resources to the community, advising individuals to contact their local school or visit if they or someone they know needs support or information. 'We stand with our community – today and always.' The city of Santa Ana also provided resources, saying, 'If you or someone you know has questions or concerns, contact your local Congressional office and visit the City's Know Your Rights webpage at for resources and information.' Rep. Correa also encouraged anyone with questions about their legal rights to reach out to his office. For more resource information, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store