logo
How Ken Livingstone defeated Tony Blair to become London Mayor

How Ken Livingstone defeated Tony Blair to become London Mayor

BBC News07-05-2025

Ken v Tony: How London elected its first mayor
10 minutes ago
Share
Save
Tony Grew
BBC News
Share
Save
Getty Images
Rivals for power: Ken Livingstone and Tony Blair come face to face
Regional mayors are now commonplace in England: Andy Burnham in Greater Manchester, Ben Houchen in the Tees Valley and Tracy Brabin in West Yorkshire are all well-known spokespeople for their areas.
But the most prominent directly-elected mayor in Britain was also the first: London.
As is fitting for a city as exciting as London, the first election for that coveted position included allegations of betrayal, stitch ups and intrigue – and one candidate ended up in prison.
Twenty five years ago Tony Blair's government, elected in 1997 and known as New Labour, was very keen on a new form of devolution.
9:11
London's mayor at 25 - what's next?
They wanted mayors like those in America, big personalities elected with powers and budgets (but not too many powers, or too big a budget).
In the end, only one was created by Blair's government.
The 1998 Greater London Authority referendum, held in May that year, asked whether there was support for creating a Greater London Authority with a directly elected mayor and Assembly.
The voters were less keen than New Labour - just 34% turned out to vote, but the majority was clear nonetheless: 72% in favour.
The 'Yes' vote won in every London borough, with support lowest in Bromley with 57% and highest in Haringey with 84%.
PA Media
Just four mayoral candidates taking a ride on the new London Eye
Now London was to have a mayor, who would it be?
The obvious candidate was Ken Livingstone, the former left-wing firebrand (and publicity-friendly) leader of the Greater London Council (GLC), who went toe-to-toe with the Thatcher government - and lost.
The GLC was abolished in 1986, leaving London in the unenviable position of having 32 boroughs (and the City of London) but no overall strategic elected body for the largest city in Europe.
However, Livingstone's ability to alienate prime ministers wasn't confined to Conservatives.
Getty Images
Ken Livingstone during his time as leader of the GLC
Tony Blair was also not a Ken fan.
"Red" Ken, as he was known, was Old Labour, not New Labour.
The message from Downing St was clear: Stop Ken.
The party management tried to get the very popular Mo Mowlam to stand, then switched to Frank Dobson.
A bearded, avuncular figure who was serving as New Labour's first health secretary, he was 'persuaded' to stand against his old comrade Ken.
Dobson had initially, and somewhat bravely, declared his desire to remain at health, but then had to give up his cabinet seat to run for a job he didn't want.
The internal workings of Labour can be difficult for outsiders - and many insiders - to navigate.
In this case, an electoral college was mandated which led to the popular Livingstone not winning selection.
The vote was a third each for party members, trade unions and London MPs and other elected representatives.
In the final ballot Livingstone won 60% of party members and 72% of affiliated unions, but Dobson won 86% of MPs, MEPs and Greater London Assembly candidates.
Dobson therefore won a narrow overall victory, and the Blairites were accused of rigging the whole thing to keep Old Labour Ken from the nomination.
Livingstone for his part had promised not to run as an independent, then decided that that was what he was going to do after all.
PA Media
Tony Blair backed Frank Dobson as Labour's candidate for Mayor
The Tories also had a colourful time choosing their candidate.
In September 1999 the novelist Jeffrey Archer was selected by party members, beating Steve Norris.
But in a plot twist reminiscent of one of his books, Archer withdrew from the race a few months later after it was alleged he had committed perjury in a famous libel case.
Lord Archer had secured the Conservative nomination with backing from former prime ministers Margaret Thatcher and John Major, who in 1992 had made him a peer.
Five years earlier, in 1987, Archer had won a libel case against The Daily Star which published a story that he had paid off a sex worker called Monica Coghlan.
After his selection as a mayoral candidate, a former friend of Archer's told the News of the World that he had lied in the libel trial and asked him to provide a false alibi.
Archer stood down from the race, and starred in a production of his courtroom play, The Accused, in London's West End while waiting for his trial to start.
In July 2001 he was found guilty and spent two years in jail, but retained his peerage and membership of the House of Lords as there was no mechanism to remove them at the time.
PA Media
Lord Archer was found guilty of perjury and spent two years in jail
Norris was selected as the Conservative Party candidate to replace Archer.
A very different type of Tory, Norris advocated for gay rights and had a relaxed approach to monogamy.
He was also a former transport minister who was obsessed with buses.
In that role, he had a hand in approving the Jubilee line extension from Green Park to Stratford, and the privatisation of London's bus services.
In the rough and tumble world of turn of the century politics, he was given the nickname "Shagger".
A brief snippet from a Guardian profile piece published during that first mayoral campaign gives a flavour of Norris' complex appeal.
"The day his original candidature was announced was marked by a letter to the Times from his father-in-law, a retired rear-admiral, expressing astonishment at Norris's public plans to marry the fourth of his famous five mistresses … since as far as the rear-admiral knew, Norris was still married to his daughter."
Norris was a self-made man, a millionaire car salesman who grew up in working class Liverpool, attending the same school as Paul McCartney.
Not many 2025 Tories can boast that sort of hinterland.
PA Media
Steve Norris was a socially liberal Conservative and bus obsessive
There may have been some intrigue in the Lib Dem selection process, but it is lost to history if there was.
Their candidate was the estimable Susan Kramer, who was subjected to condescension and mansplaining throughout the campaign - this was a time when female Labour MPs were referred to as "Blair's Babes" by tabloid and broadsheet newspapers alike.
Livingstone was to mount the first - and so far only - successful independent bid for Mayor of London.
Dobson ran a campaign that never really captured the imagination of London's voters, and his old comrade won the historic poll despite a late surge in support for the Tory candidate.
The May 2000 election was a disaster for New Labour: Dobson got just 13% of the vote and was eliminated in the first round along with Susan Kramer, who polled a respectable 11.9% for the Lib Dems.
Livingstone led by 39% to 27% of first preference votes and polled a total of 776,427 votes to 564,137 for Norris, after second preferences were calculated.
It was a bloody nose and a notable defeat for the previously unassailable Tony Blair.
The BBC News website has an archive of reports from this election, a time capsule of the way politics used to be.
It reported that Dobson's "humiliation in the mayoral poll was underlined as he came fourth in the mayoral contest in Barnet and Camden - the seat which includes his parliamentary constituency".
The BBC News website reported the Mayoral election in May 2000
The 2000 election reports reveal Livingstone said he would "fight for the interests of Londoners as mayor, demanding more money from the government and telling ministers they were wrong over plans to partially privatise the London Underground".
London Underground, now part of Transport for London, remains in public hands under the control of the Mayor of London.
It also reported that Blair "made it clear Mr Livingstone would not be allowed to return to Labour after standing against an official party candidate".
Blair was wrong about that: in 2004 Livingstone was the Labour candidate, and he won, again defeating Norris.
Livingstone was his party's standard bearer again in both 2008 and 2012, on both occasions losing to a young Conservative contender called Boris Johnson.
But that's another story.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal
Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal

Western Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal

The Prime Minister dropped in on a meeting between Howard Lutnick and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds in Downing Street on Tuesday. Mr Lutnick was in London for talks with China on resolving the trade war between Washington and Beijing, and Mr Reynolds took the opportunity to meet him in person to push for the UK-US trade deal announced last month to be implemented as soon as possible. The meeting follows talks between the Business Secretary and US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris last week. Under the terms of the agreement announced by Sir Keir and Donald Trump, the US will implement import quotas that will effectively eliminate tariffs on British steel and cut the levy on vehicles to 10%. But the deal has yet to be implemented and tariffs on both steel and cars remain at 25%, although the UK has been spared the increase on steel duties to 50% that Mr Trump imposed on the rest of the world last week. In a post on social media, Mr Reynolds said he had discussed 'progress on our trade deal – including UK autos and steel' with Mr Lutnick. UK officials remain hopeful that the deal will be implemented soon, but Tuesday's meeting does not appear to have moved the issue beyond both sides agreeing the need to move quickly. Speaking in the Commons last week, Sir Keir said he was 'very confident' that tariffs would come down in line with the deal 'within a very short time'. Implementing the deal will require the UK to pass legislation, likely to involve regulations rather than a full Act of Parliament, while the US will also need to create a legal mechanism to bring steel and vehicle quotas into effect.

UK lawyer loses bid to overturn misconduct findings over $3 bln windfall
UK lawyer loses bid to overturn misconduct findings over $3 bln windfall

Reuters

time31 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK lawyer loses bid to overturn misconduct findings over $3 bln windfall

LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - A British lawyer who stood to receive up to $3 billion from Nigeria over a collapsed gas project on Tuesday lost a bid to overturn court findings that he acted corruptly out of greed. Seamus Andrew had represented Process & Industrial Developments (P&ID), a little-known British Virgin Islands-based company, in a long-running legal battle with Nigeria that ended in a court victory for Africa's most populous country. Nigeria had been facing a bill for $11 billion, representing around a third of its foreign exchange reserves, after P&ID won an arbitration case over the collapse of a 2010 gas supply deal. But London's High Court in 2023 overturned the damages bill after finding that P&ID had paid bribes in connection with the underlying contract and the resulting arbitration. P&ID had denied paying bribes and accused Nigeria of institutional incompetence. Its application to appeal against the High Court's decision was refused. The court had also found that P&ID's lawyers, including Andrew, received confidential Nigerian documents during the arbitration, which they knew they were not entitled to see, with a judge describing Andrew's conduct as "indefensible." Andrew could have received 20% of all proceeds recovered from Nigeria, up to $3 billion of the $11 billion award, after becoming a director of P&ID and acquiring a stake in the company in 2017 following the end of the arbitration. Andrew applied to the Court of Appeal to overturn the findings against him, arguing that inadequate reasons were given for the criticism and that he was not given proper notice that findings would be made against him. But his application for permission to appeal was refused, with Judge Julian Flaux ruling on Tuesday that Andrew had brought his application too late and that, in any event, the criticism was adequately reasoned, foreseeable and justified. "Overall, the finding that Mr Andrew's conduct was indefensible was plainly correct," Flaux added. Andrew said in a statement: "Although I am disappointed by the outcome of my appeal, I believe that I acted in accordance with my professional duties and I am confident that my position will be vindicated in due course."

Welsh railways to get £445m investment in spending review
Welsh railways to get £445m investment in spending review

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Welsh railways to get £445m investment in spending review

Rachel Reeves is expected to announce the additional funding as part of her spending review, aiming to address what the Treasury sees as years of underinvestment in Welsh infrastructure. Understood to be a combination of direct funding and additional money for the Welsh government, the investment is expected to be spent on projects such as fixing level crossings, building new stations and upgrading railway lines. A Treasury source said: 'With this Government, Wales will thrive, and the Chancellor has prioritised bringing forward a package that has the potential to be truly transformative.' On Tuesday, Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan told members of the Senedd that her government was 'expecting something positive from the spending review'. She said: 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice.' Baroness Morgan's comments came in response to criticism from Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth of a decision to classify the £6.6 billion Oxford-to-Cambridge line as an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth said Wales had been 'getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts'. The expected announcement of additional funding for Welsh railways is one of several transport-related investments set to be confirmed on Wednesday. Ms Reeves has already announced plans to spend a total of £15.6 billion on public transport projects in England's city regions, and is understood to be preparing to extend the £3 cap on bus fares in England until March 2027.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store