Rocky Mountain coal mine in Alberta takes next step to expansion
Rocky Mountain coal mine in Alberta takes next step to expansion
The fate of a massive coal mine expansion on the doorsteps of Jasper National Park is now in the hands of Alberta's energy regulator.
The company submitted a formal application in April. It comes three months after the province officially lifted its moratorium on new coal mine development on the eastern slopes, though the proposed expansion was not subject to the moratorium.
The Narwhal dug into the public concern surrounding the proposed expansion of the coal mine. While most of the political attention in the province has been focused on opening mines along the southern stretch of the mountain range, the existing Vista coal mine has been working to significantly extend its production of thermal coal, burned to generate electricity.
"Simply put, the Vista expansion would carve up the Rocky Mountains, threaten endangered species, Indigenous Rights, water quality and community health," Fraser Thomson, a staff lawyer with Ecojustice who represents Keepers of the Water and the West Athabasca Watershed Bioregional Society in opposition of the project, said in an interview.
The expansion has faced delays as the federal Impact Assessment Agency mulled a review of the project before ultimately deciding not to proceed with an assessment, which would have considered adverse impacts on areas under federal jurisdiction, including migratory birds, waterways and fish. Instead, it will be up to the Alberta Energy Regulator to conduct a provincial assessment and determine whether to approve the company's application.
Thomson describes it as one of the last regulatory hurdles for the U.S.-based owners to clear, and it's not yet known how substantive the review will be.
"If the [Alberta Energy Regulator] decides that this will be undertaken quickly, with little public involvement, then that poses pretty significant risks," he said. "As most Albertans know, there can be profound impacts from development of coal in our Rocky Mountains."
The issue has been front and center in the province ever since the United Conservative government of Jason Kenney first removed a moratorium on coal mining along the Rockies and then bowed to public pressure to reinstate the old rules. The current government has once again lifted the decades-old restrictions.
Public concerns over water contamination and pollution, particularly among ranchers and nearby municipalities, were central, as was the idea of open-pit mines along the Rocky Mountains.
The regulator is accepting statements of concern regarding the project until May 22. Coral Hulse, a spokesperson for the regulator, said anyone who believes they may be adversely impacted by the project can submit a statement, and that those statements can prolong the process.
Hulse also said it hasn't been determined whether the project will have a public hearing.
"Our decision to hold a hearing is made on a case-by-case basis," she wrote in response to questions from The Narwhal.
Proposed new phase of coal mine would extend production by 12 years
The Vista mine, owned by Coalspur Mines Ltd., is located approximately 280 kilometers (174 miles) west of Edmonton, nestled into the eastern slopes of the Rockies near the town of Hinton, Alberta. All of the coal produced at the mine is shipped by rail and then overseas, where it is used to create electricity.
Opened in 2019, the mine currently has a maximum production limit of 7.5 million tons of coal per year, but the company says that's expected to drop in the coming years, before tapering off completely by 2032 when the first phase of the mine will close.
"Phase II is effectively a continuation of the Vista Mine surface mine," the company said in its application to the regulator. "It is proposed to commence in 2026, when current mine fleets would expect to be reduced, and it will operate for 12 years, therefore prolonging the life of the mine and sustain the full workforce for an additional 12 years."
It expects the expansion will produce 5.5 million tons of coal per year. In 2022, Canada produced 19.3 million tons of thermal coal, a decline of more than 15 million tons from 2013.
Coalspur Mines has asked for access to 5.4 billion liters (approximately 1.2 million gallons) of water as part of its application to the regulator.
Daniel Cheater, another Ecojustice lawyer working on the Vista mine file, said the bulk of the water will be taken from the McLeod River, a critical habitat for rainbow and bull trout, both of which are listed as species at risk.
"Coalspur has also consistently demonstrated a failure to manage tailings from the existing Phase I of the Vista coal mine," he added, noting the company's own application says water from tailings will seep through into the nearby McPherson Creek "approximately 11 to 160 years" after wastewater stops flowing into the ponds.
The project could also completely dry up both McPherson Creek and one of its tributaries. The company plans to divert water from the McLeod River post-mining, but notes recovery will take decades.
The company did not respond to an interview request.
Company behind the mine entered creditor protection in 2021
The existing mine has not been without its challenges.
In 2021, two years after it opened, the mine entered into creditor protection as its finances collapsed. It clawed its way back to life in 2022, in part by avoiding full payment of debts to local businesses.
When it initiated creditor protection proceedings, Coalspur owed nearly $5 million to local businesses, ranging from car dealerships to oilfield services to welding shops.
In the final affidavit submitted as part of the creditor protection process by Coalspur's president and CEO Michael Beyer, an American living in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Beyer said emerging from the proceedings intact, as opposed to a fire sale of assets, was a better outcome for all creditors and would enable relationships into the future.
The mine is a significant economic driver in the region and is supported by the Ermineskin Cree Nation, which has signed benefit agreements with Coalspur.
A representative with the nation's consultation department did not respond to an interview request prior to publication.
Mine expansion will benefit US company during trade war: lawyer
The expansion comes at a time of heightened international political and economic tension, not to mention the increasing threat of climate change. The proposal also clashes with a pledge by the federal Liberal government in 2021 to phase out exports of thermal coal by 2030.
"It's hard to see how it benefits our country to allow this company to build one of the biggest thermal coal mines in Canadian history on the edge of Jasper National Park," Thomson said.
"I think a lot of Canadians right now think that we should be investing in Canadian industries and preserving our export capacity, the limited export capacity that we have, for goods that keep profits inside our country and that don't just profit American companies."
Thomson is also concerned about the emissions impacts of amping up coal production.
The company says it expects emissions from its operations to be approximately 352,000 tons per year. That does not account for the carbon dioxide that would be released when the coal is ultimately used; burning 5.5 million tons of coal generates about twice that mass in carbon dioxide. Thomson said the emissions from the mine at peak production could be equivalent to that of 4 million cars, when factoring in burning the coal overseas.
"Given the events of the last few months, we often lose sight of the fact that we are also in a climate crisis, and thermal coal is one of the world's dirtiest fossil fuels," he said. "It really has no place in a world serious about tackling the climate crisis."
This story was produced by The Narwhal and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Wire
2 hours ago
- Business Wire
ATKORE INVESTIGATION INITIATED by Former Louisiana Attorney General: Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC Investigates the Officers and Directors of Atkore Inc.
NEW YORK & NEW ORLEANS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Former Attorney General of Louisiana, Charles C. Foti, Jr., Esq., a partner at the law firm of Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC ('KSF'), announces that KSF has commenced an investigation into Atkore Inc. (NYSE: ATKR). In July 2024, the Company was named as a defendant in a number of civil antitrust lawsuits alleging that, from at least April 1, 2021, it and other U.S.-based PVC Pipe manufacturers conspired to artificially inflate the price of PVC Pipes through the exchange of competitively sensitive business information regarding PVC Pipe pricing and sales through an industry newsletter called Oil Price Information Service, LLC ('OPIS'), in violation of federal antitrust laws. Thereafter, the Company and certain of its executives were sued in a securities class action lawsuit, charging them with failing to disclose material information in violation of federal securities laws, which remains ongoing. KSF's investigation is focusing on whether Atkore's officers and/or directors breached their fiduciary duties to its shareholders or otherwise violated state or federal laws. If you have information that would assist KSF in its investigation, or have been a long-term holder of Atkore shares and would like to discuss your legal rights, you may, without obligation or cost to you, call toll-free at 1-833-938-0905 or email KSF Managing Partner Lewis Kahn ( or visit to learn more. About Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC KSF, whose partners include former Louisiana Attorney General Charles C. Foti, Jr., is one of the nation's premier boutique securities litigation law firms. This past year, KSF was ranked by SCAS among the top 10 firms nationally based upon total settlement value. KSF serves a variety of clients, including public and private institutional investors, and retail investors - in seeking recoveries for investment losses emanating from corporate fraud or malfeasance by publicly traded companies. KSF has offices in New York, Delaware, California, Louisiana, Chicago, New Jersey, and a representative office in Luxembourg. To learn more about KSF, you may visit
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Non-citizen LA rioters could be deported under new House bill
FIRST ON FOX: Some House Republicans are now considering whether non-citizens who are found to have participated in violent anti-law enforcement riots have a right to stay in the United States. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, is leading a bill that would make non-U.S. citizens convicted of "actual or attempted assault, battery, or use of force" against any law enforcement officer eligible for deportation. Any immigrants deported under the legislation, if enacted, would be permanently barred from the United States. "The thing about breaking the law is, there's effectively a waiving of your constitutional rights that's sort of inherent in our system, right? When you go to prison, you're losing your liberty," Crenshaw told Fox News Digital in an interview Tuesday. California Republicans Slam Newsom, Bass For Letting La Burn With Riots Amid Trump Immigration Blitz "So this is a very normal thing, and in the case of say, people who are here legally, but then committing acts of violence – in this case, we're being really specific, during a national emergency, committing assaults against police officers, and destruction of property – that should have an effect and be on the list of things that allows for revocation of your status." Read On The Fox News App Early bill text obtained by Fox News Digital shows the bill would apply to legal permanent residents, people here illegally, and beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy. It would go into effect when presidents, governors or local leaders make emergency or major disaster declarations. It comes amid continued tensions in Los Angeles, where protests against Immigrations and Customs Enforcement operations turned violent across the city this weekend. Rioters were seen burning American flags and cars stood on the street in flames, while police used pepper spray and rubber bullets on crowds outside federal buildings. President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard despite the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and ordered 700 U.S. Marines to Los Angeles as well. Those Marines will be training in Seal Beach for a few more days before deployment, a U.S. defense official told Fox News. Democrats have accused the Trump administration of escalating violence in Los Angeles, while Republicans argue that federal action is necessary based on the state's handling of the situation. Crenshaw said his legislation would help the administration restore order during such times. "What it would do is, it would give the administration the option to say, yeah we've rounded all these people up, half of them are U.S. citizens, okay, you're going to jail for rioting. Maybe another quarter are illegals, well that's easy you can deport them," he said. "But what about the other quarter? You know, that might be…a number of legal aliens here rioting against America for enforcing our immigration laws. In our minds, you've violated that sort of social contract with the United States at that point." California Lt. Governor Says Los Angeles Riots Are 'Generated By Donald Trump' Crenshaw said he spoke with the White House and that officials there were "excited" about the bill. The White House said it would not get in front of the president on legislative matters when reached for comment by Fox News Digital. Currently, legal U.S. residents, including green card holders, can have their status revoked by an immigration judge if they are found guilty of certain crimes or are found to have fraudulently misrepresented themselves in their application for residence. Crimes that would make legal U.S. visa holders and green card holders eligible for deportation currently include murder, drug trafficking and article source: Non-citizen LA rioters could be deported under new House bill
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Panama Canal Chief Warns $23B Port Deal Poses Risks to its Neutrality
The Panama Canal Authority's lead official is the latest stakeholder to express his doubts about the sale of two ports on both sides of the waterway. Ricaurte Vásquez Morales, administrator at the Panama Canal Authority (ACP), told the Financial Times the $23 billion deal that would shift the ports into the hands of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and BlackRock could potentially put the canal's own neutrality at risk. More from Sourcing Journal Panama Canal Sees Post-Drought Spike in Container Shipping Transits Staud Said to Bring On a New Investor Panama Ports Buyers Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place 'There is a potential risk of capacity concentration if the deal comes the way it is structured as we understand right now,' Vásquez said. 'If there is a significant level of concentration on terminal operators belonging to an integrated or one single shipping company, it will be at the expense of Panama's competitiveness in the market and inconsistent with neutrality.' The Panama Canal operates as a neutral passage for ships representing all countries. Treaties signed during the Carter administration in 1977 established its neutrality, and ensured that the then-U.S.-controlled waterway would gradually be returned to Panama by Dec. 31, 1999. President Donald Trump has made overtures challenging the canal's neutrality, with claims that he wants the U.S. to 'take back' the trade artery on the grounds that it is allegedly under Chinese control. While China does not control the canal, Washington had wider concerns about the country's influence on the waterway. The sale of the Balboa and Cristobal ports by owner Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings was considered a win for the Trump administration, since the port operator's ownership of the ports was classified as a national security risk. But that deal has been scrutinized left and right, and has yet to get approval from the Panamanian government. The Chinese government, as well as state-owned media in the country, had spoken out against the deal, with reports saying President Xi Jinping was furious that CK Hutchison went forward with the sale. Following those reports, China's antitrust regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), opened a probe into the deal. That investigation has resulted in the parties deciding to amend several parts of the initial deal to try and appease both Trump and Xi, an FT report said. Hutchison, which would be selling off more than 40 non-Panama ports to MSC and BlackRock in the deal, floated the idea of potentially selling off some or all of its 10 remaining ports in China in a separate sale. The regulator had already warned Hutchison against splitting the Panama ports from the original deal altogether as a means to circumvent antitrust review. Along with government regulators, supply chain stakeholders have shown their displeasure with the potential acquisition in that it would give MSC, already the world's largest ocean carrier, a leading market share in port terminal operations. Vásquez noted that the deal has essentially pitted container shipping operators further against each other for space. 'This has become a significant battleground on transshipment capacity,' Vásquez said, noting that some at the ACP were worried the $23 billion transaction would cost it some container traffic if Hutchison's customers moved elsewhere. Vásquez added that the canal should use the ports deal as an opportunity to become a terminal operator itself by reactivating a project to build a terminal in the Port of Corozal at the Pacific end of the canal, according to FT. As Vásquez and the ACP keep an eye on the situation, the authority will itself be on the radar of the Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) in the U.S. as it plans its infrastructure projects. 'They're doing a very efficient job. What we're watching there is what's going to happen when they have a drought and they have reduced slots to go through there and then how those slots are allocated,' said FMC chairman Louis Sola, in a Monday briefing with the Port of Long Beach, calling it the agency's 'number one priority' at the canal. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which helped build and maintain the canal, is currently assisting the ACP on water management practices, according to Sola. The record drought throughout the second half of 2023 prompted the ACP's decision to build a new reservoir in the Indio River watershed to mitigate impacts from future climate conditions. To diversify its business lines, Vásquez also said the authority was considering building a pipeline along the length of the canal to carry up to 1 million barrels per day of liquefied petroleum gas.