logo
Judge Rejects Corporation For Public Broadcasting's Motion To Block Donald Trump From Removing Board Members

Judge Rejects Corporation For Public Broadcasting's Motion To Block Donald Trump From Removing Board Members

Yahoo12 hours ago

A federal judge on Sunday declined to issue an order to prohibit Donald Trump from removing three board members of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, as the administration seeks to zero out funding for public media stations, PBS and NPR.
U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss wrote that the CPB had failed to meet the threshold to issue a preliminary injunction to halt Trump's effort to remove Sony's Tom Rothman, as well as Laura Ross and Diane Kaplan.
More from Deadline
ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over X Post That Called Trump Official Stephen Miller A "World-Class Hater"
'60 Minutes' Correspondent Scott Pelley Says Trump Lawsuit Settlement & Apology Would Be "Very Damaging" To Reputation Of CBS And Paramount
Trump Deploys 2,000 Troops To L.A. As Backlash & Protests To ICE Raids Surge; POTUS Action "Purposefully Inflammatory," Newsom Warns
But Moss' ruling does not mean that Trump will be able to wrest control of the board. The judge also cautioned that Trump could not unilaterally appoint their replacements, and noted that the corporation had recently changed its bylaws that restricts the president's actions.
Moss wrote, 'Although the case presents important questions regarding the status of the Corporation and its relationship with the federal government, the Court must leave those questions for another day. For present purposes and on the present record, it is enough to conclude that Plaintiffs have failed to carry their burden of demonstrating that they are likely to prevail on the merits of their claim for injunctive relief or that Plaintiffs are likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief.'
Read the judge's public broadcasting decision.
The CPB is the nonprofit corporation set up by Congress to distribute funds to public media, largely radio and TV stations.
The CPB sued the Trump administration in April, after three board members got notices that they were being removed. The CPB cited the Public Broadcasting Act, which forbids 'any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States' from exercising 'any direction, supervision, or control over . . . the Corporation.'
PBS and NPR have filed their own lawsuits against the Trump administration over the president's executive order to restrict further funding for their networks.
Rothman, Ross and Kaplan were among the five current board members of the CPB. There are four vacancies. The board members are appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.
Moss, an appointee of President Barack Obama, wrote that one of the arguments presented by CPB lawyers was 'novel,' that removal of a board member also required Senate approval. CPB attorneys also argued that the president was an 'officer' of the United States, and therefore was restricted from exercising control over the corporation.
Moss write that he need not resolve that question here. For present purposes, the Court can assume (as seems likely) that Congress intended to preclude the President (or any subordinate officials acting at his direction) from directing, supervising, or controlling the Corporation. But Congress did provide the President with appointment power, and that authority carries with it at least some ability to influence the affairs of the Corporation.'
The judge cautioned that Trump cannot just install replacement board members.
He wrote that 'the President is not free to remove directors and then unilaterally to appoint their replacements, thereby using his power to remove as an effective tool for altering Board policy. Rather, the President's appointment authority is tempered by the requirement that he proceed only with the advice and consent of the Senate.'
He added, It is unlikely, moreover, 'that the President can shortcut this process by filling vacancies on an interim basis. To start, if the Corporation is private entity, as Plaintiffs posit, the directors are not 'officers' of the United States, and it is thus doubtful that the President could fill a vacancy in any manner other than that prescribed in the statute, in the D.C. Nonprofit Corporation Act, or in the Corporation's articles of incorporation or bylaws. The PBA is consistent with that premise and provides that '[a]ny vacancy in the Board . . . shall be filled in the manner consistent with' the Act.'
After a court hearing in the case last month, the CPB board changed its bylaws to try to put further safeguards on its independence. The new bylaws read, 'No Director may be removed from the Board by any person or authority, including the President of the United States, without a two-thirds vote of the other Directors confirming such removal. In the event the Corporation's President appoints one or more members of the Designated Body, such members may not be removed from the Designated Body by any person or authority, including the President of the United States, without a two-thirds vote of the other Directors and serving members of the Designated Body confirming such removal.'
Perhaps more urgent for public media advocates is a pending congressional vote on whether the $535 million in annual federal funding to public broadcasting should be clawed back.
The White House last week sent a package to Capitol Hill to rescind the funding for CPB in fiscal year 2026 and 2027. The corporation gets an advanced appropriation from Congress, so the money for those years already was allocated.
More to come.
Best of Deadline
2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'When He Least Expects It': Michael Cohen Warns Elon Musk Of Trump's Revenge
'When He Least Expects It': Michael Cohen Warns Elon Musk Of Trump's Revenge

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'When He Least Expects It': Michael Cohen Warns Elon Musk Of Trump's Revenge

Michael Cohen, former longtime personal attorney to Donald Trump, on Sunday warned Elon Musk that the president isn't done with him yet. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country because they can,' he said on MSNBC on Saturday. 'And one thing Elon doesn't understand is this political guerrilla warfare that they're going to conduct against him.' Cohen warned that Trump can use the power of government to target Musk's companies and even his citizenship. Musk and Trump last week had a spectacularly public falling out, and over the weekend the president slammed his one-time pal as 'very disrespectful' and warned him of 'serious consequences' if he supported Democrats. Cohen said that while Trump has also downplayed the feud, the president is likely already plotting against the billionaire behind the scenes. 'I just wish him well,' Trump said on Friday. 'No he doesn't,' Cohen said. 'Because while Elon Musk is taking a step back thinking Trump is taking a step back, what Trump is actually doing is weaponizing the Department of Justice through his attorney general and other people, and they are gonna drop the hammer on him out of nowhere when he least expects it. That's the playbook.' See more of his conversation with MSNBC's Ali Velshi below:

Trump branded 'unlawful' over handling of LA riots
Trump branded 'unlawful' over handling of LA riots

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump branded 'unlawful' over handling of LA riots

Police clashed with demonstrators after a third day of protests in Los Angeles against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, branded the US president's deployment of the National Guard in the city as "unlawful" and "purposely inflammatory". Demonstrators have been protesting since Friday against the Trump administration's immigration raids, which last month aimed to detain as many as 3,000 people per day. Police in LA have said the downtown location is now an "unlawful assembly" area, while there have been reports of looting and vehicles have been set on fire. Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that things are "looking really bad in LA" and said: "Bring in the troops!" Read more from our media partners below or click the headlines to skip ahead > How Trump's immigration crackdown sparked LA uprising > Downtown LA is a scene of pandemonium and lawlessness > Trump orders law enforcement to 'liberate' LA from 'migrant invasion' > LA protesters, enraged by Trump, flood the streets > British photographer hit by non-lethal bullets during LA protests It began with co-ordinated raids on locations throughout Los Angeles on Friday. Immigration officials, backed by heavily armed FBI officers with assault weapons and body armour, stormed a clothing factory and at least two other locations in Latino areas of the city, trying to make good on orders to ramp-up the pace of deportations. The raids were the trigger for two days of clashes between protesters and federal officers in Los Angeles, where fires flared and fireworks exploded, prompting Donald Trump to order 2,000 National Guard troops onto the streets of the city. Read the full story from The Telegraph A shirtless man waving a Mexican flag stands atop a burning car in the heart of Los Angeles, as another man throws a traffic cone into the flames and some play drums and shout chants in opposition to immigration officials. The downtown district of one of America's biggest cities was a scene of pandemonium and lawlessness as protests, which had previously been mainly peaceful, turned ugly. Read the full story from Sky News Donald Trump has vowed to 'liberate Los Angeles from the migrant invasion,' amid violent clashes between members of the state national guard and anti-immigration enforcement protesters. The president took to Truth Social on Sunday, where he promised that 'the illegals will be expelled' and that the city would be 'set free,' as troops confronted demonstrators on the streets of downtown LA – using tear gas and 'less lethal munitions' to disperse crowds. Read the full story from The Independent Thousands of Angelenos enraged by Donald Trump's decision to commandeer their state national guard swamped the downtown streets on Sunday, bringing a major freeway to a standstill. But the national guard, hemmed in by the protesters and by dozens of Los Angeles police cruisers, played almost no role in any of it. A vocal, boisterous but largely peaceful sea of protesters engulfed the north-eastern corner of downtown Los Angeles around city hall and the federal courthouse. Read the full story from The Guardian A British news photographer has undergone emergency surgery after being hit by non-lethal rounds during protests in Los Angeles. Nick Stern was documenting a stand-off between anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) protesters and police outside a Home Depot in Paramount, a city in LA county and a location known as a hiring spot for day labourers, when a 14mm 'sponge bullet' tore into his thigh. Read the full story from PA Media

Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme
Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump Accused Of Inciting Violence With Chilling New Rhyme

President Donald Trump drew accusations of inciting violence after he recited a rhyme to reporters on Sunday. Trump claimed that people who are protesting the federal immigration raids that are being carried out by his administration are now spitting on agents. Spitting 'and worse' is 'their new thing,' the president claimed, offering no evidence to back up the assertion. Then he said, 'They spit, we hit.' 'And I told them, nobody's going to spit on our police officers, nobody's going to spit on our military, which they do, it's a common thing,' he added. If they spit in the face, 'they get hit very hard,' Trump warned. Trump: When they spit at people— they spit, that's their new thing—when that happens, I have a little statement: they spit, we hit.., if that happens, they get hit very hard — Acyn (@Acyn) June 8, 2025 Critics on social media suggested Trump's remark gave the go-ahead for police brutality and the excessive use of force. Others recalled the pardons that Trump dished out to hundreds of his supporters who had been convicted for their involvement in the deadly and violent U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, during which law enforcement officers were attacked. Trump drew similar ire in 2020 when, amid the protests of the police killing of George Floyd, he warned, 'When the looting starts, the shooting starts.' @POTUS They did far worse than spitting on Jan. 6. — ModerateRepublican (@Modr8_1104) June 8, 2025 Sounds like an excessive use of force. One that will surely be taken up with the courts via lawsuits. — Vince Wilson (@VinceWilsonShow) June 8, 2025 'Unless you attacked police on Jan 6 then you get to go free and we'll pay you millions in taxpayer dollars' — Jhoff10 (@Jhoff10) June 8, 2025 If you spit on a police officer that does not give the police officer the right to beat the crap out of you. It does, however, give the officer the right to arrest you. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) June 8, 2025 Cruelty isn't a policy, it's a warning sign. 'They spit, we hit' isn't leadership, it's incitement. Brutality, dehumanization, and escalation are the ethos of authoritarian regimes. This is far from law and order. It's about power through fear. And we must resist this evil. — Evaristus Odinikaeze (@odinikaeze) June 8, 2025 Karoline Leavitt Squirms Over Maria Bartiromo's Blunt Question About Elon Musk Marjorie Taylor Greene's 'Lesson For Us All' Leaves Seth Meyers Absolutely Floored German Leader Politely Shuts Down Trump's Hot Take On D-Day

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store