logo
Critics deride DOJ plans to drop police reform efforts as harmful political theater

Critics deride DOJ plans to drop police reform efforts as harmful political theater

USA Today22-05-2025

Critics deride DOJ plans to drop police reform efforts as harmful political theater
Show Caption
Hide Caption
US abandons police reform settlements with Minneapolis and Louisville
The Department of Justice announced it'd abandon police reform settlements with Minneapolis and Louisville.
Officials and experts blasted Justice Department plans to abandon police reform settlements as political theater that will undermine public safety and social justice efforts on America's streets while possibly setting the stage for future lawsuits against police departments nationwide.
On Wednesday, the DOJ announced it would initiate dismissal of lawsuits against and consent-decree negotiations with police departments in Minneapolis and Louisville in a move decried by community activists and cheered by some policing officials.
However, consent decrees applied to law enforcement have largely helped communities in which they've been implemented, said Michael Lawlor, an associate professor of criminal justice at the University of New Haven in Connecticut.
'Where these have been imposed, in almost every case the end result was better policing, less crime and fewer lawsuits against cities and towns,' said Lawlor, a former Connecticut state representative. 'The bottom line is these actually help, and not hurt, police departments.'
In law enforcement, the legally binding agreements, approved by all parties, typically stem from Justice Department investigations into widespread patterns of misconduct. The signed agreements must be approved by a federal judge to take effect.
The DOJ on Wednesday said it would halt lawsuits and police reform settlement negotiations initiated during President Joe Biden's administration after two incidents in 2020 that drew worldwide attention and outrage, including the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin and the killing of Breonna Taylor by police executing a no-knock warrant in Louisville.
In a May 21 press release, the department said those efforts were based on what it described as erroneous associations of statistical disparities with intentional discrimination.
"These sweeping consent decrees would have imposed years of micromanagement of local police departments by federal courts and expensive independent monitors, and potentially hundreds of millions of dollars of compliance costs, without a legally or factually adequate basis for doing so," the DOJ release said.
The Justice Department also said it would close investigations and retract findings of wrongdoing against police departments in Phoenix; Memphis, Tennessee; Trenton, New Jersey; Mount Vernon, New York; Oklahoma City; and the Louisiana State Police.
Lawlor said the city of New Haven was subject to a consent decree when he served as a state representative after a federal investigation found the city's police department had a pattern of racially profiling Latinos.
'The end result was a rebooted police department, more professionalized and with higher morale,' Lawlor said. 'Everybody's a winner — but it took a tragedy to force the issue.'
He called the announcement unfortunate but not surprising given the Trump administration's record on criminal justice thus far, even down to the timing of the announcement just days before the five-year anniversary of Floyd's murder.
'I'm sure that's not a coincidence,' Lawlor said. 'As with a lot of things they're doing, it's performance art. But at the end of the day, everybody loses.'
'Everyone's fears just came true'
Community leaders and activists reacted to the DOJ's plans with a mix of devastation and determination to carry on.
In Memphis, it remained unclear whether the Justice Department's moves might affect a $550 million civil lawsuit filed against the city by the family of Tyre Nichols, a 29-year-old FedEx employee who died after being pepper-sprayed, punched and kicked by five Memphis police officers during a traffic stop. Three of those former officers were acquitted earlier this month.
"This decision is a slap in the face to the families of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor and Tyre Nichols, and to every community that has endured the trauma of police violence and the false promises of accountability," said Ben Crump, the noted civil rights attorney representing Nichols' family, in a press release. "These consent decrees and investigations were not symbolic gestures. They were lifelines for communities crying out for change, rooted in years of organizing, suffering and advocacy."
Louisville Metro Councilwoman Shameka Parrish-Wright, a leader in the 2020 protests over Taylor's killing who unsuccessfully challenged Greenberg for the mayor's seat in 2022, expressed disappointment.
'For me, everyone's fears just came true,' she told The Courier Journal in Louisville. '… The work will continue in other forms. The people of Louisville deserve accountability and transparency on every level.'
In a statement, U.S. Rep. Morgan McGarvey said he was "appalled and deeply disappointed by the Trump administration's decision to abandon Louisville's consent decree and undermine years of hard work by our community, law enforcement, and city officials."
Chanelle Helm, an organizer for Black Lives Matter Louisville, said instituting systemic change is never easy.
"Most of us never had faith that law enforcement at any level in Louisville, in Kentucky, in the U.S. was going to see justice and do right by Black folks," Helm said. "Largely, we always know that civil rights were never applied to us, and we would always have to fight for them. In this moment, we're just hoping people who have been terrorized by LMPD know that we got each other and that we're building spaces for each other to take time for ourselves. This is not the end."
Minneapolis, Louisville officials say move won't sway efforts
Lawlor, of the University of New Haven, said whether with or without federal participation, local communities can still move forward on their own and adopt whatever policies they want.
'The problems have been identified,' he said. 'Communities can deal with them or not.'
Both Minneapolis and Louisville have indicated they intend to do so.
In Minneapolis, Mayor Jacob Frey said the city will stand by the court-ordered reforms. Crime is down, he said, and police are already rolling out new use-of-force measures, improving community engagement and ensuring their work is transparent and accountable.
Frey called the timing of the announcement 'entirely predictable,' charging the Trump administration of playing politics with the issue. Minneapolis, he said, is 'serious about reform when the White House is not.'
"What this shows is that all Donald Trump really cares about is political theater,' Frey said. Whether the federal judge decides to dismiss the case or not, he said, 'I can speak to what we are doing. Here is the bottom line: We're doing it anyway.'
Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara echoed Frey's sentiments, saying the department has been through 'an unbelievable amount of change and trauma' in the five years since Floyd's death, as have the city's residents.
'I think they know things needed to change here,' O'Hara said. 'The men and women who remain here are deeply committed to getting this right. They are not about to turn their backs on their fellow officers or the residents of this community.'
"Consent decrees improve relations between police departments and communities and build necessary trust,' said Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison. 'Dismissing them does the opposite, and doing so comes as no surprise from a president who has torn up other federal consent decrees and has encouraged police to mistreat people they are sworn to protect. This dismissal, as predictable and shameful as it is, does not erase DOJ's historic finding that Minneapolis engaged in a pattern of racially discriminatory, unlawful, and unconstitutional policing.'
Ellison said the DOJ's move doesn't negate the progress made thus far, including an agreement between the city and the state's department of human rights, 'which aligns closely with the DOJ's consent decree.'
'We will continue to improve policing and community relations in Minnesota without the federal government's help," he said.
Likewise, in Louisville, Mayor Craig Greenberg said the city would continue reform efforts with or without a consent decree, including hiring an independent monitor to provide oversight. While the Justice Department's action was not the outcome the city had hoped for, he said, it was nonetheless the one it had planned for.
'We as a city are committed to reform,' Greenberg said.
Ed Harness, the city's inspector general, said his office was preparing to probe several 'misconduct areas' cited in the DOJ's 2023 investigation.
Meanwhile, the ACLU of Kentucky said its efforts to bring about reform would continue, given what legal director Corey Shapiro called the Louisville police department's 'systemic, long-term, and ongoing problem of unconstitutional policing and lack of transparency.'
'The consent decree was an opportunity to repair some of the broken trust between LMPD and the community,' Shapiro said. While city and police officials have indicated a commitment to following through on the terms of the agreement, he called on them to 'begin the hard work of demonstrating, through transparency and accountability, that they will do what is right, even without the federal government's involvement.'
Despite the Justice Department's current direction, Lawlor said, the pendulum is bound to swing back the other way.
'Whatever happens in the next few years will be paid for four or five years from now when there's a different perspective at DOJ,' he said.
Contributing: Lucas Finton, USA TODAY Network

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

House Democrats' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse
House Democrats' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House Democrats' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse

Legislation introduced Friday, during Pride Month, by more than a dozen House Democrats would help combat abuse against elderly LGBTQ Americans. The Elder Pride Protection Act would establish a task force within the Department of Justice to study the 'increased incidence of elder abuse' against LGBTQ seniors and develop best practice solutions to be implemented by state and local law enforcement, according to a copy of the bill, shared first with The Hill. 'No one, especially our vulnerable seniors, should ever be mistreated because of who they are or who they love,' said Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), who introduced the bill Friday alongside Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), who recently launched a bid to replace retiring Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) in the Senate next year. In November, Gottheimer announced he would run for governor of New Jersey. Craig, who is gay and one of 13 openly LGBTQ members of Congress, said the measure would help shield seniors from abuse and discrimination 'as we continue the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights.' 'LGBTQ+ seniors led the fight for so many of the rights LGBTQ+ Minnesotans enjoy today, and now it's our turn to fight for them,' she said in a statement. LGBTQ older adults are at heightened risk for adverse health and social outcomes compared to their cisgender and heterosexual peers, according to the Center for Health Care Strategies, a New Jersey nonprofit. SAGE, an advocacy group for LGBTQ elders that has endorsed Gottheimer and Craig's bill, has said LGBTQ seniors are more vulnerable to abuse and neglect. Comprehensive data on elder abuse is lacking, though the Justice Department estimates that more than 10 percent of Americans age 65 and older experience some form of elder abuse each year. In limited data, LGBTQ seniors, who are at higher risk of isolation, report elevated rates of abuse, according to SAGE. 'These are challenging times, and now more than ever, LGBTQ+ elders deserve to age without fear of elder abuse,' said Aaron Tax, SAGE's managing director of government affairs and policy advocacy. The bill, which has 14 Democratic co-sponsors, stands little chance of passing the GOP-controlled House. Republicans and President Trump have denounced initiatives that prioritize diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), claiming they stoke divisions and promote 'woke ideology.' A National Center on Elder Abuse webpage previously dedicated to 'advancing justice for LGBTQ elders' appears to have been deleted this year in the administration's purge of government websites following Trump's executive orders targeting DEI and 'gender ideology.' Updated at 10:32 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump Admin Laments South Sudan Deportation Debacle It Created
Trump Admin Laments South Sudan Deportation Debacle It Created

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Admin Laments South Sudan Deportation Debacle It Created

A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. This is TPM's Morning Memo. Sign up for the email version. It had been two weeks since U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy of Massachusetts ordered the Trump administration to allow the detainees it was trying to ship off to South Sudan to talk to their lawyers – and as of Wednesday, the lawyers told the Supreme Court, they had still not heard from the detainees who have been stuck in Djibouti this whole time. Then yesterday the Trump administration filed a perplexing declaration telling Judge Murphy about all the hardship ICE agents are enduring trying to guard the detainees in the harsh conditions of the U.S. base in Djibouti. The WaPo headline captured the administration-centric perspective: 'ICE officers stuck in Djibouti shipping container with deported migrants.' Who is stuck with whom exactly? The decisions to deport them to South Sudan and to keep them temporarily in Djibouti are entirely the administration's, despite what it has told the Supreme Court. It was the administration's idea in the first place, as an incensed Murphy has pointed out. He's already called out the Trump DOJ on this for claiming he forced them into this predicament. In the May hearing, the Trump DOJ floated this solution as an alternative to bringing the detainees back to the United States. Murphy took them up on it, but explicitly said the administration could always bring them back stateside. The NYT has new reporting on how all this unfolded. As of yesterday, the detainees' legal team had still not heard from them. As the government stonewalls in another of the 'facilitate' cases, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher of Maryland has ordered weekly status reports and expedited discovery into what the Trump administration is doing to retrieve Cristian, the anonymous Venezuelan wrongfully deported under the Alien Enemies Act in violation of an existing settlement agreement. Gallagher also told Cristian's lawyers that they are 'free to seek sanctions on an expedited basis' if the Trump administration doesn't engage in discovery in good faith. The case is proceeding in striking parallel alongside another Maryland case. It was two months ago when an irate U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis ordered expedited discovery in the Abrego Garcia case. At the time it was a huge deal that portended contempt of court proceedings against the Trump administration for defying her order to 'facilitate' the wrongfully deported Salvadoran's return. But that proceeding has dragged on and almost become background noise. Still, this week Xinis granted leave to Abrego Garcia's lawyers to file a motion for sanctions for the government's discovery violations. Some of that dispute is under seal, but we know from some public proceedings in the case that the Trump administration has been barely responsive to the discovery Xinis ordered to determine whether she should find government officials in contempt of court. I go deeper on the ruling here. Roger Parloff unpacks it here. ICE agents mistakenly detained a U.S. marshal last month during an immigration sweep at a federal building in Tucson Even amid all the other lousy conduct by the Trump administration in the anti-immigration cases, this case stands out. The administration has refused to accept a judge's proposal that lawyers for Columbia University student Yunseo Chung, a pro-Palestinian protestor who has avoided arrest for months, simply accept service, which would trigger that start of removal proceedings. 'The government is simply refusing to take yes for an answer,' her lawyer quipped. The government's insistence that it will only accept arresting Chung has baffled U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the Southern District of New York. Yesterday, she put a stop to it, issuing an injunction prohibiting the government from arresting Chung or transferring her out of jurisdiction of her court. The judge then went further in suggesting what this is all really about, ordering the government to give 72-hours notice before the detain Chung on new trumped-up charges to give her a chance 'to be heard regarding whether any such asserted basis for detention constitutes a pretext for First Amendment retaliation.' U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs of Boston issued a temporary restraining order against the Department of Homeland Security blocking it from enforcing a ban on international students trying to enroll at Harvard. Harvard immediately filed suit over Trump's proclamation on Wednesday, was in court by Thursday, and won the TRO later in the day. The Guardian: 'The University of Michigan is using private, undercover investigators to surveil pro-Palestinian campus groups, including trailing them on and off campus, furtively recording them and eavesdropping on their conversations, the Guardian has learned.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave life to President Trump's February executive order targeting the the International Criminal Court by sanctioning four of its judges. The sanctions freeze any U.S. assets of the judges in retaliation for two of the judges voting to authorize an ICC investigation of U.S. military actions in Afghanistan and for the other two authorizing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli defense minister Yoav Gallant. DNI Tulsi Gabbard has installed one of her top advisers in a position within the office of the inspector general of the intelligence community, which is investigating the Signal group chat fiasco in which Gabbard participated. The Trump-Musk blowup is dominating political news coverage today, and I'd feel remiss not noting it. But I'm not sure what to do with it. Both men are so inauthentic and their transactional 'relationship' so contrived, that nothing about the public rupture feels any more real than their bromance did. I can't get any more invested in it than I would a pro wrestling story arc. I will grant that the performative breakup is emblematic of the current moment both in its inauthenticity and in the Gilded Age histrionics of the billionaire man-child v. billionaire man-child. Adam Bonica continues his trenchant analysis of the DOGE rampage by comparing its layoffs to the budget increases in the House GOP's big bill: The executive director of the Skadden Foundation has resigned after the Skadden law firm struck a deal with President Trump to avoid being targeted with a punitive executive order. 'My hope is that Skadden charts a path that respects the rule of law and honors the core values of the Skadden Foundation,' Kathleen Rudenstein wrote in a post announcing her resignation.

Court Fight Over Trump Ending a Tariff Exemption Goes Forward
Court Fight Over Trump Ending a Tariff Exemption Goes Forward

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Court Fight Over Trump Ending a Tariff Exemption Goes Forward

A court fight over President Donald Trump's decision to end a US policy that exempted small-value packages from China from tariffs is moving ahead over the administration's opposition. A federal judge on Thursday denied the US Justice Department's request to pause litigation over what's known as the 'de minimis' tariff exception while a broader fight over Trump's move to raise global tariffs on imported goods is pending. Amid that fight, the president's tariffs remain in effect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store