What's going wrong inside the SNP? Activists share all
This activist works for the party and regularly attends national events. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, they said they can't help but worry that the SNP is 'heading back into the same old internal splits' seen at the height of Nicola Sturgeon's leadership.
'Which is exactly what the Unionists want,' they added.
Leader John Swinney is currently facing a wave of discontent from members following the party's underwhelming performance in last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
READ MORE: 'Foolish': Former SNP MP hits out at John Swinney's by-election campaign
When this paper spoke to activists following the result on Friday, it became clear that deeper fissures of frustration and worry had come to the surface. Members said concerns about party strategy had been dismissed by leadership, which echoes frustrations felt under Sturgeon.
For others, it's a repeat of other past elections the SNP would rather forget.
'It's starting to feel like a repeat of [Swinney's] first time in charge,' the Aberdeen activist remarked.
"We are the establishment and Swinney's been part of that shift, giving he's been at the front line for about two decades.
"If John's serious about independence, then it has to be front and centre in everything we do. Right now, it's not.'
One 2026 candidate summarised the thoughts of the majority: a quiet worry whether confidence in leadership will return in time for the elections. 'John has done a really good job of stabilising the party but it's clear that people have lost trust in all politicians," they said.
'We need to do more so that people know we are on their side, we're working hard to come up with ways to improve their day-to-day lives and that the SNP will fight for them. That message isn't getting through at the moment and we need to reflect on why that is.'
Swinney previously led the party, with a sore end. In 2000, Alex Salmond stepped down as leader of the SNP, triggering a new leadership contest.
Swinney, who launched his bid to become the leader of the SNP, advocated for a gradualist approach to independence and won, becoming leader of the opposition in Holyrood.
After disappointing elections in 2001, 2003, and 2004, which saw the party's vote share and number of seats drop, Swinney resigned as SNP leader. This was despite other pro-independence parties like the Scottish Greens and Scottish Socialist Party making gains in Holyrood.
His strategy then is similar to what is fuelling frustration within and outwith the party today. But it's nothing new and he has stood by his tactics when questioned, most thoroughly by Lesley Riddoch last year.
'I get that Swinney's steadied things after a rough patch, but it feels like we've gone quiet on the one thing that actually defines us,' the activist said. 'And in this by-election, we made the mistake of giving Reform a platform by turning them into a talking point.'
Dr Michael Higgins, a political communications expert at the University of Strathclyde, said the SNP had 'demeaned themselves' by focusing on Reform UK in the by-election campaign.
But Swinney doubled down on Sunday, saying he was 'standing up to Farage'. 'I'm going to make no apology for it,' he added.
READ MORE: Has Swinney 'healed' the SNP or will they end up back on life support?
And when asked if he was still the man to lead the party, Swinney said "Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me.
'I was not seeking high office, I'd held high office for a long time in my life, and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.'
Last week, activists told The National they had voiced concerns over Swinney's strategy and had been 'shut down' for questioning the party's tactics.
An affiliate convenor reflected that they felt the on-the-ground campaign "was good" but they had found more Labour support on the doors than expected, adding: "It didn't feel like it was taken seriously."
Looking towards the SNP's record in government, activists are also angry.
Pledge after pledge has been dropped in the last few years. Its flagship target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030 was scaled back, a conversion therapy ban was delayed, the human rights bill was kicked into the long grass, the national care service plan was dropped, and most recently, a new national park in Galloway was scrapped.
One activist, who has been integral in building campaign networks and previously served as an SNP councillor, told The National: 'Personally, I believe there is an issue where the SNP is run from an inner circle that is guided by their own deluded thoughts rather than reality.
'The party I ran for election with was informed by effective engagement with its supporters and membership – not so called 'political insight' from 20-30 somethings who have been at the helm of a party that has not had to work that hard for a monopoly we've been able to sustain against very little organised opposition.
'We now have effective opposition through two forces: a Scottish Labour Party renewed with an impressive manifesto and insight to the issues facing Scotland – and Reform UK who are riding a global populist wave of support from disgruntled people of this nation. Of which I am very much one too.'
They added: 'What is our vision? What is our plan? What are we delivering on right now that is actually aspirational given? Where is the proof that the SNP is working hard for our nation? Because I can't see it.'
But where can the party go from here?
ONCE again, the party is left asking the same question it has asked itself since Sturgeon quit: "What do we do now?"
The former councillor suggests a 'dose of reality', adding: 'No matter how much we repeat that statement on the doorsteps, that 'we don't take any votes for granted,' we are very much taking the entire nation for granted for the very little effort we put in to being strategic on how we are leading this nation."
READ MORE: How did Labour win the Hamilton by-election with an 'invisible man' candidate?
Others have called for the party to simply be 'more inspirational,' with one staffer adding: 'The churn at the top over last few years has meant promises have often been dropped just as quickly as they've been made.'
Another member said they had been 'stunned' by the result on Friday morning, sharing: 'We obviously lost votes to Reform. The Greens and our vote don't seem to be turning out.
'I think John Swinney is a good man but probably not the best person the get the voters excited enough to vote SNP. It scares me for 2026. Stephen Flynn may be better. There doesn't seem to be a direction for independence.'
However, not everyone agrees that Swinney or the party is in trouble, including Swinney himself.
Coming second in the vote, the First Minister said on Monday, is an 'indication that we are still able to perform strongly electorally'.
The First Minister added that his party lost the overlapping seat at Westminster – Hamilton and Clyde Valley – by 9000 votes last year and by just 600 on Thursday.
'So, we are quite clearly in a position where we can achieve electoral success, but we have got to build on that and make sure we're stronger for 2026,' he added.
'Any suggestions the party isn't fully behind John is being peddled by those outwith the party or by a miniscule minority,' activist Logan Urwin said.
Another activist, who campaigned heavily in the by-election alongside Swinney and candidate Katy Loudon, said: "I feel somewhat confident as feel that we are at a better position than last year.
"I do think that what happened in the by-election was strategic errors and hopefully [will be] fixed next year, but do fear that similar seats to Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse might be at real risk and needs work to make sure they stay SNP".
Glasgow activist Doug Daniel agreed, adding: 'The party seems to be in a much better place than it was when John took over, and although it's a shame we didn't quite get over the line in Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse, it's not quite the catastrophe some commentators are making it out to be.
'I think people forget we've only won one of the five previous Holyrood by-elections that have taken place since 2007, and this one was far closer than any of those. I think it'll be a different story in 2026 when people are asking themselves who they trust to stand up for Scotland against a failing Labour UK Government.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Scottish parliament to vote on scaled-back social care reforms
It started life with a promise from Nicola Sturgeon that it would be most ambitious reform of the devolution when MSPs vote on the final stage of the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill later, the proposals in front of them will be a shadow of what the former first minister pledged in 2021. At the heart of the revamp of social care services was meant to be a National Care Service - but this was dropped by SNP ministers following widespread opposition to how the shake-up would have worked in the planned law to enable this flagship change has lived on and will now deliver changes to social care procurement, family care home visits and a new right to breaks for unpaid carers. When it became clear the National Care Service was not going ahead, the Scottish government was left with a Bill it was trying to get passed that was carrying the same name as its defunct policy. This was solved by renaming it the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill and now the planned law focuses on a series of important, but less high-profile, changes to health and social care across the country. What changes to social care are planned? One of the big changes planned under the new law is a legal right to breaks for unpaid mean councils will have a duty to decide whether a carer is able to take sufficient breaks from their caring they are not, then the local authority will provide support to enable this, such as providing funding for short respite breaks. This policy, given Scotland has around 700,000 unpaid carers, will cost between £196m and £315m by 2035/36, according to the Bill's financial it remains a fraction of the £13.9bn that unpaid care is currently saving Scotland every year. Improvements to the way information is shared in health and social care - to make it less likely that people will have to repeat their information - as well changes to procurement rules in the sector are also up the powers that watchdogs can take against failing care providers is also part of the bill. What about Anne's Law? The most high-profile part of the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill is Anne's Law, which allows people in care homes to receive visits from a named loved one even in restricted is named after Anne Duke, who died aged 63 in November 2021 after being cut off from her family while battling early-onset dementia during the Covid daughter Natasha Hamilton started a petition about the issue at the height of the pandemic, which attracted nearly 100,000 signatures, and this led to a wider campaign about the rights of people in care homes."I find it sad that it gained that much traction, it showed it was just not me who was affected, but I felt like I had to do something," she explained. "It was the most vulnerable point of my mum's life, she really needed her family and I still can't believe the separation that happened."But I'm proud that I did this for my mum and for everyone else who had to endure the torture of isolation during Covid."Changes to ensure people living in care homes have the right to visits from a loved one were introduced by the Scottish government in 2022 via national standards for the the bill is passed by MSPs, the right to have a designated visitor into care homes to support loved ones will become a legal right instead. Why was the National Care Service ditched? The original proposal for a National Care Service, inspired by the NHS, was to take social care provision and staff away from local authorities into a new national was then dropped in favour of creating a national care board to supervise service delivery and improve consistency - but this failed to win over a growing number of body Cosla and trade unions then withdrew their support for the project, while a number of health boards and care organisations also expressed plan, which was also subject to a series of delays, was eventually scrapped in January after £30m was spent on the process. Social Care Minister Maree Todd said at the time she was "still committed to the ambitions of the National Care Service" but added the SNP no longer had the support it needed in parliament to pass its original plans into is left of the plans today is the creation of a national care service advisory board on a non-statutory basis which will try and improve social care support services.
Scottish Sun
25 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Gangsters ‘would be treated like terrorists' and face up to 14 years in jail under Tory plans
Scotland's turf war shows no sign of slowing down GANG DEMAND Gangsters 'would be treated like terrorists' and face up to 14 years in jail under Tory plans Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) CRIME gang members would be treated like terrorists and face up to 14 years in jail under crackdown plans from the Scottish Tories. It would see them behind bars if they are part of gangs identified by Police Scotland. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 2 A hitman stormed a bar and assassinated Eddie Lyons Jr and Ross Monaghan And the Tories would rewrite the law to stop fraudsters and rich criminals getting away with paying back a fraction of their ill-gained wealth. Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'Organised crime gangs are causing misery in our communities, but the SNP still fail to act. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW 'We'll get tough on these individuals by making it a criminal offence to be a member of gangs. 'It will be in a similar vein to it being illegal to be a member of a terrorist organisation. 'It's also time to overhaul the SNP's Proceeds Of Crime laws which too often let criminals off repaying their debts.' Gang membership would lead to the same jail sentence as being part of a terrorist group such as Hamas. It would also see Police Scotland paid by criminals ordered to pay back their ill-gotten gains. The DOWNFALL of Scotland's biggest gangster - Jamie 'The Iceman' Stevenson Part Two The party says this will encourage cops to investigate organised crime gangs by giving them a cash incentive. John Swinney was last week blasted for failing to act on organised crime amid a raging underworld turf war in Scotland and the double murder of two Scots drug lords in Spain. We told last week how a hitman stormed a bar in Fuengirola on the Costa Del Sol and assassinated Lyons gang kingpins Eddie Lyons Jr, 46, and pub owner Ross Monaghan, 43. Justice Secretary Angela Constance said: 'The Scottish Government made it an offence for an individual to be involved in serious organised crime in 2010. 'Since 2008 over £156 million of ill-gotten gains has been recovered through the UK-wide Proceeds Of Crime Act.'
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
GRAHAM GRANT: With ideas so barmy even Lord Sugar would sack her, next year Scots voters will have their own chance to tell Kate Forbes and the SNP...'YOU'RE FIRED!'
Kate Forbes showed off her renowned business acumen last week when she said businesses could avoid hefty rates by setting up in cupboards. It's a barmy idea which would see her kicked off The Apprentice – irascible Lord Sugar wouldn't put up with her weapons-grade nonsense. For bar and restaurant owners desperate for respite from a punitive rates regime, Ms Forbes's less than sage counsel was particularly galling. Operating from the confines of a cupboard is a non-starter for them, but then they've long been little more than an afterthought for the SNP. Some of them had fallen for the Deputy First Minister's act as someone who understood the needs of entrepreneurs and business owners. She was seen as the acceptable face of insular, Left-wing nationalism, as she seemed to realise that thriving firms lead to a stronger economy. After the SNP joined forces with the anti-capitalist Greens in a pact which ended in disaster, Ms Forbes was viewed as a breath of fresh air, at least by those who thought growth was a good idea. The scales fell from the eyes of those who had been hoping in vain that she would re-build bridges with Covid-battered businesses, many of them still clinging to survival, after her cupboard advice. For those who missed it, Ms Forbes was taking part in a Holyrood debate when she was asked whether the rates burden prevented companies from expanding. Ms Forbes, who is also Economy Secretary, if you can believe it, said the 'rates system often does not take into account the fact that some of the most profitable businesses are the smaller ones'. She said: 'A start-up can be launched from a cupboard, where there are no rates, while a large and perhaps less profitable business has to pay them.' Ms Forbes did concede that the rates system is 'based on an older version of the economy, in which the size of properties was linked to profitability, and that is just not the case in our new, tech-driven environment'. She might have vowed to reform the system, of course, but then it's easier just to tell people to move into cupboards, even if it does raise questions about her relationship with reality, and whether she has one. An incredulous Murdo Fraser, the Tory economy spokesman, said Ms Forbes 'might as well have claimed Narnia is at the back of the cupboard', while Glasgow-based businessman Donald MacLeod accused her of 'mind-boggling stupidity'. That's an understatement, given that Scotland is the only part of Britain not cutting business rates for shops this year. The SNP government Budget unveiled in December means retailers in Scotland are receiving less support than those in other parts of Britain. Shops will pay £9.1million more than those south of the Border, while offices will pay an additional £6.4million and hotels face an extra £2.5million bill. In its 2021 manifesto, the SNP promised to ensure that 'the largest businesses pay the same combined poundage in Scotland as in England'. Many firms are also struggling with the UK Government's hike in National Insurance employers' contributions, which began in April. For some, Ms Forbes's bizarre statement triggered flashbacks to the dark days of the Covid era when Nicola Sturgeon said the bottom of classroom doors could be sawn off to boost ventilation. Back in 2019, Ms Sturgeon had claimed Scotland remained 'imprisoned' in the UK and Boris Johnson was effectively locking the country 'in a cupboard' by refusing another referendum on breaking up Britain. Cupboards loom large in Nationalist ideology, but Ms Forbes is just as much of a true believer in independence as John Swinney and his colleagues, and everything she says about the economy must be seen through that prism. We shouldn't forget that she once described former SNP Commons group leader Ian Blackford as a pensions 'expert' after he pumped out a stream of blatant disinformation about the UK Government's supposed liability for bankrolling Scottish pensions in the event of independence. What does that say about Ms Forbes's judgment, or lack of it? She was happy enough to stand by as these distortions and untruths circulated on social media – so why should we trust anything she says now? As we reported last week, Ms Forbes also questioned why we seem to be fixated with income tax rates in Scotland. Following a keynote speech at economic think-tank Adam Smith House, she said: 'In Scotland there seems to be an obsession with income tax as though it's the only tax businesses and individuals have to grapple with.' That supposed 'obsession' shouldn't be hard to figure out, given that her party has ramped up income tax to the highest level in the UK, helping to drive away hard-working professionals. Scots economist Smith himself wrote that 'every tax ought to be so contrived as both to take out and to keep out of the pockets of the people as little as possible over and above what it brings into the public treasury of the state' – anathema to the SNP. Smith also warned that high taxes 'frequently afford smaller revenue to government than what might be drawn from more moderate taxes'. The SNP's tax-grabs are all in the name of what shamed former Finance Secretary Derek Mackay once confusingly called 'progressivity' - but the only thing the economy is progressing towards is an abyss of the SNP's own creation. Mr Mackay is remembered mainly for quitting hours before the Scottish Budget in 2020 after it emerged he had bombarded a teenage boy with inappropriate online messages. But he also admitted he'd never heard of the Laffer Curve, which dictates that revenues can go up if taxes are cut. Luckily, Tory MSP Mr Fraser was on hand to explain the concept. There's little evidence that anyone in the Cabinet has a better grasp of the basics than Mr Mackay, including Ms Forbes. Yet there's no shortage of guidance from the phalanx of spin doctors on the SNP government payroll. The average £100,000 bill for each of its 17 special advisers was slipped out under cover of the Hamilton by-election last Thursday – amounting to nearly £2million in the last financial year. Which one of them helped to craft Ms Forbes's bilge about cupboards, assuming any of them did, is unknown, but they did provide some entertainment – even if it was a blend of black comedy and high farce. The bleak punchline is that we are being led by a combination of the clueless and the incompetent. But at the Scottish election next May we'll have the chance to tell Ms Forbes and her cohorts what Lord Sugar would doubtless say, with some gusto: 'You're fired!'
