logo
Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty on One Count of Sexual Assault in New York Retrial, Acquitted on 2nd

Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty on One Count of Sexual Assault in New York Retrial, Acquitted on 2nd

Yahooa day ago

Harvey Weinstein was convicted Wednesday on one charge of first-degree sexual assault in his New York retrial, and acquitted on a second. The jury was ordered to continue deliberating on a third count, a lesser charge of third-degree rape – even as the reported chaos in the jury room continued.
The panel found Weinstein guilty of forcibly subjecting former 'Project Runway' production assistant Miriam Haley to a sex act in 2006, and acquitted him of a second charge of sexually assaulting former model Kaja Sokola, also in 2006. It could not reach a unanimous verdict on a third-degree rape involving Jessica Mann in 2013, and was sent back for more debate.
The third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the first-degree criminal sex act offenses under New York state law. The convicted charge carries a maximum penalty of seven years, though Weinstein's sentence will ultimately be dependent on the outcome of the charge involving Mann.
The panel of seven women and five men – the first female-skewed jury that Weinstein faced across three trials – began deliberating late last week. By Monday, after three days of deliberations, jurors signaled that they were struggling with issues both legal and interpersonal, reporting infighting and the consideration of improper evidence.
The foreperson had told the judge that some jurors were ganging up on others and pushing them to change their minds based on information that was not presented in court – the very issue that triggered the retrial after an appeals court ruled in Weinstein's favor last year.
The trouble in the jury room continued through Wednesday, as the foreperson again told Judge Curtis Farber that he was concerned about ongoing heated arguments, indicating he did not wish to change his position and was still being bullied. After another closed-door discussion, Farber told the court that '[the foreperson] did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of 'I'll meet you outside one day,' and there's yelling and screaming,' according to the Associated Press.
Despite the turmoil, Farber re-instructed the jury, Mann's testimony was re-read and the panel was sent back for more deliberations.
Weinstein is still on the hook for a 16-year sentence in California, where he was convicted in December 2022. That verdict is under an appeal of the same nature that got his 2022 New York conviction thrown out, due to improper testimony from women who said they were assaulted, but whose accusations were not formally charged.
Though Weinstein told his lawyers he wanted to testify in his own defense this time around – which would have been highly unusual – they ultimately decided it was too risky. He did, however, take the unusual step of granting a jailhouse interview, to Candace Owens, telling the conservative commentator that sexual encounters with the women was consensual and purely 'transactional.'
Three women took the stand to accuse Weinstein in the Manhattan retrial. Sokola, the only new witnesses who did not testify in the 2020 New York trial, told the jury on May 8 that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Mann testified May 20 that she started a consensual sexual relationship with Weinstein, but after she tried to end it by telling him she was seeing someone else, he grabbed, dragged, forcefully undressed and raped her in 2013. Another accuser, Haley, testified April 30 that Weinstein forced oral sex on her in 2006, also in a hotel room.
Throughout all three trials, Weinstein has denied any wrongdoing, saying the sex with aspiring actresses amounted to cheating on his wife, but that he never assaulted anyone.
Weinstein was a legendary moviemaker in the '90s, when he was known as the charismatic but hard-charging producer of Oscar-winning films like 'Shakespeare in Love' and 'The King's Speech' – making him without a doubt the single most-thanked man from the Oscar dais. Harvey minted not just classic movies, but bona fide Oscar-winning movie stars, seemingly out of thin air.
But even in those early days, a sinister mythology swirled around the man who operated like a mob boss – that he was a vicious bully and a serial screamer, that he would woo filmmakers only to let their films gather dust, that young actresses were always in his orbit at film festivals, angling for roles and attention.
The truth, it turned out, was far darker than the darkest of those rumors.
When the New York Times and New Yorker published back-to-back accounts in October 2017 of women who said Weinstein sexually harassed, assaulted or raped them – followed by countless other women who came forward with chillingly similar allegations – the dam broke on what soon became known as #MeToo, a social movement whose cultural impact was felt far beyond the 30-mile zone.
In the immediate aftermath, Weinstein was dismissed from The Weinstein Company (the second distribution company he founded with brother Bob, after Miramax), expelled from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, exited the Directors Guild and was divorced by his second wife, Georgina Chapman.
Police in New York, Los Angeles and London opened investigations, in some cases revisiting witnesses who had come forth before with complaints (only to have them neglected or dropped). With a preponderance of evidence now all over the local papers, New York filed the first criminal charges in May 2018, and a jury found him guilty on two of five felony counts in 2020.
Then in 2021, prosecutors filed charges in California, where a Los Angeles jury convicted Weinstein on three of seven felony counts the following year.
Dozens of witnesses were called between the two trials, and each ground through weeks of emotionally punishing testimony from victims, including Jennifer Siebel Newsom, now the wife of Gov. Gavin Newsom. One by one they took the stand and, in almost every case, broke down emotionally as they walked jurors through the grim details of unwanted sexual encounters with the imposing, bulldozing and, by many accounts, genitally mutilated movie mogul.
Their stories followed a similar script: Harvey set a professional meeting, usually set in one of his favorite luxe hotel suites, where he greeted the woman in a bathrobe and demanded a massage. In some cases, the women said Weinstein tracked them down and barged into their living quarters with no notice before going on the attack.
The post Harvey Weinstein Found Guilty on One Count of Sexual Assault in New York Retrial, Acquitted on 2nd appeared first on TheWrap.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet
Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein's New York Case Isn't Over Yet

There's one conviction in Harvey Weinstein's New York criminal case, but the saga continues. A jury of 12 had found Weinstein guilty Wednesday of one count of a criminal sexual act against former Project Runway assistant Miriam Haley, but not guilty of the other count of a criminal sexual act against former model Kaja Sokola. More from The Hollywood Reporter Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson Harvey Weinstein Trial Witnesses React to Mixed Verdict, See Win for #MeToo Movement Harvey Weinstein Receives Mixed Partial Verdict as Deliberations Heat Up in Criminal Case The jurors were sent home Wednesday afternoon, amid inflamed tensions and one juror saying he was being threatened by others, with plans to resume deliberating the next day on the remaining charge of rape in the third degree. However, on Thursday, the juror refused to return to the deliberation room and a mistrial was called on that charge. Prosecutors said they plan to retry Weinstein on the rape charge. The criminal sexual act conviction is a higher felony charge than rape in the third degree and carries a maximum prison sentence of 25 years. Asked why the Manhattan District Attorney's office was still pursuing the retrial charge – which will be Weinstein's third trial on that charge – DA Alvin Bragg said it was on behalf of Jessica Mann, who was the complaining witness on that charge. 'It's about the survivors and, yes, Harvey Weinstein is going to be held accountable for his conduct as to Ms. Haley, and he's facing a very significant term of imprisonment for that, but the jury was not able to reach a conclusion as to Ms. Mann, and she deserves that,' Bragg said. 'I will never give up on myself and making sure my voice – and the truth – is heard. I have told the District Attorney I am ready, willing and able to endure this as many times as it takes for justice and accountability to be served. Today is not the end of my fight,' Mann said in a statement. Mann also testified in Weinstein's 2020 trial, making this upcoming trial her third time on the stand. The verdict in Weinstein's 2020 rape and criminal sexual assault conviction was overturned in April 2024 after the court of appeals found the trial prejudiced Weinstein with improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about allegations that were not part of the case. Conversely, Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala, said his team is continuing to look into juror misconduct and file motions with Judge Curtis Farber to bring the jurors back in and try to find out what happened in the jury room. (He pushed for this many times over the past few days, but was denied by Farber.) 'None of us have ever heard of that, where a jury is so intimidating, a grown man who was in good physical shape in his late 30s, [says], 'I'm afraid to go back into the deliberating room'. If that doesn't cast doubt on the verdicts here, I don't know what would, so this is not over,' Aidala told press outside the courthouse. The goal is to get the conviction thrown out. However, the jury had reached unanimous verdicts on the other two counts, and the foreperson had said in court that he was not coerced into those decisions. If that doesn't happen, Aidala plans to appeal Weinstein's conviction on the one felony charge. He added that he did not know whether Weinstein will remain at Bellevue Hospital, where he's been throughout the trial, or return to Rikers. Aidala's team has repeatedly pointed to their client's poor health over the past months, and he said that would also be something they bring up during sentencing. Weinstein also still faces a 16-year prison sentence in California, after being convicted in 2022 of rape and other sex crimes. Aidala's team has also appealed that conviction. 'Mr. Weinstein started off with a 23-year prison term when we left here on March 11 of [2020]. Those numbers are now out the window,' Aidala said. 'Of course, Mr. Weinstein is disappointed. He has maintained his innocence from the day I met him in 2019. In 2020, when I sat next to when the verdict came in guilty on [Miriam Haley] he said to me, 'How could this happen? I'm innocent. I'm innocent.' He basically said the same thing yesterday to Mr. Cibella who sat next to him.' Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More

Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson
Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Harvey Weinstein Gets Mistrial on Rape Charge After Threats to Jury Foreperson

Harvey Weinstein's rape charge ended in mistrial after the jury foreperson refused to return to the jury room Thursday after saying he faced threats from other jurors. The 12-person jury in Weinstein's trial had found him guilty Wednesday of one count of a criminal sexual act against former Project Runway assistant Miriam Haley, but not guilty of the other count of a criminal sexual act against former model Kaja Sokola. More from The Hollywood Reporter Harvey Weinstein Trial Witnesses React to Mixed Verdict, See Win for #MeToo Movement Harvey Weinstein Receives Mixed Partial Verdict as Deliberations Heat Up in Criminal Case Jurors Raise Concerns About Harvey Weinstein Deliberations After the mistrial was declared, prosecutors said Thursday that they plan to retry Weinstein on the rape charge, related to aspiring actress Jessica Mann, and that 'she is ready and willing and wants to retry this count.' A July 2 hearing has been set on that charge. Weinstein faced one charge of rape in the third degree and two charges of criminal sexual act in the first degree, which is the higher felony charge and carries a maximum prison sentence of 25 years. The rape charge carries a sentence of up to four years. On Wednesday, the jury had yet to reach a verdict on rape in the third degree, but jurors were sent home midday amid concerns about fighting and tensions in the jury room. They had been in the midst of their fifth day of deliberations. The jury foreperson had sent a note Wednesday afternoon asking to speak to the judge and then told the attorneys and Judge Curtis Farber: 'I feel afraid inside there. I can't be inside there.' He added that other jurors had been trying to get him to change his decision, and, when he had refused, had said 'Oh we will see you outside,' and that he was concerned for his own safety. When the foreperson was asked Thursday if he would return to the jury room, he told the court, 'No, I'm sorry.' However, Farber spoke with the others jurors after the mistrial was declared Thursday and said 'they were extremely disappointed' that deliberations had not continued and that 'They don't understand why the foreperson bowed out.' Jury tensions had reached such a fever pitch Wednesday that Weinstein himself addressed the court, urging the judge for a mistrial. His request was denied at the time. 'This is not right for me, the person who is on trial here,' Weinstein said Wednesday. 'This is my life that's on the line, and you know what? It's not fair. It's simple. It's just not fair.' The foreperson, who is charged with speaking on behalf of the jury, then returned to court after the jury had been dismissed Wednesday and implied that he did not want to go back into the deliberation room Thursday. He returned to court, but was being kept separately from the other jurors Thursday morning. On Monday morning, the foreperson had also asked to speak to the judge and said that jurors were considering elements from Weinstein's past that weren't being used as evidence in the trial and weren't part of the charged crimes. Another juror, who was juror No. 7 on this case and the youngest on the jury, had asked to address the court twice Friday, first saying he had heard jurors discussing another juror in the courtroom elevators, and then asking to be excused from the jury as he did not feel the process was 'fair,' while staring at the defense table. 'If you're a deliberating juror you have to be punched in the face in order for it to rise to the level of a real threat,' Weinstein's attorney, Arthur Aidala said Thursday, while urging the judge to call for mistrial before the juror entered. 'It's insane in the membrane, insane on the brain.' All of this comes after Weinstein's 2020 rape and criminal sexual assault conviction was overturned in April 2024 after the court of appeals found the trial prejudiced Weinstein with improper rulings, including allowing women to testify about allegations that were not part of the case. In the 2020 trial, Weinstein received a mixed verdict with the jury finding Weinstein guilty of the crimes against Haley and Mann, but also acquitting Weinstein of first-degree rape and predatory sexual assault related to other women. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg pursued the retrial of Weinstein shortly after his conviction was overturned. In this trial, Mann had testified that she had first met Weinstein around 2013 at a party in Hollywood. After later attending his Oscars party, Mann said she was invited by Weinstein up to his hotel room, where he said he wanted to give Mann and her friend a script for Vampire Academy. There, Weinstein performed unwanted oral sex on her. After that incident, Mann said she decided to embark on a relationship with him. 'I just thought it would take the pain away,' Mann said on the stand. The charge relates to an alleged incident with Weinstein in a Manhattan hotel in March 2013. At the time, Mann was visiting New York City with friends and said she had arranged to meet Weinstein for breakfast, along with her friends, but found that he had arrived early at her hotel and was in the process of booking a hotel room. Despite her protests, Weinstein booked the room and she followed him upstairs. Once there, she claims he repeatedly held the door shut as she tried to leave and said she didn't want to do this, while he grabbed her arms and told her to undress. She did so, and said Weinstein then went to the bathroom and injected himself with a substance which she later found was to treat erectile dysfunction, and then performed unwanted penetrative sex on her. More to come. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Most Anticipated Concert Tours of 2025: Beyoncé, Billie Eilish, Kendrick Lamar & SZA, Sabrina Carpenter and More Hollywood's Most Notable Deaths of 2025 Hollywood's Highest-Profile Harris Endorsements: Taylor Swift, George Clooney, Bruce Springsteen and More

Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations
Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Another Harvey Weinstein Rape Retrial Could Start This Fall, Judge Says; Current Case Ends In Mistrial As Jury Foreman Won't Return To Deliberations

(Updated with more details) The rape retrial of Harvey Weinstein is over with the New York jury foreman refusing to return to deliberations, but the much accused producer remains incarcerated and another trial is on the horizon. The judge in Weinstein's retrial declared a mistrial this morning on the remaining, undecided charge of third degree rape involving accuser Jessica Mann. Judge Curtis Farber's ruling came after the jury's foreman, who claimed again told the judge in open court — and away of the other jurors — that he did not want to go rejoin his colleagues into the jury room. More from Deadline Patricia Clarkson Recalls Harvey Weinstein Telling Her She'd 'Never Work Again' Graydon Carter Reveals Why Harvey Weinstein Was 'Banned' For Life From Vanity Fair Oscars Party House Set To Vote On Bill To Rescind Funding To PBS, NPR And Public Broadcasting Stations Are you willing to go back into the jury room today and continue deliberations?' Judge Farber asked Juror No. 1 today. 'No, I'm sorry,' he replied from his seat alone on the jury bench. Yesterday in a near unprecedented move, the jury found Weinstein guilty of a first-degree criminal sexual act against Miriam Haley and not guilty of the same act against Kaja Sokola. In this retrial that started in late April, the single count of third-degree rape the ailing 73-year-old Weinstein faces carries a maximum sentence of four years. However, each first-degree criminal sexual act count carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Judge Farber has said that the Haley and Sokola verdicts will stand regardless of today's partial mistrial. Once clarification was given on the state of the other verdict delivered on Wednesday, prosecutors told the court that Mann is 'ready and willing' to testify again in a retrial. In response Judge Farber set July 2 as the next hearing date, which could see a start date penciled in for the next retrial. Judge Farber guessed from the bench that the next retrial would happen in the fall. Weinstein's defense lawyers were quick to urge the judge to speed up sentencing on the single guilty count. However, interestingly, Judge Farber declined. In another dramatic move on a dramatic morning, he told the courtroom Thursday he would not separate the Mann charge from the indictment under which he was convicted Wednesday of assaulting Haley. Which means Harvey Weinstein won't know for many months how long he is going to sit in a New York state prison on this Empire State sex crimes. With Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg expected to address today's events soon, lead defense lawyer Arthur Aidala said outside the courthouse that Weinstein will be appealing the Haley verdict. The attorney stated that jury misconduct would form the basis of the appeal. Every before today's shocking developments, the foreman had come before the judge repeatedly since Friday, in court and in chambers, to say he felt threatened by other jurors. After declaring the mistrial, Judge Farber brought the full jury out to tell them he was ending their deliberations. 'I understand this particular deliberation was more heated than some others,' he said, with some understatement. When Judge Farber excused the jury, the foreman exited first, walking through a side door at a noticeably quicker pace than the other men and women behind him. Judge Farber also left the courtroom for a brief spell. When he returned, the judge said to the lawyers and others in the court that he had spoken to the other eleven jurors to thank them for their work. Judge Farber added that 'all eleven' spontaneously expressed to him that they were 'extremely disappointed' they did not get to complete their deliberations. 'They did not understand why the foreperson bowed out,' Farber proclaimed 'They thought they were still in the course of deliberations and were hopeful to reach a verdict.' He continued with some lament: 'They did not describe anything that rose to the level of threats.' Up until this unique morning, to put it mildly, the seven-woman, five-man panel have been in deliberations since June 4 with tensions emerging repeatedly. It took five days for a previous Empire State jury took to reach a verdict in Weinstein's 2020 sex crimes trial. Sentenced to 23 years in state prison five years ago, Weinstein saw that case tossed out last year by a New York Court of Appeals based on its decision of the improper inclusion of prior bad acts testimony by the previous judge. After days of open tension out of the jury room, the foreman Wednesday came to Judge Farber expressing frustration and even fear in what was going on behind closed doors. Amid all that drama, the judge rejected the foreman's efforts to exit the case and denied a defense motion to get a mistrial declared. However, to cool things off a bit, Judge Farber did send the panel home early on June 11. Weinstein may not have taken the stand, but he was very vocal in court Wednesday. 'This is my life that's on the line, this is not fair,' he proclaimed. 'I'm not getting a fair trial.' Judge Farber's early exit decision on June 11 was preceded by getting a partial verdict out of the jurors. Having created a possible legal mess, the jury found Weinstein guilty on Count 1 of a criminal sexual act in the first degree against Miriam Haley. Pressed by the judge for an answer, the jury also found the ex-mini-mogul not guilty of the same charge involving Sokola, and offered no verdict Wednesday on Jessica Mann. RELATED: Still incarcerated due to his 16-year sentence on a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles, the much-accused Weinstein and his team have spent the past several months trying to rehabilitate the ex-Miramax boss' reputation with the anticipation of the #MeToo backlash of the past year or so. Weinstein had a self-pitying and widely covered jailhouse conversation with right-wing commentator Candace Owens in March. That effort saw the likes of the hugely influencial Joe Rogan express a reassessment of Weinstein. Ignoring the fact that Weinstein's case is in state court, not federal, some have even floated that Donald Trump could pardon the one-time big-time Democratic donor. On June 6, via phone, Weinstein told Fox 5's Good Day New York that while he acted 'immorally, nothing he ever did was 'illegal.' This is despite the fact that more than 100 women, from the famous to interns and others, have come forward since the deeply sourced 2017 New York Times exposé of Weinstein to tell their tales of abuse and assault by him. Allegations that Weinstein has been convicted of on both coasts and settled in several civil cases with big payoffs. It is money and fame that is behind most of these claims, the defense has been asserting in the retrial. Last week, defense lawyer and frequent CNN guest Arthur Aidala told the jury in his closing argument that accusers Jessica Mann, Miriam Haley and Kaja Sokola are 'all women with broken dreams … they're all women who wanted to cut the line.' Portraying the trio of accusers as having engaged in consensual sex with Weinstein, Aidala, who represented Steve Bannon in the MAGA warlord's fundraising fraud case, attempted to make his client the real victim. The lawyer pointed the finger at Mann, former Project Runway production assistant Haley and Polish model Sokola for using 'their youth, their beauty, their charm, their charisma to get stuff' from Weinstein. In the prosecution's closing argument, with her boss Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg looking on in the courtroom, Assistant DA Nicole Blumberg offered a perspective on Weinstein's decades of power in Hollywood, making and breaking careers. 'He also used that same power to isolate women, to trap women into places where he'd be alone with them and to rape them,' she told the jury. 'That's not fame,' Blumberg added of the trio coming forward to tell their stories publicly — again, in two cases. 'Nobody wants that.' Making that point more bluntly, Haley at one juncture in her highly emotional testimony called Weinstein a 'f*cking assh*le' on the stand. The witness later ran out of the courtroom crying under intense questioning from defense lawyer Jennifer Bonjean over what she was wearing the night in 2006 when she claims Weinstein forced himself on her in his Soho apartment. Regardless of the verdict the New York jury could have delivered and a new jury may deliver on the next retrial, Weinstein still has his L.A. conviction to deal with. If the Oscar-winning Shakespeare in Love producer is found innocent on all the East Coast charges, he will be packed on a plane in a matter of days to sit in a cell on the West Coast while the appeal of his L.A. case continues. Which is to say, despite the partial mistrial today Harvey Weinstein isn't going to be a free man anytime soon. Best of Deadline 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store