Columbia struggles to make headway with Trump admin despite praise over protest
Columbia University is increasingly acting in accordance with the Trump administration's wishes, but with little to show for it so far.
After a group of students stormed the school's library and refused to leave last week, the president of the university called in the New York Police Department (NYPD), leading to almost 80 arrests. More than 65 students have been suspended and 33 people were barred from campus over their participation.
While praise came quickly from the White House, hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding paused by the government was not restarted and members of the Columbia community are denouncing the school's actions, which also include giving into the administration's original demands for the funding but so far seeing nothing in return.
'I think what happened was enormous overreaction by the university and by the New York City Police Department,' said Michael Thaddeus, professor of mathematics at Columbia and vice-president of the Columbia chapter of the American Association of University Professors.
'This harsh and severe response by the university seems to be a response to pressure from the government,' he added.
The quick call to the NYPD and swift discipline for students mark a stark difference from how protests were handled last spring, when Columbia's administration attempted to negotiate with students and only involved law enforcement as a last resort.
Those 2024 demonstrations infuriated Republicans, with pro-Palestinian activists from Columbia and multiple other schools specifically targeted in President Trump's crackdown on international scholars.
Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said 'it's pretty clear that Columbia' gave in to the 'Trump regime by bringing in the NYPD quickly, never engaging in negotiations with students, sweeping up everybody, including students who were studying at the library, and without a hearing or even asking any questions about their involvement.'
Reached for comment, a spokesperson for Columbia said the university has been 'preparing for incidents like this' and the 'actions were in line with the enhanced protocols we've put in place in recent months.'
'Our priority was to prevent further escalation, ensure safety, and allow the Columbia community to return to its academic mission with minimal disruption,' the spokesperson said.
The White House's Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism released a statement saying acting school president Claire Shipman 'met the moment with fortitude and conviction' and it 'is confident that Columbia will take the appropriate disciplinary actions for those involved in this act.'
But despite openly agreeing nearly two months ago to the Trump administration's demands — including hiring more campus police officers, banning masks and putting certain department in academic receivership — Columbia appears no closer to the restoration of some $400 million in federal funds.
That funding freeze has resulted in at least 180 job cuts so far, but perceived efforts to curry favor with Trump are producing fury among the student population.
'Columbia University is participating in the destruction of the democratic system,' student and Palestinian activist Mohsen Mahdawi, who was recently released from Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) detention, told The Associated Press. 'They are supporting the initiatives and the agenda of the Trump administration, and they are punishing and torturing their students.'
Mahdawi, like fellow Columbia demonstrator Mahmoud Khalil, is still being targeted for deportation by the Trump administration, which accuses their school of allowing antisemitism and them of supporting Hamas.
If there's a school that has taken an opposite approach from Columbia, it's fellow Ivy League member Harvard University, which is suing the Trump administration over its own funding freeze, which it calls illegal.
In response, Harvard has lost billions in funding, is under a Title VI investigation and Trump has threatened to revoke the university's tax-exempt status.
'Other schools should look' to Columbia's response to last week's protest as an example to follow, said Roni Brunn, a leading member of the Harvard Jewish Alumni Association.
'You can protect your campus. You can ensure equal rights for all your students, not just the ones who are bullying Jews. Everybody is equal. You can do it. It's highly doable,' Brunn said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Supreme Court Issues Ruling Impacting Medicaid—What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. A divided U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that states can block Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood, delivering a victory to Republicans seeking to defund the nation's largest abortion provider. The 6–3 decision, with the court's three liberal justices dissenting, centers on a South Carolina case involving non-abortion services such as contraception, cancer screenings, and pregnancy testing—but could have sweeping implications for Medicaid patients nationwide. Although federal law prohibits public health funds from being used for abortions, many low-income patients rely on Planned Parenthood for other essential health services, particularly in areas where it's difficult to find providers who accept Medicaid. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, a Republican, moved to cut off the organization's funding in 2018, arguing that no taxpayer dollars should go to Planned Parenthood. That action was initially blocked by a lawsuit from Julie Edwards, a patient who relies on the clinic for birth control due to a high-risk medical condition. The case also tested whether Medicaid patients have the legal right to sue over the choice of providers. While public health groups such as the American Cancer Society argued in court that lawsuits are often the only tool Medicaid recipients have to enforce their rights, South Carolina contended that patients should not be allowed to file such suits. The court's decision siding with the state could restrict patients' ability to challenge funding decisions, particularly in rural areas with limited access to care. Though Planned Parenthood receives only $90,000 annually in Medicaid funds from South Carolina—a small fraction of the state's total Medicaid budget—the ruling arrives as Congress considers a Trump-backed federal budget that would eliminate Medicaid funding to the group entirely. According to the organization, such cuts could force the closure of roughly 200 clinics, many in states where abortion remains legal. South Carolina currently bans abortion at around six weeks of pregnancy, following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Zohran Mamdani's Well-Dressed Balancing Act
In all the post-mortems that have appeared since Zohran Mamdani upset the political apple cart to potentially, if unofficially, clinch the Democratic nomination for New York mayor, one particular aspect of his appeal has been largely overlooked: not how Mr. Mamdani conducted his campaign but how he looked while conducting it. Put another way: Mr. Mamdani didn't just record himself for his various social media platforms running into the freezing Atlantic on New Year's Day to publicize his pledge to freeze rents; he recorded himself running into the freezing ocean not in a wet suit or a bathing suit, but in a suit and tie. Sure, it was funnier that way. But it was also tactical. For a 33-year-old progressive and democratic socialist trying to be the city's first Muslim mayor, whose opponents are painting him as a '100 percent Communist lunatic' and a 'radical leftie' (that from President Trump on Truth Social), not to mention trying to other him because of his racial and religious identity, dressing like an establishment guy offers a counterargument of its own. As Mr. Mamdani walks the tightrope between embodying change, generational and otherwise, and reassuring those who may be leery of such change, his clothes have played a not insignificant role. His mouth may be saying one thing, but very often his outfit is saying another. This is a man, after all, who appeared in Vogue India as long ago as 2020, when he won his seat in the State Assembly, and whose mother is the film director Mira Nair. He has long understood that costume is one way to convey character. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Key Medicaid provision in Trump's big tax cut and spending bill is found to violate Senate rules
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate parliamentarian has advised that a key Medicaid provider tax overhaul that is central to President Donald Trump's big tax cut and spending bill does not adhere to procedural rules, delivering a crucial blow to Republicans rushing to finish the massive package this week. The guidance Thursday from the parliamentarian is rarely ignored, and it forces GOP leaders to consider options. Senate leaders could try to revise it or strip it from the package. Otherwise, the provision could be challenged during floor votes, requiring a 60-vote threshold to keep it, a tall order in the narrowly split Senate. Democrats are unified against the Republican president's bill. Republican leaders are relying on the provider tax change to save billions of dollars from the Medicaid health care program for the massive tax cuts package. But they had been struggling to rally support because several GOP senators warn it would harm rural hospitals who depend on the funds. The outcome is a setback as Senate Republicans hoped to launch votes on the package by the end of the week, to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline for passage. The parliamentarian of the Senate is a nonpartisan appointed position, a chief arbiter of the chamber's historic and often complicated rules.
