logo
Guj plans memorial at AI 171 crash site

Guj plans memorial at AI 171 crash site

Time of India6 hours ago

Gandhinagar: In a poignant gesture, the state govt has taken an in-principle decision to set up a memorial at the site where Air India flight number 171 crashed shortly after take-off, killing 241 of the 242 persons on board and others on the ground.
The plane crashed into the residential quarters and mess for UG, PG students of BJ Medical College here on June 12.
According to top sources in the state govt, buildings on which the ill-fated plane crashed will be demolished and constructed elsewhere, most probably at another location in the same campus. A memorial will be set up on the area where the plane crashed, so that people can visit the spot and pay their respects to those who perished in the tragedy.
"Currently, multiple investigation teams are working at the crash site to gather evidence and materials. Once the investigation at the crash site is completely over, the buildings on which the plane crashed will be demolished and a memorial is being planned at the site," a top source informed.
Sources said that although the buildings on which the plane crashed do not appear to have been severely damaged, there is a possibility that they might have been internally damaged and weakened.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
"We are also taking into consideration the sentiments of the students who may be too traumatised to occupy the same premises," said sources.
The state health department will prepare a detailed project to identify alternative land where the damaged buildings will be reconstructed. "Primarily, the govt is considering the option of reconstructing the damaged buildings at another site on the same campus, as there is ample space there," said a source.
Commenting on the proposed air crash memorial, sources said that a serene garden will be created, where visitors can offer prayers and pay obeisance to the victims. "The details of the memorial project will be decided later as currently, the authorities are busy dealing with the aftermath of the tragedy. There is a possibility that like Smritivan in Bhuj, the names of all the victims of the airplane crash will be written at the memorial as a remembrance," said sources.
On June 12, a London-bound Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed into a hostel complex of BJ Medical College in Meghaninagar area, moments after takeoff from the Ahmedabad airport. The tragedy claimed 241 lives out of 242 onboard, including former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani, and several persons were killed on the ground where it crashed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Power Failure Behind Ahmedabad Air India Crash? What Investigators Are Learning
Power Failure Behind Ahmedabad Air India Crash? What Investigators Are Learning

News18

time15 minutes ago

  • News18

Power Failure Behind Ahmedabad Air India Crash? What Investigators Are Learning

Last Updated: Early findings suggest the aircraft may have suffered a power failure seconds after liftoff, but officials stress that the final cause will depend on black box data Officials familiar with the investigation into the June 12 crash of Air India flight AI-171 from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick suspect a sudden power failure shortly after takeoff may have brought down the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which crashed into a medical hostel building after gaining an altitude of only 625 feet. While the final cause will be known only after black box data is decoded, initial visual assessments, including wreckage patterns, ATC reports, and takeoff videos, point to a failure of the aircraft's main electrical system within seconds of liftoff. The aircraft did not reach the minimum altitude required to execute an emergency turnaround or make use of its Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a backup system designed to power critical functions in case of total electrical loss. The black boxes — Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) — have been recovered and are currently in the safe custody of the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu Kinjarapu confirmed on Thursday. He said the investigation is progressing with full support from local authorities, and that key recovery work, including site documentation and evidence collection, has been completed, with further analysis now underway. In response to reports suggesting the black boxes were being sent abroad, the Ministry of Civil Aviation clarified that no final decision has been made. 'It has been reported in certain media outlets that the CVR/DFDR (black box) from the ill-fated AI171 flight is being sent abroad for retrieval and analysis… the decision regarding the location for decoding the flight recorders will be taken by the AAIB after due assessment of all technical, safety, and security considerations," the ministry said in a statement. According to a report in The Indian Express, an officer aware of the ongoing investigation said that early findings do not suggest cockpit error. Based on initial observations, the pilots are believed to have attempted to gain manual control using the Dreamliner's reversionary systems, but the lack of altitude left little room for recovery. The aircraft had reportedly pitched up for liftoff when the power failure occurred, but failed to climb beyond 625 feet — far below the safe path minimum of 3,600 feet. The officer further said that had the aircraft achieved an elevation of around 3,600 to 4,900 feet, the RAT might have been able to help sustain a glide or enable a Mayday return. Instead, the aircraft dropped sharply, with the impact separating the tail section due to its elevated nose position at the time of the crash. Investigators are now closely examining the aircraft's technical logs and maintenance records from the 24 to 48 hours before the crash. The aircraft had flown a round trip from Delhi to Paris on June 11-12 and had earlier completed a Delhi-Tokyo-Delhi sector. Officials are checking whether any crew or ground engineers reported anomalies, including ECAM (Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor) messages, engine thrust issues, or unusual sensor readouts. While sabotage has not been indicated, investigators are examining whether fuel contamination—such as water in the fuel—could have contributed to the suspected power failure. According to The Indian Express, the officer said this scenario may be a leading explanation if no direct technical fault (mechanical or electrical) is found. Water in aviation fuel is a known cause of power loss and may remain undetected until the aircraft is airborne, especially if it leads to corrosion or clogging in the fuel system. Chemical analysis of the wreckage, especially around the fuel tanks and delivery systems, is underway to identify any unusual chemical traces, impurities, or signs of corrosion. Forensic engineers have collected debris samples for lab testing, but much of the fuel system was damaged in the explosion and fire. Comparisons are also being drawn with a February 2020 incident at London's Gatwick Airport, where an Airbus A321 suffered dual engine failure shortly after takeoff. That aircraft returned safely to the airport after declaring Mayday thrice, but only because it had climbed to nearly 3,580 feet, investigators said. The UK's Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB), which is now in Ahmedabad to assist with the AI-171 probe, had concluded in the 2020 case that the failure was caused by fuel system contamination. Notably, engineers had found no faults in the aircraft before it was cleared to fly that night. As per The Indian Express, the officer pointed out that the Gatwick aircraft had shown signs of engine trouble on three previous flights. These included multiple attempts to start one engine and in-flight stalling messages. However, engineers had not conducted an extensive follow-up examination, resulting in the failure being missed. Investigators are now checking whether any such signs were overlooked in the case of AI-171. The Ahmedabad crash is the first known accident involving a Boeing 787 Dreamliner, a modern aircraft known for its fly-by-wire systems and backup electrical configurations. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is designed to continue flight on a single engine and can operate on manual reversion in case of dual hydraulic failure — standard capabilities for the aircraft type. However, according to the officer cited by The Indian Express, the crash altitude was too low for any of these backup systems to be effectively deployed. The crash has raised serious questions around last-mile maintenance checks, fuel quality verification, and pre-flight inspection protocols. While a final conclusion will depend on flight data and chemical forensics, investigators are 'leaving nothing to chance" given the rarity of a failure involving the 787 platform.

CUET UG Result 2025: NTA to declare results soon at cuet.nta.nic.in; check past trends, steps to download and other key details
CUET UG Result 2025: NTA to declare results soon at cuet.nta.nic.in; check past trends, steps to download and other key details

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

CUET UG Result 2025: NTA to declare results soon at cuet.nta.nic.in; check past trends, steps to download and other key details

The Common University Entrance Test (CUET) for Undergraduate courses concluded on June 3, 2025. The National Testing Agency (NTA) is expected to announce the CUET UG 2025 results soon on its official website — . The results will be published online for over 10 lakh candidates. To access their CUET UG 2025 scorecard, candidates will need to log in using their application number and password. The provisional answer key for CUET UG 2025 was released on June 17, 2025, and candidates could download the answer key along with their recorded responses until June 20, 2025. With this release, the final result is likely to be declared by the last week of June 2025. CUET UG 2025 Result Date Although the exact result date has not yet been confirmed by NTA, the release of the provisional answer key signals that the final answer key and scorecard PDF may be published in the last week of June 2025. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Warning To South African Parents Without A Valid Will Consumer Advice Read More Undo CUET UG Past Result Trends Over the past three years, the CUET UG result dates have followed a consistent post-exam timeline. In 2024, the exam was conducted from May 15 to May 29, and the result was declared on July 30, 2024. In 2023, the examination took place between May 21 and June 3, with the result announced on July 15, 2023. In 2022, the exam was held in multiple phases from July 15 to August 20, and the result was released on September 15, 2022. These trends indicate a gap of several weeks between the conclusion of the exam and the result declaration. Steps to Download CUET UG 2025 Result Step 1: Visit the official website: Live Events Step 2: Click on the ' CUET UG Scorecard Download ' link Step 3: Enter your Application Number and Password Step 4: Your CUET UG 2025 scorecard will appear on the screen Step 5: Download and save it for future reference CUET UG 2025 Counselling Top central universities, including Delhi University, have already started their counselling registration process for CUET UG 2025. Candidates aiming for admission to CUET-participating institutions should regularly visit the official websites of respective universities to stay updated on counselling schedules, merit list releases, and further admission steps.

Air India crash: Cockpit error or fuel system contamination, what brought AI71 down? Probe looks at 2020 UK mishap
Air India crash: Cockpit error or fuel system contamination, what brought AI71 down? Probe looks at 2020 UK mishap

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Air India crash: Cockpit error or fuel system contamination, what brought AI71 down? Probe looks at 2020 UK mishap

The 2020 incident, which involved an Airbus A321, saw the plane's both engines malfunction shortly after take-off. Fortunately, the plane had gained an altitude of almost 3580 feet and was able to make the roundabout read more This handout taken and posted on the X (formerly Twitter) account of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) On June 12, 2025 shows the back of an Air India plane after it crashed in a residential area near the airport in Ahmedabad. Image- AFP The officials investigating the Air India flight AI-171 crash are closely drawing parallels with a February 2020 incident at the UK's Gatwick airport, and are hunting for clues. The incident, which involved an Airbus A321, saw the plane's both engines malfunction shortly after take-off. The pilots made a Mayday call and returned to the airport after 11 minutes after a turnaround. Fortunately, the Airbus plane had gained an altitude of almost 3580 feet and was able to make the roundabout and touch down after declaring Mayday thrice. However, the people onboard the doomed Air India plane were not that lucky as it came crashing down after gaining the altitude of just 625 feet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Looking for clues The UK Air Accident Investigation Branch (AIIB) later investigated the Airbus incident and found that the reason for the engine failure was fuel system contamination. This despite engineers clearing the aircraft for operations just ahead of the take-off. Notably, the AIIB investigators have joined the Ahmedabad plane crash probe. Officials are taking a look at AI-171's technical logs in the 24 hours preceding the crash. Plane lost power after take-off The officials meanwhile also appear to conclude that the plane lost power immediately after take-off, citing 'visual observation and wreckage'. 'The material evidence, which includes the wreckage and the videos of the takeoff as well as the crash, indicate a definite power failure on the flight. The cause will be known only when the black box data is recovered but we can estimate that since the flight was in a takeoff and its nose pitched up for the liftoff, the deployment of the Ram Air Turbine (RAT) could not help the flight make a safe turnaround as it had not even achieved the minimum altitude of 3600 feet for a safe path,' Indian Express quoted an officer as saying. The officer also dismissed speculations around cockpit error, saying the pilots 'may have tried their best to gain manual control'. 'It does not appear to be a cockpit error… The observations are that the power failure occurred as soon as the flight was airborne and was unable to climb to the safe path altitude… the (Boeing) 787 Dreamliner has a provision for a manual reversion control system to allow pilots to regain control of critical systems in the event of a hydraulic failure. This system is a backup, using RAT to generate power, but there was no altitude cushion to ensure a safe glide downward or for the pilot to attempt anything… It just dropped on to the medical hostel building, with the tail being impacted and separated due to its liftoff position. Had it achieved an elevation of about 3600-4900 feet, it could have been a different story as planes can safely make Mayday landings with the RAT,' the officer said. On fuel contamination The officer said investigators were looking at technical log of the aircraft to examine whether any technical abnormalities were flagged by any of the previous captains or maintenance staff. 'The aircraft was incoming from Paris to Delhi and from Delhi to Ahmedabad… In fact, it made a round trip to Paris from Delhi on June 11-12. Just a day earlier, it had returned to Delhi after a round trip to Tokyo. We will check the technical logs to see if any of the engineering teams or pilots of the previous flight left comments on the performance of both engines or experienced any ECAM (Electronic Centralised Aircraft Monitor) message during the flight, accompanied by any thrust issues during flight,' the officer said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'At this point, we have no reason to speculate a sabotage but if the cause of the engine failure is fuel contamination, which is most likely due to water, the maintenance records of the flight, which are also under scrutiny, will reveal if it was due to oversight or negligence or corrosion in the fuel system, leading to clogging which is rare if the aircraft is regularly serviced. Fuel contaminated with water is the most common cause of power loss in flights and, many times, cannot be detected until the aircraft is actually airborne,' the officer said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store