
As Trump's EPA ends 'environmental justice,' minority communities may pay a price
Summary
Trump administration withdraws lawsuit against chloroprene-emitting plant
Grants are slashed along with EPA's environmental justice and DEI programs
New EPA chief says US can protect the environment and economy at the same time
LAPLACE, Louisiana, April 23 (Reuters) - From her home on Louisiana's "Cancer Alley," Lydia Gerard looks down at her 8-month-old great-granddaughter and wonders if she will one day suffer the same fate as her many friends and relatives whose lives were cut short by the disease.
Gerard lives along the Mississippi River, just a few blocks from a synthetic rubber plant that the administration of former President Joe Biden sued, claiming it posed an imminent public health hazard. Gerard, like more than 90% of people living within 1 mile (1.5 km) of the plant, is Black.
"She's not even 8 months yet, and has to be subject to breathing all that," said Gerard, referring to the plant's emissions of chloroprene, which in 2010 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency classified as a likely human carcinogen.
Seven weeks after President Donald Trump took over in January, the new EPA leadership withdrew the lawsuit against the plant's Japanese owners, Denka Performance Elastomer LLC, siding with company lawyers who disputed the lawsuit's contention that emissions were linked to significant cancer risk.
The Trump administration's press release announcing the end of the lawsuit said the dismissal fulfilled the president's Day One executive order to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion, and that it aligned with the EPA's new pledge to "end the use of 'environmental justice' as a tool for advancing ideological priorities."
Three environmental researchers and five former EPA officials interviewed by Reuters say the end of the EPA's DEI and environmental justice programs - which seek to ensure a healthy environment for minority groups that often live closest to sources of contamination - will be most felt in Black and Hispanic communities that have long endured the harmful effects of pollution.
Those health inequities are the legacy of racial discrimination that was legal from the country's inception until 1965, the type of historical injustice DEI policies were designed to correct.
Trump has also rescinded a 1994 executive order by President Bill Clinton that directed every federal agency to develop an agency-wide environmental justice strategy to address adverse health or environmental effects on minority and low-income populations.
"It's DEI being treated like a four-letter word," said Linda Birnbaum, a retired toxicologist and former director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences who spent 19 years at the EPA. "People who are already most impacted by high pollution are going to be most hurt by the loosening of regulations."
Asked to comment on the findings of this story, an EPA spokesperson directed Reuters to a video statement by Trump's new EPA administrator, Lee Zeldin, who has outlined a strategy emphasizing deregulation, saying the U.S. can protect the environment and promote economic growth at the same time.
"In practice, 'environmental justice' has been used primarily as an excuse to fund left-wing activist groups instead of actually spending those dollars on directly remediating the specific environmental issues that need to get addressed," Zeldin said in the video posted on the EPA website last month.
Zeldin has also promoted traditional EPA initiatives such as expediting cleanup of toxic "Superfund" sites and collaborating with states on clean air and water projects. He expressed pride in EPA removal of hazardous material from Los Angeles wildfire sites in only 28 days.
On March 12, the new EPA unveiled what it called "the most consequential day of deregulation in U.S. history" by rolling back 31 initiatives and eliminating the agency's DEI arm and its 10 regional environmental justice offices, which worked with communities to identify and mitigate local sources of pollution. It said it has saved $2 billion in wasteful spending by canceling hundreds of grants in conjunction with billionaire Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
Some business leaders and conservative groups have praised Zeldin's deregulation measures, predicting they would lower the cost of living for all Americans and stimulate energy production. Reuters could not immediately establish if they also explored the environmental impact on minority communities.
CANCELED GRANTS
Democrats on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works complained in a letter to Zeldin in March that the cancellation of 400 grants in the name of eliminating DEI and environmental justice violated several court orders and terms of EPA contracts. The EPA has yet to respond, a spokesperson for the committee said.
At least one non-profit group is suing to reactivate an $11.4 million grant that was frozen for the Union Heights section of North Charleston, South Carolina, one of the first Black communities established after emancipation from slavery. It would have funded energy-efficient affordable homes, weatherized and retrofitted homes, and restored a neighborhood divided by highway construction.
A $20 million EPA grant was cut for San Diego's Barrio Logan, a predominantly Latino community with high rates of asthma. A major highway cuts through the neighborhood, which is further affected by pollution from waterfront industry and its associated truck traffic.
As a result of the grant cut, a program to provide electric transit buses for Barrio Logan has been canceled and a long-planned community park will be significantly delayed or canceled, as will free electric shuttle service and home upgrades to improve air quality, grant recipients said.
"This is a very underserved community," said Tonantzin Sanchez, 42, a board member of the Chicano Park Steering Committee, speaking from the park in the heart of the neighborhood. "We're given the scraps."
CANCER ALLEY
Cancer Alley, a nickname that dates to the 1980s, is an 85-mile (137-km) stretch from New Orleans to Baton Rouge that is home to some 150 chemical plants and oil refineries.
Multiple studies over the years point to elevated health risks, including one in 2022, opens new tab that found nearly every census tract in the area ranks in the top 5% nationally for cancer risk.
In 2023, the Biden administration sued Denka, demanding it eliminate the alleged dangers posed by chloroprene emissions.
Denka said the lawsuit relied on flawed and outdated data that emerged from studies of mice, while an updated 2021 survey, opens new tab of humans showed no increase in cancer deaths.
Denka criticized the EPA's reliance on the data that assumed affected people would have to breathe chloroprene emissions 24 hours a day for 70 years. Moreover, Denka said the plant's emissions were reduced 85% after a $35 million upgrade completed in 2018.
"Where is the cancer? I mean, you could just call it Cancer Alley ... but we don't see the increase in cancer," said Jason Hutt, an attorney for Denka and a partner at Bracewell LLP.
One peer-reviewed 2021 study, opens new tab, the only one to examine effects in the surrounding community, found elevated levels of cancer and other maladies for people living closest to the plant.
Denka dismissed this field survey, which was prompted by concerns from a community advocacy group and led by the progressive University Network for Human Rights, as "flawed and biased" and cited an EPA assessment that called it "uninformative."
The 2021 field study found 52 cancer cases among people living within 1.5 km of the plant, a prevalence 44% higher than the national level, which would have produced 36 cases.
That translates to an additional 16 people, out of a sample of 777, who contracted cancer within the previous 23 years, said Ruhan Nagra, lead author and a law professor at the University of Utah.
Within a second concentric circle extending to a radius from 1.5 to 2.5 km from the plant, cancer rates dropped to virtually even with the national level.
Children in the closer zone also had higher rates of headaches and nosebleeds, and adults reported more chest pain, heart palpitations and breathing difficulty than people in the outer zone, the study said.
Gerard, 70, lives in the inner zone. She said her husband died of kidney cancer in 2018 at age 67. Her grandmother died of lung cancer.
"We had other people," she said, referring to those diagnosed with cancer, which Reuters was unable to independently confirm. "Cousins, and people in the neighborhood, next door, across the street, down the street - a lot of people."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dramatic move by Pentagon hint Trump could be siding with another billionaire amid Musk fallout
The Pentagon appears to be contemplating pivoting away from Elon Musk 's SpaceX following the almighty blowup between President Donald Trump and the world's richest man earlier this week. The fallout appears to be impacting the nation's space program as the Trump administration looks toward another billionaire to replace Musk in the race to Mars. Officials at NASA and the Pentagon quietly reached out to SpaceX's competitors, urging them to accelerate development of alternative rockets and spacecraft. Decisions appear to have been taken quickly after Musk made a defiant threat to pull SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a lifeline to the International Space Station, after Trump first threatened to cancel SpaceX's lucrative government contracts. 'It turned really terrifying,' one NASA official admitted to the Washington Post after initially finding the feud 'entertaining.' Although Musk eventually walked back his threat, the damage was done. Officials from NASA and the Pentagon, already uneasy with their reliance on SpaceX, were rattled to the core. SpaceX has become indispensable as it transports astronauts and cargo to the ISS, launches sensitive military satellites, and operates Starlink, the world's largest satellite constellation. The flare-up served to remind officials of the risks of tying national interests to a mercurial billionaire. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse … that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous,' a former space agency official said. NASA insiders said Musk's threat 'crossed a line,' invoking memories of the 2018 episode when Musk smoked marijuana during a podcast interview, which prompted NASA to launch a safety investigation into SpaceX. The clash was also inflamed by the White House's decision to abruptly withdraw Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA Administrator. Isaacman, closely aligned with Musk, had twice flown to space aboard SpaceX vehicles. In the aftermath, government officials reached out to Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, RocketLab, and Stoke Space, querying when their rockets might be ready to shoulder critical missions. Fatih Ozmen, CEO of Sierra Space, which is developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane, confirmed that NASA was 'working closely' with his company stating, 'NASA mentioned to us that they want diversity and do not want to rely on a single provider.' For some insiders, it wasn't hard to connect the dots: Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin, has long been a rival to Musk. Now, with the Biden-era antagonism between Trump and Bezos thawing, some see a political recalibration. Bezos' Blue Origin has lagged behind SpaceX for years, but its New Glenn rocket is finally gaining traction, albeit slowly. The Pentagon's recent 'lanes' strategy to diversify launch providers now looks prescient, with officials seeking to avoid 'overreliance on any single provider or solution.' A source familiar with the Defense Department's strategy said the White House sees an opening to back Bezos as a counterweight to Musk's volatility. 'They want someone who's predictable,' the person said to The Post. Even Congress appeared to be spooked by the behavior. A key committee demanded updates on Boeing's long-delayed Starliner capsule, which has struggled to match the reliability of Musk's Dragon. NASA, under pressure, said Friday that Starliner's next mission could come 'early 2026,' though it remains unclear whether it will fly astronauts or cargo only. Indeed, just how reliant NASA were on SpaceX was illustrated last year when American astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were left on the International Space Station by Boeing's troubled Starliner capsule. Wilmore and Williams had set off for an eight-day Starliner test flight that swelled into a nine-month stay in space Boeing, which has taken $2 billion in charges on its Starliner development, faces a looming decision by NASA to refly the spacecraft uncrewed before it carries humans again. Boeing spent $410 million to fly a similar uncrewed mission in 2022 after a 2019 testing failure. Reflying Starliner uncrewed 'seems like the logical thing to do,' Williams said, drawing comparisons with Elon Musk's SpaceX and Russian capsules that flew uncrewed missions before putting humans aboard. She and NASA are pushing for that outcome, Williams added. 'I think that's the correct path,' said Williams, who is 'hoping Boeing and NASA will decide on that same course of action' soon. Results from Starliner testing planned throughout the summer are expected to determine whether the spacecraft can fly humans on its next flight, NASA officials have said. Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, likened Musk's social media post to 'an embargo of the space station.' 'Musk was saying he is going to cut NASA off from its own laboratory in space,' he added. Harrison also recalled Musk's refusal to activate Starlink Internet for a Ukrainian military strike in 2022, a decision that raised alarms about national defense being at the mercy of a single CEO. 'The nation's missile defenses could be held hostage to the twittering whims of Elon Musk,' Harrison warned. Former NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman, who worked at SpaceX, voiced the fears of many in the astronaut corps: 'When your hopes and dreams are tied up in this, you can't help but think, "Oh my goodness, am I going to fly in space?"' Meanwhile, Trump, who once championed Musk as a visionary, appears to be cooling. His allies note that the president has no tolerance for perceived disloyalty and Musk's defiance has not gone unnoticed. Some aides believe Trump's sharp pivot is personal as much as political. RocketLab's CEO Peter Beck had previously warned how Musk's acquisition of Twitter, now rebranded as X, and his flirtation with politics could backfire. 'It certainly makes people uncomfortable. At the end of the day, if you're delivering important national security missions, the buck stops with the CEO,' Beck said. Pentagon officials remain wary, not least because few companies have rockets certified for critical national security missions. Blue Origin's New Glenn has flown once, and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan only twice. RocketLab's Neutron has yet to launch at all. SpaceX's Falcon 9 still dominates, launching with near clockwork precision. But now, Trump's administration appears ready to gamble on fostering competition, even if it means leaning more heavily on Bezos. 'Sierra Space stands ready,' Ozmen declared. Others in the sector are similarly jockeying for position, sensing that Musk's once-unshakable grip may be loosening.


Scottish Sun
43 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump slams ‘big-time drug addict' Elon Musk as toxic feud intensifies
It came after the Tesla billionaire linked Mr Trump to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump called Elon Musk a 'big-time drug addict' as his spat with the world's richest man intensified. The US President is said to have blasted his billionaire ex-backer as reliant on ketamine in phone calls. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Donald Trump called Elon Musk a 'big-time drug addict' as his spat with the world's richest man intensified Credit: AFP It came after the Tesla billionaire linked Mr Trump to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Their feud went public on Thursday night as both men used their own social media platforms — X and Truth Social — to insult each other. Mr Musk, 53, turned on the US leader, calling his Congressional spending bill a 'disgusting abomination' on Wednesday. The President, 78, has called it his 'big, beautiful bill', but Mr Musk believes it will increase national debt by an unsustainable amount. It triggered the ugly public bust-up, with Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and accusing him of being a close associate of Epstein. Yesterday, Mr Musk deleted the post, which was seen hundreds of millions of times. The Washington Post reported Mr Trump used private calls to urge his allies not to pour fuel on the fire and told Vice President JD Vance to be cautious. But the President, whose campaign took £250million from Mr Musk, is also said to have become weary with the tycoon's alleged drug use. He called Mr Musk an 'addict' in the calls and claimed he 'lost his mind' after leaving the administration. The businessman previously admitted using ketamine, but it is alleged he became so hooked last year it affected his kidneys. Trump insists Elon Musk is lashing out at 'big beautiful bill' for personal reason as he admits he's 'disappointed' in Tesla boss Mr Musk officially left the government last week but said he would remain as a 'friend and adviser' to Mr Trump. The President last night said he had 'no intention' of speaking to Mr Musk, adding: 'I think it's a very bad thing because he's very disrespectful'.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump: Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democratic candidates
In a new phone interview with NBC News, President Trump on Saturday said there would be 'serious consequences' if tech mogul Elon Musk funds Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of the GOP's sweeping budget bill. NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell and 'Meet the Press' moderator Kristen Welker have the 7, 2025