Alarm raised over slow pace of payouts to UK veterans fired over sexuality
An MP has raised alarm at the slow pace of a scheme to compensate LGBT service personnel dismissed or discharged from the forces because of their sexuality, saying that at the current rate it could take more than a decade to complete the process.
Jess Brown-Fuller, the Liberal Democrat MP for Chichester, said she began examining the LGBT Financial Recognition Scheme, formally launched in December, due to the experiences of a constituent, who is one of just 69 people to have been compensated, of more than 1,200 who have applied.
Liz Stead, who was discharged from the RAF in 1969 after letters between her and her girlfriend were discovered by military police, said her case had been given priority because she has a rare lung condition. While she received compensation last month for being discharged, she is still awaiting news of a possible separate payout over how she was treated while in service.
Stead, 77, who was a radar operator, spent six months in what she calls 'limbo' after the letters were discovered, which put her at the mercy of a ban on gay people serving in the UK military in place from 1967 to 2000.
Stead had served for three years when she met her girlfriend, who was also a radar operator at RAF Boulmer in Northumberland, in 1968. When Stead was moved to a posting near London the pair wrote to each other. In July that year the couple had arranged to meet up in person. Stead explained: 'She didn't turn up. The military police had arrested her and searched her belongings, and got hold of my letters.
'They got a statement from her, and asked me to do a statement – well, they coerced and bullied me to admit my sexuality. They arrested me, then searched my accommodation so they could get hold of her letters. And then for six months, I was left in limbo because we were seen as a security risk. They then made a decision, and gave us a week's notice we were being discharged.'
Stead was also given a criminal conviction for 'same-sex sexual activity' – but was never told about it. She only discovered this after she applied to the LGBT scheme and was granted a pardon, as well as given compensation.
Stead, who later worked as a business manager for a council, said she believed the conviction might have been the reason why she had once been turned down for a job with a government department.
She said: 'When I found out about the conviction I just thought – what? My wife said to me: 'Are you sure you didn't do anything else?' I said: 'No, absolutely not. I would remember that.''
Brown-Fuller used a parliamentary question on Thursday to highlight Stead's case and to push the government to make sure claims were processed more quickly. She cited statistics from mid-June showing that of 1,289 applications, 44 have been completed, a timetable which if maintained would take about 14 years to clear the backlog. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said later the total was now 69.
'It will take years to settle all of these applications, and veterans in their 60s, 70s and 80s potentially don't have years for those payments to be settled,' Brown-Fuller said. 'My frustration is shared by the LGBTQ+ veterans, because they're angry, they're frustrated and they're disappointed that they're still experiencing these delays.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'I think the government is totally aware of the issue, because there is cross-party support for this scheme. What it is not fully grasping is that the minister needs to get a handle on how quickly those payments are going out and the process.'
Stead, who lives in Chichester, is still in touch with her former girlfriend, who is in London, and has helped her complete an application to the compensation scheme. Stead says that last time she heard, her ex-girlfriend was still waiting for compensation.
An MoD spokesperson said: 'We deeply regret the treatment of LGBT serving personnel between 1967 and 2000 which was wholly unacceptable.
'While we don't hold comprehensive records of personnel discharged due to sexuality, we're working with organisations like Fighting with Pride to ensure that we reach as many LGBT veterans who may have been affected.
'We also encourage anyone who may think that they're affected to contact us so that we can see if we can help, and the Home Office also runs the disregards and pardons scheme for people wishing to have historic 'offences' wiped from their records.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
London Ambulance worker says patient attack was like horror film
A pair of London ambulance workers said they felt like they were trapped in a "horror film" after a drunk patient became aggressive, kicked through their windscreen and threw bricks at them as they tried to help Jenkins said he and colleague Tom Pursey were covered in broken glass in the attack that "went on and on" after being called out to a housing estate in Rotherhithe, south-east London, last chief paramedic Pauline Cranmer said it was a "deeply disturbing and sustained attack" and said assaults like these were on the rise. The attacker, Seiitbek Uulu, admitted assaulting an emergency worker, damaging property and being drunk and disorderly in public. The London Ambulance Service (LAS) said the attack on 24 August unfolded as Uulu was being checked out by the patient left the ambulance appearing to be in distress and said he was looking for his bike, Mr Jenkins said. "My crewmate got out to help him look for it but then I heard the emergency button go off and I knew he was in trouble."The patient was chasing him and threatening him." The pair got into the front of the ambulance and tried to drive away, but as they set off, Uulu jumped on to the bonnet of the ambulance, the LAS Harvey, 25, said: "He was punching and stamping on the windscreen until he got his foot through it. We were in disbelief and got into the back of the ambulance to get away."It felt like a horror film, as it went quiet, but then suddenly he was punching the windows and throwing bricks and concrete trying to hit us. "The attack just went on and on."We didn't know whether to go out and tackle him or stay in the ambulance – we just felt trapped."Mr Harvey was hit by a brick, although he was not seriously were called and Uulu was apprehended soon afterwards, while the ambulance was taken off the road for 33, of Gibsons Hill, Southwark, was sentenced last month at Croydon Magistrates' Court and ordered to pay a fine of £114, abstain from alcohol for four months and complete 150 hours of community service. 'Disproportionately low sentence' Ms Cranmer said: "This was a deeply disturbing and sustained attack on an ambulance crew who were simply trying to help."Attacks on ambulance workers are increasing and sentences should reflect the impact crimes like this have."According to the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives (AACE), incidents of violence and abuse against ambulance workers have been on the rise in recent years, with an 11.3% increase in 2024 compared with chair Jason Killens said he believed the sentence handed to Uulu was "disproportionately low" given the "level of violence" towards the ambulance crew."This appalling behaviour has a major long-term impact on the health and wellbeing of ambulance people, but the situation appears to be getting worse, with low rates of conviction and weak sentences issued to offenders who do not see them as a serious deterrent," he said.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Palestine Action: We're spreading ‘intifada' in prisons
Jailed Palestine Action activists are radicalising other prisoners in pursuit of their cause, the movement has boasted. The group – which will be proscribed as a terrorist organisation within days – said the 'resistance lives on the streets, in cities, in towns and in prisons' in a meeting accessed by The Telegraph. On a call with potential recruits, the host of the meeting said members of the organisation are 'spreading intifada', an Arabic word for uprising. This week, The Telegraph revealed that Palestine Action was plotting to target RAF bases across the country in a wave of attacks. At a direct action 'workshop' for people wanting to join the organisation, at which the RAF plans were discussed, a member of the group quoted the words of an anonymous former prisoner. The former prisoner said: 'In locking me up, the British state made a miscalculation. They thought that by imprisoning me, they would halt the British resistance to Israel's genocide. But while you can imprison a revolutionary, you cannot imprison a revolution. 'The resistance lives on the streets, in our cities and our towns, and in our prisons too. I brought the intifada with me to the prison and I remain steadfast and determined now I am free – just as Palestine, too, will be.' In total, the group says it currently has around 19 members imprisoned in the UK. The majority of those are the 'Filton 18' who are currently remanded in custody awaiting trial in April next year. Members of the group allegedly drove a modified prison van into the Israeli arms company Elbit's research, development, and manufacturing hub in Filton, Bristol. Two responding police officers and a security guard were allegedly injured in the incident. Further arrests were made at a protest in Trafalgar Square this week during a demonstration against Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's plans to proscribe the organisation. On Thursday, the Telegraph exposed a list of Palestine Action's next targets. Tactics discussed included breaking into factories and hitting 'everything you can find with a sledgehammer', as well as setting up autonomous cells able to target military bases without detection. A slide in the call identified three RAF bases most suitable for attack – RAF Cranwell and RAF Barkston Heath, both in Lincolnshire, and RAF Valley, in Anglesey, North Wales. It also recommended action against defence companies believed to be supplying arms to Israel, including a drone factory in Leicester. There have been growing fears of radicalisation in prisons more generally over the past decade, partly because of the presence of a large number of Islamist gangs. Hashem Abedi, one of the terrorists behind the 2017 Manchester Arena bombing, attacked three prison officers with makeshift weapons and hot cooking oil at HMP Frankland in County Durham in April. Two officers were left with life-threatening injuries. The incident came just days after reports that Frankland, the high-security prison where Abedi is serving life, has become 'overrun' with Islamist gangs threatening to attack or kill other prisoners if they did not join up. After a surge of law enforcement activity in the UK in the early 2000s following the 9/11 attacks in the US and the July 7 bombings in London, the number of Islamist extremists in custody for terror-related offences increased sharply. The increase in Islamist terrorist prisoners came at the same time as a rise in the overall number of Muslims in jails across England and Wales – 99 per cent of whom are being held for non-terror offences. The number has nearly trebled, from 5,500 in 2002 to almost 16,000 in 2024, and now represents 18 per cent of the prison population, compared with 8 per cent two decades ago. In 2022, a report by Jonathan Hall KC, the reviewer of anti-terrorism legislation, found that faith-based self-segregation by prisoners had provided a 'fertile base for violent Islamist activity'. It said attacks on non-Muslim inmates, staff and the public were 'encouraged'. The report said charismatic or violent prisoners acted as 'self-styled emirs' to radicalise the wider Muslim prison population, exerting control through a network of 'enforcers' over access to prayer meetings, the prison kitchens and showers.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Welfare reforms: What concessions has the Government made?
Last-minute concessions to the Government's controversial welfare reforms have been welcomed by some campaigners but described as not good enough by others. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the changes are and how Labour MPs and disability groups have reacted. – What had the Government originally planned? In March, reforms to the welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The Government said the changes, including restricting access to the main disability benefit known as Pip (personal independence payment) and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), were expected to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year', the Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill included estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules would see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Changes to UC were expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. Overall, as a result of the changes, it was estimated some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, across Great Britain were likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs by the end of the decade. – What concessions have been made? In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall conceded two changes she said would 'strengthen the Bill'. In recognition of the 'uncertainty and anxiety' caused by the proposed changes, she said all current Pip recipients would keep their benefits, saying only new claims from November 2026 will come under the tightened eligibility requirements. An impact assessment had stated that 370,000 current recipients were set to lose Pip entitlement across England and Wales. Ms Kendall also vowed all those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'. The Work and Pensions Secretary has also promised a review of the Pip assessment, led by social security and disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, which will have input from disabled people 'to ensure the benefit is fair and fit for the future'. – What are disability groups saying? Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, accused the Government of 'playing politics with our lives', insisting the Bill must still be pulled. He said the changes will mean 'a benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today' and added that, in making the original announcement of cuts, the Government had 'prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens'. Mr Erhardt added: 'Despite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn't provide enough support as it stands.' The MS Society said the Government was simply 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster', and urged MPs 'not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions'. Food bank network Trussell welcomed the 'significant' concessions but said the proposals 'still present a bleak future for future claimants and still risk placing the Government's commitments to end the need for emergency food and tackle poverty in serious jeopardy'. – What are Labour MPs saying? Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms. She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Health minister Stephen Kinnock said he is confident the welfare reforms – being brought under the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will pass a vote in the Commons on Tuesday in the wake of the concessions. But some Labour MPs are still not satisfied, with Nadia Whittome saying the concessions are 'nowhere near good enough', vowing to still vote against the Bill unless 'serious' proposals are made to 'protect the dignity of disabled people'. Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, she said MPs she had spoken to 'are sticking to their position because we understand that we are answerable to our constituents'. Ms Whittome added: 'If the Government doesn't pull the Bill, doesn't consult properly with disabled people and come back to MPs with a serious proposal that protects the dignity of disabled people, I will vote against and I will be far from the only one.'
