
Texas Senate passes bill to define the difference between man and woman based on reproductive organs. Check details
In a significant development, the
Texas Senate
has passed a bill requiring the state to strictly define man and woman based on reproductive organs on a 20-11 party line vote. The bill has already passed the House and will go now to the governor's desk, reports The NewsWeek. The move was welcomed by champaigners as a win for "truth and reality" and one that protects single sex spaces such as locker rooms.
But advocates for LGBTQ rights said the bill is harmful to the lives of trans people, who will face greater marginalization and discrimination as a result.
If this bill becomes law, more than 120,000 trans Texans would be forced to be defined in state records by the sex they were assigned at birth, rather than the gender they identify as, even if they've already legally changed their birth certificates and driver's licenses.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If You Eat Ginger Everyday for 1 Month This is What Happens
Tips and Tricks
Undo
ALSO READ:
Elon Musk-Trump bromance over? Tesla CEO's first major public disagreement with President sparks buzz
What does the bill say?
According to Texas Tribune,
House Bill 229
says "a woman is an individual whose biological reproductive system is developed to produce ova, while a man is someone whose reproductive system is developed to fertilize the ova". The bill would require that this definition be used across state statute, with potentially wide-ranging consequences for trans and intersex people who would see their gender identity reverted back to the sex they were assigned at birth in state records.
Live Events
The Texas Senate has passed HB 229, known as the "Women's Bill of Rights," with a vote of 20 to 11. The bill now heads to Republican
Governor Greg Abbott
for his signature.
If signed into law, the legislation would require state documents—including birth certificates and driver's licenses—to record individuals' sex as assigned at birth, rather than their gender identity.
"The message is clear: You don't mess with Texas women," said M. E. Castle, director of government relations for Texas Values, a Christian advocacy group, in a statement posted to X.
"HB 229 makes sure that the reality and truth of the two sexes is clear in Texas law and never altered by school districts, local cities, or bureaucrats ever again!
ALSO READ:
Inside The Handmaid's Tale series finale: Elisabeth Moss reflects on show's ending, says 'I can't imagine...'
"With today's vote in the Senate, Texas will lay the foundation for protecting women's spaces and opportunities."
The bill was introduced by State Representative Ellen Troxclair and sponsored in the Senate by State Senator Mayes Middleton, both Republicans. It aligns closely with executive orders issued by former President Donald Trump on the same issue.
Trump has advocated for reinstating a
biological definition of sex
, particularly emphasizing the exclusion of transgender women from women's and girls' sports to maintain what he describes as competitive fairness.
State Senator José Menéndez, a Democrat, criticized the legislation as 'state-sponsored discrimination.'
'If a law forces non-binary Texans—real people—into categories that don't reflect their lived experiences or identities, that amounts to discrimination in practice,' Menéndez told the Texas Tribune.
ALSO READ:
Why Melania Trump's $40 million documentary deal with Amazon has sent Hollywood into a tizzy
Trump threatens to hold federal fund California
Trump had also threatened to withhold 'large scale' federal funding from California if it allowed a transgender student-athlete to compete in girls' state championships. 'THIS IS NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS,' he wrote on Truth Social.
California, under the leadership of Radical Left Democrat Gavin Newscum, continues to ILLEGALLY allow 'MEN TO PLAY IN WOMEN'S SPORTS.' This week a transitioned Male athlete, at a major event, won 'everything,' and is now qualified to compete in the 'State Finals' next weekend. As a Male, he was a less than average competitor. As a Female, this transitioned person is practically unbeatable. THIS IS NOT FAIR, AND TOTALLY DEMEANING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS. Please be hereby advised that large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the Executive Order on this subject matter is not adhered to. The Governor, himself, said it is 'UNFAIR.' I will speak to him today to find out which way he wants to go??? In the meantime I am ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow the transitioned person to compete in the State Finals. This is a totally ridiculous situation!!!
ALSO READ:
Thousands could lose SNAP benefits under 'big, beautiful bill' in state Trump won by 1%
He further warned: 'Please be hereby advised that large scale Federal Funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the Executive Order on this subject matter is not adhered to.'
The executive order, referencing Title IX—the federal law prohibiting sex-based discrimination—requires all recipients of federal funds to bar transgender women and girls from participating in female sports categories.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Ready to facilitate for a reasonable fee': Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO
Russia mocks Donald Trump-Elon Musk feud, offers 'peace talks' & business haven for Tesla CEO (Picture credit: AP) The spectacular fallout between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk has become a source of mockery and intrigue in Moscow, where senior officials and media figures are treating the public feud as both comedy and opportunity. "Elon, don't be upset!" posted nationalist senator Dmitry Rogozin, the former head of Russia's space agency, on Musk's platform X. "If you encounter insurmountable problems in the US, come to us. Here you will find reliable comrades and complete freedom of technical creativity," he added, in a tone mixing humour with a clear invitation. Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev took the trolling a step further, offering to mediate between the feuding duo. 'We are ready to facilitate the conclusion of a peace deal between D and E for a reasonable fee,' he wrote on X, before jokingly requesting Starlink shares as payment. As per the news agency Reuters, the episode has been widely ridiculed as an example of chaos in Washington, with Margarita Simonyan, editor-in-chief of RT, deriding it as 'modern US political culture, sort of like the English Industrial Revolution. Only in reverse.' The Trump-Musk relationship imploded after Musk criticised Trump's flagship legislative proposal as an 'abomination.' Trump responded with rare public disappointment, telling reporters in the Oval Office, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' He later suggested slashing Musk's lucrative government contracts, saying, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts.' The spat escalated quickly, with Musk accusing Trump of 'ingratitude' and reposting claims that the president appeared in government documents linked to Jeffrey Epstein, allegations he shared without providing evidence. The feud also triggered a $100 billion drop in Tesla's market value and prompted Musk to threaten decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a key part of Nasa missions, before walking it back. The Russian elite appears to be relishing the distraction. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov, as reported by Reuters, dismissed the feud as an internal US matter but expressed confidence in Trump's ability to manage it. Others, like hardline nationalist businessman Konstantin Malofeyev, saw strategic value in the squabble. 'We can just be glad that they won't have time for us,' he said, calling it 'the best time to strike back' against Ukraine. Meanwhile, the White House ruled out any imminent reconciliation. A senior official said that Trump had no plans to speak to Musk, dismissing rumours of a scheduled call. When asked by ABC whether he intended to reconnect with his ex-ally, Trump replied bluntly: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' As the public spat continues to reverberate, it has turned into a political spectacle that offers both global amusement and serious implications.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump, Musk, and the Big Beautiful Breakup
Donald Trump, left, and Elon Musk depart the White House to board Marine One en route to New Jersey, March 21, 2025, in Washington. (AP) TOI correspondent from Washington: The epic war between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man kept America -- and the world -- enthralled on Friday as attempts to bring about a truce between Elon Musk and Donald Trump failed. There was a brief prospect of reconciliation on Thursday night as mutual friends tried to patch things up after Musk ratcheted up his attacks on the President, linking Trump to the pedophile Epstein. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' he posted on X. Trump ignored the charge but he responded to the broader issue of their falling out, saying he had asked Musk to leave the White House because he was 'wearing thin,' and he (Musk) went "crazy" because the administration took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that "nobody else wanted." Things went further south when the President posted, "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That triggered Musk to warn that he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, critical for NASA's International Space Station operations, a threat he later retracted. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trending in in 2025: Local network access control [Click Here] Esseps Learn More Undo Amid the heated, real-time exchanges on social media, billionaire hedge fund manager Bill Ackman got in a word edgewise, asking the warring duo to reunite "for the benefit of our great country." Musk responded, "You're not wrong," and reportedly sought a Trump phone call, which the President rejected on Friday, characterizing Musk as the "man who has lost his mind." Officials though warned the President could change his mind. Chances of a truce appeared to have been derailed by Musk himself after he mused about the President's political mortality in the hours before, telling social media gadabout Laura Loomer that "Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…" This came after he tried to talk up JD Vance for the Oval Office following a Trump impeachment proposed by some critics. But the US vice-president smacked down the idea, saying, "President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him." Several GOP lawmakers rallied around Trump saying Musk had "gone too far" in the feud. Musk also posted a poll on X asking, "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" There were more than 5 million responses, with more than 80 percent saying "yes." A variety of other characters waded into the drama, offering millions of political junkies a constant high. While Ackman and other billionaires and tech bros sought to keep a lid on the explosion, former Trump advisor Steve Bannon and other MAGA hardliners, who see Musk as an interloper, poured gasoline on the fumes, demanding Trump seize's Musk's SpaceX invoking national security provisions and deport Musk, although the South Africa born Tesla boss is now a US citizen. A current Trump advisor Peter Navarro, among many in the President's inner circle happy with the departure of the man some called a "co-President," said Musk was just 'a special government employee with an expiration date.' Russia too stepped into the American swamp, offering Musk political asylum if his feud with Trump went further south. Some of the feuding bordered on the petulant, with several media outlets reporting that Trump now plans to sell the red Tesla S that he bought with great fanfare after celebrating Musk and his cars on the White House lawns just a few weeks ago. The banner headline in the NewYork Post said it all: I HATE MY X.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
41 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Trump and Nasa cannot afford to cut SpaceX contract over Musk feud
The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government read more Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's violent feud on Thursday might have a significant impact on many US space initiatives and jeopardise around $22 billion of SpaceX's federal contracts. Musk's criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending legislation, which started last week, was the starting point of the dispute, which swiftly got out of hand. When Musk talked in the Oval Office, Trump snapped at him. Then, Musk attacked Trump in a string of X postings, threatening to revoke federal contracts with Musk's businesses. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk took the warning seriously and announced that he would begin 'decommissioning' SpaceX's Dragon spaceship, which is used by Nasa. Hours later, however, Musk appeared to reverse course. Responding to a follower on X urging him and Trump to 'cool off and take a step back for a couple of days,' Musk wrote: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Still, Musk's mere threat to abruptly pull its Dragon spacecraft out of service marked an unprecedented outburst from one of Nasa's leading commercial partners. Under a roughly $5 billion contract, the Dragon capsule has been the agency's only US vessel capable of carrying astronauts to and from the International Space Station, making Musk's company a critical element of the US space program. The feud raised questions about how far Trump, an often unpredictable force who has intervened in past procurement efforts, would go to punish Musk, who until last week headed Trump's initiative to downsize the federal government. If the president prioritized political retaliation and canceled billions of dollars of SpaceX contracts with Nasa and the Pentagon, it could slow US space progress. Nasa press secretary Bethany Stevens declined to comment on SpaceX, but said: 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Musk and Trump's tussle ruptured an extraordinary relationship between a US president and industry titan that had yielded some key favours for SpaceX: a proposed overhaul of Nasa's moon program into a Mars program, a planned effort to build a gigantic missile defence shield in space, and the naming of an Air Force leader who favoured SpaceX in a contract award. Taking Dragon out of service would likely disrupt the ISS program, which involves dozens of countries under a two-decade-old international agreement. But it was unclear how quickly such a decommissioning would occur. Nasa uses Russia's Soyuz spacecraft as a secondary ride for its astronauts to the ISS. SpaceX's rise SpaceX rose to dominance long before Musk's foray into Republican politics last year, building formidable market share in the rocket launch and satellite communications industries that could shield it somewhat from Musk's split with Trump, analysts said. 'It fortunately wouldn't be catastrophic, since SpaceX has developed itself into a global powerhouse that dominates most of the space industry, but there's no question that it would result in significant lost revenue and missed contract opportunities,' said Justus Parmar, CEO of SpaceX investor Fortuna Investments. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under Trump in recent months, the US space industry and Nasa's workforce of 18,000 have been whipsawed by looming layoffs and proposed budget cuts that would cancel dozens of science programs, while the US space agency remains without a confirmed administrator. Trump's nominee for Nasa administrator, Musk ally and billionaire private astronaut Jared Isaacman, appeared to be an early casualty of Musk's rift with the president when the White House abruptly removed him from consideration over the weekend, denying Musk his pick to lead the space agency. Trump on Thursday explained dumping Isaacman by saying he was 'totally Democrat,' in an apparent reference to reports Isaacman had donated to Democrats. Isaacman has donated to some Republican but mostly Democratic candidates for office, according to public records. Musk's quest to send humans to Mars has been a critical element of Trump's space agenda. The effort has threatened to take resources away from Nasa's flagship effort to send humans back to the moon. Trump's budget plan sought to cancel Artemis moon missions beyond its third mission, effectively ending the over-budget Space Launch System rocket used for those missions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But the Senate Commerce Committee version of Trump's bill released late on Thursday would restore funding for missions four and five, providing at least $1 billion annually for SLS through 2029. Since SpaceX's rockets are a less expensive alternative to SLS, whether the Trump administration opposes the Senate's changes in the coming weeks will give an indication of Musk's remaining political power. SpaceX, founded in 2002, has won $15 billion of contracts from Nasa for the company's Falcon 9 rockets and development of SpaceX's Starship, a multipurpose rocket system tapped to land Nasa astronauts on the moon this decade. The company has also been awarded billions of dollars to launch a majority of the Pentagon's national security satellites into space while it builds a massive spy satellite constellation in orbit for a US intelligence agency. In addition to not being in US interests, former Nasa Deputy Administrator Lori Garver said cancelling SpaceX's contracts would probably not be legal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But she also added, 'A rogue CEO threatening to decommission spacecraft, putting astronauts' lives at risk, is untenable.'