Hogan honored as this year's Citizen of the Year
Feb. 18—When Ted Hogan first learned that he was named the Citizen of the Year, he was astonished.
"I was surprised," Hogan said when asked about his initial reaction. "It's an honor to be considered. It's really great."
The respected business leader and community advocate was honored by the Odessa Chamber of Commerce with a ceremony Tuesday at the Marriott Hotel and Conference Center.
"It was a big surprise but it's an honor because I love Odessa," Hogan said. "My family has been blessed to live here."
Hogan, who's lived in Odessa since 1992, graduated from Crane High School in 1973.
He earned a Bachelor of Science degree in physical education with a minor in biology from Texas Tech in 1977.
Hogan would go on to embark on a successful career in the oilfield services industry.
In 1994, he founded Light Tower Rentals, a rental service company that he built into a regional powerhouse.
While Hogan is now retired from LTR, he remains actively engaged in the business world.
He currently partners with MHRT International Oilfield Services, LLC, RTB Ventures LLC, Freedom First Inc., and Boot Heel Management.
"I work in oil and gas," Hogan said. "I have a few other interests like ranching and cattle."
He was quick to thank his wife Jodi as well as his family and friends around the community.
"My wife's been my rock and has stood behind me and supported me," Hogan said. "I've made a lot of friends in Odessa. Odessa is a great place to raise a family. We've made so many friends. We have a great church family here. Everything about Odessa is great. It's been a blessing for us."
Odessa Chamber of Commerce Chair Shem Culpepper talked about this year's Citizen of the Year recipient.
"Today, we're rewarding a very worthy citizen of the year," Culpepper said. "Even though it's called Citizen of the Year, it's really more like a lifetime achievement award. Mr. Ted Hogan has devoted a large portion of his life in giving back to the community. He's a very successful businessman. It's an honor and a privilege to honor him. He has not been selfish with his time and he's given back to his community."
President and CEO of Odessa Chamber of Commerce Renee Earls also talked about the process of selecting this year's winner.
"Each year, we ask the community to make nominations for candidates that they feel like would be good nominees," Earls said. "We always receive wonderful nominations. Ted Hogan is the epitome of service. He's an example of not only in his business but also in his volunteering of being very giving and he deserves this award."
The Odessa Chamber of Commerce has selected a Citizen of the Year since 1958.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Feds didn't follow procurement rules in contracts with company behind ArriveCan app
OTTAWA — Federal organizations failed to follow procurement and security rules when awarding contracts to a company behind the controversial ArriveCan app, the auditor general said Tuesday. Last year Karen Hogan published an audit of ArriveCan, finding the government did not deliver value to taxpayers and that three federal departments disregarded federal policies and controls in awarding contracts for the development of the app. GCStrategies was granted the largest share of those contracts. It lost its security status last year and last week the government banned it from federal contracts for seven years over its conduct. On Tuesday Hogan published a wider audit of 106 other contracts awarded to GCStrategies by 31 federal organizations between 2015 and 2024, and found in many of those cases procurement rules were also not followed. Hogan also found federal organizations and departments often provided little evidence to show the work they had paid for had actually been done. The maximum value of those contracts was more than $90 million but only about $65 million was paid out. The report says that, for half of the contracts requiring security clearances, federal organizations weren't able to show that those doing the work had the appropriate clearances before the contract was awarded. Federal organizations lacked documentation to show that they had confirmed security clearances for just over one in five of the contracts Hogan's office examined. The report also found that federal organizations failed to monitor contract work and performance. Many accepted poorly drafted timesheets or failed to collect them at all. Others couldn't show that the people doing the work had the required experience and qualifications. Hogan said that in more than 80 per cent of the contracts examined, organizations couldn't prove that the fees paid didn't exceed market rates. In just under half of the contracts, the report says, organizations had "little to no evidence" to show that deliverables were received. Despite that, payments were still made. The report says most contracts were awarded without organizations assessing whether they should call for bids. Many organizations justified the need for the contracts by pointing to increased workloads or public servants' absences. In September, the House of Commons agreed unanimously to ask Hogan to look into contracts. Hogan said the audit findings echoed those from previous audits by her office. "I said it back then, and I'll repeat it now: I have no reason to believe that this is unique to two vendors," she said. "And that's why I believe the government needs to take a step back and look at why this behaviour is happening." Hogan noted she did not make any recommendations in the report, because she said, the rules don't need to be updated, they just need to be followed. "It's already happening, to make sure that the rules that are in place are followed, well understood across departments," Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound told reporters, following the Liberal cabinet meeting Tuesday. He said it is up to departments overseeing contracts "to make sure that in each and every department, the rules are followed" and that proper documentation is submitted and reviewed. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Tuesday that the government needs to go to GC Strategies and "get our money back." He said all public servants who failed to follow procurement policies should be fired and that politicians should be held accountable too. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 10, 2025. Catherine Morrison, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
EDITORIAL: Auditor general targets spending on fighter jets
Be alarmed. Be very alarmed. A day after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced he will invest billions of new taxpayer dollars to meet Canada's NATO target of spending 2% of our gross domestic product (GDP) on defence, a scathing report by the auditor general reveals massive cost overruns in the government's plan to modernize Canada's aging fleet of fighter jets. Karen Hogan reported Tuesday that the cost of buying 88 F-35 fighter jets to replace Canada's aging fleet of CF-18s — estimated at $19 billion in 2022 because the government used outdated information — had increased by almost 50% to $27.7 billion by 2024. That's without including the added costs of building essential infrastructure — now more than three years behind schedule — and purchasing advanced weaponry to make the F-35s fully operational, which Hogan said will add at least $5.5 billion more to the final price tag. The fighter jet program also faces a shortage of qualified pilots, despite being warned about that issue in a 2018 report by the auditor general. Hogan said some of the government's cost increases were unavoidable due to inflation, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and supply chain shortages caused by the 2020 global pandemic. But others were caused by government failures. 'National Defence's approach to managing risks … had weaknesses, lacking proactive measures to minimize the impact of potential threats and the project did not have robust contingency plans,' Hogan concluded. Adding to the uncertainty is that Carney has ordered a review on whether Canada should purchase all 88 American-made fighter jets or consider possible alternatives such as European-made fighter jets. EDITORIAL: Meeting NATO's 2% target the right move EDITORIAL: Jobless numbers spell trouble Defence Minister David McGuinty gave the standard government boilerplate response to the auditor general's findings, saying the government accepts the auditor general's recommendations and will implement some by Sept. 30 and others by Nov. 30. Which means that, as is the standard operating procedure in responses to critical auditor general reports these days, the same people who created the problems will now be trusted to fix them. That's disturbing in the context of the massive amount of new spending Carney has promised in order to hit Canada's NATO target of committing 2% of Canada's GDP annually to defence spending, starting during this fiscal year, which ends on March 31, 2026, compared to 1.4% last year.
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Auditor general finds F-35 costs soar amid project delays, pilot shortages
OTTAWA - The estimated cost of Canada's incoming fleet of advanced stealth fighters exploded by nearly 50 per cent in just a few years, auditor general Karen Hogan said Tuesday in a new report. The fighter jet audit was one of eight tabled in the House of Commons by Hogan and environment commissioner Jerry DeMarco. The reports flag problematic procurement contracts, a backlog in applications for First Nations status and a delay in reducing the amount of federal office space. An investigation by the auditor general concluded that costs associated with the F-35 advanced fighter jet program are running $8.7 billion higher than the original estimates. And it warns the program is being plagued by delays and critical shortfalls — including a lack of qualified pilots. The report lands in the middle of an active review ordered by Prime Minister Mark Carney to examine possible alternatives to the F-35. He ordered the review in response to U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war with Canada. National Defence said in 2022 the base price for the F-35s would be $19 billion. Just two years later, the number has climbed to $27.7 billion. That estimate does not include figures for infrastructure upgrades or weapons. The report says the department's 2022 estimates relied on outdated data from 2019 — despite the availability of better estimates showing 'that costs of the aircraft had already increased substantially.' The audit says issues associated with the global pandemic — such as runaway inflation, rising costs for facilities and munitions and volatile foreign exchange rates — pushed the price tag sky high. Defence Minister David McGuinty's office sent out a written statement to media that blamed the increased costs on 'external economic conditions driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, including global supply chain disruptions, workforce shortages, and increased inflation and foreign exchange rates.' 'In combination with increased global tensions and related impacts on the availability and demand for materials, we would not have been able to deliver the full scope of this project under our previous budget,' he said in the statement. But Hogan also warned Tuesday that the program faces 'significant risks that could jeopardize the timely introduction of the new fleet.' She said the department successfully identified the risks but has not planned appropriately to mitigate them. Construction of two new fighter squadron facilities — in Cold Lake, Alta., and Bagotville, Que. — is running three years behind schedule. The report says the facilities will not be ready until at least 2031 because the department needs to 'redo important elements' of their design. The department started planning the new facilities in 2020 before the government had settled on the F-35. The aircraft comes with significant infrastructure security requirements. 'Costs to develop an interim solution to support the new jets will further increase infrastructure expenses,' the report warned. It said the department produced a contingency plan to operate the aircraft from temporary facilities but the plan fell short because it was incomplete and offered 'no proposed actions nor a cost estimate.' Canada is also still short of qualified pilots to fly the advanced aircraft — despite being warned about this in 2018. The report said the F-35 program lacks measures to minimize potential risks and the department failed to produce robust contingency plans. It notes that the department identified cost overruns from inflation and currency fluctuations as potential risks to monitor, but plans to track those risks were never approved by officials. The Liberal government announced in 2017 it planned to purchase 88 new fighter jets. It signed a contract with Lockheed Martin for the F-35s in 2023. The modern jets are needed to replace Canada's aging CF-18 fleet, which is nearing the end of its service life. The fighter jets are expected to be delivered between 2026 and 2032. Over the next two years, the initial eight will be sent to a U.S. air force base in Arizona, where Canadian pilots will be trained to fly them. The rest will be delivered to Canada starting in 2028. The report said the Joint Strike Fighter Program Office conducted various assessments that uncovered 'significant issues,' such as 'insufficient departmental engineering personnel to service support equipment for both the CF-18 Hornet and CF-35A during the transition.' The audit said that at the end of the last fiscal year in March, National Defence earmarked $935 million for the U.S. government for the first four jets and related items needed to produce another eight aircraft. It says about $197 million has been paid out already. On top of that, National Defence spent another $516 million on the project, including $270 million in infrastructure costs. This report by The Canadian Press was first published on June 10, 2025.
