Local HIV Diagnoses In Decline, Challenges To Achieving Elimination Goal
There were 38 gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) who acquired HIV in Aotearoa New Zealand last year, a decrease from the previous year and continuing the overall downward trend since the peak of 97 in 2016. The 2024 HIV and AIDS notification data was released today by the University of Otago AIDS Epidemiology group.
There were also 28 people diagnosed with AIDS in 2024, with 18 (64%) being MSM. This is the highest number of local AIDS diagnoses since 2010. Over 70% of these people (20) were diagnosed with AIDS within 3 months of their HIV diagnosis—indicating late HIV diagnoses.
Burnett Foundation Interim General Manager, Alex Anderson, says it is worrying that we are still seeing people being diagnosed with AIDS, a sign of a late diagnosis of HIV-infection that developed into AIDS.
'If we are going to achieve our 2030 goal of eliminating local HIV transmission, we need to see everyone at-risk of acquiring HIV in regular systems of testing. If HIV is diagnosed early, it helps stop further transmission and ensures better health outcomes for recently diagnosed people.'
Mr. Anderson says that while numbers are trending down, work is needed to ensure equitable access to testing, prevention and education.
'We are seeing continued decline in local HIV acquisitions, but the new data show it is mostly in European MSM. We are not seeing the same decline in Māori and Pacific people. It is imperative that nobody is left behind in our response,' says Mr. Anderson.
Of the MSM who acquired HIV in New Zealand in 2024, 8 were European while 16 were Māori, 5 were Pacific people, 6 Asian and 3 were of another or unknown ethnicity.
'We are working with community to ensure our messages reaches those who need it most. Our free HIV self-test vending machines around the country are making testing more accessible to all. We are also advocating to make PrEP more accessible from a wider range of nurses, pharmacies and community orgs to increase uptake of this important prevention tool,' says Mr. Anderson.
The government's National HIV Action Plan received a one-year funding extension in Budget 2025, now running through to the 2028/29 financial year. The Action Plan's goal is a 90% reduction in locally acquired infections compared to the 2010 baseline by 2030 as well as ensuring that people living with HIV have healthy lives free from stigma and discrimination.
'This is a clear signal that the government continues to see value in the Action Plan, although we'll be watching closely how this additional funding is prioritised and commissioned by Te Whatu Ora Health NZ,' says Mr. Anderson.
A recent study showed that every $1 invested in Burnett Foundation Aotearoa means $5.05 saved for the New Zealand public, in HIV acquisitions prevented.
Mr. Anderson says that the Foundation is also watching the growing HIV outbreak in Fiji, and cuts to global HIV funding, with concern.
'We must ensure our local response remains strong, with a growing number of people being unable to access prevention and treatment overseas, there is a real risk of rising global transmission. We are looking at ways we can support our local Fijian communities as there are strong migrant connections between our two countries. We are aware how an outbreak in Fiji can affect our own response here. We must work together to ensure there is a strong, coordinated regional response.'
Notes:
There were three trans women who acquired HIV in Aotearoa last year. Although data on HIV diagnoses among trans populations has only been collected since 2017, and increasing awareness of gender diversity among healthcare providers is likely improving reporting, it remains crucial that we monitor emerging population groups closely and ensure our prevention tools are both accessible and inclusive.
Living with HIV is a manageable condition for most Kiwis in 2024. People living with HIV who are on effective treatment, with an undetectable viral load, have zero chance of passing on HIV to their sexual partners.
Burnett Foundation Aotearoa, along with our sector partners Positive Women Inc., Toitū te Ao and Body Positive Inc., provide a broad range of support services and information for people living with HIV, to support the HIV response in Aotearoa New Zealand. Anyone can visit our websites or contact us to discuss how we can best support them:
• https://www.burnettfoundation.org.nz/
• https://positivewomen.org.nz/
• https://www.toituteao.org/
• https://bodypositive.org.nz/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Factory Farms And The Next Pandemic: How Industrial Animal Agriculture Fuels Global Health Threats
Throughout human history, zoonotic diseases, illnesses that jump from animals to humans, have shaped civilizations, triggered pandemics, and rewritten the course of economies. The Black Death, which ravaged Europe in the 14th century, originated from bacteria transmitted by fleas that lived on rats. Ebola, HIV, and SARS-CoV-2, which caused COVID-19, all had animal origins. As humanity's relationship with animals has become increasingly industrialized through factory farming, the risk of zoonotic spillover has escalated. Some diseases are transmitted through direct contact with animals, such as rabies from a bite or tuberculosis from infected cattle. Others spread through the consumption of poorly cooked meat, contaminated dairy products, or wet markets that sell live animals. Vector-borne diseases, where insects like mosquitoes and ticks act as intermediaries, transfer pathogens from animals to humans. Factory Farms and the Growing Threat of Zoonotic Pandemics The intensification of industrial agriculture has amplified these risks. The crowded, high-density conditions of factory farms create a breeding ground for disease. Animals raised in confined spaces experience high levels of stress, which weakens their immune systems and increases their susceptibility to infections. When a pathogen emerges in this environment, it can mutate rapidly and spread with alarming efficiency. This is particularly concerning with influenza viruses, which frequently originate in birds and pigs before adapting to humans. Bird flu has been detected in sheep, raising concerns about the virus's ability to cross species boundaries. Such a discovery underscores the unpredictability of zoonotic diseases, particularly in terms of cross-species transmission and the potential for rapid evolution of health threats. Philip Lymbery, author and global CEO of Compassion in World Farming, thinks the danger is serious: 'Factory farms are a ticking time bomb for future pandemics,' he says. 'Hundreds of coronaviruses are in circulation, most of them among animals including pigs, camels, bats, and cats. Sometimes those viruses jump to humans.' Antibiotics, widely used in industrial farming to promote growth and prevent disease, exacerbate the issue. Overuse has led to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can jump to humans through direct exposure, contaminated food, or environmental runoff from farms. The World Health Organization has repeatedly warned that antibiotic resistance could become one of the greatest threats to human health, rendering common infections untreatable. COVID-19 was a wake-up call, but it was not the first time a zoonotic virus wreaked havoc on global health. The HIV/AIDS epidemic, which originated from nonhuman primates, has killed over 40 million people since it emerged in the 20th century. The 2009 H1N1 swine flu pandemic, which was linked to pig farming, spread globally within months. Bird flu strains continue to pose a significant threat, with highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) causing sporadic human infections, resulting in a fatality rate of over 50 percent. Reimagining Protein: Innovations That Could Prevent the Next Pandemic Despite these risks, the global demand for animal protein is surging. Humans now eat 350 million metric tons of meat annually, nearly 'a thousand Empire State Buildings in carcass weight,' according to academic and writer Tim Searchinger. The United Nations estimates that meat production will increase by more than 70 percent by 2050. This trajectory presents challenges not only for climate change, deforestation, and water pollution but also for the likelihood of future pandemics. However, emerging innovations in food technology present possible solutions. Precision fermentation and cultivated meat are being explored as methods to reduce dependence on traditional livestock. Precision fermentation, which is used to produce dairy-identical proteins without the need for cows, utilizes engineered microbes to create compounds such as whey and casein. Cultivated milk, bio-identical to cow milk but grown in a bioreactor rather than in a cow, is expected to enter the market soon. Cultivated meat, grown from animal cells in bioreactors, provides real meat without the need for slaughterhouses or crowded factory farms. These technologies have the potential to transform global protein production, significantly lowering the risk of zoonotic disease spillover. Because they bypass live animals, they eliminate the risks associated with confined feeding operations, antibiotic resistance, and cross-species viral mutations. Studies suggest that precision fermentation and cultivated dairy could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 96 percent compared to conventional dairy farming. Jeff Tripician, who has worked in the meat industry for 40 years, recently moved to head a cultivated meat company based in the Netherlands. He told the Future of Foods Interviews podcast that, 'Cultivated meat is the only solution on the table.' In regard to bird flu, he went on to say that, 'Livestock disease could wipe out huge areas of herds. We're seeing that in the U.S. with egg-laying hens. Eight percent of the supply has been euthanized.' Challenges for alternative proteins remain, including regulatory hurdles, production scaling issues, and consumer acceptance barriers. Governments worldwide are still determining how to classify and approve these products for sale, with Singapore leading the way in regulatory approval for cultivated meat. The U.S., Israel, and UK regulators are following closely behind, but widespread commercialization is still a few years away. Affordability is also a concern. Although costs are declining, cultivated meat remains significantly more expensive than conventional meat. However, as production scales, prices are expected to fall. A Turning Point: Reducing Pandemic Risk Through Food System Reform The transition away from industrial animal farming will take time, but the need for change is apparent. If the world continues down its current path, the risks of future pandemics will only grow. Addressing this problem requires serious attention, including government policies that promote alternative proteins, investment in food technology, and increased public awareness of the health impacts of factory farming. Experts in epidemiology, virology, and food innovation continue to examine the intersection of food production and disease risk. Dr. Michael Greger, physician and author of Bird Flu: A Virus of Our Own Hatching, has long warned about the pandemic potential of factory farming. Dr. Rob Wallace, an evolutionary biologist and author of Big Farms Make Big Flu, examines how industrial agriculture fuels the evolution of viruses. Journalists covering the relationship between food, health, and climate change will need to monitor closely how food production impacts disease risk. There is no single solution, but reducing reliance on industrially farmed animals could significantly lower the likelihood of the next global pandemic. Author Bio: Alex Crisp is a freelance journalist focusing on environment, animal welfare, and new technology. He has a background in law, journalism, and teaching. He is the host of theFuture of Foods Interviews podcast.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
NZ's goal to get smoking rates under 5 percent this year – why that's highly unlikely
By By Janet Hoek and Jude Ball* of More than 80,000 people would need to quit smoking this year to bring Aotearoa's overall smoking prevalence under 5 percent. Photo: Next week is "scrutiny week" in Parliament - one of two weeks each year when opposition MPs can hold ministers accountable for their actions, or lack thereof. For us, it's a good time to take stock of whether New Zealand is on track to achieve its smokefree goal of reducing smoking prevalence to under 5 percent and as close to zero as possible, among all population groups, this year. The latest New Zealand Health Survey shows that, for the first time in a decade, smoking rates have flatlined rather than fallen. Stark inequities persist, with daily smoking prevalence among Māori at 14.7 percent (compared to 6.1 percent among European New Zealanders). To bring New Zealand's overall smoking prevalence under 5 percent would require more than 80,000 people to quit this year. Achieving the goal equitably means more than 60,000 of those people would need to be Māori. The government's repeal of earlier measures predicted to bring rapid and equitable reductions in smoking prevalence means achieving the Smokefree 2025 goal for all population groups is now highly unlikely. Proposed by the Māori Affairs Select Committee and adopted by the then National-led government in 2011, the Smokefree 2025 goal has always had equity at its heart. At that time, smoking prevalence among Māori was 37.7 percent and 14.7 percent among European New Zealanders. Reducing smoking rates to less than 5 percent for all population groups offered an opportunity to profoundly reduce health inequities burdening Māori. Early discussions recognised the large inequities in smoking rates. Speaking about his role in the select committee inquiry, former National Party leader Simon Bridges stated: The picture I had of smoking was quite wrong. Most of the time, smoking is not this idea of a free market with adults who freely consent to take up smoking but the more complex, difficult situation of children smoking as a result of parents and grandparents who smoked . That means that a more intense, stronger, more interventionist approach is called for. The first Smokefree Action Plan, only introduced a decade later in late 2021, included more intense measures and established a Māori and Pacific oversight committee to ensure all actions taken promoted equity. The action plan introduced three key initiatives: denicotinisation, a large reduction in outlets selling tobacco, and the smokefree generation strategy. All were expected to have strong pro-equity outcomes. Modelling predicted denicotinisation would bring unprecedented reductions in smoking prevalence, eliminating the gaps between Māori and non-Māori. Reducing tobacco availability would end the widespread access to tobacco in lower-income communities. The smokefree generation, a longer-term endgame strategy that would have meant anyone born after 2009 could no longer buy tobacco, was predicted to significantly reduce inequity, given the younger Māori (and Pacific) population structure. Then Minister of Health Ayesha Verrall noted: While smoking rates are heading in the right direction, we need to do more, faster, to reach our goal. If nothing changes, it would be decades till Māori smoking rates fall below 5 percent, and this government is not prepared to leave people behind. The coalition government's repeal of these measures in early 2024 left a void, but Associate Health Minister Casey Costello reaffirmed a commitment to the Smokefree 2025 goal. A January 2024 update to Cabinet stated: The government remains committed to further reducing smoking rates and achieving the Smokefree 2025 goal of daily smoking prevalence of less than 5 percent for all population groups. However, by late 2024 the narrative began changing. In November, Costello launched a new smokefree action plan in a final push to reach the headline 5 percent target. Her plan does not emphasise the structural changes (such as fewer outlets selling tobacco) called for by the Māori Affairs Select Committee. Instead, it relies on health promotion programmes to reduce smoking uptake and on increasing attempts to quit by "reinvigorating" stop-smoking messages and improving referral rates to support. We argue New Zealand will likely fall well short of its 2025 goal to bring smoking rates below 5 percent and reduce inequities, despite an ongoing commitment by Health New Zealand-Te Whatu Ora. During scrutiny week, we hope Associate Health Minister Costello will be asked how she explains the discrepancy between her earlier commitment to achieving the Smokefree 2025 goal among all population groups and more recent comments which appear to roll back the equity goal. More importantly, we hope questions will probe how she plans to reduce smoking prevalence among Māori to a third of its current level, and what evidence she has that the steps she proposes will work. * Janet Hoek receives funding from the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Marsden Fund, NZ Cancer Society and NZ Heart Foundation. She is a member of the Health Coalition Aotearoa's smokefree expert advisory group and of the Ministry of Health's smokefree advisory group, a member of the HRC's Public Health Research Committee, and a Senior Editor at Tobacco Control (honorarium paid). She serves on several other government, NGO and community advisory groups. Jude Ball receives funding from the Health Research Council of New Zealand, the Marsden Fund, NZ Cancer Society, NIB Foundation, and the Health Promotion Agency. She is affiliated with the Public Health Association of New Zealand, a member of Health Coalition Aotearoa's smokefree advisory group, and serves on other NGO and community advisory groups. - This story originally appeared on The Conversation.
Scoop
16 hours ago
- Scoop
Health Reforms Raise Fears Of Two-Tier System And Workforce Shortages
Press Release – ANZCA Dr Graham Roper, chair of ANZCAs New Zealand National Committee, says the outsourcing plans will negatively affect the training of anaesthetists, who are critical for operations to proceed, and see existing specialists move from public hospitals to … Moves by Health NZ to outsource elective operations to the private hospital sector increase the risk of a two-tier health system and will worsen the medical workforce shortage, a leading medical college has warned. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) is one of the largest specialist medical colleges in Australia and New Zealand and the region's leading authority on anaesthesia, pain medicine and perioperative medicine. Dr Graham Roper, chair of ANZCA's New Zealand National Committee, says the outsourcing plans will negatively affect the training of anaesthetists, who are critical for operations to proceed, and see existing specialists move from public hospitals to the private sector. 'Trainees' practical experience will be impacted, with a loss of exposure to outsourced clinical cases, and skewed amounts of urgent and complex work. It will take longer for trainees to get their required experience, delaying their entry into the workforce. Anaesthesia training will become less desirable, threatening the ability to produce much-needed specialists. 'Anaesthetists are a central part of both the hospital and the surgical team – without them, operations simply can't go ahead.' Dr Roper says the changes will lead to public system specialists facing a large amount of complex and urgent patients, requiring the highest level of care with extended hours of work. This would lead to specialists choosing to move to the private sector, further increasing the strain on the public system. He is also questioning the ability of some private facilities to provide the required level of care and training opportunities. 'Not all private facilities are set up to deliver the same level of clinical care as the public system. Private providers do not take on the same complexity of work in the same volumes as the public system, and may not provide high-dependency care, intensive care, acute pain services, pre-admission clinics and access to urgent investigations. Any significant complications during or after surgery will see the patient transferred to the public system for ongoing care. 'Many private facilities do not have on-site medical cover overnight and have a limited ability to respond to medical emergencies,' Dr Roper says. 'Our Māori and Pacific peoples, with increased complexity of health needs, are unlikely to benefit from this outsourcing model. In addition, our rural and remote communities may not be well served with this change. 'People living in rural areas are not always close to a private provider, can have transport difficulties, and lose family and whānau support if they have to travel long distances for surgery.' Dr Roper says ANZCA is willing to be involved in finding solutions to the unmet need of elective surgery across Aotearoa New Zealand. 'The provision of high-quality safe and equitable care for our community remains the core aim of our profession and the New Zealand public should expect that access to anaesthesia and surgery is future-proofed.'
