Reform U.K.'s Chairman Quits Amid New Infighting
One of the most senior figures in Reform U.K., Britain's anti-immigration political party, unexpectedly resigned on Thursday after fresh infighting broke out within the insurgent political force led by Nigel Farage.
The sudden departure of Zia Yusuf, Reform's chairman, is a blow to the party, because he was responsible for the crucial task of helping the relatively new party build its structure.
His resignation comes after Mr. Yusuf, a millionaire businessman who has described himself as 'a British Muslim patriot,' criticized Reform's newest member of Parliament, Sarah Pochin, who on Wednesday called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to ban the burqa.
Mr. Yusuf, 38, characterized her comments as 'dumb' because they did not align with the party's official policy outlined at the last general election.
Not all senior figures in the party agreed with him, however. Reform's chief whip, Lee Anderson, wrote on social media: 'Ban the burqa? Yes we should.' He added, 'No one should be allowed to hide their identity in public.'
In a statement posted on social media, Mr. Yusuf did not give a reason for his decision, saying only that 'I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
29 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Thousands Gather for Anti-Austerity Demonstration in London
Thousands of people have gathered to "send a message" to the Government with a demonstration over spending cuts and welfare reform. Campaign group The People's Assembly said it expected trade unionists, campaigners and activists to attend the event in central London on Saturday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk attacked the courts. Now they're his best hope against Trump.
In the end, the fight between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may see the latter turning to the same institution that he has tried to tear down over the last year in the president's name: the courts. And the truth is, even the richest man in the world deserves legal protection. That's how the Constitution and the rule of law work, despite Musk's best efforts to run over both. Musk spent months and hundreds of millions of dollars to support Trump's campaign in 2024. He then spent the first several months of Trump's second presidency helping to cut government programs and employees and criticizing the administration's foes. One frequent target of his attacks has been the courts. He called for the impeachment of judges who resisted the administration's agenda and even tried to sway a judicial election in Wisconsin for a seat on its Supreme Court. Last month, the Republican majority in the House (which Musk claims to have saved) passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which would explode the deficit, cut taxes mostly for the wealthy, cut services for the poor and kill the tax break for electronic vehicles such as Teslas. Earlier this week, Musk began speaking out against the bill, calling it 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination.' The feud became more personal Thursday, with Trump criticizing Musk in the Oval Office. As Musk continued to fire back, Trump said he will explore cutting his administration's extensive contracts with Musk's companies, including Starlink and SpaceX. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump wrote. Musk likewise doubled down, sharing footage of Trump and Jeffrey Epstein and approving a social media post that called for Trump's impeachment. By the end of the day, Musk had gestured at conciliation, but as of Friday, the president was not in the same mood, with a senior White House aide telling NBC News that Trump was 'not interested' in a call to cool tensions. So, where might Musk turn to stop the Trump train from running over his companies? It wasn't long ago that Musk threatened to use his wealth to fund primary challenges against any Republican who might seek to rein in Musk's activities through his so-called Department of Government Efficiency. But the leverage there relied as much on Trump's sway over the GOP base as on Musk's funds. It is certainly possible that Musk could spend enough to sway elected officials to slow down such attacks on his companies. Yet such an approach, even if successful, would take a significant amount of time, with only marginal gains in the short term. Ironically, should the president seek to cut the federal government's ties with Musk's companies based on his criticism, it is the courts that will likely serve as the best forum in which to challenge any retribution. Over the last month, three law firms — Perkins Coie, Jenner & Block and WilmerHale — have all succeeded in defeating Trump's efforts to punish them for standing up to him. They have all relied, in part, on a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court from last year, NRA v. Vullo. In that case, a unanimous court found that a government official in New York could not punish the NRA and the companies with which it did business for the organization's political speech (in that case, opposing gun regulation). Under the First Amendment, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the court, 'government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavors.' One would be hard-pressed to say that what the administration is threatening to do against Musk's companies doesn't fall squarely under the prohibitions the court identified in that case. Despite railing against the institutions that might stand in the way of his and Trump's agenda for months, Musk will now have to trust in those institutions. But that is how our First Amendment, our courts and the rule of law function; they typically protect even their fiercest critics. This article was originally published on
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Macron Will Visit Greenland This Month, Defying Trump
In a challenge to President's Trump's vow to take control of Greenland, President Emmanuel Macron of France will visit the enormous Arctic island on June 15 with the aim of 'contributing to the reinforcement of European sovereignty.' The French presidency announced the visit on Saturday, saying that Mr. Macron had accepted an invitation from Jens-Frederik Nielsen, Greenland's prime minister, and Mette Frederiksen, the Danish prime minister, with whom it said Mr. Macron would discuss 'security in the North Atlantic and the Arctic.' Greenland, a semiautonomous island that is a territory of Denmark, a NATO ally, has been thrust in recent months from a remote, uneventful existence to the center of a geostrategic storm by Mr. Trump's repeated demands that it become part of the United States, one way or another. 'I think there's a good possibility that we could do it without military force,' Mr. Trump told NBC in March, but added that he would not 'take anything off the table.' Mr. Macron, who has seen in the various provocations directed at Europe by the Trump administration an opportunity for European assertion of its power, will be the first foreign head of state to go to Greenland since Mr. Trump embarked on his annexation campaign this year. JD Vance, the American vice president, visited Greenland in March. The trip was drastically scaled back and confined to a remote military base after the threat of local protests. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
