logo
R.I. senators vying for leadership posts face potential conflicts of interest

R.I. senators vying for leadership posts face potential conflicts of interest

Boston Globe28-04-2025

Advertisement
Lawson, an East Providence Democrat, works full-time as president of the
Get Rhode Map
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
John M. Marion, executive director of Common Cause Rhode Island, said, 'If she becomes Senate president, there is a good chance she opens herself up to future complaints if she remains NEARI president because NEARI has so much business before the Legislature and the Senate presidency uniquely controls the agenda and appointments in the chamber.'
In 2019, the state Ethics Commission
Advertisement
And in 2024, the Ethics Commission
But the circumstances would be different if Lawson is president of both the Senate and NEARI, Marion said.
'Lawson is no longer a classroom teacher or vice president of NEARI,' he said. 'She's president of NEARI, responsible for a very large organization with lots of business before the state Senate. Her duty to lead NEARI at the same time as exercising the vast powers of Senate president create a unique challenge.'
The potential conflicts could involve a wide range of significant issues, including how union contracts are negotiated, and how labor disputes are resolved, he said.
Marion said other legislators might be able to sidestep conflicts of interest by recusing themselves from certain votes and stepping out of the room during any debate. 'But as Senate president, you can't really step out of the room when the final decision needs to be made,' he said, noting the Senate president plays a pivotal role in deciding which bills make it to floor votes and in negotiating with the House and the governor.
Marion said her potential conflicts differ from those of Ciccone and Pearson because she holds the top job at her union while Ciccone is a consultant for a union, and Pearson is a vice president at a bank.
Of course, Lawson could avoid those potential conflicts by stepping down as NEARI president, Marion said. He noted Ruggerio, who was 76, had retired from the New England Laborers' Labor-Management Cooperation Trust when he was leading the Senate. But it remains unclear if Lawson, who is 58, will leave her NEARI post, for which she earns
Advertisement
Lawson could not immediately be reached for comment.
Ciccone, 77, a Providence Democrat, receives income as a consultant for Local Union 808, as a senator, and as a 'federal firearms dealer,' according to his latest financial disclosure form filed with the Ethics Commission. He previously worked as a field representative for the Rhode Island Laborers' District Council and as business manager of Rhode Island Judicial, Professional, and Technical Employees Local Union 808.​
In 2008,
In 2019, the Ethics Commission issued an advisory opinion, saying the ethics code did not prohibit Ciccone from serving as chairman of the Senate Labor Committee. But the commission said he is prohibited from participating in matters that would directly impact his 'business associate,' Local Union 808.
As majority leader, Ciccone could face potential conflicts as a union consultant and firearms dealer, Marion said. 'But there are tools to deal with that, like recusal,' he said.
Ciccone also has faced criticism for his involvement in a 2012 episode in which Barrington police say
Advertisement
That issue never came before the Ethics Commission. 'But certainly it was wrong,' Marion said. 'He has a track record of poor decision making.'
Pearson, 36, a Cumberland Democrat, receives income as a senior vice president at Citizens Bank, as a senator, and as a partner in Hanaway Real Estate Holdings, according to his latest financial disclosure form.
In 2020, the Ethics Commission issued an advisory opinion, saying the ethics code did not prohibit Pearson from participating in Senate discussions and voting on the state budget, but he had to recuse himself from discussions or votes on line items or budget amendments that could financially impact Citizens.
In 2024, Pearson
'Pearson would not be immune from navigating ethics concerns if he kept his day job because he works for one of the largest employers in the state,' Marion said.
The potential conflicts facing all three senators 'speaks particularly to the challenges of a part-time Legislature where people don't get paid a living wage and therefore have to have outside employment,' Marion said.
Rank-and file senators earn
Ciccone and Pearson could not be immediately reached for comment.
Advertisement
Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"
Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

CNBC

time37 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Kelly Evans: Musk, Trump, and "the Bill"

As absolutely delicious as the personal drama between Elon Musk and Donald Trump is--and as much as it may escalate into everything from robotaxis to SpaceX and national defense--let's not lose sight of the deficit fight that's at the heart of it. Musk's beef with Trump after he was dismissed from service first erupted over the "One Big Beautiful Bill." A "disgusting abomination," Musk called it on X this week. "Shame on those who voted for it." He went on to repost tons of old tweets from Trump, along with current Senate and Congressional Republican leaders, calling out their hypocrisy for criticizing past debt levels and deficits even as they now support a bill that would raise the debt ceiling by trillions and increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Yesterday, when asked about Musk's criticism--which could sink the entire bill, if enough Senate Republicans like Ron Johnson and their constituents turn against it--the president chalked it up to sour grapes over the bill's failure to extend EV tax credits. But Musk insists that's not the case, and few really expected the credits to be continued anyway. No, it seems Musk's real beef, assuming this isn't just a convenient way for him to reposition himself with the broader public, seems to be over the cost of Trump's megabill. But here's the rub. This isn't just any old stimulus act, or grab-bag of political preferences. There is a ticking time bomb hanging over the economy this year, because Trump's first-term tax cuts are going to expire at year-end. The cost of this bill isn't over new stuff they want to do--it's mostly just extending the status quo. That alone costs $4 trillion over the next decade. So while it's a very attractive argument that Musk is making--I'd love to know what exactly he would propose doing instead. Would he prefer that taxes go up on households and businesses next year? Fine, if so; that's the Democratic party's position. But I have yet to hear him embrace that either tactically or philosophically. This is where the issue of "SALT" comes in. It would cost $377 billion over the next decade, according to Heritage, to quadruple the cap--and this would be new tax relief. But again, this is a small percentage of the overall cost. And it could be the difference between Republicans keeping their tiny majority in the House, or not. House Speaker Mike Johnson made this clear on Squawk Box this morning. "If we don't deliver on this [bill], and we don't deliver a little bit on SALT relief, then we're not going to have the House majority," he said. "And if the Democrats take over, they will impeach Donald everything will go to chaos. So this team has to stay in power." He also implied Democrats would deliver even worse fiscal outcomes. But perhaps none of that matters to Musk, who would practically seem to be leading the impeachment drive, the way things are going this week. Perhaps he disagrees that Democrats would be worse for the fiscal situation. Or perhaps he senses that party would now be much more sympathetic to his EV and robotaxi ambitions. Point being, if Musk blows up the budget bill, and takes a hard fiscal line on any subsequent negotiations, the GOP isn't going to turn around and gut Medicare or Medicaid--which it's struggling to pare back at all right now--in order to balance the budget. No, it just means that taxes are going up at year-end. See you at 1 p.m! Kelly Twitter: @KellyCNBC Instagram: @realkellyevans

Trump Says He Won't Be Speaking With Musk ‘For a While'
Trump Says He Won't Be Speaking With Musk ‘For a While'

Epoch Times

timean hour ago

  • Epoch Times

Trump Says He Won't Be Speaking With Musk ‘For a While'

President Donald Trump said on June 6 that he won't be speaking with Elon Musk 'for a while' in the aftermath of the feud between the two billionaires. 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem,' Trump When asked if he had a phone conversation with the Tesla CEO, who left the Trump administration last week, Trump said, 'No. I won't be speaking to him for a while I guess, but I wish him well.' The Feb. 5 feud began with Trump reacting to Musk's opposition to the House GOP bill that would make the 2017 tax cuts permanent and includes provisions related to American energy and securing the border. It would also lift the debt ceiling by $4 trillion and repeal the $7,500 EV tax credit. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' he said in the Oval Office, sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Musk said that Trump would not have won the presidency and the GOP would not have captured the House had it not been for the entrepreneur's efforts, worth $300 million. He also said that the GOP would only control the Senate with 51 seats and not 53 had it not been for him. Trump said Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' Musk denied that and said he was never shown a copy of the bill despite it being publicly available. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk said in a social media The president said that Musk is upset that the EV credit would be repealed in the bill, thereby negatively affecting Tesla. Musk denied this and said he would not mind the mandate being eliminated. 'Whatever,' he said in a Trump also said Musk was upset at him withdrawing Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Musk supported Isaacman. The president called for the elimination of government subsidies for Musk's companies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump wrote in a Musk said in

How You Can Qualify For the Proposed $2,500 Child Tax Credit
How You Can Qualify For the Proposed $2,500 Child Tax Credit

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

How You Can Qualify For the Proposed $2,500 Child Tax Credit

On May 22, 2025, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that would, among other provisions, boost the child tax credit to as much as $2,500. This would represent an increase from the current $2,000 maximum, which itself was an increase over the $1,000 limit in place before 2017. Although the bill still has to pass the Senate — which is not guaranteed — here's what you'll need to know about how to qualify for the newly enhanced credit. Find Out: Read Next: The current $2,000 child tax credit is set to expire at the end of 2025, and it will take an act of Congress to extend it. If the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' doesn't become law, the child tax credit will revert to a maximum of $1,000. However, if the bill passes, the new minimum of $2,000 will become permanent, with no set expiration date. The bill would also permanently index the maximum amount to inflation, beginning in 2029. Discover More: From 2025 to 2028, the bill allows for a maximum credit of $2,500 that is not indexed to inflation. The idea behind the increase is that the current $2,000 amount has not been adjusted for inflation since it was enacted in 2017, making $2,500 a more appropriate level. If the $2,500 is not extended by future legislation, it will revert to the current $2,000 level. However, that amount will then be indexed to inflation annually. Here are the requirements to qualify for the child tax credit as outline in the Big, Beautiful Bill: The qualifying child must be 17 years or younger. The child must be a dependent and a U.S. citizen, national or permanent resident. Both the child and the parent must have a Social Security number. You must file a tax return to claim the credit. After the first $2,500 of income, the credit is calculated as 15% of AGI until it reaches the maximum and/or begins to phase out for higher-income taxpayers. The credit begins to phase out once your MAGI exceeds $400,000 for married couples filing jointly, or $200,000 for all other filers. Only $1,700 of the tax credit is refundable. This means that unless your tax liability exceeds the amount of the credit, you won't qualify for the full amount. The Social Security number requirement is one of the major new provisions of the bill, and it's somewhat controversial as it may exclude some low-income families. Although the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passed the House, it still must pass the Senate before it becomes law. It's entirely possible that the legislation dies in the Senate or that it undergoes substantial revisions. It's important to keep this in mind if you're planning to take advantage of the credit. Critics of the bill also highlight that the lowest-income earners in America — the ones that could use the credit the most — won't qualify for enhanced provisions of the child tax credit. This is because many lower-income earners don't have any tax liability at all, which restricts them to the $1,700 refundable credit maximum. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), joint filers would have to earn $48,550 to qualify for the full tax credit under the new bill, up from $36,800 under current law. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on How You Can Qualify For the Proposed $2,500 Child Tax Credit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store