
Lawmakers Call on Hotel Giants to Stop Using ‘Taiwan, China' Label
Two Republican lawmakers are urging Hilton, Marriott, and Hyatt to drop their use of the phrase 'Taiwan, China' to refer to Taiwan on their websites and promotional materials, questioning whether this wording was influenced or requested by Beijing.
Rep. John Moolenaar (R-Mich.) and Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.)
'Using terminology such as 'Taiwan, China,' gives false credence to the PRC's position of authority and sovereignty over Taiwan and implies that Taiwan is the property of the PRC,' the lawmakers wrote, using the acronym of China's official name, People's Republic of China.
'Not only does this directly contradict U.S. policy, but it also undermines Taiwan's democratic system.'
Moolenaar is the chairman of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Blackburn is a member of the Senate Finance and Senate Judiciary committees.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been known for pressuring organizations and companies to refer to Taiwan with such names as 'Taiwan, China' or 'Chinese Taipei,' as part of its broader efforts to isolate Taiwan in the international community. One such
Related Stories
5/22/2025
5/19/2025
Taiwan is a de facto independent nation with its own military, constitution, and democratically elected government. The CCP, which has never ruled Taiwan, considers the self-governing island a 'wayward province' that should be united with the mainland.
Moolenaar and Blackburn pointed out that the U.S. government supports Taiwan's participation on the global stage through the Taiwan Relations Act, a legislation signed into law by President Jimmy Carter in April 1979 after Washington changed diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing earlier that year.
'This [U.S.–Taiwan] relationship is of the utmost importance to the economic and national security of the United States, and the government and the private sector alike must take steps to bolster and support Taiwan, one of our most important allies in the region,' they wrote.
To show that there is widespread support for Taiwan within the federal government, the lawmakers cited a
'This [2024] letter followed consistent action from President [Donald] Trump and every president—from both parties—since President Carter,' the May 21 letter reads.
The lawmakers said the three hotel chains should follow other major U.S. companies that have correctly identified Taiwan.
'We urge Hilton, Marriott, and Hyatt to review this practice and ensure that your companies' language on both U.S. and Taiwan-hosted websites properly reflects long-standing U.S. policy,' they said. 'This includes avoiding the use of 'Taiwan, China.''
The lawmakers requested the three hotel chains to answer three questions before June 20, including whether the decision to use the term 'Taiwan, China' was 'influenced by any instructions, guidelines, requests, or suggestions from the PRC government or related entities.'
They also asked whether the hotels would make a correction and commit to referring to Taiwan as 'Taiwan.'
Taiwanese Foreign Minister Lin Chia-lung thanked the lawmakers for voicing support for Taiwan, in a statement to the local government-run Central News Agency on May 22.
'For a long time, the Chinese government has used economic coercion against international companies to force them to comply with its false political claims,' Lin said.
'The [Taiwanese] government continues to pay close attention to and take seriously the foreign companies that mislabel Taiwan's name,' he said, adding that his ministry and the island's overseas missions have actively sought name changes to uphold the island's sovereignty.
The Epoch Times contacted Hilton, Marriott, and Hyatt for comment and did not receive a response by publication time.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Posts Thinly-Veiled Message to Judges on Tariffs
With courts threatening to unravel his global trade war, Donald Trump took to Truth Social on Sunday to send a not-so-subtle signal to the judges standing in his way. The president suggested he expects an appeal to go his way following a week of legal whiplash over his signature economic policy. On Wednesday, a federal trade court struck down his sweeping 'Liberation Day' tariffs on global trade partners, ruling he had overstepped his constitutional authority. But just a day later, an appeals court put that decision on hold while it reviews the case. Trump catastrophized in his post that a court loss would spell economic disaster. 'If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us,' he wrote. 'This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!' The initial ruling came in response to a lawsuit from small businesses that said the tariffs put their operations at existential risk by driving up costs associated with importing goods. The U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the plaintiffs, with the three-judge panel concluding that the 1977 law Trump relied on to impose the tariffs did not give him 'unbounded authority' to do so. Trump and his mouthpieces have characteristically lashed out at the judiciary in response. His White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on Thursday cast the panel as 'activist judges'—despite the fact that two of the three were appointed by Republican presidents, including one by Trump himself. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has also reaffirmed the administration's intent to push forward with the tariff policy—via other means if necessary—regardless of the legal setback. 'We're going to take that up to higher courts, the president's going to win like he always does. But rest assured, tariffs are not going away,' Lutnick said in an interview on Fox News Sunday. 'He has so many other authorities, that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another.' Trump has spent months framing his tariffs as a bargaining chip to force overseas trade partners to make new agreements. To date, the administration has finalized only one such agreement—with the United Kingdom—and a separate 90-day truce with China to roll back steep tariffs on both sides. A federal appeals court has set a June 5 deadline for plaintiffs in the trade court case to respond and June 9 for the administration.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan (AP) — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement. That referred to a China-U.S. joint statement in which the United States and China agreed to slash their massive recent tariffs, restarting stalled trade between the world's two biggest economies. But last month's de-escalation in President Donald Trump's trade wars did nothing to resolve underlying differences between Beijing and Washington and Monday's statement showed how easily such agreements can lead to further turbulence. The deal lasts 90 days, creating time for U.S. and Chinese negotiators to reach a more substantive agreement. But the pause also leaves tariffs higher than before Trump started ramping them up last month. And businesses and investors must contend with uncertainty about whether the truce will last. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the U.S. agreed to drop the 145% tax Trump imposed last month to 30%. China agreed to lower its tariff rate on U.S. goods to 10% from 125%. The Commerce Ministry said China held up its end of the deal, canceling or suspending tariffs and non-tariff measures taken against the U.S. 'reciprocal tariffs' following the agreement. "The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' while China has stood by its commitments, the statement said. It also threatened unspecified retaliation, saying China will 'continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' And in response to recent comments by Trump, it said of the U.S.: 'Instead of reflecting on itself, it has turned the tables and unreasonably accused China of violating the consensus, which is seriously contrary to the facts.' Trump stirred further controversy Friday, saying he will no longer be nice with China on trade, declaring in a social media post that the country had broken an agreement with the United States. Hours later, Trump said in the Oval Office that he will speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping and 'hopefully we'll work that out,' while still insisting China had violated the agreement. 'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' The Trump administration also stepped up the clash with China in other ways last week, announcing that it would start revoking visas for Chinese students studying in the U.S. U.S. campuses host more than 275,000 students from China. Both countries are in a race to develop advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, with Washington seeking to curb China's access to the most advanced computer chips. China is also seeking to displace the U.S. as the leading power in the Asia-Pacific, including through gaining control over close U.S. partner and leading tech giant Taiwan. Christopher Bodeen, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
China blasts US for its computer chip moves and for threatening student visas
TAIPEI, Taiwan — China blasted the U.S. on Monday over moves it alleged harmed Chinese interests, including issuing AI chip export control guidelines, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and planning to revoke Chinese student visas. 'These practices seriously violate the consensus' reached during trade discussions in Geneva last month, the Commerce Ministry said in a statement.