
Labour explores compulsory ID cards to curb illegal migration
Labour is examining proposals for a compulsory digital ID card for every adult in Britain to help tackle illegal immigration.
A think tank previously headed by Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir Starmer's chief of staff, has put forward the proposal, which is being considered by No 10.
In a policy paper, Labour Together argues that the new BritCard – downloaded to phones free of charge – would help crack down on illegal migration and provide the public with a 'one-stop shop' for government services such as passports or benefits without the need for further identity checks.
Britain is the only country in Europe without an ID card system, which critics claim has allowed a black market in jobs to flourish, making it attractive to illegal migrants.
The last Labour government attempted to introduce ID cards, with the first issued in 2009, but the scheme was scrapped by the incoming Tory-led coalition on the basis that it was an 'erosion of civil liberties'.
Sir Tony Blair and Lord Blunkett, the former home secretary who first put forward the idea, have remained strong advocates of compulsory ID cards as a simple, effective way to tackle illegal migration.
Digital identity must be 'top PM priority'
In its report, published on Friday, Labour Together urged Sir Keir to make digital identity a 'top prime ministerial priority' and begin a 'fundamental transformation in the way British citizens interact with the government'.
It said the BritCard should initially be rolled out for right-to-rent and right-to-work checks. It estimated it would cost as little as £140 million to build, and between £5 million and £10 million per year to administer.
The app would automatically check a person's right to work against government records. The system would be able to cross-reference the stored identity against company tax records to identify firms with workers who had not undergone checks.
At present, employers and landlords are expected to check identity through one of 15 documents, many of which can be easily forged. A typical employer will have the Home Office check that they apply such checks once every 150 years.
The report cited polling showing that 80 per cent of the public supported the introduction of digital right-to-work credentials. Almost a third thought it would deter people from coming to the UK illegally to work.
Cabinet ministers believed to be interested in the plan are Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, and Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, who believes it could transform the way in which public services are delivered.
ID cards versus e-visas
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary – who was a minister when the last Labour government sought to introduce ID cards – is understood to be sceptical about a compulsory ID card for all adults but is a strong advocate of e-visas for anyone coming to the UK.
Some four million have so far been issued, enabling UK authorities to check when a migrant has entered the UK and when they should leave, thereby establishing if they should be removed.
'We want to ensure e-visas can effectively be used as a way of having that digital ID around the ability to work, to be here lawfully,' she told the home affairs select committee this week.
Labour Together said: 'Under the current system, enforcement for right to work and right to rent checks is looking for a needle in a haystack of 2 million employers and 2.8 million landlords. BritCard would shrink this haystack.
'It would support better enforcement of migration rules, making it harder for rogue landlords and employers, and those who don't have the right to be here.
'For vulnerable British citizens, it would provide a quick and easy solution to avoid being wrongly denied their rights, and a repeat of scandals like Windrush.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Forget paying France to stop migrants – spend it destroying UK black market that lures them here
Migrant millions wasted on French IN THE last ten years this country has handed the thick end of £1billion to France to stop the boats. What has it achieved? 1 Since 2018, more than 150,000 people have made the perilous Channel crossing as French cops watched them go. This year alone nearly 15,000 have come across in small boats, a 42 per cent increase on the same time last year. In any other business, investing £800million for such a disastrous return would be seen as a catastrophic failure on all sides. But the shameless French don't care when it comes to our taxpayer cash. Despite their flop they are now demanding even more money to intercept boats in shallow water. What a disgraceful cheek. We have no guarantee French cops will approach the task with any more enthusiasm if we fill their pockets yet again. In fact their police union leader seems to despise migrants so much that he appears happy to see the back of them. Since removing the Rwanda deterrent, Sir Keir Starmer's attempts to stop the boats or the gangs have floundered. But rather than gifting hundreds of millions more to the French, the PM would do better to look in our own backyard. Fury as hotel firm housing asylum seekers in 'all-inclusive resorts' paid £700M a year of YOUR money Spend the money destroying the booming black market that is such a magnet for migrants in the first place. Without the lure of illegal cash-in-hand jobs thousands would never risk the treacherous crossing in the first place. Boom & boast RACHEL REEVES will this week boast of an £86billion investment in Britain's fastest growing sectors. The Chancellor's Spending Review bonanza will focus on tech, sciences and defence. If it boosts business and creates jobs it is well worth shouting about. With growth as slow as a snail carrying a sandbag the economy needs help. But this cash has to come from somewhere. Spend, spend, spend is all very well. As long as it isn't followed in October by tax, tax, tax. Sprout of order Wouldn't it have been nice for someone else to have paid the bills. Which is exactly what happened to Lib Dem MP Sarah Gibson when she got the taxpayer to pay for her £154 festive party. She should be deeply ashamed for claiming it on her Commons expenses when millions are feeling the pinch.


The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
Small sport stirs up controversy in Spain as Basque Country makes its international debut
A small sport popular in Spain's northern Basque Country has stirred up a political controversy that triggered court action and fanned the region's long-held feelings of nationalism. There has been back-and-forth spats between sports officials and politicians after the Basque Country region was allowed to compete as a nation in international competitions in pelota vasca, a sport that was in the Olympics more than 100 years ago but is now rarely seen in most parts of the world. Even sport's highest court was asked to get involved. The dispute culminated this weekend in what many had thought was an impossible scenario: The Basque Country and Spain playing against each other in an international sporting event — the pelota vasca Nations League. The Basque Country, also known as Euskadi, maintains a strong cultural identity and traditions in a region once scarred by violence. The Basque separatist movement began in the late 1950s and was led by the now-defunct militant group ETA. In 2011, the group declared a 'definitive end' to an armed conflict that killed nearly 900 people, and it officially disbanded in 2018. What is pelota vasca and who won? Pelota vasca, also known as Basque pelota, is played on a court with players using their hands and different types of rackets to hit the ball against a high wall. Depending on which version of the sport is being played, there are different court measurements — all of them with a high front wall and most with another high side wall. The biggest court is 54 meters long (177 feet long). In the Basque Country region, it's considered by many as a national sport. There were jeers when the Spanish national anthem played at the awards ceremony in the Basque Country location of Gernika-Lumo. The Basque Country won the men's final on Friday night, while Spain took the victory in the women's decider. Legal fight The sport's Spanish federation had strongly opposed the recognition of the Basque team, citing alleged illegalities in the recognition process by the international body. It denounced 'pressure, threats and coercion' against Basque players who had chosen to play for Spain. Spain eventually went to the Court of Arbitration for Sports and asked for a ruling on the legality of the changes made in the bylaws of the international federation to allow the Basque team to be recognized. The Spanish federation said it was not allowed to vote in the general assembly in late December. The CAS decision is still pending. 'It's essential to emphasize that this is not an issue against the Basque Country, but rather a matter of legality,' the Spanish federation said in one of its many statements. The Spanish federation at one point complained of a lack of government support and was especially upset when the nation's top sports official, José Manuel Rodríguez Uribes, said that pelota vasca shouldn't be considered a Spanish sport in the sense that it is not played throughout the nation. The Spanish federation said the sport has an 'unquestionable national presence' with more than 10,000 athletes in the country. 'Exciting step' Politicians in the Basque Country had deemed the recognition by the international federation as historic. They had been working on making that possible for several years but lacked legal backing within local laws and statutes. 'It was unimaginable not too long ago to see these athletes wearing the Basque Country jersey in an international competition,' said Aitor Esteban, president of the Basque Nationalist Party. 'I think it's an important and exciting step. It's another step toward national recognition as a country. This international presence gives us visibility.' The Spanish federation said the Nations League can't be considered an official competition because the international federation did not meet the requirements needed to be able to host the event on Spanish soil, which included proper approval by Spanish officials. The Spanish federation said it only participated in the event out of consideration for its athletes who wanted to play and were afraid that the competition could eventually serve as a qualifier for next year's world championships in Argentina, as indicated by the international body. The Spanish federation insisted it can't be considered an official competition. The Basque federation of pelota vasca praised the fact that its national team became a 'reality.' 'We were born to grow and promote pelota vasca. It is part of our culture, of our identity and of our people," it said. 'We look to the future with hope, the future is ours.' In addition to Spain and the Basque Country, the other participants in the Nations League were the United States, France, Mexico and the Philippines. Pelota vasca was an official Olympic sport at the 1900 Paris Games and has been a demonstration sport several times since then, most recently in Barcelona in 1992. Variations of pelota vasca include jai alai, which in the United States is mostly played in Florida. Other countries where the sport is seen include France, Argentina, Mexico and Cuba.


The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Britain is ALREADY at war with Russia and ‘we are in pretty big trouble' admits defence expert in bombshell warning
RUSSIA is already at war with Britain, an author of the Government's defence review has warned. Fiona Hill, who was the White House's chief Russia adviser during Donald Trump 's first term, delivered the stark warning of the threat posed by Vladimir Putin. 4 4 4 She said: 'We are in pretty big trouble. "Russia has hardened as an adversary in ways that we probably hadn't anticipated.' Ms Hill said Moscow has been ' menacing the UK in various different ways ' for years, including poisonings and assassinations on British soil, carrying out cyber attacks and cutting sea cables. In her grim alert, the Kremlin expert said: 'Russia is at war with us.' And she warned that Britain can no longer rely on US military might to protect itself from enemy states. Ms Hill co-wrote the Strategic Defence Review, which warned the UK is facing its biggest threats since the Cold War — and set out plans to urgently build more bombs and guns to arm ourselves. Her comments came as Russian missiles blitzed Kharkiv, killing three people and injuring at least 22, including a six-week-old baby and a 14-year-old girl. The eastern Ukrainian city was struck by 48 drones, two missiles and five glider bombs as part of a huge, countrywide bombardment by Putin in retaliation for last week's Spider Web attack on his nuclear bombers. PM Sir Keir Starmer used an article in last week's Sun on Sunday to deliver his starkest warning yet of the danger of war. Putting the nation on a war footing, he said Britain must prepare to 'sight and win' against our enemies. New footage of Op Spiderweb shows drone blitzing Putin's burning aircraft 4