
US labor unions fight to contain AI disruption
By Thomas Urbain
New York: As
artificial intelligence
threatens to upend entire sectors of the economy, American labor unions are scrambling to protect workers, demand corporate transparency, and rally political support-an uphill battle in a rapidly changing world.
"As laborers, the ability to withhold our labor is one of our only tools to improve our lives," explained Aaron Novik, a key organizer with Amazon's ALU union.
"What happens when that disappears (to AI)? It's a real existential issue," he added.
Automation has already transformed most industries since the 1960s, typically reducing workforce numbers in the process.
But the emergence of advanced "physical AI" promises a new generation of intelligent robots that won't be limited to repetitive tasks -- potentially displacing far more blue-collar workers than ever before.
The threat extends beyond manufacturing.
The CEO of Anthropic, which created Claude as a competitor to ChatGPT, warned last week that generative AI could eliminate half of all low-skilled white-collar jobs, potentially driving unemployment rates up to 10-20 percent.
"The potential displacement of workers and elimination of jobs is a significant concern not just for our members, but for the public in general," said Peter Finn of the
International
Brotherhood of Teamsters, America's largest union.
Vetoes
The Teamsters have focused their efforts on passing legislation limiting the spread of automation, but face significant political obstacles.
California's governor has twice vetoed bills that would ban autonomous trucks from public roads, despite intense lobbying from the state's hundreds of thousands of union members.
Colorado's governor followed suit last week, and similar battles are playing out in Indiana, Maryland, and other states.
At the federal level, the landscape shifted dramatically with the change in the White House.
Under former president Joe Biden, the Department of Labor issued guidelines encouraging companies to be transparent about AI use, involve workers in strategic decisions, and support employees whose jobs face elimination.
But US President Donald Trump canceled the protections within hours of taking office in January.
"Now it's clear. They want to fully open up AI without the safeguards that are necessary to ensure
workers' rights
and protections at work," said HeeWon Brindle-Khym of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union (RWDSU), which represents workers in the retail sector.
Rush to AI
Meanwhile, companies are racing to implement AI technologies, often with poor results.
"By fear of missing out on innovations, there's been a real push (to release AI products)," observed Dan Reynolds of the Communications Workers of America (CWA).
The CWA has taken a proactive approach, publishing a comprehensive guide for members that urges negotiators to include AI provisions in all collective bargaining agreements.
The union is also developing educational toolkits to help workers understand and negotiate around AI implementation.
A handful of unions have successfully negotiated AI protections into their contracts.
Notable examples include agreements with media company Ziff Davis (which owns Mashable) and video game publisher ZeniMax Studios, a Microsoft subsidiary.
The most significant victories belong to two powerful unions: the International Longshoremen's Association, representing dock workers, secured a moratorium on full automation of certain port operations, while the Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) won guarantees that actors must be consulted and compensated whenever their AI likeness is created.
These successes remain exceptional, however.
The American labor movement, as a whole, lacks the bargaining power enjoyed by those highly strategic or publicly visible sectors, said Brindle-Khym.
"Smaller contract-by-contract improvements are a long, slow process," she added.
Despite frequent accusations by corporate interests, the unions' goal isn't to halt technological progress entirely.
"Workers are usually not seeking to stop the march of technology," noted Virginia Doellgast, a Cornell University professor specializing in labor relations.
"They just want to have some control."
As AI continues its rapid advance, the question remains whether unions can adapt quickly enough to protect workers in an economy increasingly dominated by artificial intelligence.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Why Pakistan's Taliban Sanctions Panel Role At UNSC Is No Victory, Here's The Fine Print
Last Updated: While Pakistan will chair the UNSC Taliban Sanctions Committee, it is no victory for Islamabad - due to its poor record on terrorism - as it received far less than what it wanted. While Pakistan is set to chair the Taliban Sanctions Committee of the UN Security Council in 2025, it failed to get what it wanted – to secure chairmanship of other UN Sanctions Committees – possibly due to its dismal record of keeping cross-border terrorism emanating from the country in check. Apart from chairing the UNSC Taliban Sanctions Committee, Pakistan will also be the vice-chair of the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the 15-nation UN body. According to a list of chairs of the subsidiary bodies of the UN Security Council, Denmark will chair the 1267 ISIL and Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee of the UN Security Council, while Russia and Sierra Leone will be vice-chairs for 2025. However, Pakistan has actually received far less than what it wanted, given the world's doubts on Islamabad's credibility. For the first time in the history of the UN Security Council, the Informal Working Group (IWG) on Sanctions will have two co-chairs. Pakistan will co-chair the documentation IWG with Denmark and the Sanctions IWG with Greece. What Did Pakistan Want? Pakistan had demanded the 1267 Sanctions Committee; 1540 (Non-Proliferation) Sanctions Committee; 1988 (Taliban) Committee and Chair of the 1373 Counter Terrorism Committee (CTC), but only got the Taliban Sanctions Committee, much less than what it had wanted. Pakistan is also co-chairing the 1373 CTC, which is not very substantial and is merely ceremonial in nature. India had chaired the 1373 CTC in 2011 and in the committees require consensus of members, so the current allocation is far below the expectations of Pakistani leadership. In reality, the allocation has dealt a heavy blow to Pakistan, as its allocation remains far below its expectations despite sending a delegation – led by Bilawal Bhutto – to the UN, possibly due to its poor track record on cross-border terrorism. Despite failing to curb terrorism on its soil, Pakistan showed an uncompromising and undeserving attitude that delayed a consensus from being formed by six months, which greatly annoyed other UNSC members. India's Diplomatic Outreach India, which co-chaired the Counter Terrorism Committee in 2022, has consistently reminded the international community that Pakistan is host to the world's largest number of UN-proscribed terrorists and entities, including notorious terrorist Osama bin Laden, who was found and eliminated by American forces in Pakistan in 2011. In a big blow to Pakistan, Russia and Guyana – both sharing cordial ties with India – are vice-chairs in the Taliban Sanctions Committee, which will prevent Pakistan from gaining a free hand. Pakistan is also co-chairing two IWGs with Denmark and Greece, who are also friends with India. This means that India can use its diplomatic might and close partnership with friends in the Council to prevent Pakistan from making any adverse steps. Notably, India had also chaired the same 1988 (Taliban) Sanctions Committee during its UNSC 2021-22 term along with the Chair of the 1970 Libya Sanctions Committee. First Published: June 07, 2025, 15:20 IST

Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Act on Terror, Target Jaish': US Lawmaker Brad Sherman Gives Earful to Pakistan, BIlawal Bhutto
In a powerful diplomatic moment, US Congressman Brad Sherman directly confronted a Pakistani delegation led by Bilawal Bhutto Zardari during their visit to Washington, DC. Sherman demanded action against the Pakistan-based terror group Jaish-e-Mohammed, which was responsible for the 2002 murder of American journalist Daniel Pearl. He also called on Pakistan to release Dr. Shakil Afridi, the doctor who helped the US locate Osama bin Laden. Additionally, Sherman urged Pakistan to ensure religious freedom for Hindus, Christians, and Ahmadiyya Muslims. This high-level meeting took place alongside the Indian parliamentary delegation visit, where Shashi Tharoor and others briefed US officials on Operation Sindoor and India's counter-terror strategy post the Pahalgam terror attack.#bradsherman #bilawalbhutto #jaishmohammed #freeshakilafridi #uspakrelations #minorityrights #kashmirdiplomacy #operationSindoor #shashitharoor #terrorismaccountability #toi #toibharat #bharat #breakingnews #indianews Read More


India.com
42 minutes ago
- India.com
As row with Donald Trump gets bitter, Elon Musk makes startling claim, says he might..., could challenge Trump's...
(Image: X) New Delhi: The whole world is watching the ongoing dispute between US President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. Both are constantly attacking each other. Tesla chief Elon Musk has made several tweets on the social media platform X about a new political party, after which it is believed that he can form a new party. He has named it 'The America Party' in his post. However, Musk has not said that he will form a new party. But he has made many such posts, which are fueling these speculations. The timing of such an announcement is also very special. Actually, Elon Musk attacked his own old political partner and US President Donald Trump. This social media war has given a new turn to American politics, which can play a decisive role in the upcoming elections. Elon Musk had conducted a poll on X and asked whether a new political party is needed in America? Musk says that in this poll 80% of the users answered 'yes'. Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 Talking about the poll, Musk wrote, 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree This is fate.' The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree 😂 This is fate. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 6, 2025 The relationship between Elon Musk and Donald Trump was very close at one time. Musk participated in Trump's cabinet meetings while he was President, he was even seen standing behind him in Trump's inauguration ceremony. He also became the head of the DOGE department. Musk campaigned for Trump by traveling around. But now this friendship has turned hostile. Musk has even said that if he had not supported Trump, he would have lost the election. At the same time, Donald Trump has threatened that he will end Musk's subsidy and government contract.