Once-homeless student wins Volusia schools' version of 'Shark Tank' with food-prep concept
DELAND – Healthy, fresh prepped foods for SNAP recipients. Nickel-free jewelry for people with sensitive skin. Kits of items newly independent college students don't yet know they need.
Aspiring entrepreneurs from three Volusia County high schools dropped these and other ideas for businesses onto panels of judges with business backgrounds in a "Shark Tank"-like competition Thursday, with at least one – first-place winner Geo Hoffmann, a senior at Spruce Creek High School – qualifying for a similar regional event in Miami next month with the potential to move on to a national pitch competition.
Students at Spruce Creek, Mainland and DeLand high schools are in a course aligned with standards established by the Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship. Each school had its own competition and 17 made it to the district-wide event at Stetson Baptist Church in DeLand.
"This is taught in our high schools to give that entrepreneurial mindset to students," said Vince Roeshink, the career-technical education specialist at Volusia County Schools, "so that they can try to learn how to start a business, what it takes to do that from startup to operating costs, the finance portions of it and there's a pitch deck that has to cover a variety of items."
Working through the competition gives students skills – not the least of which is public speaking and networking.
School Board member Krista Goodrich, who has started several businesses herself, attended the event and said it's "wildly important" to provide entrepreneurial skill-building in high school.
"I think if they start formulating those ideas now, and start learning about the entire process of starting a business, it will give them quite a few steps ahead of kids that aren't learning that," said Goodrich, who was 23 when she started building her first business.
"I had no background of how to get a business license, how to start a business, how to get funding. Would I take a loan? Would I do (venture capital) money? How did all of that work?" she said. "We weren't taught this when I was in school. ... I was the first entrepreneur of my friend group."
Hoffmann pitched PREP – Prepare Recipies, Expand Possibilities – a meal-prep service aimed at low-income families who rely upon government assistance programs, including SNAP, and can struggle to find fresh, healthy food both because of cost and the phenomenon of food deserts, neighborhoods without grocery stores.
A New York native, Hoffmann knows of which he speaks. He said his family has struggled the point of being homeless at times. And his idea also stems from his job at Perrine's Produce in Port Orange.
"We ship off meal-prep to families who can't really afford the super-expensive stuff," Hoffmann said. "It would be around $8.50 per meal, so super cost-affordable.
"Pretty much the main goal is making sure everybody can afford healthy, nutritious meals," he said.
Before learning he had won, Hoffmann said he was most proud of being cool while giving his presentation in front of a bigger audience than a high school classroom.
"I wasn't really worried about what anybody else was presenting. I was just worried about me, doing my own thing," he said. "And I'm happy with what I've done today."
Hoffmann intends to enroll at Daytona State College and become a certified public accountant, while minoring in firefighting.
Asked about having an entrepreneurial mind, he offered a simple response: "I like solving problems."
Hoffmann said he's learned the best way to build a business is by networking.
"The biggest lesson that you can learn is how to talk to people," he said.
Even after presenting, Payton Bonino, a Spruce Creek junior, admitted she felt "so scared, so nervous."
Regardless, judges found her concept of affordable hypoallergenic jewelry to be worthy of second place. It wasn't her first idea, she said.
She started, vaguely, with wanting to do something with jewelry. She wanted to do something to customize accessories with "detachable pendants," but a recent episode at school got her thinking differently.
"I have a severe nickel allergy. I have scars on my finger and on the back of my neck from wearing jewelry that was not nickel-free," she said. "And I literally got sent home from lunch the other day because I wore a necklace that was not nickel-free, and 15 minutes later, I had rashes forming."
So she came up with a company she called Bella.
"I started realizing there was a much bigger problem that I could address other than just customization," Bonino said. "And I could address a much more toxic point in the jewelry industry, which was the hypoallergenic, where either you have to choose between comfort and spending hundreds of dollars in jewelry."
Third-place finisher Payton Garner, a senior at Mainland High School and founder of the EssentialCube, said the transition from high school to college "can be very overwhelming and time consuming," particularly the part about moving into a dorm.
"The EssentialCube is a cost effective and family-focused tote that comes with all the essentials that you don't know you need yet," Garner said during one of her pitches. "It also allows for being a dependent upon your parents to becoming independent."
She presented the EssentialCube as a curated selection of items for students moving into dorms, including a power strip, a mini tool kit, ice tray, sponge, collapsible laundry basket and other items.
One of the judges, Brad Harris, business manager for the Volusia County Division of Economic Development, was taken with Garner's idea.
"In this case, I had a personal experience where a family member bought me kind of the essentials for college," he said. "I could relate to that."
Harris said the best pitches are a combination of research and personal testimony that solve a real problem.
"In my mind, whenever I hear a creative idea like you heard today, I start thinking of opportunities to expand and grow," he said, "and I saw potential in (Garner's pitch) to grow far beyond what I think she's envisioning right now."
This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Volusia students pitch business ideas in 'Shark Tank'-like competition
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
How SNAP Benefits Are Impacted by Trump's Tax Bill: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. House Republicans have advanced a sweeping tax and spending bill backed by President Donald Trump that makes significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps. The bill—the One Big Beautiful Act—passed the House by a narrow 215–214 vote and is now headed to the Senate, where revisions are expected. If enacted, the measures would mark a major shift in eligibility and administrative rules for the country's largest anti-hunger program. Why It Matters More than 40 million low-income Americans rely on SNAP to help pay for groceries each month. The changes proposed in the Trump-supported bill reflect broader Republican goals to tighten eligibility, reduce federal spending and increase work requirements for federal food assistance. While the legislation also aims to cut taxes and simplify rules for retirees and workers, critics warn the SNAP provisions could leave vulnerable recipients—especially childless adults and those without full-time work—at risk of losing access to essential food support. What to Know The bill includes the following SNAP-related provisions: Increased state financial responsibility : States would be required to contribute more funds to support SNAP, shifting part of the cost burden from the federal government to state budgets. : States would be required to contribute more funds to support SNAP, shifting part of the cost burden from the federal government to state budgets. Expanded work requirements : The bill would require more SNAP recipients to work in order to maintain eligibility. Specifically, it increases the age cap at which work requirements end from 54 to 64 years old. Able-bodied adults without dependents would be subject to these rules unless they meet other exemptions. Only parents with children under age 7 would be exempt from the work requirements, a significant change from the current exemption for parents with children under 18. : The bill would require more SNAP recipients to work in order to maintain eligibility. Specifically, it increases the age cap at which work requirements end from 54 to 64 years old. Able-bodied adults without dependents would be subject to these rules unless they meet other exemptions. Only parents with children under age 7 would be exempt from the work requirements, a significant change from the current exemption for parents with children under 18. Reduced state exemptions : The legislation limits states' ability to exempt individuals from federal SNAP work requirements. : The legislation limits states' ability to exempt individuals from federal SNAP work requirements. No changes to benefit amounts or maximum eligibility thresholds were specified in the bill, but administrative changes could affect how and when recipients qualify. These SNAP reforms are intended to partially offset revenue losses from the bill's expanded tax deductions, including higher standard deductions for older Americans and the elimination of taxes on overtime and tips. Stock image/file photo: Man shopping for groceries in a store. Stock image/file photo: Man shopping for groceries in a store. GETTY Policy and poverty experts have said the bill could be devastating for SNAP recipients. The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank, said the passage of the bill would constitute "by far the largest cut to SNAP in history"—with some 7 million recipients possibly seeing reduction or total loss of their benefits. The Congressional Budget Office has said that while it will reduce federal spending on SNAP to $76.6 billion in 2034, down from a baseline projection of $115.8 billion, recipients would see an average reduction of SNAP benefits of $15 dollars per month by 2034 for every single SNAP participant What People Are Saying President Trump has not commented directly on the SNAP provisions, but he framed the broader legislation as a necessary reset. "It's time for our friends in the United States Senate to get to work, and send this Bill to my desk AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!" he wrote on Truth Social. Democrats have been outspoken in their criticism. Those on the House Agriculture Committee said the bill is "irresponsible" and poses an "immense threat" to "food assistance for vulnerable seniors, children, working families, veterans, and Americans with disabilities." Jennifer Greenfield, associate professor at University of Denver who specializes in the intersection of health and wealth disparities, told Newsweek: "The proposed federal "savings" are not savings at all—it's a shift of the costs to our already cash-strapped states and families. The net result will be to increase hunger and financial instability among households with children, older adults, people with disabilities, and veterans—while also sending tens of thousands of people into unemployment." What's Next The Senate is expected to negotiate revisions to several parts of the legislation, including the SNAP work requirement provisions, before any final vote. If changes are made, the bill will return to the House for another vote.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicare & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
President Donald Trump's 'one big beautiful bill' has passed in the House and is now awaiting Senate approval. If passed, Trump's signature bill would extend the tax cuts granted by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and add additional tax cuts. While this might be welcome news to many, the bill also includes changes to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that could threaten seniors' access to these programs. Find Out: Read Next: 'The 'one big beautiful bill' passed by the House of Representatives, if it were passed into law today, would cut Medicaid and SNAP by a combined $1 trillion,' said Chris Orestis, president of Retirement Genius. 'In addition, because of the increase to federal debt of as much as $5 trillion, the bill would trigger an automatic reduction in Medicare funding of $500 billion,' he continued. 'This would represent the largest cut to social services and health insurance for the poor, disabled, children and the elderly in U.S. history.' Here's a look at the changes retirees can make now to secure care and avoid benefit disruptions if the bill were to pass. Before changes go into effect, check with your healthcare providers to ensure there won't be any interruption to your care if there are cuts to Medicaid. 'Check with your healthcare provider to see if they might cut back on services or cease accepting Medicaid-funded patients, and contact any nursing home where you or a loved one may reside to find out if they will be reducing the number of patients they can support — or even [if they are] possibly planning to close,' Orestis said. Knowing this ahead of time will allow you to find alternative care providers before it's too late. Learn More: If you are reliant on SNAP, start searching for alternatives that may be able to provide food assistance in the event your benefits are reduced or cut. 'Make sure you know where there are local support services through community or faith-based organizations to replace lost access through SNAP,' Orestis said. Many retirees plan to 'spend down' their savings so that they qualify for Medicaid to pay for their long-term care. However, this may no longer be a viable option. 'If you are considering going onto Medicaid for long-term care and are preparing to engage the 'spend down' process to impoverish yourself and get below the poverty level to qualify, you may want to reconsider that strategy, and instead look to leverage private pay resources to pay for your care,' Orestis said. 'If you are on Medicaid, you will primarily be reliant on nursing homes for your care, and their ability to withstand these cuts will be very challenging and up in the air,' he continued. 'If you are private pay, you are in control and can decide where and when you will receive care, such as at home or an assisted living community not funded by Medicaid.' Strategies to stay private pay for long-term care would include long-term care insurance, annuities, a life insurance settlement, a reverse mortgage or VA benefits. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement This article originally appeared on Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Slash Medicare & SNAP: 3 Moves Retirees Should Make Now
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary blasts the 4-day week as the ‘stupidest idea' because the digital economy means we're always working
Millionaire judge Kevin O'Leary isn't a fan of the shift to a four-day workweek, laughing off the idea in a recent Fox News appearance. Instead, he said in today's modern workplace, everything is project-based, and tasks need to be completed by their deadline: 'There's no such thing as a workweek anymore.' If you have dreams of never working Fridays again, you may want to lower your expectations—at least if you work for Mr. Wonderful. Shark Tank star Kevin O'Leary, who's known for his blunt communication style, was asked about a growing trend among workers for a four-day workweek. It's something that France, in particular, is exploring, on top of already capping work at 35 hours. 'That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard,' O'Leary told Fox News. 'I think we should let the French go to a two-day workweek and then kick their ass internationally.' At the same time, the 70-year-old acknowledged that the traditional 9-to-5, five days a week work schedule is not what it used to be. In fact, with 40% of his staff working remotely around the world, he admitted he doesn't care when his staff does their work—as long as it gets done on time. 'There's no such thing as a workweek anymore anyway on a digital economy, post-pandemic,' he added. Fortune reached out to O'Leary for comment. For workers, a four-day workweek is more than just about having a longer weekend; it's about providing extra flexibility and work–life balance, while also minimizing burnout. In fact, some 77% of workers say a four-day workweek, even if it still means working 40 hours, would have a favorable impact on their wellbeing, according to a survey by Gallup. At Exos, a performance coaching company with over 3,500 employees, a four-day workweek was implemented, and the results were largely positive. Teams were allowed to take one day as a 'You Do You' day, and productivity increased by some 24%. Burnout was cut in half. Other business leaders have started paying attention, too. About 30% of CEOs are now considering new organization-wide work schedule shifts, like a four or four-and-a-half-workweek, according to a KPMG survey of 100 CEOs of U.S. companies with over $500 million in revenue. Earlier this year, the Tokyo Metropolitan government began allowing its employees to work only four days a week in an attempt to help alleviate its growing population crisis and allow parents to better balance childcare and work. The governor of Tokyo, H.E. Yuriko Koike, told Fortune at the Most Powerful Women International summit in Riyadh that a four-day work is key to building a modern workplace. 'We must build a society where everyone can balance work and family life, and one step forward is the four-day workweek,' she said. 'Flexible systems like this allow both women and men to choose a work style that reflects their circumstances.' O'Leary isn't the only shark eager to share his opinions on hot-button topics affecting the workplace. Daymond John recently posted to TikTok to express his thoughts on a growing trend of 'loud quitting.' 'You see a bunch of people loud quitting, you better pay attention to what's going on with your staff and your team, because you awoke so much emotion that these people have collectively started saying 'I don't care what happens to me, [and] out publicly, this place sucks,'' John said, adding that he thinks 'that's absolutely amazing.' For workers simply looking for a raise, self-made millionaire Barbara Corcoran shared her thoughts earlier this year. 'You want to prepare for the meeting by making a list of everything you are hired for and then everything you are actually doing right now and share that with your boss,' Corcoran said in an Instagram post. 'Don't go in there and say you want a raise,' she added. 'Say you want a 10% raise and you're in a much better negotiation position to maybe get 8%. Name the number.' This story was originally featured on