Embarrassing moment ESPN mis-identify new NBA superstar Cooper Flagg on live TV
The hype around Cooper Flagg on NBA Draft night led to an unfortunate mistake by the director of ESPN's pre-draft coverage - who jumped the gun on a graphic.
Coming out of a commercial break for their flagship show SportsCenter, the voice of an anchor said, 'Welcome back to SportsCenter, you're looking at Cooper Flagg and in just over an hour from now...'
The anchor's voice then trailed off. Because as the camera panned up, the player staring directly into the lens was not the star Duke freshman.
Instead, standing there with an open jacket and staring directly into the lens was Rutgers forward Ace Bailey.
A flustered anchor said, 'That is not Cooper Flagg at all, actually. That is quite famously Ace Bailey.'
When the booth switched to a second player to pan up, the anchor tried guessing once again that Flagg would be on the other side of the camera.
That is most certainly not Cooper Flagg. pic.twitter.com/zGUP0WChko
— Awful Announcing (@awfulannouncing) June 25, 2025
But instead, she was once again incorrect as the broadcast showed Bailey's Rutgers teammate, Dylan Harper.
It's an unfortunate job from those in the control booth on a night where all three players were projected to be picked in the first selections of the draft.
Flagg had long been tipped to be the first overall pick and the Dallas Mavericks did not mess that selection up.
Nor did the San Antonio Spurs at pick No. 2, as they selected Harper.
As for Bailey, his night did not go according to plan - falling out of the top-3 after failing to meet with a single NBA team.
The 76ers, who had the third overall selection, decided to pick Baylor's VJ Edgecombe instead.
Eventually, Bailey was selected fifth overall by the Utah Jazz.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
‘I would literally rip his heart out' – Jake Paul claims he could beat Canelo Alvarez even in a STREET FIGHT
JAKE PAUL claims he would beat Canelo Alvarez in the ring or STREETS and warned: "I would literally rip his heart out." The YouTuber-turned-boxer and Mexican legend were close to agreeing a shock May 3 bout in Las Vegas - until Canelo walked away. 4 4 Canelo recently told TalkTV's Piers Morgan that Paul's life was SAVED after the collapse of their mega-bout. But 11-1 Paul hit back: "My response is he's 5'8. Like, I'll see that guy anywhere and end his life for real. He doesn't want the smoke. "I'll beat him in boxing but at the end of the day, if it was just man on man in the street, I would literally rip his heart out." Canelo, 34, instead signed a four-bout deal with Saudi Arabia's Turki Alalshikh and regained his undisputed throne by beating William Scull, 32, in May. Now he takes all four super-middleweight world titles into his September 13 blockbuster against Terence Crawford, 37, in Vegas. So Paul, 28, instead returns on Saturday against former middleweight world champ Julio Cesar Chavez Jr, 39, in California on DAZN PPV. But he still wants to settle the score with Canelo in the ring - audaciously planning to do so for a cruiserweight belt. Paul said: "I think it has to happen at some point. Jake Paul vs Julio Cesar Chavez Jr JAKE PAUL'S controversial boxing career rolls on this weekend with the Problem Child facing boxing royalty in Anaheim, California. Paul will face Julio Cesar Chavez Jr, a highly-decorated former world middleweight champion. The Mexican, 39, has fought just once in the last four years but has the best boxing resume of any fighter to step into a ring with Paul - bar Mike Tyson, who was aged 58 at the time they fought. INFO Everything you need to know about Paul vs Chavez Jr LATEST NEWS & FEATURES Jake Paul buys incredible £29MILLION ranch with 5,700 acres Jake Paul in talks over TWO shock world title fights Chavez Jr is son of boxing great who was arrested on gun charges and robbed by party girls Jake Paul heavyweight days over after getting 'too fat' 4 "And especially get through this fight, get ranked, go for the world championship, have the cruiserweight belt and then me and Canelo can fight for the cruiserweight world championship." Paul's only defeat came against Tommy Fury, 26, in Saudi Arabia - losing a split-decision. But he has since bounced back with five wins - most recently against Mike Tyson who controversially came out of retirement in November aged 58. Paul is in line for a surprise ranking with the WBC and WBA by beating Chavez - who is not currently rated within the governing bodies. Paul said: "To become world champion I need to be ranked. That's what this fight is all about beating Chavez in a great fashion. "We'll see where the WBA and WBC rank me and then hopefully I'll be able to go for a world title." 4
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The biggest Club World Cup question is still unanswered – does anyone care?
There is the £1bn broadcasting deal, the £97m prize for the winners, the guarantee of a minimum of over £30m in revenue for the Premier League participants. There is the possibility of the kind of windfall that could bring domestic dominance for a club from outside Europe. There is the potential reward of cracking America, as everyone looks to build their brand. In a sense, though, the Club World Cup depends upon a different kind of investment. Whatever the big financial figures, it needs buy-in: not from Fifa 's partners but from the part of the footballing family who are rarely consulted, the fans. The Club World Cup is in a battle for hearts and minds and eyeballs. It is a matter if – and it is too early to draw definitive conclusions – people buy into it; if they invest their time, their hopes and their emotions. It is perhaps easiest to assess the match-going public. The empty seats suggest Fifa misjudged the equation of supply and demand, selecting some venues that were too big and making tickets too expensive. It is partly about the American fans, partly an issue of how many clubs have brought a sizeable travelling support, and the evidence is mixed. But there is a broader test, conducted not in Atlanta or Seattle but in armchairs and sofas. How many are tuning in and how often? Because there are audiences Fifa will be chasing, hoping the interest they display in established competitions is transferred to a new – or expanded, or reinvented – one. There is the summer tournament audience, those who, if they can, would try to watch every game of a World Cup or European Championship; will they assume the same approach with a Club World Cup? There are those who, in the group stages and last 16, would not go that far, but would tune in for the main game of the day. Are they carving out a couple of hours every night for the Club World Cup? Then there is the Champions League precedent. With multiple matches on at the same time, no one sees everything. But there are plenty who will watch something on every match night, and then, when the fixtures are fewer, will not miss anything at the business end of the tournament. The Club World Cup contains some of the same sides, the possibility of the same match-ups. Would those who, with no allegiance to any of the sides, automatically watch a Champions League semi-final between, say, Juventus and Bayern Munich or Real Madrid and Paris Saint-Germain, adopt the same attitude? Or, to use a parallel from 2022, will the neutrals who came to cheer on Morocco in their surprise surge to the semi-finals of the World Cup do likewise if Botafogo or Palmeiras, Flamengo or Fluminense charge into the last four now? Or will they simply sit this one out? It is a question of if the Club World Cup becomes appointment viewing; if millions, across the footballing world and separately, resolve to make a date in their diaries. And if the answers will be different, with the early indications that South America has bought into the Club World Cup more than Europe, there are a host of factors. They include time and weather: for the European audience, the late kick-offs are off-putting; for everyone, the risk of 100-degree heat can diminish the spectacle of the earlier ones. They can relate specifically to the United States, but there are wider issues. There is the crisis of legitimacy with the Infantino algorithm for qualification, whereby Lionel Messi's Inter Miami were crowbarred into the tournament, and, seemingly, there were attempts to find Cristiano Ronaldo a club for a month. Separately, there is the Ceferin criteria that means that, somehow, Red Bull Salzburg are in a tournament that does not feature the reigning champions of England, Italy or Spain, or two of the Champions League semi-finalists. There is the ennui and exhaustion felt by players and public alike; many footballers' comments last year were hints they knew their workload was unsustainable, but presumably they have been silenced by executives who want the profits from the competition. Yet the sense of overkill has been apparent among many a football fan. While there were legitimate reasons to want a Club World Cup, this competition has been imposed on everyone without consultation or consideration, and that can alienate some potential viewers. Fifa's hype and hyperbole, pronouncing everything they do a glorious success, is propaganda rather than analysis – perhaps some are voting with their remote controls by turning off. There is the football itself. Some games have been like pre-season friendlies, with heavily rotated teams that bear no resemblance to the clubs' strongest sides, with managers taking the understandable view that their season has almost 12 months left to run. Which, in itself, is an admission that it ends with the Champions League final and the World Cup. A danger for this Club World Cup is that European fans can zone out of summer games in the United States, unless they are in an actual World Cup, anyway. There are annual matches, some in tournaments with grandiose names – the International Champions Cup or the World Football Challenge – that carry absolutely no prestige. If the Club World Cup can redress a global imbalance – the dominance of the five major European leagues – it probably can't do so without sufficient engagement from this side of the Atlantic, and not merely because some of the most lucrative television markets are here. It is too easy, too simplistic, to dismiss all the scepticism as Anglocentric, a 21st-century version of the Little Englander syndrome that led this country to skip the first three World Cups, when the Champions League can feel the ultimate in the club game on the mainland as well. It is scarcely conclusive proof, but in five days in a continental European city last week, there seemed no evidence of bars or restaurants showing the Club World Cup, or that it was even on. It is hard to imagine a similar indifference to football in the summer of 2024 or 2026. There is ample proof that European football fans are prepared to commit to a summer tournament every two years, whether the World Cup or the European Championship, but not lesser tournaments. There are plenty of competing attractions in the summer sporting schedule – football does not always succeed when it attempts to park its tanks on their lawn. And, in this case, Fifa is also trying to overshadow the rest of the same sport, whether it's the women's European Championship, the men's Under-21 tournament or the Gold Cup. The game's governing body does not always capture the imagination with its competitions. Undoubtedly, some people cared about the Confederations Cup. Just not enough for Fifa and not enough to dominate the popular consciousness. Does the Club World Cup? It may be too soon to tell. Organic growth – as opposed to imposing a tournament and expecting it to be an instant hit – can take time. Anything new has not yet become a habit for many. But each of us among the intended audience faces a decision: how much value we attach to the Club World Cup. It has had shock scorelines, the unexpectedly early eliminations of Atletico Madrid and Porto, and the spirited progress of the Brazilian clubs. But plotlines are more enthralling, characters more compelling and the narrative only addictive if you are sufficiently invested in it. Some, undeniably, are. Others are not. For them, the Club World Cup has been the breaking point, something they are deliberately switching off. Some will be picking and choosing their games, or vaguely paying attention. Different people will provide different answers. But for the Club World Cup to genuinely prosper, it needs a critical mass who want it, want to watch it, and want to watch almost all of it.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Is Juventus vs Man City on TV? Kick-off time, channel and how to watch Club World Cup for free
The battle for top spot in Group G comes to a head in Orlando as Manchester City and Juventus go head-to-head in pursuit of an easier knockouts draw. Both European giants have already booked their respective places in the round of 16, convincingly beating Wydad AC and Al Ain to each boast a goal difference of eight after two games. Now comes the biggest test of the competition for both sides, with the prospect of avoiding likely Group H winners Real Madrid in the next round acting as a major motivation. Man City have a poor record against The Old Lady, having lost three of their previous four meetings against the Italian titans over the past 15 years. Here's everything you need to know. When and where is Juventus vs Man City? Juventus take on Manchester City at 3pm ET on Thursday 26 June which is at 8pm BST. The clash will take place at the Camping World Stadium in Orlando, Florida, previously home to XFL team Orlando Guardians. How to watch the Club World Cup DAZN will be broadcasting each match of the tournament live, including the final, for free in the UK. All users can watch a live stream on television and mobile devices, all they need to do is sign up for the company's DAZN Freemium service, with the option to watch ad-free coverage for £14.99. Users can watch DAZN from anywhere by using the DAZN App on TVs, smartphones and any device with a web browser. Club World Cup schedule GROUP STAGE Thursday 26 June Group G: Wydad AC vs. Al Ain, 3 p.m. ET, (8 p.m. BST) (Washington) Group G: Juventus vs. Manchester City, 3 p.m. ET, (8 p.m. BST) (Orlando) Group H: Al Hilal vs. Mexico Pachuca, 9 p.m. ET, (2 a.m. BST) (Nashville) Group H: FC Salzburg vs. Real Madrid, 9 p.m. ET, (2 a.m. BST) (Philadelphia) ROUND OF 16 Saturday 28 June Match 49: Palmeiras vs. Botafogo (Philadelphia) Match 50: Benfica vs. Chelsea (Charlotte) Sunday 29 June Match 51: PSG vs. Inter Miami (Atlanta) Match 52: Flamengo vs. Bayern Munich (Miami) Monday 30 June Match 53: Inter Milan vs. Fluminense (Charlotte) Match 54: Winners of Group G vs. Runners of Group H (Orlando) Tuesday 1 July Match 55: Borussia Dortmund vs. Monterrey (Atlanta) Match 56: Winners of Group H vs. Runners of Group G (Miami) QUARTER-FINALS Friday 4 July Match 57: Winners of Match 49 vs. Winners of Match 50 (Philadelphia) Match 58: Winners of Match 53 vs. Winners of Match 54 (Orlando) Saturday 5 July Match 59: Winners of Match 51 vs. Winners of Match 52 (Atlanta) Match 60: Winners of Match 55 vs. Winners of Match 56 (East Rutherford) SEMI-FINALS Tuesday 8 July Match 61: Winners of Match 57 vs. Winners of Match 58 (East Rutherford) Wednesday 9 July Match 62: Winners of Match 59 vs. Winners of Match 60 (East Rutherford) FINAL Sunday 13 July
