'War Plans'? What War Plans? Trump Press Secretary Tries To Clean Up Group Chat Mess
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt boldly denied there being any discussion of 'war plans' going on in a group chat between government officials which was accidentally infiltrated by journalist Jeffrey Goldberg earlier this month.
Though the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic plainly detailed how he ended up in the highly sensitive national security conversation in a bombshell exposé published Monday, Leavitt still tried her hardest to rewrite the situation in a post on X Tuesday morning.
After first claiming that Goldberg was 'well-known for his sensationalist spin,' she laid out a list of dubious 'facts' about the fiasco.
1. No 'war plans' were discussed.
2. No classified material was sent to the thread.
3. The White House Counsel's Office has provided guidance on a number of different platforms for President Trump's top officials to communicate as safely and efficiently as possible.
Leavitt went on to note that the White House is investigating how Goldberg's number was 'inadvertently added to the thread' and commended President Donald Trump for following through on the March 15 military offensive against Yemen's Houthi rebels which was discussed in emoji-peppered texts on the encrypted messaging app Signal.
'Terrorists were killed and that's what matters most to President Trump,' she concluded.
While Leavitt maintained that 'war plans' were not part of the conversation, Goldberg had a very different account of what went down in the chat, which included Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Vice President JD Vance and a list of other prominent White House officials.
According to Goldberg, the texts 'included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing.'
Hegseth used the same lines as Leavitt while addressing the ordeal on Monday after Goldberg's account was published.
'You're talking about a deceitful and highly discredited so-called journalist who's made a profession of peddling hoaxes time and time again,' he told the press while touching down in Hawaii.
'Nobody was texting war plans,' Hegseth went on. 'That's all I have to say about that.'
Mike Johnson Downplays Group Chat Leaks As 'Officials Doing Their Job,' Gets Torched On X
Atlantic Editor Slams Pete Hegseth's Defense Of War Plan Group Text: 'That's A Lie'
Pete Hegseth And Mike Waltz Ripped As 'Careless,' 'Incompetent' Amid Calls To Resign
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
What we know about Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear sites − and Iran's drone response
What we know about Israel's attacks on Iran's nuclear sites − and Iran's drone response Show Caption Hide Caption Israel launches attack on Iran Israel launched a military operation against Iran after the country failed to stop enriching uranium. Senior Iranian regime officials. Nuclear scientists. The uranium enrichment facility in Natanz and surface-to-air missile systems in Tehran − these were among the targets Israel struck June 13 as part of a wave of attacks on Iran. Now Iran has launched retaliatory drone strikes on Israel, according to Israel's military, hours after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had begun an operation aimed at rolling back Iran's "threat to Israel's very survival." The Israel Defense Forces said Iran launched more than 100 UAVs toward Israel and was working to intercept them. Iran has not confirmed its counter-attack, but it follows what Israel called a "preemptive strike" on Iran's nuclear program and other military targets, including senior officials such as Gen. Hossein Salami, the head of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Israel attacks Iran: See strike map, video, satellite images Netanyahu said Israel's offensive will last "as many days as it takes." Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei confirmed several of his nation's senior military commanders and nuclear scientists were killed in Israel's attacks, which struck parts of Iran's capital Tehran. Khamenei warned Israel had "prepared a bitter fate for itself." President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal "before there is nothing left," saying on his Truth Social platform that Israel had access to the U.S.'s "lethal military equipment." Here's what you need to know about Israel's attacks on Iran − and what might happen next. Why is Israel attacking Iran now? Iran's rulers have been pledging to destroy Israel ever since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Netanyahu has long argued that Iran can't be trusted and that Israel would eventually need to attack Iran's nuclear sites to prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon. Although Iran insists its nuclear program is for civilian energy purposes only, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations' nuclear watchdog, recently concluded that Iran was very close to reaching the 90% uranium enrichment level required to build a nuclear weapon. Iran has also for years militarily and financially supported regional militia groups, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, Houthi rebels in Yemen and Hamas in Gaza, that have pressured or attacked Israel on multiple fronts. They support Palestinians in Gaza: What do Yemen's Houthi rebels really want? Israel attacks Iran. Iran strikes back: What's the latest? The Israel Defense Forces said more than 200 fighter jets struck dozens of targets in Iran, including what it called the "hideouts" of senior operatives in Iran's military leadership. In addition to IRGC chief Salami, the attack killed Iran's highest-ranking military officer, Mohammad Bagheri, and Gholamali Rashid, its armed forces' deputy commander. Iranian state media said at least six people had been killed and 20 wounded. Iranian state TV images and footage showed apartment buildings and cars on fire in Tehran. The IDF said it successfully "damaged" an underground area of Iran's uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, a district in central Iran, that contained a "multi-story enrichment hall with centrifuges, electrical rooms and additional supporting infrastructure." The IAEA confirmed that at least one strike hit the Natanz nuclear site. The nuclear watchdog said in a statement that it has so far found "no elevated radiation levels" at the facility. Israeli media reported that Iran's drones were being intercepted over Jordan and elsewhere. There were no immediate reports of damage in Israel and, while schools and gatherings were cancelled and Israelis told to stay near bomb shelters, the country's Home Front Command lifted an order to seek shelter. Was the U.S. involved in Israel's Iran attack? What about diplomacy? In his statement announcing the attack, Netanyahu thanked Trump for "his leadership in confronting Iran's nuclear weapons program. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the attack in a statement. He also made it clear that American forces "are not involved in strikes against Iran." In fact, Trump told reporters at an event this week that he did not want Israel to strike Iran while a nuclear deal was still on the table. Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff had been scheduled to meet with Israeli officials before participating in a sixth round of nuclear talks with the Iranians in Oman over this weekend. Those talks now seem in doubt. "These developments eventually could prompt Iran to try to rush for a bomb," wrote Jonathan Panikoff, director of the Atlantic Council think tank's Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative, in a blog post. Trump will attend a National Security Council meeting later June 13. What has been the global reaction to Israel's strikes on Iran? Multiple Arab countries issued statements of condemnation. Saudi Arabia's foreign ministry described Israel's attack as "heinous" and said the international community bears "a great responsibility to halt this aggression." Oman, which has been hosting the nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran, said it was a "reckless" attack. In Europe, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, critical of Israel in recent weeks because of the war in Gaza, said Israel has a right to "defend its existence." Merz increased protections for Jewish institutions in Germany. Oil prices surged, fearing a potential supply disruption. Stock markets in Asia and Europe trade lower. Wall Street stock futures also traded lower ahead of the market open.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth says the Pentagon has contingency plans to invade Greenland if necessary
WASHINGTON (AP) — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth appeared to acknowledge that the Pentagon has developed plans to take over Greenland and Panama by force if necessary but refused to answer repeated questions at a hotly combative congressional hearing Thursday about his use of Signal chats to discuss military operations. Democratic members of the House Armed Services Committee repeatedly got into heated exchanges with Hegseth, with some of the toughest lines of questioning coming from military veterans as many demanded yes or no answers and he tried to avoid direct responses about his actions as Pentagon chief. In one back-and-forth, Hegseth did provide an eyebrow-raising answer. Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., asked whether the Pentagon has developed plans to take Greenland or Panama by force if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any contingency,' Hegseth said several times. It is not unusual for the Pentagon to draw up contingency plans for conflicts that have not arisen, but his handling of the questions prompted a Republican lawmaker to step in a few minutes later. 'It is not your testimony today that there are plans at the Pentagon for taking by force or invading Greenland, correct?' said Rep. Mike Turner, R-Ohio. As Hegseth started to repeat his answer about contingency plans, Turner added emphatically, 'I sure as hell hope that is not your testimony.' 'We look forward to working with Greenland to ensure that it is secured from any potential threats,' Hegseth responded. Time and again, lawmakers pressed Hegseth to answer questions he has avoided for months, including during the two previous days of hearings on Capitol Hill. And frustration boiled over. "You're an embarrassment to this country. You're unfit to lead," Rep. Salud Carbajal snapped, the California Democrat's voice rising. 'You should just get the hell out.' GOP lawmakers on several occasions apologized to Hegseth for the Democrats' sharp remarks, saying he should not be subject to such 'flagrant disrespect.' Hegseth said he was 'happy to take the arrows' to make tough calls and do what's best. Questions emerge on Signal chats and if details Hegseth shared were classified Hegseth's use of two Signal chats to discuss details of the U.S. plans to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen with other U.S. leaders as well as members of his family prompted dizzying exchanges with lawmakers. Hegseth was pressed multiple times over whether or not he shared classified information and if he should face accountability if he did. Hegseth argued that the classification markings of any information about those military operations could not be discussed with lawmakers. That became a quick trap, as Hegseth has asserted that nothing he posted — on strike times and munitions dropped in March — was classified. His questioner, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and Marine veteran, jumped on the disparity. 'You can very well disclose whether or not it was classified,' Moulton said. 'What's not classified is that it was an incredible, successful mission,' Hegseth responded. A Pentagon watchdog report on his Signal use is expected soon. Moulton asked Hegseth whether he would hold himself accountable if the inspector general finds that he placed classified information on Signal, a commercially available app. Hegseth would not directly say, only noting that he serves 'at the pleasure of the president.' He was asked if he would apologize to the mother of a pilot flying the strike mission for jeopardizing the operation and putting her son's life at risk. Hegseth said, 'I don't apologize for success.' Trump's speech at Fort Bragg raises Democratic concerns about politics in the military Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who appeared along Hegseth, was questioned about Trump's speech at Fort Bragg this week and whether the military was becoming politicized. The Defense Department has a doctrine that prohibits troops from participating in political activity while in uniform. Members of the 82nd Airborne Division were directed to stand behind Trump at Fort Bragg, and they booed and cheered during his incendiary remarks, including condemnation of his predecessor, Joe Biden. There also was a pop-up MAGA merchandise stand selling souvenirs to troops in uniform. Caine repeatedly said U.S. service members must be apolitical but that he was unaware of anything that happened at Fort Bragg. Hegseth is pressed about policies on women in uniform and transgender troops Hegseth got into a sharp debate about whether women and transgender service members should serve in the military or combat jobs. He said he has worked to remove diversity programs and political correctness from the military. He said he has not politicized the military but simply wants the most capable troops. Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., demanded to know if Hegseth believes that both men and women can pull a trigger, cause death, operate a drone or launch a missile. 'It depends on the context,' Hegseth said, adding that 'women carry equipment differently, a 155 round differently, a rucksack differently.' Hegseth, who has previously said women 'straight up' should not serve in combat, asserted that women have joined the military in record numbers under the Trump administration. He said the military 'standards should be high and equal.' He also was asked about three female service members — now being forced out as part of the Pentagon's move to ban transgender troops. Hegseth agreed that their accomplishments — which Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., read out — were to be celebrated, until he learned they were transgender. Republican lawmakers jumped to his defense, criticizing any Pentagon spending on gender transition surgery. Democrats ask about plans for action against Greenland and Panama President Donald Trump has said multiple times that he wants to take control of Greenland, a strategic, mineral-rich island and long a U.S. ally. Those remarks have been met with flat rejections from the leaders of Greenland, an autonomous territory that is part of Denmark. 'Greenland is not for sale,' Jacob Isbosethsen, Greenland's representative to the U.S, said Thursday at a forum in Washington sponsored by the Arctic Institute. In an effort not to show the Pentagon's hand on its routine effort to have plans for everything, Hegseth danced around the direct question from Smith, leading to the confusion. 'Speaking on behalf of the American people, I don't think the American people voted for President Trump because they were hoping we would invade Greenland,' Smith said. ___ AP writer David Klepper in Washington contributed to this report. Lolita C. Baldor And Tara Copp, The Associated Press
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Israel Strikes Iran's Nuclear Facilities in Preemptive Attack, Killing Top Military Figures
Israel launched a preemptive airstrike on Iran early Friday, targeting nuclear sites and senior figures in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
