logo
New JPL space mission seeks to unravel the mystery of cosmic 'inflation'

New JPL space mission seeks to unravel the mystery of cosmic 'inflation'

Yahoo01-03-2025

Before there was light, there was cosmic inflation.
Before life, planet Earth, the first galaxies — and even before the violent explosion of hot dense primordial stuff scientists traditionally have thought of as the Big Bang — our universe was in an exotic state, expanding exponentially at an unfathomable rate.
It expanded so fast that in about a trillionth of a trillionth of a billionth of a second, a chunk of space the size of an atom would have exploded into a size far larger than our solar system. It brought our slice of the universe — everything we can see in the night sky — from an incomprehensibly small point to a size roughly between that of a human head and a city block.
But while the modern-day universe is riddled with evidence that this strange prologue to the universe that physicists call "inflation" probably happened, scientists still don't know exactly why it happened.
A new spacecraft from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, launching as early as Tuesday evening on a SpaceX rocket out of Vandenberg Space Force Base near Lompoc, hopes to find out.
The mission — the Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization and Ices Explorer; or SPHEREx — will examine one of the clues inflation left behind. From its data, scientists hope to gain a better understanding of the culprit (or culprits) behind the rapid expansion.
Over the course of two years, SPHEREx will create four three-dimensional maps of the spread of galaxies throughout the entire sky, allowing scientists to search for the subatomic quantum ripples created by undiscovered inflation particles 13.8 billion years ago, now etched into the large-scale structure of the universe.
'It's zooming out to map the cosmos and see the largest structures and the biggest picture, unlike large telescopes like [the James Webb Space telescope] that will zoom in and take very detailed, exquisite pictures over specific small areas of the sky,' said James Bock, Caltech physics professor, JPL senior research scientist and SPHEREx's principal investigator.
While the universe has been expanding ever since its first moments, physicists reserve the term "inflation" only for the rapid, exponential expansion governed by unknown physics at the start of the universe as we know it.
Inflation still has its detractors who say the inflation process would have needed incredibly unlikely circumstances to kick off in the first place and that — absent the ability to directly detect exotic inflation particles — the current indirect evidence of their existence remains insufficient. However, inflation is widely accepted in the field as the best explanation for a range of strange phenomena throughout our modern universe.
The different inflation theories disagree on some numbers and details, but the general story goes like this: Whatever existed before inflation instantly exploded away once the great expansion began.
During inflation, no form of matter we know was present yet. Instead, the universe was filled with some unknown inflationary energy and particles. As they fluctuated, they created ripples in the energy field — pockets of higher energy and pockets of lower energy.
What's still unclear, though, is what exactly this energy and particle field was, or if there were multiple sets of energy fields and particles at work. But whatever SPHEREx finds will almost certainly have been created by wild particles outside the realm of physics as we know it.
When inflation fizzled out, the energy field and its fluctuations transmogrified into an incredibly hot and dense soup of the stuff we know today — eventually becoming the light we see and the protons, neutrons and electrons that make up our world.
This hot, dense, nascent universe, under tremendous pressure, exploded outward, as described by the traditional hot Big Bang theory developed in the 1920s. Inflation was physicists' revision for the first few moments of the universe, conceived of in the 1980s to account for some weird effects in the universe.
The quantum ripples in the inflation energy seemingly never went away. While they started on the subatomic scale, they're now bigger than galaxies. The higher energy spots turned into bright and busy corners of the universe with plenty of galaxies. The lower energy spots are relative dead zones now.
The web of galaxies we see when we look to the sky is a snapshot of the drama that played out in a small subatomic section of space some 13.8 billion years ago.
The SPHEREx team thinks there's still more to that drama hidden in the fine details of that web.
Read more: Scientists long urged NASA to search for signs of life near Jupiter. Now it's happening
The probe will, for the first time, create three-dimensional full-sky maps with enough precision and data to tease out whether it was a single energy field responsible for inflation, or if it was multiple.
'If you throw a tiny pebble into a pond, it creates ripples,' said Spencer Everett, a Caltech research scientist working on the SPHEREx mission. 'Then, inflation suddenly swells them into these massive waves in an ocean.'
While single-field inflation theories are analogous to throwing a bunch of same-sized pebbles into the pond, Everett said, multi-field theories are like throwing many different sized pebbles and rocks into the water. By looking at the resulting ripples, scientists should be able to determine whether multiple sizes of pebbles — or inflation particles, in SPHEREx's case — created them.
Evidence from SPHEREx that the spread of galaxies in the universe does not look like ripples from a single field (or a single-sized pebble in Everett's analogy) would not only serve as strong proof inflation did in fact happen, but it would also effectively put the single-field theories on their deathbeds.
By launching into space, SPHEREx will have unobstructed views of virtually the entire sky as it orbits Earth. SPHEREx also needs to look at infrared wavelengths of light, with slightly longer wavelengths than the color red. However, it's also the wavelength at which most objects, including Earth's ground, radiate heat.
'If you try to measure anything in the infrared on the ground,' said Everett, 'you're just going to see the ground. At the temperatures close to room temperature, everything is emitting in the infrared.'
For this reason, the spacecraft will operate at a brisk minus-350 degrees Fahrenheit, kept cool by concentric cone-shaped aluminum shields that look something like a dog cone for a spacecraft.
SPHEREx is a medium-class mission in NASA's Explorers Program, designed to provide frequent flight and funding opportunities for space science missions on a less ambitious scale than NASA's flagship missions like the James Webb Space Telescope, a $10-billion mission that launched in 2021 to explore a wide range of pressing space science research questions.
The mission will also probe how some of the first galaxies formed and how icy cosmic dust carrying important molecules for life ends up on planets.
SPHEREx will ride alongside a small-class Explorers mission — called the Polarimeter to Unify the Corona and Heliosphere, or PUNCH — that will study solar wind.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump team weighs shutting out Musk's SpaceX from ‘Golden Dome' project as fallout from feud lingers
Trump team weighs shutting out Musk's SpaceX from ‘Golden Dome' project as fallout from feud lingers

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump team weighs shutting out Musk's SpaceX from ‘Golden Dome' project as fallout from feud lingers

The role of Elon Musk's SpaceX in the Trump administration's Golden Dome missile project is reportedly in doubt following the feud between the billionaire and President Donald Trump last week. Musk's company appeared to be the frontrunner to begin work on the ambitious project to create a missile shield over America, a project that would have pocketed Musk billions. But after last week's explosive breakup, which Musk has since attempted some damage control, the project is in jeopardy, three people familiar with plans told Reuters. 'Because of the blowup, the Pentagon has been given the space to look at other alternatives,' one of the people told the news agency. The White House said in a statement that any decision on the project would be made 'prioritizing the best deal for America and leveraging the most advanced and innovative technology.' A spokesperson added that the administration 'is committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts.' A senior Defense Department official told Reuters that the Pentagon 'has no announcements regarding future contracts associated with the Golden Dome effort.' If SpaceX misses out on the project, it would signal the significance of the president's personal relationships when it comes to his leadership, aerospace and defense experts said. 'That people guiding the program or building it are approved based on their political affiliation signals a real concern that the project itself is very politicized and not being conducted on the technical merits,' Laura Grego, a missile defense expert and research director at the non-profit Union of Concerned Scientists, told Reuters. Insiders also told the outlet that there is a lot of uncertainty looming over the project and a 'scramble' among contractors and industry experts. 'There isn't a coordinated effort with a true vision,' an insider told the outlet. 'All of these companies are just grabbing at this pot of money.' The independent Congressional Budget Office has estimated the project could take 20 years to complete and cost $524 billion. After last week's blowup between Trump and Musk, the tech mogul issued a groveling climbdown in the early hours of Wednesday, expressing regret over the public fallout between him and Trump last week. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' the world's richest man wrote on X. Trump also hinted that reconciliation between the pair was possible. 'Look, I have no hard feelings,' Trump said in the interview recorded on Monday.

Why is the International Space Station leaking? What to know after Axiom mission delayed
Why is the International Space Station leaking? What to know after Axiom mission delayed

USA Today

time36 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Why is the International Space Station leaking? What to know after Axiom mission delayed

Why is the International Space Station leaking? What to know after Axiom mission delayed Until the air leak detected on the ISS' Russian segment is resolved, NASA has opted not to send any other people to dock at the station, including the crew of Axiom Mission 4. Show Caption Hide Caption Watch: NASA astronauts compete in Olympic Games in space The crew of the International Space Station tried out some of the events at the 2024 Olympics, but with no gravity. For 25 years, the International Space Station has been stationed in low-Earth orbit, typically about 250 miles high, where it has been home to astronauts from all over the world. While the astronauts aboard the station are not in danger, small cracks on the ISS in recent years, particularly on the aging Russian segment, have contributed to the decision to retire the station. This also isn't the first time the International Space Station has experienced a leak. A leak on a remote outpost orbiting about 250 miles above Earth may sound alarming, but not to worry: The seven astronauts aboard the International Space Station are not in harm's way. But until the air leak detected on the laboratory's Russian segment is resolved, NASA has opted not to send any other people to dock at the station. That means an indefinite delay for a four-person commercial spaceflight. The postponement is nothing new for Axiom Mission 4, which has already experienced previous delays due to bad weather and issues with the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket selected to get it off the ground. Axiom Space, headquartered in Houston, Texas, is the company behind the private mission – its latest in a series of human spaceflights in partnership with both NASA and SpaceX. While the astronauts aboard the station are not in danger, small cracks on the ISS in recent years, particularly on the aging Russian segment, have contributed to the decision to retire the station by 2030. Here's what to know about the latest leak on the space station, and how it will effect the launch of Axiom Mission 4. What is the International Space Station? For 25 years, the International Space Station has been stationed in low-Earth orbit, typically about 250 miles high, where it has been home to astronauts from all over the world. The orbital laboratory is operated through a global partnership of space agencies, including NASA, Roscosmos, the European Space Agency, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). More than 280 spacefarers from 23 countries have visited the International Space Station, including 169 from the United States alone, according to NASA. Bigger than a six-bedroom house, the outpost has six sleeping quarters, two bathrooms, a gym and a 360-degree view bay window. Space station air leak delays Axiom 4 crewed launch The launch of the Axiom mission had already been delayed to allow SpaceX to repair a liquid oxygen leak found on the Falcon 9 rocket, NASA has said. Now, the mission is being delayed indefinitely after a "new pressure signature" was found on the station's Zvezda service module, a more than 2-decade-old core compartment, according to NASA. The discovery came after cosmonauts aboard the space station recently performed inspections of the pressurized module's interior surfaces, sealed some area and measured the current leak rate. NASA, Roscosmos to investigate leak on Russian module The segment now is holding pressure, but NASA said the Axiom Mission 4 delay will provide additional time for the U.S. space agency to evaluate the leak with Roscosmos and determine next steps. NASA deferred additional questions about the leak to Roscosmos. A new launch date for Ax-4 has not yet been announced as of Friday, June 13. What is commercial Axiom Mission 4? Axiom Mission 4, also known as Ax-4, is a commercial spaceflight venture that aims to send four private astronauts on a two-week trip to the International Space Station. Among the mission's crew are astronauts from India, Poland and Hungary who would be the first from their respective nations to ever reach the station. Under the command of former NASA astronaut Peggy Whitson, the crew members are due to undertake about 60 scientific experiments during their time aboard the orbital laboratory. The research was developed specifically to take place in microgravity on behalf of organizations around the world, according to Axiom Space. But the launch of the mission has undergone a slew of delays since Axiom Space was originally working toward a May 29 launch. When the crew does get off the ground, they'll be aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule that will be propelled to orbit atop a Falcon 9 rocket launching from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. The Axiom missions are also aimed at advancing the company's goals of building a space station that will attach to the ISS before its planned 2030 retirement. The missions began in 2022, with the most recent, Axiom Mission 3, taking place in January 2024. International Space Station has had leaks before This isn't the first time the International Space Station has experienced a leak. In February 2024, an air leak in the Russian segment of the orbital laboratory known as the PrK module caused disagreement between Roscosmos and NASA about not only the cause, but how serious it was. By November, the leak was still unresolved while the two space agencies were monitoring it. The area has also been sealed from the rest of the station when crew members did not need to access the spacecraft docked at the module. Leaks of air from the cracks have been minor and posed no immediate safety threats to the station's astronauts, who patch the leaks with tape, glue and other solutions. But issues on the ISS are increasingly worrisome signs of aging. In late-2024, a NASA Office of Inspector General report even raised concerns about whether it would be safe or even affordable to operate past the station's 2030 retirement date. Who is on the International Space Station? Seven members of Expedition 73, including three Americans, are living aboard the ISS – conducting scientific research and working to maintain the station. That includes NASA astronauts Nichole Ayers and Anne McClain, who in May made headlines for completing a rare all-female spacewalk. The women both arrived in March 2025 with JAXA astronaut Takuya Onishi and Roscosmos cosmonaut Kirill Peskov as part of a SpaceX mission known as Crew-10. That mission also made headlines due to its role in paving the way for the NASA astronauts who crewed the doomed Boeing Starliner to depart with the Crew-9 mission. Also at the station is NASA astronaut Jonny Kim, who reached the outpost in April 2025 with cosmonauts Sergey Ryzhikov and Alexey Zubritsky. Contributing: Reuters

How much NASA spends on science in Utah
How much NASA spends on science in Utah

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

How much NASA spends on science in Utah

NASA spends an average of $11 million annually in Utah on scientific missions, per data from The Planetary Society, a pro-space nonprofit. Why it matters: NASA's science efforts bear the brunt of cuts to the agency in the Trump administration's proposed budget, which would slash science funding by nearly 50% to $3.9 billion. The big picture: Science represents roughly 30% of NASA's budget, supporting missions like space telescopes, robotic probes and satellites that gather data about Earth's changing climate. While not always as headline-grabbing as human spaceflight, NASA's science activity has greatly enhanced our scientific understanding of both Earth and our celestial neighborhood. By the numbers: NASA supported 2,375 jobs in Utah and generated $486.6 million in economic output and $17.2 million in state tax revenue in fiscal year 2023, per a state report. Over 60 suppliers in the state have contributed to the agency's Artemis moon exploration program. The intrigue: The proposed cuts come as some Utah officials want to position the state as a leader in space innovation. Gov. Spencer Cox signed a bill in March appropriating $1 million to study the feasibility of a spaceport in Utah for potential space exploration. Zoom out: California (about $3 billion), Maryland ($2 billion) and Texas ($614 million) saw the most average annual NASA science spending across fiscal 2022-2024, the data shows. Zoom in: Missions on the chopping block in President Trump's NASA budget include the Mars Sample Return, an ambitious joint American-European plan to collect Martian soil samples and bring them to Earth for further study. Nearly 20 active science missions would be canceled in total, the Planetary Society says, representing more than $12 billion in taxpayer investments. What they're saying: A chief concern, Planetary Society chief of space policy Casey Dreier tells Axios, is that already paid-for probes and telescopes would be deactivated even though they're still delivering valuable data. "They keep returning great science for the very fractional cost to keep the lights on. And a lot of these will just be turned off and left to tumble in space," Dreier says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store