logo
Grand Central Market, an embodiment of immigrant L.A., confronts new climate of fear

Grand Central Market, an embodiment of immigrant L.A., confronts new climate of fear

Los Angeles Times16 hours ago

Most weekdays the foot traffic and the din of business are constant in Grand Central Market, a food hall and staple of downtown's historic core since 1917. In a way, the market, with its oldest stalls ranging from Mexican to Chinese to Salvadoran cuisines, is an embodiment of the immigrant experience in Los Angeles.
But this week, even at what are typically its peak hours, tables sat empty. The legendary market, like so many other restaurants and businesses across downtown, is losing business due to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and the neighborhood's anti-ICE protests.
On Thursday afternoon, Martha Luna stood helping scant guests from beneath the iconic red neon signage at China Cafe, where she's been a server for more than 40 years. Founded in 1959, it is one of the oldest legacy vendors in Grand Central Market.
'The last few days, it's been crazy,' she said from behind the red counter. 'Everybody's afraid, you know? When they come, they're just talking about [how] they're afraid to go out. Even if they go to the market or eat, they're so afraid, even my boss.'
Throughout the last week, she said, she's seen one to three of her regulars each day, with only one or two guests seated at the counter at any given time.
In the daytime, downtown office workers line the squat wraparound counter. In the evenings, Luna said, the clientele are mostly tourists. Since 1959, they've come for Chinese American classics such as sweet and sour chicken, barbecued pork chow mein, egg rolls, chop suey and shrimp fried rice.
Some of the newer, flashier vendors also noted a dramatic drop in business.
'We are typically one of the vendors that stays very, very busy throughout the entire week and day,' said Amy Recinos at Villa's Tacos. It's not uncommon to see lines of customers stretching the length of the counter as they wait for charred meats on a layer of crispy cheese and fresh blue corn tortillas.
Typically the taqueria — one of the L.A. Times' 101 Best Restaurants in Los Angeles — sees a 'huge' lunch rush at the market from noon to 2 p.m. But this week Villa's is closing early due to lack of business.
Recinos spoke with some of the restaurant's regulars, most of whom work in the neighborhood and told her they're working from home 'to avoid the riots and to avoid the protests.'
On Sunday, the stand found most of its customers to be protesters, and Recinos expects that to be the case this weekend.
'To all of my Hispanic immigrants: I'm here for you, we see you,' she said. 'I'm very lucky and blessed to be born here, but we support you, and hopefully this does calm down because it's not easy to know or predict what's gonna happen for families and kids. Just stay safe out there, and we're here for you if you guys need a meal.'
Bella Aguirre sat on a stool at Sticky Rice's counter, finishing her meal of pad kra pow. The aspiring costume designer came to the market with an out-of-town friend despite her father's warning against the neighborhood's dangers given the protests.
She said that on Thursday afternoon, she found it to be 'pretty peaceful' — and that she's looking forward to returning this weekend.
'I think it's within our rights to protest,' she said. 'And I'm looking forward to going to the Saturday protests because I think it's going to be a bigger outpouring of people. I think I feel safe going.'
Grand Central Market, she said, seemed slow in comparison with her previous visits.
Nearby, at the stall of lauded smashburger spot For the Win, a yellow, hand-written sign read, 'Due to current events, we will be closing early.'
Sitting on the patio with a laptop and a cup of green juice, Sonya Mendoza noted the dearth of customers she regularly sees at the market. From noon to 3 p.m., she said, there's always a lunch rush. On Thursday, only a handful of customers passed by or filled the nearby tables.
Mendoza's work centers her in downtown and Echo Park on weekdays, and she lives less than one mile from the landmark food hall. She's found the desolation isn't limited to Grand Central Market.
'There's not a street vendor in sight,' Mendoza said. 'I haven't seen any street vendors in the past three days, which is mind boggling to me because I live in Echo Park and they're everywhere there usually.'
In a corner seat at Lucky Bird's counter, Froi Cruz sat enjoying his break from managing the fried chicken stall. He's worked at the restaurant for five years and said that business is depleted now.
Customers have gradually decreased throughout the week. Due to the curfew and the slowing of business, Lucky Bird has been closing around 5 p.m., two hours earlier than unusal on weekdays. This weekend it might not make it to its usual hours of 9 p.m., either.
Much of Lucky Bird's clientele are office workers who place orders for fried chicken sandwiches, tenders, wings and sides like cheddar jalapeño biscuits. That business trickled to a fraction of its former volume this week.
'I feel like people are just scared to come out,' Cruz said.
Across the aisle, Jose Marroquin at Shiku echoed these sentiments. 'It's very slow,' he said. 'No people, nothing.'
At the end of the block, a decadelong vendor of Grand Central Market found its own brick-and-mortar location and is, like its former food-hall brethren, greatly affected by the week's loss of business.
DTLA Cheese Superette relies heavily on nearby offices for lunch orders of sandwiches, salads and charcuterie boards. Co-owner and cheesemonger Lydia Clarke said that all of their catering orders were canceled this week, which is difficult to offset. On Sunday, Clarke and her partner, chef Reed Herrick, served a number of protesters. On Monday, they noted 'an immediate halt' to business.
She called the lack of customers 'brutal' and wondered how DTLA Cheese Superette or its adjacent bar, Kippered, will weather the curfews and the neighborhood's remote work due to the anti-ICE protests.
As a longtime resident of downtown herself, Clarke sees aiding protesters as serving her community — and hopes to continue to do so as long as she can.
'We feed a lot of people that have been walking the pavement, and it's great to hear the story and feel supported in that way: to serve a nourishing meal of support [for] our community and the causes,' Clarke said, tearing up. 'With this cause it just feels so personal to so many [in the] industry, of our food sources, of our workforce. I don't have the fear of being taken, so I feel heartbroken for these families. It is an honor to be able to still stand here and have our doors open and have a place for people to come.'
Times staff writers Lauren Ng and Karla Marie Sanford contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No More Student Visas? No Problem.
No More Student Visas? No Problem.

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

No More Student Visas? No Problem.

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Just how mad is Beijing about President Donald Trump's decision to revoke student visas for Chinese nationals? Not as mad as it says, and not as mad as one might expect. Publicly, China's leadership will likely complain that Trump's action is yet another attempt to thwart the country's rise. But in reality, Beijing would probably just as soon keep its smartest kids at home. Late last month, the U.S. State Department announced that it would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields,' and that it would 'enhance scrutiny' of the applications it received in the future. The new visa policy, a spokesperson said, is meant to prevent China from exploiting American universities and stealing intellectual property. A spokesperson for the foreign ministry quickly registered Beijing's objection to the new policy. But when Chinese leader Xi Jinping spoke with Trump by phone last week, either he didn't raise the new visa policy or his foreign ministry didn't regard his comments on the matter worth including in its official summary of the call, which suggests that the issue is not a top priority in Beijing's negotiations with Washington. One reason for this underwhelming response may be that re-shoring its university students serves Beijing's current agenda. China first opened to the world in the 1980s; in the decades that followed, securing a Western education for its elite helped the country bring in the technology and skills it needed to escape poverty. China was 'sending people out, learning from other places, finding the best quality wherever it was, and bringing that quality back to China,' Robin Lewis, a consultant for U.S.-China education programs and a former associate dean at Columbia University, told me. Now that period has given way to one of nationalism and self-reliance, which means promoting China's own companies, products, technologies—and universities. [Rose Horowitch: Trump's campaign to scare off foreign students] Xi has consistently stressed the importance of education in sustaining China's rise. His government has invested heavily in China's schools and lavished resources on science and technology programs, with some success. Some of China's top institutions, such as Tsinghua University in Beijing, have gained international recognition as serious competitors in scientific research. China would like to have its own Harvards, rather than sending its elite students to the United States, for political and cultural reasons as well as economic ones. Chinese authorities have long worried that the hundreds of thousands of students it exports to America will absorb undesirable ideas about democracy and civil liberties—and that they will access information about China that is suppressed at home, such as the story of the Tiananmen Square massacre in 1989. In fact, many young Chinese who study in the United States seem to enjoy American freedoms and seek to stay rather than return to serve the motherland. Beijing has tried to deal with this in part by monitoring the activities of its students in the U.S. and attempting to hold them firmly to the party line, including by harassing the families back home of those who stray. Within China, authorities can more easily confine students inside the government's propaganda bubble, which in recent years has become more airtight. Domestic media seek to portray the U.S. as unsafe, especially for Asians, by highlighting incidents of racial discrimination, violence, and disorder. One story published last year by the state news agency Xinhua, under the headline 'Chinese Students' Dreams Turned Into Nightmares at U.S. Doorstep,' tells the harrowing tale of a Chinese student detained and deported at an airport and claims that others had suffered the same fate. China's top spy agency, the Ministry of State Security, warned Chinese students at universities abroad against being recruited as foreign agents, and told of one such unfortunate national who was discovered and punished. Even before Trump's announcement, this climate of mutual distrust had led to a drop-off in Chinese students enrolled in American universities. The number had reached an all-time high during the 2019–20 academic year, topping 372,000, according to the Institute of International Education. But that figure has fallen since—by a quarter, to 277,000, in the 2023–24 academic year. Now India, with more than 331,000 enrolled, sends more students to American institutions than China does. The Trump administration appears to believe that curtailing Chinese access to American technology, money, and, in this case, education will give the U.S. the edge over its closest competitor. In some areas, this might work: Restricting the export of advanced U.S. semiconductor technology to China seems to have helped hold Beijing's chip industry back. So why not do the same with higher education? A case can be made that keeping Chinese students out of some of the world's top research institutions will hold back their skills acquisition and, with it, the country's progress. [Adam Serwer: Trump is wearing America down] In practice, though, the effect of this policy could be hard to gauge. The engineers behind the Chinese AI firm DeepSeek, which wowed Silicon Valley by developing a competitive chatbot on the cheap, were mainly locally trained. And the skills that Chinese students can't find at home they can seek in any number of places. There may be only so many Harvards, but Chinese students can receive a good education—and a warmer reception—in countries other than the United States. Universities in Japan and Hong Kong are already trying to capitalize on Trump's harassment of international students to lure them. The idea that any American policy can effectively dampen Chinese ambition may be far-fetched. 'People wake up in the morning and it's all about education here. There is nothing more important,' James McGregor, the chair for China at the consulting firm APCO, told me. 'You're going to stop Chinese people from learning the top skills in the world? No. They'll just deploy them somewhere else.' For now, the Trump team can't seem to decide whether it wants to get tough on China or make deals with China, and the new student-visa policy reflects this confusion. 'Chinese students are coming. No problem,' Trump said in a briefing after his call with Xi. 'It's our honor to have them, frankly.' China's leadership surely knows that many Chinese families still aspire to send their young-adult children to American universities. But Beijing is much more single-minded than Washington about the future of relations between the two countries: Xi appears to see Washington as the primary impediment to China's rise, and ties to the U.S. as a vulnerability best eliminated. From that viewpoint, relying on Harvard to train China's most promising students is a national-security risk. That means that Trump may be doing Xi a favor. Article originally published at The Atlantic

Bankrupt retailer sends urgent message after mass store closures
Bankrupt retailer sends urgent message after mass store closures

Miami Herald

time14 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Bankrupt retailer sends urgent message after mass store closures

It's a pretty rough time to be in retail. On the one hand, it seems like most every small retailer is being gobbled up by a larger competitor. Related: Amazon makes a harsh decision amid concerning customer trend On the large, corporate side of things, however, things aren't any simpler. Bigger retail companies are grappling with a variety of problems that are now common among most stores around the U.S. Some of these include crushing levels of inventory shrink (the industry term for theft and other losses), changing customer preferences, and a race to the bottom for prices. This is especially difficult when shoppers expect nearly-instant and free shipping on everything -- a complicated effort when supply chains are either tied up or tariffs are taking their toll on global inventory. No matter which way you slice it, retail is a hard business to be in. And that's especially the case for many legacy mall retailers, who once enjoyed relative prowess in the U.S. shopping arena. What was once considered the gold standard for retail -- that is, having a large brick and mortar presence in shopping malls around the country -- has now become something more of a death knell. Image source: Bloomberg/Getty Across the country, many retailers that depend on malls for business are finding survival an increasingly uphill battle. With the exception of a few luxury malls located in particularly wealthy urban areas, the overarching trend across the country is that indoor shopping malls are on a downward trajectory. More closings: Popular local Dairy Queen rival suddenly closing, no bankruptcyAnother big Mexican chain closing down restaurant, no bankruptcyUPS suddenly closing more stores amid chaotic new change, layoffsPopular fast-food burger chain closes all restaurants in key area Popularity has waned for a variety of reasons. It's true that a lot more shoppers prefer to find products online, where things are often cheaper and more selection abounds. But it's also just an increasingly unappealing prospect to trudge through an indoor shopping mall in search of everything from furniture to formalwear. In the 1980s and 1990s, at the height of the indoor shopping mall, the average U.S. consumer spent 12 hours per month inside of one. Now, that number has dramatically dwindled, as it's easier to find products either online or at discount stores closer to home. Some of the largest mall retailers are the most vulnerable amidst changing consumer behavior. Forever 21, an iconic fast fashion store clustered mostly in and around shopping malls, is one such brand. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time in six years in March 2025. After it was unable to find a buyer, its operating parent company, F21 OpCo, said it would begin closing down all 354 of its leased U.S. stores by May 2025. Related: Another giant cosmetics brand closing store unexpectedly Now, however, Forever 21 has issued an update on social media, indicating things may not be completely over for the brand. "Hey Forever 21 Fam," Forever 21's official Instagram wrote in a post. "We know there's been some buzz, and we want to clear things up. Forever21 isn't going anywhere and we are still committed to bringing you the styles you love. Right now, we're evolving, refreshing and building what's next." "We get that change can feel unexpected," the post continued, "but we're excited for what's ahead, and we'll be sharing more with you soon. Thanks for sticking with us, you're the heart of everything we do." Forever 21's official website contains some information about the ongoing bankruptcy process. "Decisions about which stores will ultimately close are ongoing, pending further discussions with landlords and potential buyers," the site reads. Related: Troubled retailer puts 100s of stores at risk after drastic move The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Lottery player let scratch-offs pile up — and one of them was a big winner
Lottery player let scratch-offs pile up — and one of them was a big winner

Miami Herald

time20 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Lottery player let scratch-offs pile up — and one of them was a big winner

A Pennsylvania man picked up a lottery ticket while in Maryland on a business trip and ended up winning $50,000. Ralph DiGuiseppe III, who works in real estate, bought the $10 Ice scratch-off in April, Maryland Lottery officials said in a June 13 news release. He was at a travel plaza in Aberdeen when he noticed the lottery vending machine and made the purchase, lottery officials said. He didn't scratch the ticket right away, in keeping with his usual practice. 'I'll pick up a few scratch-offs when I stop in different places. When the pile gets too big, I scratch them,' he said, per the release. Then a few weeks back, while relatives were visiting, DiGuiseppe had them work through the scratch-off pile, lottery officials said. He was mowing the law when 'he saw a mob of people emerge from the house,' according to lottery officials. 'I couldn't tell whether they looked worried or excited,' he said, according to lottery officials. But he soon learned he was $50,000 richer. The Ice game made its debut in April, and four $100,000 top prizes remain, lottery officials said. Aberdeen is about a 30-mile drive northwest from Baltimore.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store