logo
UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

UN to vote on resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire, hostage release and aid access

Time of Indiaa day ago

UNITED NATIONS - The UN General Assembly is expected to vote Thursday on a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the release of all hostages held by Hamas, and the opening of all Israeli border crossings for deliveries of desperately needed food and other aid.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The resolution, drafted by Spain and obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press, "strongly condemns any use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare."
Experts and human rights workers say hunger is widespread in Gaza and some 2 million Palestinians are at risk of famine if Israel does not fully lift its blockade and halt its military campaign, which it renewed in March after ending a ceasefire with Hamas.
Last week, the UN Security Council failed to pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and calling on Israel to lift all restrictions on the delivery of aid.
The United States vetoed the resolution because it was not linked to the release of the hostages, while all 14 other members of the council voted in favor.
There are no vetoes in the 193-member General Assembly, where the resolution is expected to pass overwhelmingly. But unlike in the Security Council, assembly resolutions are not legally binding, though they are seen as a barometer of world opinion.
After a 10-week blockade that barred all aid to Gaza, Israel is allowing the United Nations to deliver a trickle of food assistance and is backing a newly created US aid group, which has opened several sites in the center and south of the territory to deliver food parcels.
But the aid system rolled out last month by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been troubled by near-daily shootings as crowds make their way to aid sites, while the longstanding UN run system has struggled to deliver food because of Israeli restrictions and a breakdown of law and order.
The draft resolution being voted on Thursday references a March 28 legally binding order by the top United Nations court for Israel to open more land crossings into Gaza for food, water, fuel and other supplies.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The International Court of Justice issued the order in a case brought by South Africa accusing Israel of acts of genocide in its war in Gaza, charges Israel strongly denies.
The resolution stresses that Israel, as an occupying power, has an obligation under international law to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches those in need.
It reiterates the assembly's commitment to a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with the Gaza Strip as part of a Palestinian state.
The assembly is holding a high-level meeting next week to push for a two-state solution, which Israel has rejected.
The resolution supports mediation efforts by Egypt, Qatar and the United States aimed at implementing a January ceasefire agreement. When the US vetoed last week's Gaza resolution, acting Ambassador Dorothy Shea said it would have undermined the security of Israel and diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire "that reflects the realities on the ground."
Like the failed Security Council resolution, the resolution to be voted on Thursday also does not condemn Hamas' deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, which ignited the war, or say the militant group must disarm and withdraw from Gaza. Both are US demands.
The Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 hostage. About 55 hostages are still being held. Israel's military campaign has killed over 55,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. It says women and children make up most of the dead, but doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants. Israel says it has killed more than 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Explosions across Tehran': Visuals capture Israel's preemptive strike on Iran; watch video
'Explosions across Tehran': Visuals capture Israel's preemptive strike on Iran; watch video

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Explosions across Tehran': Visuals capture Israel's preemptive strike on Iran; watch video

Visuals from Iran showed smoke billowing from multiple areas in Iran early on Friday as Israel launched an attack, with explosions resonating throughout Tehran. The strikes targeted nuclear and military installations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Tehran residents woke to explosions. State television acknowledged the incident. Smoke was visible near Chitgar, western Tehran. No known nuclear facilities exist there, with situation unclear elsewhere. While there is still uncertainty surrounding the extent of damage, Iran's primary nuclear enrichment facility was reportedly targetted at Natanz. The Natanz facility consists of both above-ground and underground sections, housing numerous centrifuge halls for uranium gas enrichment in its nuclear programme. Israeli Prime Minister confirmed Israel's responsibility for Friday's attack on the site. Natanz has previously experienced the Stuxnet cyberattack and several suspected Israeli sabotage operations. Iranian state television reports suggest the leader of Iran's Revolutionary Guard Gen. Hossein Salami may have perished in the Israeli strike. The broadcast indicated that another senior Guard official and two nuclear scientists were also possibly deceased. State television reported the attack ignited the Revolutionary Guard headquarters. Netanyahu confirmed multiple targets in the capital, including nuclear and military installations, along with officials overseeing Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile programmes. This escalation follows mounting tensions regarding Iran's nuclear programme advancement. The International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors censured Iran on Thursday, their first such action in 20 years, regarding cooperation with inspectors. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Iran responded by announcing plans for a third enrichment facility and upgrading centrifuges. Israel has consistently opposed Iran developing nuclear weapons, which Tehran maintains it does not intend to do, despite officials suggesting capability. The US has taken precautionary measures, withdrawing some diplomats from Iraq and offering evacuation options to US military families in the region. Netanyahu stated via YouTube that operations would continue "for as many days at it takes to remove this threat." US secretary of state Marco Rubio confirmed Israel's independent action, noting they deemed it necessary for self-defence. "We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," Rubio's White House statement declared. Rubio cautioned Iran against targeting US interests or personnel. Brent crude prices increased nearly 5% following the attack. Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz acknowledged the operation without specifying targets. "In the wake of the state of Israel's preventive attack against Iran, missile and drone attacks against Israel and its civilian population are expected immediately," his statement read. Katz "signed a special order declaring an emergency situation in the home front." "It is essential to listen to instructions from the home front command and authorities to stay in protected areas," it continued. Both nations closed their airspace. During the Tehran explosions, President Donald Trump socialised with Congress members at the White House. His awareness remained unclear as he continued greeting guests. Trump had previously urged Netanyahu to delay action while diplomatic negotiations continued. "As long as I think there is a (chance for an) agreement, I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it," Trump told reporters.

Israel's Operation Rising Lion: Iran warns 'sworn enemies' should expect retaliation; says US 'responsible for consequences'
Israel's Operation Rising Lion: Iran warns 'sworn enemies' should expect retaliation; says US 'responsible for consequences'

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Israel's Operation Rising Lion: Iran warns 'sworn enemies' should expect retaliation; says US 'responsible for consequences'

Iran warned Israel after it launched "Operation Rising Lion" on Thursday in Tehran, targeting Iranian nuclear and military sites. Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on Friday, issued a statement stating that Israel's strike reveals their malicious nature. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "Israel opened its wicked and blood-stained hand to a crime in our beloved country, revealing its malicious nature more than ever by striking residential centers,' Khamenei says. 'With this crime, the Zionist regime has set itself for a bitter and painful fate and it will definitely receive it,' he added. He also said that Israel has unleashed its wicked and bloody hand in a crime against Iran. He went on to say the attack revealed Israel's "vile nature." Israel will pay heavy heavy price, warns of retaliation against 'sworn enemies': Revolutionary Guards Israel will pay a heavy price for its attack on Iran which killed Revolutionary Guards top commander Hossein Salami, the Guards said in a statement on Friday, warning of a decisive retaliation against its "sworn enemies." "The Israeli attack was carried out with full knowledge and support of the wicked rulers in the White House and terrorist US Regime," the Guards' statement said, as per Reuters. Iran has right to respond attack, US will be held responsible: Israel foreign ministry The regimes foreign ministry also issued a statement insisting that Iran had the right to respond to the attack in accordance with international law. "This morning, the occupying and rogue Zionist regime, violating the territorial integrity and national sovereignty of our beloved Iran, attacked areas including several residential areas in Tehran and several other cities of our country, and killed a group of the most honorable and patriotic servants of the homeland in the field of defending the honor and authority of Iran and science and technology, along with other innocent people. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now ," the statement read. "The Zionist regime's attacks on Iran are a violation of Article 4, Paragraph 2, of the Charter of the United Nations and a clear aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran. "Responding to this aggression is Iran's legal and legitimate right in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, and the armed forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran will not hesitate to defend the Iranian nation with all their might and in a manner they determine. "The aggressive actions of the Zionist regime against Iran could not have been carried out without coordination with and approval of the United States. Thus, the US government, as the main supporter of this regime, will be held responsible for the dangerous consequences of Israel's adventurism." The Israeli attack comes hours after Iran announced that it has built and plans to activate a third nuclear enrichment facility, escalating tensions with the United Nations just after the UN's atomic watchdog censured the country for failing to meet its nonproliferation commitments aimed at preventing the development of nuclear weapons. The strikes occurred amid heightened tensions regarding Iran's nuclear programme. The International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors issued its first censure against Iran in 20 years on Thursday. Iran responded by announcing plans for a third enrichment facility and upgrading its centrifuges. Israel maintains its stance against Iran developing nuclear weapons, while Tehran denies such intentions despite issuing contradictory statements.

Tied To Both, Siding With Neither: Where India Stands On The Israel–Iran Conflict
Tied To Both, Siding With Neither: Where India Stands On The Israel–Iran Conflict

News18

time28 minutes ago

  • News18

Tied To Both, Siding With Neither: Where India Stands On The Israel–Iran Conflict

Last Updated: As tensions between Tehran and Tel Aviv threaten to upend regional peace, India is treading cautiously, staying neutral while protecting long-standing interests on both sides With Israel and Iran locked in one of the most dangerous face-offs in recent history, India's diplomatic playbook is clear: stay neutral, avoid escalation, and protect core interests. From defence partnerships with Israel to energy and connectivity projects with Iran, India's messaging has been consistent—de-escalation, restraint, and diplomacy. How India Has Framed Its Position On The Israel–Iran Conflict Over the years, India has developed a well-defined template: one that reflects strategic neutrality, avoids public alignment, and foregrounds its core interests — peace, stability, and the safety of Indian citizens abroad. Consistently Neutral, Deliberately Measured: Whether responding to the 2012 New Delhi bombing, the 2021 Gaza war, or the 2024-25 missile exchanges, India has avoided naming either party as the aggressor. Its official language has remained consistent: 'We are deeply concerned at the escalation of hostilities" 'We urge all sides to exercise restraint" 'There is a need to return to the path of diplomacy and dialogue" Such phrasing is not accidental. It allows India to maintain equidistance, essential when navigating strategic ties with Israel and deep-rooted connectivity with Iran. Condemnation Without Attribution: In 2012, when an Israeli diplomat's car was bombed in New Delhi — a case that Israeli authorities publicly linked to Iran — India condemned the incident as a 'terrorist attack" and launched an investigation. But it stopped short of naming Iran, reflecting a conscious choice to avoid public attribution. A similar pattern was seen during the 2021 Israel–Hamas conflict. India condemned violence from all sides, including Hamas's rocket attacks, but simultaneously urged Israel to ensure civilian protection, balancing its evolving defence relationship with Israel and its longstanding support for Palestinian statehood. Positioning As A Responsible Stakeholder: In the 2024-25 escalations, India's statements began to shift subtly from just neutrality to active concern for regional stability. The MEA didn't just call for restraint, it also positioned India as a country invested in peace: 'We are seriously concerned at the escalation… and urge all parties to avoid further destabilisation of the region." – Ministry of External Affairs, April 2024 This framing aligns with India's aspirations to be seen as a stabilising power in West Asia — not just a passive observer but a credible regional actor. Focus On Citizens: India's immediate focus during any regional conflict has consistently been the safety of its diaspora. In every flare-up, the Ministry of External Affairs has responded swiftly, issuing travel advisories, maintaining close coordination with embassies, and steering clear of ideological posturing. The pattern held true again today. The Indian Embassy in Israel issued a fresh advisory on Friday, urging Indian nationals to remain cautious and adhere to safety instructions. In a post on X, the embassy stated: 'In view of the current situation in Iran, all Indian nationals & persons of Indian origin in Iran are requested to remain vigilant, avoid all unnecessary movements, follow the Embassy's Social Media accounts & observe safety protocols as advised by local authorities." ⚠️ADVISORYIn view of the current situation in Iran, all Indian nationals & persons of Indian origin in Iran are requested to remain vigilant, avoid all unnecessary movements, follow the Embassy's Social Media accounts & observe safety protocols as advised by local authorities. — India in Iran (@India_in_Iran) June 13, 2025 Quiet Diplomacy Over Public Posturing: Unlike other major powers, India rarely offers to mediate publicly or intervene visibly. But its actions, maintaining channels with both Israel and Iran, facilitating backchannel dialogue, and engaging Gulf players, show it prefers quiet influence over declarative diplomacy. This posture allows India to speak to both sides without alienating either — a calculated positioning that keeps its options open across West Asia. India-Israel Ties: A Strategic Pillar India's relationship with Israel has grown rapidly over the last decade, especially in defence, intelligence, and technology. Israel is one of India's top defence suppliers, providing drones, radar systems, missiles, and more. Notably: India has purchased the Barak-8 air defence system, jointly developed by Israel Aerospace Industries and DRDO. India has also acquired Heron and Hermes drones, which are used extensively for surveillance and targeted operations. In October 2023, following the Hamas-led attack on Israel, India condemned the assault in strong terms and expressed solidarity with the Israeli people, a rare departure from its traditionally neutral tone in West Asia conflicts. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and PM Benjamin Netanyahu have spoken multiple times, including in September 2024 when Modi called for calm and emphasised India's support for Israel's right to self-defence, while also urging restraint. Why India Won't Alienate Iran Despite the growing closeness with Israel, India has reasons to stay engaged with Iran. Foremost among them: the Chabahar port. In May 2024, India signed a 10-year agreement with Iran to develop and operate the Shahid Beheshti terminal at Chabahar. The deal, between Indian Ports Global Ltd and Iran's Ports and Maritime Organization, is a key component of India's connectivity strategy for Central Asia and Afghanistan, crucially bypassing Pakistan. It also includes plans to expand port infrastructure and integrate operations with the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). Iran has also historically been one of India's major crude oil suppliers. While direct imports have sharply declined due to US sanctions, limited backchannel energy trade has continued. Security cooperation too remains in play, albeit quietly. In May 2025, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval held talks with Iran's top security official, Ali Akbar Ahmadian, during which both sides agreed to explore regional cooperation on counter-terrorism and maritime safety. The meeting reaffirmed that high-level strategic contact between New Delhi and Tehran continues, despite the heightened Israel–Iran tensions. The Israel-Iran Conflict: Why It Matters To India The escalating conflict between Israel and Iran is more than a distant geopolitical flashpoint, it has direct economic and strategic implications for India. With over 85 per cent of its crude oil imported, much of it sourced through or near the Gulf, India is acutely vulnerable to disruptions in energy supply and pricing. Any military escalation in the region — especially near critical shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz — risks pushing up oil prices, widening India's current account deficit, and fuelling imported inflation. Beyond energy, the conflict could strain India's balancing act in West Asia. While India has deepening strategic ties with Israel, it also relies on Iran for regional connectivity, particularly through the Chabahar port and the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC). A prolonged conflict could complicate both diplomatic engagement and logistics on that front. Most critically, instability in West Asia also threatens the safety of over nine million Indians working across the Gulf region, making regional peace not just a foreign policy priority but a domestic imperative. How Israel–Iran Conflict Impacts The World top videos View all West Asia is home to some of the world's most critical energy corridors, and any disruption—especially near the Strait of Hormuz—could jolt global oil and gas supplies. Brent crude prices have already reacted to initial strikes, and a prolonged war risks triggering an energy shock that would ripple across economies still recovering from the effects of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and post-pandemic inflation. The conflict also threatens to widen fault lines among global powers, with the US, Russia, and China pursuing competing interests in the region. Escalation could draw in non-state actors like Hezbollah and expand violence across Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq, stretching regional stability to the brink. For global markets, a wider war means higher energy costs, flight to safe-haven assets, increased military spending, and prolonged volatility at a time when economic sentiment remains fragile. About the Author Karishma Jain Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @ More Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : Israel-Iran tensions Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 13, 2025, 10:06 IST News explainers Tied To Both, Siding With Neither: Where India Stands On The Israel–Iran Conflict

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store